Multi-omics data integration provides insights into the post-harvest biology of a long shelf-life tomato landrace

Abstract

In this study we investigated the transcriptome and epigenome dynamics of the tomato fruit during post-harvest in a landrace belonging to a group of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) collectively known as “Piennolo del Vesuvio”, all characterized by a long shelf- life. Expression of protein-coding genes and microRNAs as well as DNA methylation patterns and histone modifications were analysed in distinct post-harvest phases. Multi-omics data integration contributed to the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying processes leading to long shelf-life. We unveiled global changes in transcriptome and epigenome. DNA methylation increased and the repressive histone mark H3K27me3 was lost as the fruit progressed from red ripe to 150 days post-harvest. Thousands of genes were differentially expressed, about half of which were potentially epi-regulated as they were engaged in at least one epi-mark change in addition to being microRNA targets in ∼5% of cases. Down-regulation of the ripening regulator MADS-RIN and of genes involved in ethylene response and cell wall degradation was consistent with the delayed fruit softening. Large-scale epigenome reprogramming that occurred in the fruit during post-harvest likely contributed to delayed fruit senescence.

References

[1] Giovannoni JJ, Nguyen C, Ampofo B et al. The epigenome and transcriptional dynamics of fruit ripening. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2017; 68: 61-84.

[2] Gapper NE, McQuinn RP, Giovannoni JJ . Molecular and genetic regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Mol Biol. 2013; 82: 575-91.

[3] Zhang B et al. Chilling-induced tomato flavor loss is associated with altered latile synthesis and transient changes in DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113: 12580-5.

[4] Conesa MÀ, Fullana-Pericàs M, Granell A, Galmés J . Mediterranean long shelf-life landraces: an untapped genetic resource for tomato improvement. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 10: 1651.

[5] Casals J et al. Genetic basis of long shelf life and variability into Penjar tomato. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2012; 59: 219-29.

[6] Tranchida-Lombardo V et al. Whole-genome re-sequencing of two Italian tomato landraces reveals sequence variations in genes associated with stress tolerance, fruit quality and long shelf-life traits. DNA Res. 2018; 25: 149-60.

[7] Shinozaki Y et al. High-resolution spatiotemporal transcriptome mapping of tomato fruit development and ripening. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 364.

[8] Tang D, Gallusci P, Lang Z . Fruit development and epigenetic modifications. N. Phytologist. 2020; 228: 839-44.

[9] Zhong SL et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nature Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 154-9.

[10] Aiese CR et al. Genome-wide analysis of histone modifiers in tomato: gaining an insight into their developmental roles. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14: 57.

[11] Lü P et al. Genome encode analyses reveal the basis of convergent evolution of fleshy fruit ripening. Nat Plants. 2018; 4: 784-91.

[12] Ma L et al. Noncoding RNAs: functional regulatory factors in tomato fruit ripening. Theor Appl Genet. 2020; 133: 1753-62.

[13] Gao C et al. MicroRNA profiling analysis throughout tomato fruit development and ripening reveals potential regulatory role of RIN on microRNAs accumulation. Plant Biotech J. 2015; 13: 370-82.

[14] Chung MY et al. Ectopic expression of miRNA172 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) reveals novel function in fruit development through regulation of an AP2 transcription factor . BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 283.

[15] Manzo N et al. Comparative chemical compositions of fresh and stored Vesuvian PDO "Pomodorino Del Piennolo" tomato and the Ciliegino variety. Molecules. 2018; 23: 2871.

[16] Ito Y et al. Allelic Mutations in the Ripening-Inhibitor Locus Generate Extensive Variation in Tomato Ripening. Plant Physiol. 2020; 183: 80-95.

[17] Kumar R, Tamboli V, Sharma R, Sreelakshmi Y . NAC-NOR mutations in tomato Penjar accessions attenuate multiple metabolic processes and prolong the fruit shelf life. Food Chem. 2018; 259: 234-44.

[18] Vrebalov J et al. A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (rin) locus. Science. 2002; 296: 343-6.

[19] Fujisawa M et al. Direct targets of the tomato-ripening regulator RIN identified by transcriptome and chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses. Planta. 2012; 235: 1107-22.

[20] Fujisawa M, Nakano T, Shima Y, Ito Y . A large-scale identification of direct targets of the tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR reveals the regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Cell. 2013; 25: 371-86.

[21] Chen P et al. Interactions of ABA signaling core components (SlPYLs, SlPP2Cs, and SlSnRK2s) in tomato (solanum lycopersicon) . J Plant Physiol. 2016; 205: 67-74.

[22] Ito Y et al. Re-evaluation of the rin mutation and the role of RIN in the induction of tomato ripening. Nat Plants. 2017; 3: 866-74.

[23] Li S et al. Roles of RIN and ethylene in tomato fruit ripening and ripening-associated traits. N Phytologist. 2020; 226: 460-75.

[24] Uluisik S et al. Genetic improvement of tomato by targeted control of fruit softening. Nature Biotechnol. 2016; 34: 950-2.

[25] León-García E et al. Increased Postharvest Life of TomLox B Silenced Mutants of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Var. TA234 . Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2017; 72: 380-7.

[26] Li Z et al. Histone demethylase SlJMJ6 promotes fruit ripening by removing H3K27 methylation of ripening-related genes in tomato. N Phytologist. 2020; 227: 1138-56.

[27] Jia H et al. Abscisic acid and sucrose regulate tomato and strawberry fruit ripening through the abscisic acid-stress-ripening transcription factor. Plant Biotech J. 2016; 14: 2045-65.

[28] Esposito S et al. ddRAD sequencing-based genotyping for population structure analysis in cultivated tomato provides new insights into the genomic diversity of Mediterranean ‘da serbo’ type long shelf-life germplasm. Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 134.

[29] Li S et al. The RIN-MC fusion of MADS-box transcription factors has transcriptional activity and modulates expression of many ripening genes. Plant Physiol. 2018; 176: 891-909.

[30] Liu M et al. Comprehensive profiling of ethylene response factor expression identifies ripening-associated ERF genes and their link to key regulators of fruit ripening in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2016; 170: 1732-44.

[31] Tucker G et al. Ethylene and fruit softening. Food Qual Saf. 2017; 1: 253-67.

[32] Mou W et al. Comprehensive analysis of ABA effects on ethylene biosynthesis and signaling during tomato fruit ripening. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0154072.

[33] Sun Y et al. Suppressing ABA uridine diphosphate glucosyltransferase (SlUGT75C1) alters fruit ripening and the stress response in tomato. Plant J. 2017; 91: 574-89.

[34] Diretto G et al. Manipulation of β-carotene levels in tomato fruits results in increased ABA content and extended shelf life. Plant Biotech. J. 2020; 18: 1185-99.

[35] Kai W et al. PYL9 is involved in the regulation of ABA signaling during tomato fruit ripening. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70: 6305-19.

[36] Zuo J et al. Sculpting the maturation, softening and ethylene pathway: the influences of microRNAs on tomato fruits. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13: 7.

[37] Karlova R et al. Identification of microRNA targets in tomato fruit development using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64: 1863-78.

[38] Liu RE et al. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112: 10804-9.

[39] Lang ZB et al. Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114: E4511-9.

[40] Derkacheva M et al. Arabidopsis MSI1 connects LHP1 to PRC2 complex. EMBO J. 2013; 32: 2073-85.

[41] Liu D-D et al. Polycomb-group protein SlMSI1 represses the expression of fruit ripening genes to prolong shelf life in tomato. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31806.

[42] Abuqamar S, Luo H, Laluk K et al. Crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses in tomato is mediated by the AIM1 transcription factor. Plant J. 2009; 58: 347-60.

[43] Khan GA et al. The transcription and export complex THO/TREX contributes to transcription termination in plants. PLoS Genet. 2020; 16: e1008732.

[44] Pan H, Liu S, Tang D . HPR1, a component of the THO/TREX complex, plays an important role in disease resistance and senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012; 69: 831-43.

[45] Xu C, Zhou X, Wen CK . HYPER RECOMBINATION1 of the THO/TREX complex plays a role in controlling transcription of the REVERSION-TO-ETHYLENE SENSITIVITY1 gene in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11: e1004956.

[46] López Camelo AF, Gómez PA . Comparison of color indexes for tomato ripening. Hort Brasil. 2004; 22: 534-7.

[47] Nguyen CV et al. Tomato GOLDEN2-LIKE transcription factors reveal molecular gradients that function during fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell. 2014; 26: 585-601.

[48] Di Matteo A et al. Identification of candidate genes for phenolics accumulation in tomato fruit. Plant Sci. 2013; 205-206: 87-96.

[49] Lister R et al. Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2008; 133: 523-36.

[50] Martel C, Vrebalov J, Tafelmeyer P, Giovannoni JJ . The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 2011; 157: 1568-79.