The callus formation capacity of strawberry leaf explants is modulated by DNA methylation

Decai Liu , Qin Mu , Xianyang Li , Sheng Xu , Yi Li , Tingting Gu

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhab073

PDF (1938KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhab073 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab073
Article
research-article
The callus formation capacity of strawberry leaf explants is modulated by DNA methylation
Author information +
History +
PDF (1938KB)

Abstract

Shoot regeneration from leaf tissue requires the de-differentiation of cells from a highly differentiated state into an actively dividing state, but it remains unclear how this physiological transition occurs and is regulated, especially at the epigenetic level. Here, we characterized the DNA methylome represented by 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in leaf and callus tissue derived from leaf explants of woodland strawberry, Fragaria vesca. We detected an overall increase in DNA methylation and distinct 5mC enrichment patterns in the CG, CHG, and CHH sequence contexts in genes and transposable elements. Our analyses revealed an intricate relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression level in leaves or leaf-derived callus. However, when considering the genes involved in callus formation and shoot regeneration, e.g. FvePLT3/7, FveWIND3, FveWIND4, FveLOG4 and FveIAA14, their dynamic transcription levels were associated with differentially methylated regions located in the promoters or gene bodies, indicating a regulatory role of DNA methylation in the transcriptional regulation of pluripotency acquisition in strawberry. Furthermore, application of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine (5-Aza) hampered both callus formation and shoot regeneration from the leaf explants. We further showed that 5-Aza downregulated the expression of genes involved in cell wall integrity, such as expansin, pectin lyase, and pectin methylesterase genes, suggesting an essential role of cell wall metabolism during callus formation. This study reveals the contribution of DNA methylation to callus formation capacity and will provide a basis for developing a strategy to improve shoot regeneration for basic and applied research applications.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Decai Liu, Qin Mu, Xianyang Li, Sheng Xu, Yi Li, Tingting Gu. The callus formation capacity of strawberry leaf explants is modulated by DNA methylation. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhab073 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhab073

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Motte H, Vereecke D, Geelen D et al. The molecular path to in vitro shoot regeneration. Biotechnol Adv. 2014; 32: 107-21.

[2]

Ikeuchi M, Ogawa Y, Iwase A et al. Plant regeneration: cellular origins and molecular mechanisms. Development. 2016; 143: 1442-51.

[3]

Wei X, Gou X, Yuan T et al. A highly efficient in vitro plant regeneration system and agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Plumbago zeylanica. Plant Cell Rep. 2006; 25: 513-21.

[4]

Miguel S, Michel C, Biteau F et al. In vitro plant regeneration and agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of a carnivorous plant. Nepenthes mirabilis Scientific reports. 2020; 10: 17482.

[5]

Fan MZ, Xu CY, Xu K et al. LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN transcription factors direct callus formation in Arabidopsis regeneration. Cell Res. 2012; 22: 1169-80.

[6]

Berckmans B, Vassileva V, SPC S et al. Auxin-dependent cell cycle reactivation through transcriptional regulation of Arabidopsis E2Fa by lateral organ boundary proteins. Plant Cell. 2011; 23: 3671-83.

[7]

Xu C, Cao H, Zhang Q et al. Control of auxin-induced callus formation by bZIP59-LBD complex in Arabidopsis regeneration. Nat Plants. 2018; 4: 108-15.

[8]

Ikeuchi M, Sugimoto K, Iwase A . Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 3159-73.

[9]

Iwase A, Mitsuda N, Koyama T et al. The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2011; 21: 508-14.

[10]

Iwase A, Ohme-Takagi M, Sugimoto K . WIND1: a key molecular switch for plant cell dedifferentiation. Plant Signal Behav. 2011; 6: 1943-5.

[11]

Iwase A, Harashima H, Ikeuchi M et al. WIND1 promotes shoot regeneration through transcriptional activation of ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2017; 29: 54-69.

[12]

Sun RZ, Zuo EH, Qi JF et al. A role of age-dependent DNA methylation reprogramming in regulating the regeneration capacity of Boea hygrometrica leaves. Functional & integrative genomics. 2020; 20: 133-49.

[13]

Williams L, Zhao J, Morozova N et al. Chromatin reorganization accompanying cellular dedifferentiation is associated with modifications of histone H3, redistribution of HP1, and activation of E2F-target genes. Dev Dynam. 2003; 228: 113-20.

[14]

Tessadori F, Chupeau MC, Chupeau Y et al. Large-scale dissociation and sequential reassembly of pericentric heterochromatin in dedifferentiated Arabidopsis cells. J Cell Sci. 2007; 120: 1200-8.

[15]

Cokus SJ, Feng S, Zhang X et al. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature. 2008; 452: 215-9.

[16]

Morrish FM, Vasil IK . DNA methylation and embryogenic competence in leaves and callus of Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.). Plant Physiol. 1989; 90: 37-40.

[17]

Shim S, Lee HG, Park OS et al. Dynamic changes in DNA methylation occur in TE regions and affect cell proliferation during leaf-to-callus transition in Arabidopsis. Epigenetics. 2021; 1-18.

[18]

Zakrzewski F, Schmidt M. Van Lijsebettens, M. & Schmidt, T . DNA methylation of retrotransposons, DNA transposons and genes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology. 2017; 90: 1156-75.

[19]

Miguel C, Marum L . An epigenetic view of plant cells cultured in vitro: somaclonal variation and beyond. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62: 3713-25.

[20]

Jiang F, Xu X, Liu H et al. DRM1 and DRM2 are involved in Arabidopsis callus formation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 2015; 123: 221-8.

[21]

Li W, Liu H, Cheng ZJ et al. DNA methylation and histone modifications regulate De novo shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis by modulating WUSCHEL expression and auxin signaling. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7.

[22]

Liu H, Zhang H, Dong YX et al. DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE1-mediated shoot regeneration is regulated by cytokinin-induced cell cycle in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2018; 217: 219-32.

[23]

Grafi G, Ben-Meir H, Avivi Y et al. Histone methylation controls telomerase-independent telomere lengthening in cells undergoing dedifferentiation. Dev Biol. 2007; 306: 838-46.

[24]

Law JA, Jacobsen SE . Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11: 204-20.

[25]

Matzke MA, Mosher RA . RNA-directed DNA methylation: an epigenetic pathway of increasing complexity. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15: 394-408.

[26]

Zhang H, Zhu JK . Active DNA demethylation in plants and animals. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2012; 77: 161-73.

[27]

Betekhtin A, Rojek M, Nowak K et al. Cell Wall epitopes and Endoploidy as reporters of embryogenic potential in Brachypodium Distachyon callus culture. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19.

[28]

Vining K, Pomraning KR, Wilhelm LJ et al. Methylome reorganization during in vitro dedifferentiation and regeneration of Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biol. 2013; 13: 92.

[29]

Liu H, Ma L, Yang X et al. Integrative analysis of DNA methylation, mRNAs, and small RNAs during maize embryo dedifferentiation. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17: 105.

[30]

Lanciano S, Carpentier MC, Llauro C et al. Sequencing the extrachromosomal circular mobilome reveals retrotransposon activity in plants. PLoS Genet. 2017; 13: e1006630.

[31]

Lee K, Seo PJ . Dynamic epigenetic changes during plant regeneration. Trends Plant Sci. 2018; 23: 235-47.

[32]

Zhang H, Lang Z, Zhu JK . Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018; 19: 489-506.

[33]

Bewick AJ, Schmitz RJ . Gene body DNA methylation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017; 36: 103-10.

[34]

Harris CJ, Scheibe M, Wongpalee SP et al. A DNA methylation reader complex that enhances gene transcription. Science. 2018; 362: 1182-6.

[35]

Rymen B, Kawamura A, Lambolez A et al. Histone acetylation orchestrates wound-induced transcriptional activation and cellular reprogramming in Arabidopsis. Communications biology. 2019; 2: 404.

[36]

Christman JK . 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 5483-95.

[37]

Sugimoto K, Jiao Y, Meyerowitz EM . Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Dev Cell. 2010; 18: 463-71.

[38]

Wachsman G, Zhang J, Moreno-Risueno MA et al. Cell wall remodeling and vesicle trafficking mediate the root clock in Arabidopsis. Science. 2020; 370: 819-23.

[39]

Liu Y, Chaturvedi P, Fu J et al. Induction and quantitative proteomic analysis of cell dedifferentiation during callus formation of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.Spp. baijianlian). J Proteome. 2016; 131: 61-70.

[40]

Brown PTH, Yoneyama K, Lorz H . An investigation into the role of 5-Azacytidine in tissue-culture. Theor Appl Genet. 1989; 78: 321-8.

[41]

Munsamy A, Rutherford RS, Snyman SJ et al. 5-Azacytidine as a tool to induce somaclonal variants with useful traits in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2013; 7: 489-502.

[42]

Betekhtin A, Milewska-Hendel A, Chajec L et al. 5-Azacitidine induces cell death in a tissue culture of Brachypodium distachyon. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19.

[43]

Zhao Q, Du Y, Wang H et al. 5-Azacytidine promotes shoot regeneration during agrobacterium-mediated soybean transformation. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019; 141: 40-50.

[44]

Santos D, Fevereiro P . Loss of DNA methylation affects somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2002; 70: 155-61.

[45]

Krueger F, Andrews SR . Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 1571-2.

[46]

Park Y, Wu H . Differential methylation analysis for BS-seq data under general experimental design. Bioinformatics. 2016; 32: 1446-53.

[47]

Li RQ, Li YR, Kristiansen K et al. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24: 713-4.

[48]

Kim D, Landmead B, Salzberg SL . HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015; 12: 357-U121.

[49]

Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK . edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 139-40.

PDF (1938KB)

31

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/