Physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects of grafting in fruit trees

Abstract

Grafting is a widely used practice for asexual propagation of fruit trees. Many physiological, biochemical, and molecular changes occur upon grafting that can influence important horticultural traits. This technology has many advantages, including avoidance of juvenility, modifying the scion architecture, improving productivity, adapting scion cultivars to unfavourable environmental conditions, and developing traits in resistance to insect pests, bacterial and fungal diseases. A limitation of grafting is scion-rootstock incompatibility. It may be caused by many factors, including insufficient genetic proximity, physiological or biochemical factors, lignification at the graft union, poor graft architecture, insufficient cell recognition between union tissues, and metabolic differences in the scion and the rootstock. Plant hormones, like auxin, ethylene (ET), cytokinin (CK), gibberellin (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), and jasmonic acid (JA) orchestrate several crucial physiological and biochemical processes happening at the site of the graft union. Additionally, epigenetic changes at the union affect chromatin architecture by DNA methylation, histone modification, and the action of small RNA molecules. The mechanism triggering these effects likely is affected by hormonal crosstalk, protein and small molecules movement, nutrients uptake, and transport in the grafted trees. This review provides an overview of the basis of physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects of fruit tree grafting between scion and rootstock.

References

[1] Warschefsky EJ, Klein LL, Frank MH et al. Rootstocks: diversity, domestication, and impacts on shoot phenotypes. Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 418-37.

[2] Mudge K, Janick J, Scofield S, Goldschmidt EE . A history of grafting. Hortic Rev. 2009; 35: 437-93.

[3] Tsutsui H, Notaguchi M . The use of grafting to study systemic signaling in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017; 58: 1291-301.

[4] Goldschmidt EE . Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 727.

[5] Preece JE . A century of progress with vegetative plant propagation. HortScience. 2003; 38: 1015-25.

[6] Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Geneve. Hartmann & Kester’s Plant Propagation Principles and Practices, Upper Saddle River (Nueva Jersey, Estados Unidos). 8th ed. Nueva Jersey, Estados Unidos, US State: Prentice Hall; 2011: 915.

[7] Nawaz MA, Imtiaz M, Kong Q et al. Grafting: a technique to modify ion accumulation in horticultural crops. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1457.

[8] Melnyk CW . Plant grafting: insights into tissue regeneration. Regeneration. 2017; 4: 3-14.

[9] Webster A. Vigour mechanisms in dwarfing rootstocks for temperate fruit trees. In: I International Symposium on Rootstocks for Deciduous Fruit Tree Species.M.A. Moreno Sánchez, A.D. Webster eds. Zaragoza, Spain: ISHS, 2004, 29-41.

[10] Melnyk CW, Meyerowitz EM . Plant grafting. Curr Biol. 2015; 25: R183-8.

[11] Belmonte-Urena LJ, Garrido-Cardenas JA, Camacho-Ferre F . Analysis of world research on grafting in horticultural plants. HortScience. 2020; 55: 112-20.

[12] Webster AD, Wertheim SJ . Apple rootstocks. In: Ferree DC, Warrington IJ, eds. Apples: Botany, Production and Uses.CABI Publishing, CAB International: Wallingford, 2003, 91-124.

[13] Assunção M, Pinheiro J, Cruz S et al. Gallic acid, sinapic acid and catechin as potential chemical markers of Vitis graft success. Sci Hortic. 2019; 246: 129-35.

[14] Hartmann HT, Kester DE . Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall International, Inc; 1975: 647 p.

[15] Gonçalves B, Moutinho-Pereira J, Santos A et al. Scion-rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiol. 2006; 26: 93-104.

[16] Harada T . Grafting and RNA transport via phloem tissue in horticultural plants. Sci Hortic. 2010; 125: 545-50.

[17] Pina A, Errea P . A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility-incompatibility. Sci Hortic. 2005; 106: 1-11.

[18] Zhai L, Wang X, Tang D et al. Molecular and physiological characterization of the effects of auxin-enriched rootstock on grafting. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 1-13.

[19] Nanda AK, Melnyk CW . The role of plant hormones during grafting. J Plant Res. 2018; 131: 49-58.

[20] Sharma A, Zheng B . Molecular responses during plant grafting and its regulation by auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins. Biomol Ther. 2019; 9: 397.

[21] Aloni R. Phloem and Xylem Differentiation. In: Vascular Differentiation and Plant Hormones.1st ed. Switzerland AG: Springer, 2021, 101-30.

[22] Bishopp A, Help H, El-Showk S et al. A mutually inhibitory interaction between auxin and cytokinin specifies vascular pattern in roots. Curr Biol. 2011; 21: 917-26.

[23] Yin H, Yan B, Sun J et al. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 4219-32.

[24] Chen Z, Zhao J, Hu F et al. Transcriptome changes between compatible and incompatible graft combination of Litchi chinensis by digital gene expression profile. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 1-12.

[25] He W, Wang Y, Chen Q et al. Dissection of the mechanism for compatible and incompatible graft combinations of Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck (‘Hongmian Miyou’). Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 505.

[26] Mo Z, Feng G, Su W et al. Transcriptomic analysis provides insights into grafting union development in pecan (Carya illinoinensis). Genes. 2018; 9: 71.

[27] Nieminen K, Immanen J, Laxell M et al. Cytokinin signaling regulates cambial development in poplar. PNAS. 2008; 105: 20032-7.

[28] Köse C, Güleryüz M . Effects of auxins and cytokinins on graft union of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). N Z J Crop Hortic Sci. 2006; 34: 145-50.

[29] Hirose N, Takei K, Kuroha T et al. Regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis, compartmentalization and translocation. J Exp Bot. 2008; 59: 75-83.

[30] Dettmer J, Elo A, Helariutta Y . Hormone interactions during vascular development. Plant Mol Biol. 2009; 69: 347.

[31] Eriksson ME, Israelsson M, Olsson O, Moritz T . Increased gibberellin biosynthesis in transgenic trees promotes growth, biomass production and xylem fiber length. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18: 784-8.

[32] Dayan J, Schwarzkopf M, Avni A, Aloni R . Enhancing plant growth and fiber production by silencing GA2-oxidase. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010; 8: 425-35.

[33] Martínez C, Espinosa-Ruiz A, Prat S . Gibberellins and plant vegetative growth. Annu Plant Rev. 2016; 49: 285-322.

[34] Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Rymen B et al. Wounding triggers callus formation via dynamic hormonal and transcriptional changes. Plant Physiol. 2017; 175: 1158-74.

[35] Lordan J et al. Horticultural performance of ‘Marinada’ and ‘Vairo’ almond cultivars grown on a genetically diverse set of rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2019; 256: 1-12, 108558.

[36] Reig G, Zarrouk O, Font i Forcada C, Moreno MÁ . Anatomical graft compatibility study between apricot cultivars and different plum based rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2018; 237: 67-73.

[37] Reig G, Salazara A, Zarrouka O et al. Long-term graft compatibility study of peach-almond hybrid and plum based rootstocks budded with European and Japanese plums. Sci Hortic. 2019; 243: 392-400.

[38] Flaishman MA, Loginovsky K, Golobowich S, Lev-Yadun S . Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for graft union development in homografts and heterografts. Plant Growth Regul. 2008; 27: 231-9.

[39] Notaguchi M, Higashiyama T, Suzuki T . Identification of mRNAs that move over long distances using an RNA-Seq analysis of Arabidopsis/Nicotiana benthamiana heterografts. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56: 311-21.

[40] Zarrouk O, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA, Pinochet J . Graft compatibility between peach cultivars and Prunus rootstocks. HortScience. 2006; 41: 1389-94.

[41] Warmund MR, Barritt BH, Brown JM et al. Detection of vascular discontinuity in bud unions of ‘Jonagold’ apple on ‘mark’ rootstock with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1993; 118: 92-6.

[42] Errea P, Felipe A, Herrero M . Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus spp. J Exp Bot. 1994; 45: 393-401.

[43] Usenik V, Krška B, Vičan M, Štampar F . Early detection of graft incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) using phenol analyses. Sci Hortic. 2006; 109: 332-8.

[44] Gur A. The role of the cyanogensic glycoside of the quince in the incompatibility between pear cultivars and quince rootstocks. Hortic Res. 1968; 8: 113-34.

[45] Musacchi S, Pagliuca G, Kindt M et al. Flavonoids as markers for pear-quince graft incompatibility. J Appl Bot. 2000; 74: 206-11.

[46] Ciobotari G, Brinza M, Morariu A, Gradinariu G . Graft incompatibility influence on assimilating pigments and soluble sugars amount of some pear (Pyrus sativa) cultivars. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 2010; 38: 187-92.

[47] Sarooshi R, Bevington K, Coote B . Performance and compatibility of ‘Muscat Gordo Blanco’ grape on eight rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 1982; 16: 367-74.

[48] Canas S, Assunção M, Brazão J et al. Phenolic compounds involved in grafting incompatibility of Vitis spp: development and validation of an analytical method for their quantification. Phytochem Anal. 2015; 26: 1-7.

[49] Assunção M, Canas S, Cruz S et al. Graft compatibility of Vitis spp.: the role of phenolic acids and flavanols. Sci Hortic. 2016; 207: 140-5.

[50] Assunção M, Santos C, Brazão J et al. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying graft success in grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 1-17.

[51] Li D, Han F, Liu X et al. Localized graft incompatibility in kiwifruit: analysis of homografts and heterografts with different rootstock & scion combinations. Sci Hortic. 2021; 283: 1-7, 110080.

[52] Chen Z, Zhao J, Qin Y, Hu G . Study on the graft compatibility between ‘Jingganghongnuo’ and other litchi cultivars. Sci Hortic. 2016; 199: 56-62.

[53] Azimi M, Ozkaya MT, Colgecen H, Buyukkartal HN . Analysis of phenolic compounds for determination of cambium differentiation and tracheal elements in olive graft combinations. J Exp Biol Agric Sci. 2016; 4: 714-20.

[54] Guclu SF, Koyuncu F . A method for prediction of graft incompatibility in sweet cherry. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 2012; 40: 243-6.

[55] Zarrouk O, Testillano PS, Risueño MC et al. Changes in cell/ tissue organization and peroxidase activity as markers for early detection of graft incompatibility in peach/plum combinations. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2010; 135: 9-17.

[56] Amri R, Font i Forcada C, Giménez R et al. Biochemical characterization and differential expression of PAL genes associated with translocated peach/plum graft-incompatibility. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 177.

[57] Hudina M, Orazem P, Jakopic J, Stampar F . The phenolic content and its involvement in the graft incompatibility process of various pear rootstocks (Pyrus communis L.). J Plant Physiol. 2014; 171: 76-84.

[58] Moreno P, Ambrós S, Albiach-Martí MR et al. Citrus tristeza virus: a pathogen that changed the course of the citrus industry. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008; 9: 251-68.

[59] Mircetich S, Rowhani A . The relationship of cherry leafroll virus and blackline disease of English walnut trees. Phytopathology. 1984; 74: 423-8.

[60] Stouffer RF, Uyemoto JK . Association of tomato ringspot virus with apple union necrosis and decline. In: X International Symposium on Fruit Tree Virus Diseases 67. L. Kunze ed. Heidelberg, Germany: ISHS, 1976, 203-8.

[61] Rasool A, Mansoor S, Bhat KM et al. Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 1-19, 5908047.

[62] Pina A, Errea P, Martens HJ . Graft union formation and cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata in compatible and incompatible stem unions of Prunus spp. Sci Hortic. 2012; 143: 144-50.

[63] Moreno MA, Moing A, Lansac M et al. Peach/Myrobalan plum graft incompatibility in the nursery. J Hortic Sci. 1993; 68: 705-14.

[64] López-Ortega G, García-Montiel F, Bayo-Canha A et al. Rootstock effects on the growth, yield and fruit quality of sweet cherry cv.‘Newstar’ in the growing conditions of the region of Murcia. Sci Hortic. 2016; 198: 326-35.

[65] Dawson WO, Garnsey SM, Tatineni S et al. Citrus tristeza virus-host interactions. Front Microbiol. 2013; 4: 88.

[66] Seemüller E, Schneider B . ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Mali’,‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum’, the causal agents of apple proliferation, pear decline and European stone fruit yellows, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004; 54: 1217-26.

[67] Pina A, Cookson SJ, Calatayud Á et al. Physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying graft compatibility. In: Vegetable Grafting: Principles and Practices.Colla, G., Pérez-Alfocea, F. & Schwarz, D. eds. Croydon, London (UK): CABI, 2017, 132-54.

[68] Loupit G, Cookson SJ . Identifying molecular markers of successful graft union formation and compatibility. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 1903.

[69] Moing A, Carbonne F, Gaudillere J . Growth and carbon partitioning in compatible and incompatible peach/plum grafts. Physiol Plant. 1990; 79: 540-6.

[70] Prodhomme D, Fonayet JV, Hévin C et al. Metabolite profiling during graft union formation reveals the reprogramming of primary metabolism and the induction of stilbene synthesis at the graft interface in grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 1-12.

[71] Moreno MA, Gaudillere JP, Moing A . Protein and amino acid content in compatible and incompatible peach/plum grafts. J Hortic Sci. 1994; 69: 955-62.

[72] Machado BD, Magro M, Rufato L et al. Graft compatibility between European pear cultivars and east Malling ‘C’ rootstock. Rev Bras Frutic. 2017; 39: 1-9.

[73] Pereira IS, Pina A, Antunes LEC et al. Genotypic differences in cyanogenic glycosides levels of compatible Prunus persica P. persica and incompatible P. persica P. mume combinations. Bragantia. 2017; 77: 1-12.

[74] Koepke T, Dhingra A . Rootstock scion somatogenetic interactions in perennial composite plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2013; 32: 1321-37.

[75] Pina A, Errea P . Influence of graft incompatibility on gene expression and enzymatic activity of UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Plant Sci. 2008; 174: 502-9.

[76] Irisarri P, Zhebentyayeva T, Errea P, Pina A . Differential expression of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) genes implies distinct roles in development of graft incompatibility symptoms in Prunus. Sci Hortic. 2016; 204: 16-24.

[77] Irisarri P, Errea P, Pina A . Physiological and molecular characterization of new apricot cultivars grafted on different Prunus rootstocks. Agronomy. 2021; 11: 1464.

[78] Pina A, Irisarri P, Errea P, Zhebentyayeva T . Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with graft (in) compatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.). Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 45.

[79] Assunção M, Tedesco S, Fevereiro P . Molecular aspects of grafting in woody plants. In: Annuual Plant Reviews Online. 2018, 87-126.

[80] Tedesco S, Erban A, Gupta S et al. The impact of metabolic scion-rootstock interactions in different grapevine tissues and phloem exudates. Meta. 2021; 11: 349.

[81] Dogra K, Kour K, Kumar R et al. Graft-incompatibility in horticultural crops. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018; 7: 1805-20.

[82] Tedesco S, Pina A, Fevereiro P, Kragler F . A phenotypic search on graft compatibility in grapevine. Agronomy. 2020; 10: 706.

[83] Tworkoski T, Miller S . Rootstock effect on growth of apple scions with different growth habits. Sci Hortic. 2007; 111: 335-43.

[84] Cheng FS, Roose ML . Origin and inheritance of dwarfing by the citrus rootstock Poncirus trifoliata ‘flying dragon’. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1995; 120: 286-91.

[85] Botelho RV, Schneider E, Machado D et al. Quince ’CPP’: new dwarf rootstock for pear trees on organic and high density planting. Rev Bras Frutic. 2012; 34: 589-96.

[86] Tombesi S, Almehdi A, DeJong TM . Phenotyping vigour control capacity of new peach rootstocks by xylem vessel analysis. Sci Hortic. 2011; 127: 353-7.

[87] Atkinson C, Else M . Understanding how rootstocks dwarf fruit trees. Compact Fruit Tree. 2001; 34: 46-9.

[88] Zheng X, Zhao Y, Shan D et al. Md WRKY 9 overexpression confers intensive dwarfing in the M26 rootstock of apple by directly inhibiting brassinosteroid synthetase MdDWF4 expression. New Phytol. 2018; 217: 1086-98.

[89] Jia D, Gong X, Li M et al. Overexpression of a novel apple NAC transcription factor gene, MdNAC1, confers the dwarf phenotype in transgenic apple (Malus domestica). Genes (Basel). 2018; 9: 229.

[90] Chen Y, An X, Zhao D et al. Transcription profiles reveal sugar and hormone signaling pathways mediating tree branch architecture in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) grafted on different rootstocks. PLoS One. 2020; 15: 1-20, e0236530.

[91] Faust M. Physiology of Temperate Zone Fruit Trees. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1989: 338 P.

[92] Lockard R, Schneider G . Phenols and the dwarfing mechanism in apple rootstocks. Acta Hortic. 1981; 120: 107-12.

[93] Cui Z, Zhang H, Galarneau ER-A et al. Metabolome analysis reveals important compounds related to dwarfing effect of interstock on scion in pear. Ann Appl Biol. 2021; 179: 108-122.

[94] Foster TM, McAtee PA, Waite CN et al. Apple dwarfing rootstocks exhibit an imbalance in carbohydrate allocation and reduced cell growth and metabolism. Hortic Res. 2017; 4: 1-13.

[95] Schechter I, Elfving D, Proctor J . Apple tree canopy development and photosynthesis as affected by rootstock. Can J Bot. 1991; 69: 295-300.

[96] Zhou Y, Hayat F, Yao J et al. Size-controlling interstocks affect growth vigour by downregulating photosynthesis in eight-year-old ‘red Fuji’ apple trees. Eur J Hortic Sci. 2021; 86: 146-55.

[97] Foster TM, Celton J-M, Chagné D et al. Two quantitative trait loci, Dw1 and Dw2, are primarily responsible for rootstock-induced dwarfing in apple. Hortic Res. 2015; 2: 1-9.

[98] Fazio G, Wan Y, Kviklys D et al. Dw2, a new dwarfing locus in apple rootstocks and its relationship to induction of early bearing in apple scions. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2014; 139: 87-98.

[99] Van Hooijdonk B, Woolley D, Warrington I, Tustin S . Rootstocks modify scion architecture, endogenous hormones, and root growth of newly grafted ‘Royal Gala’ apple trees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2011; 136: 93-102.

[100] Seleznyova AN, Tustin DS, Thorp TG . Apple dwarfing rootstocks and interstocks affect the type of growth units produced during the annual growth cycle: precocious transition to flowering affects the composition and vigour of annual shoots. Ann Bot. 2008; 101: 679-87.

[101] Foster TM, Watson AE, Van Hooijdonk BM, Schaffer RJ . Key flowering genes including FT-like genes are upregulated in the vasculature of apple dwarfing rootstocks. Tree Genet Genomes. 2014; 10: 189-202.

[102] Calderón FJ, Weibel AM, Trentacoste ER . Effects of different interstock length on vegetative growth and flowering in peach cv. Pavie Catherine. Sci Hortic. 2021; 285: 1-7, 110174.

[103] Avery D. Effects of fruiting on the growth of apple trees on four rootstock varieties. New Phytol. 1970; 69: 19-30.

[104] Avery D. Comparisons of fruiting and deblossomed maiden apple trees, and of non-fruiting trees on a dwarfing and an invigorating rootstock. New Phytol. 1969; 68: 323-36.

[105] Pal MD, MITRE I, ASANICA AC et al. The influence of rootstock on the growth and fructification of cherry cultivars in a high density cultivation system. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 2017; 45: 451-7.

[106] Reig G, Font i Forcada C, Mestre L et al. Horticultural, leaf mineral and fruit quality traits of two ‘greengage’ plum cultivars budded on plum based rootstocks in Mediterranean conditions. Sci Hortic. 2018; 232: 84-91.

[107] Font i Forcada C, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA . Fruit sugar profile and antioxidants of peach and nectarine cultivars on almond × peach hybrid rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2013; 164: 563-72.

[108] Font i Forcada C, Reig G, Giménez R et al. Sugars and organic acids profile and antioxidant compounds of nectarine fruits influenced by different rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2019; 248: 145-53.

[109] Fisher D, Britton J, Porritt S . Some horticultural aspects of black-end of pears. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1950; 55: 217-23.

[110] Mourão Filho F d AA, Núñez EE, Stuchi ES, Ortega E . Plant growth, yield, and fruit quality of ‘Fallglo’ and ‘sunburst’ mandarins on four rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2007; 114: 45-9.

[111] Tietel Z, Srivastava S, Fait A et al. Impact of scion/rootstock reciprocal effects on metabolomics of fruit juice and phloem sap in grafted Citrus reticulata. PLoS One. 2020; 15: 1-17, e0227192.

[112] Morales J, Bermejo A, Navarro P et al. Rootstock effect on fruit quality, anthocyanins, sugars, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavanones content during the harvest of blood oranges ‘Moro’ and ‘Tarocco Rosso’ grown in Spain. Food Chem. 2021; 342: 1-12, 128305.

[113] Domingues AR, Marcolini CDM, da Silva Gonçalves CH et al. Fruit ripening development of ‘Valencia’ orange trees grafted on different ‘Trifoliata’ hybrid rootstocks. Horticulturae. 2021; 7: 3.

[114] Corso M, Vannozzi A, Ziliotto F et al. Grapevine rootstocks differentially affect the rate of ripening and modulate auxin-related genes in cabernet sauvignon berries. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 69.

[115] Bavaresco L, Giachino E, Pezzutto S . Grapevine rootstock effects on lime-induced chlorosis, nutrient uptake, and source-sink relationships. J Plant Nutr. 2003; 26: 1451-65.

[116] Ibacache AG, Sierra CB . Influence of rootstocks on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in petioles of four table grape varieties. Chil J Agric Res. 2009; 69: 503-8.

[117] Covarrubias JI, Retamales C, Donnini S et al. Contrasting physiological responses to iron deficiency in cabernet sauvignon grapevines grafted on two rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2016; 199: 1-8.

[118] Habran A, Commisso M, Helwi P et al. Roostocks/scion/nitrogen interactions affect secondary metabolism in the grape berry. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1134.

[119] Lecourt J, Lauvergeat V, Ollat N et al. Shoot and root ionome responses to nitrate supply in grafted grapevines are rootstock genotype dependent. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2015; 21: 311-8.

[120] Zamboni M, Garavani A, Gatti M et al. Vegetative, physiological and nutritional behavior of new grapevine rootstocks in response to different nitrogen supply. Sci Hortic. 2016; 202: 99-106.

[121] Meister R, Rajani M, Ruzicka D, Schachtman DP. Challenges of modifying root traits in crops for agriculture. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:779-88.

[122] Zeng H, Wang G, Hu X et al. Role of microRNAs in plant responses to nutrient stress. Plant Soil. 2014; 374: 1005-21.

[123] Amiri ME, Fallahi E, Safi-Songhorabad M . Influence of rootstock on mineral uptake and scion growth of ‘Golden delicious’ and ‘Royal Gala’ apples. J Plant Nutr. 2014; 37: 16-29.

[124] Sorgonà A, Abenavoli MR, Gringeri PG, Cacco G . A comparison of nitrogen use efficiency definitions in citrus rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2006; 109: 389-93.

[125] Mei L, Sheng OU, Peng S-a et al. Growth, root morphology and boron uptake by citrus rootstock seedlings differing in boron-deficiency responses. Sci Hortic. 2011; 129: 426-32.

[126] Guidong L, Cuncang J, Yunhua W . Distribution of boron and its forms in young “Newhall” navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osb.) plants grafted on two rootstocks in response to deficient and excessive boron. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2011; 57: 93-104.

[127] Liu G-D, Wang R-D, Liu L-C et al. Cellular boron allocation and pectin composition in two citrus rootstock seedlings differing in boron-deficiency response. Plant Soil. 2013; 370: 555-65.

[128] Wang N, Wei Q, Yan T et al. Improving the boron uptake of boron-deficient navel orange plants under low boron conditions by inarching boron-efficient rootstock. Sci Hortic. 2016; 199: 49-55.

[129] Hrotkó K, Magyar L, Borsos G, Gyeviki M. Rootstock effect on nutrient concentration of sweet cherry leaves. J Plant Nutr. 2014;37:1395-409.

[130] Zarrouk O, Gogorcena Y, Gómez-Aparisi J et al. Influence of almond× peach hybrids rootstocks on flower and leaf mineral concentration, yield and vigour of two peach cultivars. Sci Hortic. 2005; 106: 502-14.

[131] Mestre L, Reig G, Betran JA et al. Influence of peach-almond hybrids and plum-based rootstocks on mineral nutrition and yield characteristics of ‘big top’ nectarine in replant and heavy-calcareous soil conditions. Sci Hortic. 2015; 192: 475-81.

[132] Jiménez S, Garín A, Gogorcena Y et al. Flower and foliar analysis for prognosis of sweet cherry nutrition: influence of different rootstocks. J Plant Nutr. 2004; 27: 701-12.

[133] Caballero F, Garcia-Sanchez F, Gimeno V et al. High-affinity potassium uptake in seedlings of two citrus rootstocks Carrizo citrange (‘Citrus sinensis’ [L.] Osb. X ‘Poncirus trifoliata’ [L.] Raf.) and Cleopatra mandarin (’Citrus reshni’ hort. Ex tanaka). Aust J Crop Sci. 2013; 7: 538-42.

[134] Zha Q, Wang Y, Zhang X-Z, Han Z-H . Both immanently high active iron contents and increased root ferrous uptake in response to low iron stress contribute to the iron deficiency tolerance in malus xiaojinensis. Plant Sci. 2014; 214: 47-56.

[135] Gonzalo MJ, Moreno MÁ, Gogorcena Y . Physiological responses and differential gene expression in Prunus rootstocks under iron deficiency conditions. J Plant Physiol. 2011; 168: 887-93.

[136] Tomasi N, Monte R, Varanini Z et al. Induction of nitrate uptake in sauvignon blanc and chardonnay grapevines depends on the scion and is affected by the rootstock. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2015; 21: 331-8.

[137] Mota M, Neto C, Oliveira C . Identification of genes coding for NH₄⁺ transporters in ’Rocha’ pear/BA29 . Acta Hortic. 2007; 800: 365-72.

[138] Li H, Han J-L, Chang Y-H et al. Gene characterization and transcription analysis of two new ammonium transporters in pear rootstock (Pyrus betulaefolia). J Plant Res. 2016; 129: 737-48.

[139] Cimen B, Yesiloglu T . Rootstock Breeding for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Citrus. In: Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants-Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.A. K. Shanker and C. Shanker eds., IntechOpen: London, 2016.

[140] Peccoux A, Loveys B, Zhu J et al. Dissecting the rootstock control of scion transpiration using model-assisted analyses in grapevine. Tree Physiol. 2018; 38: 1026-40.

[141] Prinsi B, Negri AS, Failla O et al. Root proteomic and metabolic analyses reveal specific responses to drought stress in differently tolerant grapevine rootstocks. BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18: 1-28.

[142] Upadhyay A, Upadhyay A, Bhirangi R . Expression of Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter gene in response to water and salinity stress in grapevine rootstocks . Biol Plant. 2012; 56: 762-6.

[143] Guo T, Wang N, Xue Y et al. Overexpression of the RNA binding protein MhYTP1 in transgenic apple enhances drought tolerance and WUE by improving ABA level under drought condition. Plant Sci. 2019; 280: 397-407.

[144] Gonçalves LP, Boscariol Camargo RL, Takita MA et al. Rootstock-induced molecular responses associated with drought tolerance in sweet orange as revealed by RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20: 1-14.

[145] Zhao T, Liang D, Wang P et al. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of the DREB transcription factor gene family in malus under abiotic stress. Mol Gen Genomics. 2012; 287: 423-36.

[146] Xie R, Pan X, Zhang J et al. Effect of salt-stress on gene expression in citrus roots revealed by RNA-seq. Funct Integr Genomics. 2018; 18: 155-73.

[147] Sahin-Çevik M, Moore GA . Identification and expression analysis of cold-regulated genes from the cold-hardy citrus relative Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. Plant Mol Biol. 2006; 62: 83-97.

[148] Nyczepir A. Nematode management strategies in stone fruits in the United States. J Nematol. 1991; 23: 334.

[149] Pinochet J, Calvet C, Hernández-Dorrego A et al. Resistance of peach and plum rootstocks from Spain, France, and Italy to root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica. HortScience. 1999; 34: 1259-62.

[150] Bowman KD, Joubert J . Citrus rootstocks. In: The Genus Citrus.M. Talon, Marco Caruso, and F. G. Gmitter Jr. eds, Elsevier Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2020, 105-27.

[151] Cline J, Hunter D, Bonn W, Bijl M . Resistance of the Vineland series of apple root-stocks to fire blight caused by Erwinia amylovora. J Am Pomol Soc. 2001; 55: 218.

[152] Jensen PJ, Halbrendt N, Fazio G et al. Rootstock-regulated gene expression patterns associated with fire blight resistance in apple. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13: 1-17.

[153] Peil A, Bus VGM, Geider K et al. Improvement of fire blight resistance in apple and pear. Int J Plant Breed. 2009; 3: 1-27.

[154] Wang J, Jiang L, Wu R . Plant grafting: how genetic exchange promotes vascular reconnection. New Phytol. 2017; 214: 56-65.

[155] Kapazoglou A, Tani E, Avramidou EV et al. Epigenetic changes and transcriptional reprogramming upon woody plant grafting for crop sustainability in a changing environment. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 11: 2160.

[156] Varkonyi-Gasic E, Gould N, Sandanayaka M et al. Characterisation of microRNAs from apple (Malus domestica ‘Royal Gala’) vascular tissue and phloem sap. BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10: 1-15.

[157] Kanehira A, Yamada K, Iwaya T et al. Apple phloem cells contain some mRNAs transported over long distances. Tree Genet Genomes. 2010; 6: 635-42.

[158] Xu H, Zhang W, Li M et al. Gibberellic acid insensitive mRNA transport in both directions between stock and scion in malus. Tree Genet Genomes. 2010; 6: 1013-9.

[159] Zhang W-N, Gong L, Ma C et al. Gibberellic acid-insensitive mRNA transport in Pyrus. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2012; 30: 614-23.

[160] Yang Y, Mao L, Jittayasothorn Y et al. Messenger RNA exchange between scions and rootstocks in grafted grapevines. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15: 1-14.

[161] An N, Fan S, Yang Y et al. Identification and characterization of miRNAs in self-rooted and grafted malus reveals critical networks associated with flowering. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 2384.

[162] Ahsan MU, Hayward A, Alam M et al. Scion control of miRNA abundance and tree maturity in grafted avocado. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 1-11.

[163] Zhao D, Zhong G-Y, Song G-Q . Transfer of endogenous small RNAs between branches of scions and rootstocks in grafted sweet cherry trees. PLoS One. 2020; 15: 1-12, e0236376.

[164] Duan X, Zhang W, Huang J et al. KNOTTED1 mRNA undergoes long-distance transport and interacts with movement protein binding protein 2C in pear (Pyrus betulaefolia). PCTOC. 2015; 121: 109-19.

[165] Duan X, Zhang W, Huang J et al. PbWoxT1 mRNA from pear (Pyrus betulaefolia) undergoes long-distance transport assisted by a polypyrimidine tract binding protein. New Phytol. 2016; 210: 511-24.

[166] Xu D, Yuan H, Tong Y et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of the graft unions in hickory (Carya cathayensis) provides insights into response mechanisms to grafting process. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 676.

[167] Langridge P, Fleury D . Making the most of omics for crop breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 33-40.

[168] Shiratake K, Suzuki M . Omics studies of citrus, grape and rosaceae fruit trees. Breed Sci. 2016; 66: 122-38.

[169] Cookson SJ, Moreno MJC, Hevin C et al. Graft union formation in grapevine induces transcriptional changes related to cell wall modification, wounding, hormone signalling, and secondary metabolism. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 2997-3008.

[170] Flachowsky H, Szankowski I, Waidmann S et al. The MdTFL1 gene of apple (malus× domestica Borkh.) reduces vegetative growth and generation time. Tree Physiol. 2012; 32: 1288-301.

[171] Artlip TS, Wisniewski ME, Arora R, Norelli JL . An apple rootstock overexpressing a peach CBF gene alters growth and flowering in the scion but does not impact cold hardiness or dormancy. Hortic Res. 2016; 3: 1-9.

[172] Lemgo GNY, Sabbadini S, Pandolfini T, Mezzetti B . Biosafety considerations of RNAi-mediated virus resistance in fruit-tree cultivars and in rootstock. Transgenic Res. 2013; 22: 1073-88.

[173] Dutt M, Li Z, Dhekney S, Gray D . Transgenic plants from shoot apical meristems of Vitis vinifera L.‘Thompson seedless’ via agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 2007; 26: 2101-10.

[174] Zhao D, Song GQ . Rootstock-to-scion transfer of transgene-derived small interfering RNAs and their effect on virus resistance in nontransgenic sweet cherry. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014; 12: 1319-28.

[175] Fan S, Wang J, Lei C et al. Identification and characterization of histone modification gene family reveal their critical responses to flower induction in apple. BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18: 1-21.

[176] Neves DM, da Hora Almeida LA, Santana-Vieira DDS et al. Recurrent water deficit causes epigenetic and hormonal changes in citrus plants. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 1-11.

[177] Huang H, Liu R, Niu Q et al. Global increase in DNA methylation during orange fruit development and ripening. PNAS. 2019; 116: 1430-6.

[178] Cookson SJ, Ollat N . Grafting with rootstocks induces extensive transcriptional re-programming in the shoot apical meristem of grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2013; 13: 1-14.

[179] Chitarra W, Perrone I, Avanzato CG et al. Grapevine grafting: Scion transcript profiling and defense-related metabolites induced by rootstocks. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 654.

[180] Sandanayaka W, Bus V, Connolly P, Newcomb R . Characteristics associated with woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum, resistance of three apple rootstocks. Entomol Exp Appl. 2003; 109: 63-72.

[181] Kaja E, Szcześniak MW, Jensen PJ et al. Identification of apple miRNAs and their potential role in fire blight resistance. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015; 11: 812.

[182] Pagliarani C, Vitali M, Ferrero M et al. The accumulation of miRNAs differentially modulated by drought stress is affected by grafting in grapevine. Plant Physiol. 2017; 173: 2180-95.

[183] Santos AS, Neves DM, Santana-Vieira DDS et al. Citrus scion and rootstock combinations show changes in DNA methylation profiles and ABA insensitivity under recurrent drought conditions. Sci Hortic. 2020; 267: 1-11, 109313.

[184] Perrin A, Daccord N, Roquis D et al. Divergent DNA methylation signatures of juvenile seedlings, grafts and adult apple trees. Epigenomes. 2020; 4: 4.

[185] Limera C, Sabbadini S, Sweet JB, Mezzetti B . New biotechnological tools for the genetic improvement of major woody fruit species. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1418.

[186] Lobato-Gómez M, Hewitt S, Capell T et al. Transgenic and genome-edited fruits: background, constraints, benefits, and commercial opportunities. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 1-16.

[187] Albacete A, Martínez-Andújar C, Martínez-Pérez A et al. Unravelling rootstock× scion interactions to improve food security. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66: 2211-26.

[188] Smolka A, Li X-Y, Heikelt C et al. Effects of transgenic rootstocks on growth and development of non-transgenic scion cultivars in apple. Transgenic Res. 2010; 19: 933-48.

[189] Song G-q, Walworth A, Lin T et al. VcFT-induced mobile florogenic signals in transgenic and transgrafted blueberries. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 1-15.

[190] Song G-q, Sink KC, Walworth AE et al. Engineering cherry rootstocks with resistance to Prunus necrotic ring spot virus through RNAi-mediated silencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11: 702-8.

[191] Dandekar AM, Jacobson A, Ibáñez AM et al. Trans-graft protection against Pierce’s disease mediated by transgenic grapevine rootstocks. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 84.