Cytokinins are involved in regulation of tomato pericarp thickness and fruit size

Abstract

Although cytokinins (CKs) regulate fruit development, no direct genetic evidence supports the role of endogenous CKs in pericarp growth or development or fruit size. Here, we report that the reduction in levels of endogenous active CKs via overexpression of the CK-inactivating enzyme gene AtCKX2 specifically in fruit tissues resulted in reduced pericarp thickness and smaller fruit size compared with wild-type control fruits. Pericarp thickness and single fruit weight in transgenic plants were significantly reduced. Analysis of paraffin sections showed that the reduced pericarp thickness was due largely to a decreased number of cells, and thus decreased cell division. Transcriptome profiling showed that the expression of cell division- and expansion-related genes was reduced in AtCKX2-overexpressing fruits. In addition, the expression of auxin-signaling and gibberellin-biosynthetic genes was repressed, whereas that of gibberellin-inactivating genes was enhanced, in AtCKX2-overexpressing fruits. These results demonstrate that endogenous CKs regulate pericarp cell division and subsequently fruit size. They also suggest that CKs interact with auxin and gibberellins in regulating tomato pericarp thickness and fruit size.

References

[1] Li N, Huang B, Tang N et al. The MADS-box gene SlMBP21 regulates sepal size mediated by ethylene and auxin in tomato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017; 58: 2241-56.

[2] Cheniclet C, Rong WY, Causse M et al. Cell expansion and endoreduplication show a large genetic variability in pericarp and contribute strongly to tomato fruit growth. Plant Physiol. 2005; 139: 1984-94.

[3] Matsuo S, Kikuchi K, Fukuda M et al. Roles and regulation of cytokinins in tomato fruit development. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 5569-79.

[4] Ding J, Chen B, Xia X et al. Cytokinin-induced parthenocarpic fruit development in tomato is partly dependent on enhanced gibberellin and auxin biosynthesis. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e70080.

[5] Kieber JJ, Schaller GE . Cytokinins. Arabidopsis Book. 2014; 12: e0168.

[6] Ha S, Vankova R, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K et al. Cytokinins: metabolism and function in plant adaptation to environmental stresses. Trends Plant Sci. 2012; 17: 172-9.

[7] Werner T, Köllmer I, Bartrina I et al. New insights into the biology of cytokinin degradation. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006; 8: 371-81.

[8] Kieber JJ, Schaller GE . Cytokinin signaling in plant development. Development 2018; 145: dev149344.

[9] Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M et al. Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98: 10487-92.

[10] Werner T, Motyka V, Laucou V et al. Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem activity. Plant Cell. 2003; 15: 2532-50.

[11] Nieminen K, Immanen J, Laxell M et al. Cytokinin signaling regulates cambial development in poplar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105: 20032-7.

[12] Li W, Zhai L, Strauss SH et al. Transgenic reduction of cytokinin levels in roots inhibits root-sprouting in Populus. Plant Physiol. 2019; 180: 1788-92.

[13] Žižková E, Dobrev PI, Muhovski Y et al. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) SlIPT3 and SlIPT4 isopentenyltransferases mediate salt stress response in tomato. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15: 85.

[14] Zhang Y, Li Z, Tu Y et al. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) SlIPT4, encoding an isopentenyltransferase, is involved in leaf senescence and lycopene biosynthesis during fruit ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18: 107.

[15] Chen S, Wang X, Zhang L et al. Identification and characterization of tomato gibberellin 2-oxidases (GA2oxs) and effects of fruit-specific SlGA2ox1 overexpression on fruit and seed growth and development. Hortic Res. 2016; 3: 16059.

[16] Santino CG, Stanford GL, Conner TW . Developmental and transgenic analysis of two tomato fruit enhanced genes. Plant Mol Biol. 1997; 33: 405-16.

[17] Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhang J et al. Decreased number of locules and pericarp cell layers underlie smaller and ovoid fruit in tomato smaller fruit (sf) mutant. Botany. 2018; 96: 883-95.

[18] Pilkington S, Montefiori M, Galer AL et al. Endogenous cytokinin in developing kiwifruit is implicated in maintaining fruit flesh chlorophyll levels. Ann Bot. 2013; 112: 57-68.

[19] Jin SH, Ma XM, Kojima M et al. Overexpression of glucosyltransferase UGT85A1 influences trans-zeatin homeostasis and trans-zeatin responses likely through O-glucosylation. Planta. 2013; 237: 991-9.

[20] Bhargava A, Clabaugh I, To JP et al. Identification of cytokinin-responsive genes using microarray meta-analysis and RNA-Seq in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013; 162: 272-94.

[21] Kumar R, Khurana A, Sharma AK . Role of plant hormones and their interplay in development and ripening of fleshy fruits. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 4561-75.

[22] Li W, Fang C, Krishnan S et al. Elevated auxin and reduced cytokinin contents in rootstocks improve their performance and grafting success. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15: 1556-65.

[23] Nehnevajova E, Ramireddy E, Stolz A et al. Root enhancement in cytokinin-deficient oilseed rape causes leaf mineral enrichment, increases the chlorophyll concentration under nutrient limitation and enhances the phytoremediation capacity. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 83.

[24] Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S et al. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science. 2005; 309: 741-5.

[25] Jameson P, Song J . Cytokinin: a key driver of seed yield. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 593-606.

[26] Burr CA, Sun J, Yamburenko MV et al. The HK5 and HK6 cytokinin receptors mediate diverse developmental pathways in rice. Development. 2020; 147: dev191734.

[27] Tao Y, Miao J, Wang J et al. RGG1, involved in the cytokinin regulatory pathway, controls grain size in rice. Rice (NY). 2020; 13: 76.

[28] Fahima A, Levinkron S, Maytal Y et al. Cytokinin treatment modifies litchi fruit pericarp anatomy leading to reduced susceptibility to post-harvest pericarp browning. Plant Sci. 2019; 283: 41-50.

[29] Tanksley SD . The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell. 2004; 16: S181-9.

[30] Riou-Khamlichi C, Huntley R, Jacqmard A et al. Cytokinin activation of Arabidopsis cell division through a D-type cyclin. Science. 1999; 283: 1541-4.

[31] Schaller G, Street I, Kieber J . Cytokinin and the cell cycle. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014; 21: 7-15.

[32] Thompson D, Davies W, Ho L . Regulation of tomato fruit growth by epidermal cell wall enzymes. Plant Cell Environ. 1998; 21: 589-99.

[33] Bosch M, Cheung AY, Hepler PK . Pectin methylesterase, a regulator of pollen tube growth. Plant Physiol. 2005; 138: 1334-46.

[34] Micheli F. Pectin methylesterases: cell wall enzymes with important roles in plant physiology. Trends Plant Sci. 2001; 6: 414-9.

[35] Phan TD, Bo W, West G et al. Silencing of the major salt-dependent isoform of pectinesterase in tomato alters fruit softening. Plant Physiol. 2007; 144: 1960-7.

[36] Carmi N, Salts Y, Dedicova B et al. Induction of parthenocarpy in tomato via specific expression of the rolB gene in the ovary. Planta. 2003; 217: 726-35.

[37] Martí C, Orzaez D, Ellul P et al. Silencing of DELLA induces facultative parthenocarpy in tomato fruits. Plant J. 2007; 52: 865-76.

[38] Mignolli F, Vidoz ML, Picciarelli P et al. Gibberellins modulate auxin responses during tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit development. Physiol Plant. 2019; 165: 768-79.

[39] Yuste-Lisbona FJ, Fernandez-Lozano A, Pineda B et al. ENO regulates tomato fruit size through the floral meristem development network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 8187-95.

[40] Muños S, Ranc N, Botton E et al. Increase in tomato locule number is controlled by two single-nucleotide polymorphisms located near WUSCHEL. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156: 2244-54.

[41] Xu C, Liberatore KL, MacAlister CA et al. A cascade of arabinosyltransferases controls shoot meristem size in tomato. Nat Genet. 2015; 47: 784-92.

[42] Wu S, Xiao H, Cabrera A et al. SUN regulates vegetative and reproductive organ shape by changing cell division patterns. Plant Physiol. 2011; 157: 1175-86.

[43] Liu J, Van Eck J, Cong B et al. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 13302-6.

[44] Anastasiou E, Kenz S, Gerstung M et al. Control of plant organ size by KLUH/CYP78A5-dependent intercellular signaling. Dev Cell. 2007; 13: 843-56.

[45] Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S et al. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science. 2000; 289: 85-8.

[46] Mauxion JP, Chevalier C, Gonzalez N . Complex cellular and molecular events determining fruit size. Trends Plant Sci. 2021; 26: 1023-38.

[47] Kitagawa M, Jackson D . Control of meristem size. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019; 70: 269-91.

[48] Clevenger JP, Van Houten J, Blackwood M et al. Network analyses reveal shifts in transcript profiles and metabolites that accompany the expression of SUN and an elongated tomato fruit. Plant Physiol. 2015; 168: 1164-78.

[49] Wu S, Zhang B, Keyhaninejad N et al. A common genetic mechanism underlies morphological diversity in fruits and other plant organs. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 4734.

[50] Zhou S, Hu Z, Li F et al. Overexpression of SlOFP20 affects floral organ and pollen development. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 125.

[51] Niu Q, Zong Y, Qian M et al. Simultaneous quantitative determination of major plant hormones in pear flowers and fruit by UPLC/ESI-MS/MS. Anal Methods. 2014; 6: 1766-73.

[52] Czerednik A, Busscher M, Bielen BAM et al. Regulation of tomato fruit pericarp development by an interplay between CDKB and CDKA1 cell cycle genes. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63: 2605-17.

[53] Carrera E, Ruiz-Rivero O, Peres L et al. Characterization of the procera tomato mutant shows novel functions of the SlDELLA protein in the control of flower morphology, cell division and expansion, and the auxin-signaling pathway during fruit-set and development. Plant Physiol. 2012; 160: 1581-96.

[54] Li H, Wu H, Qi Q et al. Gibberellins play a role in regulating tomato fruit ripening. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019; 60: 1619-29.