Multi-omics approaches identify a key gene, PpTST1, for organic acid accumulation in peach

Abstract

Organic acid content in fruit is an important determinant of peach organoleptic quality, and undergoes considerable variations during development and maturation. However, its molecular mechanism remains largely unclear. In this study, an integrative approach of genome-wide association studies and comparative transcriptome analysis was applied to identify candidate genes involved in organic acid accumulation in peach. A key gene, PpTST1, encoding tonoplast sugar transporter, was identified and the genotype of PpTST1 with a single-base transversion (G1584T) in the third exon that leads to a single amino acid substitution (Q528H) was associated with a low level of organic acid content in peach. Overexpression of PpTST1^His resulted in reduced organic acid content along with increased sugar content both in peach and tomato fruits, suggesting its dual function in sugar accumulation and organic acid content reduction. Two V-type proton ATPases interacted with PpTST1 in a yeast two-hybrid assay. In addition, the G1584T transversion appeared and gradually accumulated during domestication and improvement, which indicated that PpTST1 was under selection. The identification and characterization of PpTST1 would facilitate the improvement of peach fruit quality.

References

[1] Yu Y, Fu J, Xu Y et al. Genome re-sequencing reveals the evolutionary history of peach fruit edibility. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 5404.

[2] Li Y, Cao K, Zhu G et al. Genomic analyses of an extensive collection of wild and cultivated accessions provide new insights into peach breeding history. Genome Biol. 2019; 20: 36.

[3] Yamamoto N, Garcia R, Suzuki T et al. Comparative whole genome re-sequencing analysis in upland new rice for Africa: insights into the breeding history and respective genome compositions. Rice. 2018; 11: 33.

[4] Cao K, Zhou Z, Wang Q et al. Genome-wide association study of 12 agronomic traits in peach. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 13246.

[5] Verma S, Zurn JD, Salinas N et al. Clarifying sub-genomic positions of QTLs for flowering habit and fruit quality in U.S. strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) breeding populations using pedigree-based QTL analysis . Hortic Res. 2017; 4: 17062.

[6] Chagné D, Vanderzande S, Kirk C et al. Validation of SNP markers for fruit quality and disease resistance loci in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) using the OpenArray^® platform. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 30.

[7] Wang Q, Wang L, Zhu G et al. DNA marker-assisted evaluation of fruit acidity in diverse peach (Prunus persica) germplasm . Euphytica. 2016; 210: 413-26.

[8] Cirilli M, Bassi D, Ciacciulli A . Sugars in peach fruit: a breeding perspective. Hortic Res. 2016; 3: 15067.

[9] Byrne DH . Trends in stone fruit cultivar development. HortTechnology. 2005; 15: 494-500.

[10] Borsani J, Budde CO, Porrini L et al. Carbon metabolism of peach fruit after harvest: changes in enzymes involved in organic acid and sugar level modifications. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60: 1823-37.

[11] Etienne C, Moing A, Dirlewanger E et al. Isolation and characterization of six peach cDNAs encoding key proteins in organic acid metabolism and solute accumulation: involvement in regulating peach fruit acidity. Physiol Plant. 2002; 114: 259-70.

[12] Etienne A, Génard M, Lobit P et al. What controls fleshy fruit acidity? A review of malate and citrate accumulation in fruit cells. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 1451-69.

[13] Bai Y, Dougherty L, Li M et al. A natural mutation-led truncation in one of the two aluminum-activated malate transporter-like genes at the Ma locus is associated with low fruit acidity in apple. Mol Gen Genomics. 2012; 287: 663-78.

[14] Khan SA, Beekwilder J, Schaart JG et al. Differences in acidity of apples are probably mainly caused by a malic acid transporter gene on LG16. Tree Genet Genomes. 2013; 9: 475-87.

[15] Li CL, Dougherty L, Coluccio AE et al. Apple ALMT9 requires a conserved C-terminal domain for malate transport underlying fruit acidity. Plant Physiol. 2019; 182: 992-1006.

[16] Ma B, Chen J, Zheng H et al. Comparative assessment of sugar and malic acid composition in cultivated and wild apples. Food Chem. 2015; 172: 86-91.

[17] Hu D, Sun CH, Ma QJ et al. MdMYB1 regulates anthocyanin and malate accumulation by directly facilitating their transport into vacuoles in apples. Plant Physiol. 2016; 170: 1315-30.

[18] Hu D, Li YY, Zhang QY et al. The R2R3-MYB transcription factor MdMYB73 is involved in malate accumulation and vacuolar acidification in apple. Plant J. 2017; 91: 443-54.

[19] Jia D, Shen F, Wang Y et al. Apple fruit acidity is genetically diversified by natural variations in three hierarchical epistatic genes: MdSAUR37, MdPP2CH and MdALMTII. Plant J. 2018; 95: 427-43.

[20] Ma B, Liao L, Fang T et al. A Ma10 gene encoding P-type ATPase is involved in fruit organic acid accumulation in apple. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 674-86.

[21] Eisenach C, Baetz U, Martinoia E . Vacuolar proton pumping: more than the sum of its parts? Trends Plant Sci. 2014; 19: 344-6.

[22] Yu JQ, Gu K, Sun C et al. The apple bHLH transcription factor MdbHLH3 functions in determining the fruit carbohydrates and malate. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 19: 285-99.

[23] Shi C, Hussain SB, Yang H et al. CsPH8, a P-type proton pump gene, plays a key role in the diversity of citric acid accumulation in citrus fruits. Plant Sci. 2019; 289: 110288.

[24] Li S, Liu X-j, Xie X-l et al. CrMYB73, a PH-like gene, contributes to citric acid accumulation in citrus fruit. Sci Hortic. 2015; 197: 212-7.

[25] Li S, Yin X-r, Xie X-l et al. The citrus transcription factor, CitERF13, regulates citric acid accumulation via a protein-protein interaction with the vacuolar proton pump, CitVHA-c4. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 20151-1.

[26] Li S, Yin X-R, Wang W-L et al. Citrus CitNAC62 cooperates with CitWRKY1 to participate in citric acid degradation via up-regulation of CitAco3. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68: 3419-26.

[27] Strazzer P, Spelt CE, Li S et al. Hyperacidification of citrus fruits by a vacuolar proton-pumping P-ATPase complex. Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 744.

[28] Butelli E, Licciardello C, Ramadugu C et al. Noemi controls production of flavonoid pigments and fruit acidity and illustrates the domestication routes of modern citrus varieties. Curr Biol. 2019; 29: 158.

[29] Dirlewanger E, Pronier V, Parvery C et al. Genetic linkage map of peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] using morphological and molecular markers . Theor Appl Genet. 1998; 97: 888-95.

[30] Etienne C, Rothan C, Moing A et al. Candidate genes and QTLs for sugar and organic acid content in peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] . Theor Appl Genet. 2002; 105: 145-59.

[31] Boudehri K, Bendahmane A, Cardinet G et al. Phenotypic and fine genetic characterization of the D locus controlling fruit acidity in peach. BMC Plant Biol. 2009; 9: 59-9.

[32] Eduardo I, López-Girona E, BatlIe I et al. Development of diagnostic markers for selection of the subacid trait in peach. Tree Genet Genomes. 2014; 10: 1695-709.

[33] Cao K, Li Y, Deng CH et al. Comparative population genomics identified genomic regions and candidate genes associated with fruit domestication traits in peach. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 1954-70.

[34] Zheng B, Zhao L, Jiang X et al. Assessment of organic acid accumulation and its related genes in peach. Food Chem. 2020; 334: 127567.

[35] Wang L, Jiang X, Zhao L et al. A candidate PpRPH gene of the D locus controlling fruit acidity in peach. Plant Mol Biol. 2020; 3: 1-12.

[36] Peng W, Ogutu L, Han. Functional analysis reveals the regulatory role of PpTST1 encoding tonoplast sugar transporter in sugar accumulation of peach fruit. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21: 1112.

[37] Martinoia E, Maeshima M, Neuhaus HE . Vacuolar transporters and their essential role in plant metabolism. J Exp Bot. 2007; 58: 83-102.

[38] Emmerlich V, Linka N, Reinhold T et al. The plant homolog to the human sodium/dicarboxylic cotransporter is the vacuolar malate carrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 11122-6.

[39] Kovermann P, Meyer S, Hörtensteiner S et al. The Arabidopsis vacuolar malate channel is a member of the ALMT family. Plant J. 2007; 52: 1169-80.

[40] Schumacher K, Krebs M . The V-ATPase: small cargo, large effects. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010; 13: 724-30.

[41] Barbier-Brygoo H, De Angeli A, Filleur S et al. Anion channels/transporters in plants: from molecular bases to regulatory networks. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011; 62: 25-51.

[42] Meyer S, Scholz-Starke J, De Angeli A et al. Malate transport by the vacuolar AtALMT6 channel in guard cells is subject to multiple regulation. Plant J. 2011; 67: 247-57.

[43] Ohshima K, Hatakeyama K, Nagashima T et al. Integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number identified potential cancer driver genes with amplification-dependent overexpression in 1,454 solid tumors. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 641.

[44] Ma B, Liao L, Zheng H et al. Genes encoding aluminum-activated malate transporter II and their association with fruit acidity in apple. Plant Genome. 2015; 8.

[45] Jie YE, Xin W, Tixu HU et al. An InDel in the promoter of Al-ACTIVATED MALATE TRANSPORTER9 selected during tomato domestication determines fruit malate contents and aluminum tolerance. Plant Cell. 2017; 29: 2249-68.

[46] Huang W, Hu B, Liu J et al. Identification and characterization of tonoplast sugar transporter (TST) gene family in cucumber. Hortic Plant J. 2020; 6: 145-57.

[47] Chen LQ, Cheung LS, Feng L et al. Transport of sugars. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015; 84: 865-94.

[48] Wormit A, Trentmann O, Feifer I et al. Molecular identification and physiological characterization of a novel monosaccharide transporter from Arabidopsis involved in vacuolar sugar transport. Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 3476-90.

[49] Schulz A, Beyhl D, Marten I et al. Proton-driven sucrose symport and antiport are provided by the vacuolar transporters SUC4 and TMT1/2. Plant J. 2011; 68: 129-36.

[50] Jung B, Ludewig F, Schulz A et al. Identification of the transporter responsible for sucrose accumulation in sugar beet taproots. Nat Plants. 2015; 1: 14001.

[51] Reuscher S et al. The sugar transporter inventory of tomato: genome-wide identification and expression analysis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014; 55: 1123-41.

[52] Zheng Q, Tang Z, Xu Q, Deng X . Isolation, phylogenetic relationship and expression profiling of sugar transporter genes in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) . Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult. 2014; 119: 609-24.

[53] Cheng R, Zhang H, Cheng YS, Wang YZ . In silico and expression analysis of the tonoplast monosaccharide transporter (TMT) gene family in Pyrus bretschneideri . J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2018; 93: 366-76.

[54] Cheng R, Cheng Y, Lü J et al. The gene PbTMT4 from pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) mediates vacuolar sugar transport and strongly affects sugar accumulation in fruit . Physiol Plant. 2018; 164: 307-19.

[55] Li J, Zheng D-m, Li L-t et al. Genome-wide function, evolutionary characterization and expression analysis of sugar transporter family genes in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd) . Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56: 1721-37.

[56] Hu B, Huang W, Dong L et al. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a sugar transporter gene (CsTST2) from cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) . Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2019; 33: 118-27.

[57] Ma Q, Sun MH, Lu J et al. Transcription factor AREB2 is involved in soluble sugar accumulation by activating sugar transporter and amylase genes. Plant Physiol. 2017; 174: 2348-62.

[58] Wei X, Liu F, Chen C et al. The Malus domestica sugar transporter gene family: identifications based on genome and expression profiling related to the accumulation of fruit sugars. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 569-9.

[59] Afoufabastien D, Medici A, Jeauffre J et al. The Vitis vinifera sugar transporter gene family: phylogenetic overview and macroarray expression profiling. BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10: 245-5.

[60] Cakir B, Giachino RR . VvTMT2 encodes a putative tonoplast monosaccharide transporter expressed during grape berry (Vitis vinifera cv. Sultanine) ripening . Plant Omics. 2012; 5: 576-83.

[61] Ren Y, Guo S, Zhang J et al. A tonoplast sugar transporter underlies a sugar accumulation QTL in watermelon. Plant Physiol. 2018; 176: 836-50.

[62] Cheng J, Wen S, Xiao S et al. Overexpression of the tonoplast sugar transporter CmTST2 in melon fruit increases sugar accumulation. J Exp Bot. 2018; 69: 511-23.

[63] Krzywińska E, Kulik A, Bucholc M et al. Protein phosphatase type 2C PP2CA together with ABI1 inhibits SnRK2.4 activity and regulates plant responses to salinity. Plant Signal Behav. 2016; 11: e1253647.

[64] Gao S, Song T, Han J et al. A calcium-dependent lipid binding protein, OsANN10, is a negative regulator of osmotic stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2020; 293: 110420.

[65] Huang CF, Yamaji N, Mitani N et al. A bacterial-type ABC transporter is involved in aluminum tolerance in rice. Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 655-67.

[66] Sun J, Jiang H, Xu Y et al. The CCCH-type zinc finger proteins AtSZF1 and AtSZF2 regulate salt stress responses in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Physiol. 2007; 48: 1148.

[67] Cao K, Zheng Z, Wang L et al. Comparative population genomics reveals the domestication history of the peach, Prunus persica, and human influences on perennial fruit crops. Genome Biol. 2014; 15: 415.

[68] Flores FB, Romojaro F, Latche A et al. Assay of a potential postharvest handling procedure for cantaloupe Charentais melon fruit with inhibited ethylene production. J Sci Food Agric. 2007; 87: 2034-9.

[69] Colaric M, Veberic R, Stampar F, Hudina M . Evaluation of peach and nectarine fruit quality and correlations between sensory and chemical attributes. J Sci Food Agric. 2005; 85: 2611-6.

[70] Murray MG, Thompson WF . Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980; 8: 432-4326.

[71] Verde I, Jenkins J, Dondini L et al. The peach v2.0 release: high-resolution linkage mapping and deep resequencing improve chromosome-scale assembly and contiguity. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18: 225-5.

[72] Li H, Durbin R . Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 1754-60.

[73] Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 2078-9.

[74] McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20: 1297-303.

[75] Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010; 42: 348-54.

[76] Bolger A, Lohse M, Usadel B . Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 2114-20.

[77] Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013; 14: 1-13.

[78] Li B, Dewey CN . RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12: 323.

[79] Takagi H, Abe A, Yoshida K et al. QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 2013; 74: 174-83.

[80] Verde I, Abbott AG, Scalabrin S et al. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution . Nat Genet. 2013; 45: 487-94.

[81] Liu H, Cao X, Liu X et al. UV-B irradiation differentially regulates terpene synthases and terpene content of peach. Plant Cell Environ. 2017; 40: 2261-75.

[82] Stagljar I, Korostensky C, Johnsson N, te Heesen S . A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95: 5187-92.

[83] Thaminy S, Auerbach D, Arnoldo A, Stagljar I . Identification of novel ErbB3-interacting factors using the split-ubiquitin membrane yeast two-hybrid system. Genome Res. 2003; 13: 1744-53.

[84] Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 2156-8.

[85] Li Y, Cao K, Li N et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into peach local adaptation and responses to climate change. Genome Res. 2021; 31: 592-606.

[86] Yuan H, Owsiany K, Sheeja TE et al. A single amino acid substitution in an ORANGE protein promotes carotenoid overaccumulation in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. 2015; 169: 421-31.