Comparative transcriptomic analysis on compatible/incompatible grafts in Citrus

Wen He , Rui Xie , Yan Wang , Qing Chen , Hao Wang , Shaofeng Yang , Ya Luo , Yong Zhang , Haoru Tang , Frederick G. Gmitter , Xiaorong Wang

Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : uhab072

PDF (1367KB)
Horticulture Research ›› 2022, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :uhab072 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab072
Article
research-article
Comparative transcriptomic analysis on compatible/incompatible grafts in Citrus
Author information +
History +
PDF (1367KB)

Abstract

Grafting is a useful cultivation technology to resist abiotic and biotic stresses and is an integral part of citrus production. However, some widely utilized rootstocks may still exhibit graft incompatibility in the orchard. ‘Hongmian miyou’ (Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merrill) is mutated from ‘Guanxi miyou’, but these two scions showed different compatibility with available Poncirus trifoliata rootstock. Foliage etiolation is an observed symptom of graft incompatibility, but its mechanism remains poorly understood. This study is the first to investigate the morphological, physiological, and anatomical differences between compatible and incompatible grafts, and perform transcriptome profiling at crucial stages of the foliage etiolation process. Based on comprehensive analyses, hormonal balance was disordered, and two rate-limiting genes, NCED3 ( 9- cis -epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3) and NCED5 , being responsible for ABA (abscisic acid) accumulation, were highlighted. Further correlation analysis indicated that IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) and ABA were the most likely inducers of the expression of stress-related genes. In addition, excessive starch accumulation was observed in the lamina and midribs of leaves of incompatible grafts. These results provide a new insight into the role of hormonal balance and ABA biosynthesis genes in regulating and contributing to graft incompatibility, and will further define and deploy candidate genes to explore the mechanisms underlying citrus rootstock–scion interactions.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wen He, Rui Xie, Yan Wang, Qing Chen, Hao Wang, Shaofeng Yang, Ya Luo, Yong Zhang, Haoru Tang, Frederick G. Gmitter, Xiaorong Wang. Comparative transcriptomic analysis on compatible/incompatible grafts in Citrus. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9 (1) : uhab072 DOI:10.1093/hr/uhab072

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Melnyk CW, Meyerowitz EM . Plant grafting. Curr Biol. 2015; 25: 183-8.

[2]

Warschefsky EJ, Klein LL, Frank MH et al. Rootstocks: diversity, domestication, and impacts on shoot phenotypes. Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 418-37.

[3]

Li H, Testerink C, Zhang Y . How roots and shoots communicate through stressful times. Trends Plant Sci. 2021; 26: 940-52.

[4]

Morales J, Bermejo A, Navarro P et al. Rootstock effect on fruit quality, anthocyanins, sugars, hydroxycinnamic acids and flavanones content during the harvest of blood oranges ’Moro’ and ’Tarocco Rosso’ grown in Spain. Food Chem. 2021; 342: 128305.

[5]

Fadel AL, Stuchi ES, da Silva SR et al. Compatibility and horticultural performance of Pera sweet orange clones grafted to Swingle citrumelo rootstock. Bragantia. 2019; 78: 564-72.

[6]

Huang Y, Xu Y, Jiang X et al. Genome of a citrus rootstock and global DNA demethylation caused by heterografting. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 69.

[7]

Peng Z, Bredeson JV, Wu GA et al. A chromosome-scale reference genome of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) provides insights into disease resistance, cold tolerance and genome evolution in Citrus. Plant J. 2020; 104: 1215-32.

[8]

Bevington KB . Development of union abnormalities in grafts between lemon (Citrus limon) and Poncirus trifoliata. Aust J Agric Res. 1976; 27: 661.

[9]

He W, Wang Y, Chen Q et al. Dissection of the mechanism for compatible and incompatible graft combinations of Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck (’Hongmian Miyou’). Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: 505.

[10]

Rasool A, Mansoor S, Bhat KM et al. Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 590847.

[11]

Melnyk CW . Plant grafting: insights into tissue regeneration. Regeneration. 2017; 4: 3-14.

[12]

Gaut BS, Miller AJ, Seymour DK . Living with two genomes: grafting and its implications for plant genome-to-genome interactions, phenotypic variation, and evolution. Annu Rev Genet. 2019; 53: 195-215.

[13]

Kehr J, Kragler F . Long distance RNA movement. New Phytol. 2018; 218: 29-40.

[14]

Kondhare KR, Patil NS, Banerjee AK, Sunkar R . A historical overview of long-distance signalling in plants. J Exp Bot. 2021; 72: 4218-36.

[15]

Tsutsui H, Notaguchi M . The use of grafting to study systemic signaling in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017; 58: 1291-301.

[16]

Zheng X, Zhao Y, Shan D et al. MdWRKY9 overexpression confers intensive dwarfing in the M26 rootstock of apple by directly inhibiting brassinosteroid synthetase MdDWF4 expression. New Phytol. 2018; 217: 1086-98.

[17]

Zhao D, Song G . Rootstock-to-scion transfer of transgene-derived small interfering RNAs and their effect on virus resistance in nontransgenic sweet cherry. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014; 12: 1319-28.

[18]

Duan X, Zhang W, Huang J et al. PbWoxT1 mRNA from pear (Pyrus betulaefolia) undergoes long-distance transport assisted by a polypyrimidine tract binding protein. New Phytol. 2016; 210: 511-24.

[19]

Wu GA, Terol J, Ibanez V et al. Genomics of the origin and evolution of Citrus. Nature. 2018; 554: 311-6.

[20]

He W, Yan W, Qing C et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of etiolated seedling of Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck. cv. ’Hongmian miyou’ grafted to Poncirus trifoliata and expression of CgSGR. Acta Bot Bor-Occid Sci. 2018; 38: 808-15 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[21]

Gong YQ, YouHeng Q, Xiaoke F et al. Graft compatibility evaluation of different rootstock-scion combinations of honey pomelo at seedling stage. J Trop Subtrop Bot. 2016; 24: 287-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[22]

Langfelder P, Horvath S . WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9: 559.

[23]

Deng HH, Achor D, Exteberria E et al. Phloem regeneration is a mechanism for Huanglongbing-tolerance of ‘Bearss’ lemon and ‘LB8-9’ Sugar Belle ® mandarin. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 277.

[24]

Cookson SJ, Moreno MJC, Hevin C et al. Heterografting with nonself rootstocks induces genes involved in stress responses at the graft interface when compared with autografted controls. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 2473-81.

[25]

Zombardo A, Crosatti C, Bagnaresi P et al. Transcriptomic and biochemical investigations support the role of rootstock-scion interaction in grapevine berry quality. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21: 468.

[26]

Foster TM, Celton J, Chagné D et al. Two quantitative trait loci, Dw1 and Dw2, are primarily responsible for rootstock-induced dwarfing in apple. Hortic Res. 2015; 2: 15001.

[27]

Foster TM, McAtee PA, Waite CN et al. Apple dwarfing rootstocks exhibit an imbalance in carbohydrate allocation and reduced cell growth and metabolism. Hortic Res. 2017; 4: 17009.

[28]

Cui F, Brosché M, Sipari N et al. Regulation of ABA dependent wound induced spreading cell death by MYB108. New Phytol. 2013; 200: 634-40.

[29]

Höll J, Vannozzi A, Czemmel S et al. The R2R3-MYB transcription factors MYB14 and MYB15 regulate stilbene biosynthesis in Vitis vinifera. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 4135-49.

[30]

Shoji T, Yuan L . ERF gene clusters: working together to regulate metabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 2021; 26: 23-32.

[31]

Nanda AK, Melnyk CW, Sveriges L . The role of plant hormones during grafting. J Plant Res. 2018; 131: 49-58.

[32]

Kumar RS, Gao LX, Yuan HW et al. Auxin enhances grafting success in Carya cathayensis (Chinese hickory). Planta. 2018; 247: 761-72.

[33]

Korver RA, Koevoets IT, Testerink C . Out of shape during stress: a key role for auxin. Trends Plant Sci. 2018; 23: 783-93.

[34]

Zhai L, Wang X, Tang D et al. Molecular and physiological characterization of the effects of auxin-enriched rootstock on grafting. Hortic Res. 2021; 8: 74.

[35]

Ranocha P, Denancé N, Vanholme R et al. Walls are thin 1 (WAT1), an Arabidopsis homolog of Medicago truncatula NODULIN21, is a tonoplast-localized protein required for secondary wall formation in fibers. Plant J. 2010; 63: 469-83.

[36]

Lee DS, Kim BK, Kwon SJ et al. Arabidopsis GDSL lipase 2 plays a role in pathogen defense via negative regulation of auxin signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 379: 1038-42.

[37]

Bak S, Tax FE, Feldmann KA et al. CYP83B1, a cytochrome P450 at the metabolic branch point in auxin and indole glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2001; 13: 101-11.

[38]

Xu D, Yang Y, Tao S et al. Identification and expression analysis of auxin-responsive GH3 family genes in Chinese hickory (Carya cathayensis) during grafting. Mol Biol Rep. 2020; 47: 4495-506.

[39]

Grunewald W, Vanholme B, Pauwels L et al. Expression of the Arabidopsis jasmonate signalling repressor JAZ1/TIFY10A is stimulated by auxin. EMBO Rep. 2009; 10: 923-8.

[40]

Jiang Y, Liang G, Yang S, Yu D . Arabidopsis WRKY57 functions as a node of convergence for jasmonic acid- and auxin-mediated signaling in jasmonic acid-induced leaf senescence. Plant Cell. 2014; 26: 230-45.

[41]

Frey A, Effroy D, Lefebvre V et al. Epoxycarotenoid cleavage by NCED5 fine-tunes ABA accumulation and affects seed dormancy and drought tolerance with other NCED family members. Plant J. 2012; 70: 501-12.

[42]

Hao G, Zhang X, Wang Y et al. Nucleotide variation in the NCED3 region of Arabidopsis thaliana and its association study with abscisic acid content under drought stress. J Integr Plant Biol. 2009; 51: 175-83.

[43]

Liu W, Ye Q, Jin X et al. A spontaneous bud mutant that causes lycopene and β-carotene accumulation in the juice sacs of the parental Guanxi pummelo fruits (Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck). Sci Hortic. 2016; 198: 379-84.

[44]

Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu F et al. Investigation of chromoplast ultrastructure and tissue-specific accumulation of carotenoids in citrus flesh. Sci Hortic. 2019; 256: 108547.

[45]

Wang D, Li S, Le Wei ZL et al. Transcriptome analysis identifies key genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis in the flesh of red pummelo (Citrus maxima). Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2020; 34: 614-22.

[46]

Zhang M, Yu Q, Liu Z et al. UBX domain-containing proteins are involved in lipid homeostasis and stress responses in Pichia pastoris. Int J Biochem Cell B. 2017; 90: 136-44.

[47]

Phan TD, Bo W, West G et al. Silencing of the major salt-dependent isoform of pectinesterase in tomato alters fruit softening. Plant Physiol. 2007; 144: 1960-7.

[48]

Cao H, Wang J, Dong X et al. Carotenoid accumulation affects redox status, starch metabolism, and flavonoid/anthocyanin accumulation in citrus. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15: 27.

[49]

Guo S, Sun H, Tian J et al. Grafting delays watermelon fruit ripening by altering gene expression of ABA centric phytohormone signaling. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12: 624319.

[50]

Kuromori T, Seo M, Shinozaki K . ABA transport and plant water stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2018; 23: 513-22.

[51]

Li W, de Ollas C, Dodd IC . Long-distance ABA transport can mediate distal tissue responses by affecting local ABA concentrations. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018; 60: 16-33.

[52]

Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013; 14: R36.

[53]

Wang X, Xu Y, Zhang S et al. Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nat Genet. 2017; 49: 765-72.

[54]

Li B, Dewey CN . RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12: 323.

[55]

Kang C, Darwish O, Geretz A et al. Genome-scale transcriptomic insights into early-stage fruit development in woodland strawberry Fragaria vesca. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 1960-78.

[56]

Cheng S, Chen P, Su Z et al. High-resolution temporal dynamic transcriptome landscape reveals a GhCAL-mediated flowering regulatory pathway in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 19: 153-66.

[57]

Ernst J, Bar-Joseph Z . STEM: a tool for the analysis of short time series gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7: 191.

[58]

Müllner D . Fastcluster: fast hierarchical, agglomerative clustering routines for R and python. J Stat Softw. 2013; 53: 1-18.

PDF (1367KB)

69

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/