Pear genetics: Recent advances, new prospects, and a roadmap for the future

Abstract

Pear, belonging to the genus Pyrus, is one of the most economically important temperate fruit crops. Pyrus is an important genus of the Rosaceae family, subfamily Maloideae, and has at least 22 different species with over 5000 accessions maintained or identified worldwide. With the release of draft whole-genome sequences for Pyrus, opportunities for pursuing studies on the evolution, domestication, and molecular breeding of pear, as well as for conducting comparative genomics analyses within the Rosaceae family, have been greatly expanded. In this review, we highlight key advances in pear genetics, genomics, and breeding driven by the availability of whole-genome sequences, including whole-genome resequencing efforts, pear domestication, and evolution. We cover updates on new resources for undertaking gene identification and molecular breeding, as well as for pursuing functional validation of genes associated with desirable economic traits. We also explore future directions for “pear-omics”.

References

[1] Potter D, Li J, Sun J et al. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst Evol. 2007; 266: 5-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9.

[2] Cao YF, Tian LM, Liu-Lin LI et al. Comparison studies on the stone cell content in flesh of pear cultivars. Acta Hortic Sinica. 2010; 22: 417-33. https://doi.org/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2010.08.016.

[3] Yao GF, Zhang SL, Cao YF et al. Characteristics of components and contents of soluble sugars in pear fruits from different species. Scient Agric Sinica. 2010; 43: 4229-37. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.20.014.

[4] Quinet M, Wesel JP . Botany and taxonomy of pear. In: Korban SS, ed. The Pear Genome.Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019, 1-33.

[5] Wu J, Wang Z, Shi Z et al. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) . Genome Res. 2013; 23: 396-408. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.144311.112.

[6] Li JM, Zheng DM, Li LT et al. Genome-wide function, evolutionary characterization and expression analysis of sugar transporter family genes in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd) . Plant Cell Physiol. 2015; 56: 1721-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv090.

[7] Qiao X, Li M, Li et al. Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of the heat shock transcription factor family in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) and five other Rosaceae species . BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15: 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0401-5.

[8] Li X, Xue C, Li J et al. Genome-wide identification, evolution and functional divergence of MYB transcription factors in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . Plant Cell Physiol. 2016; 57: 824-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcw029.

[9] Lü H, Li J, Huang Y et al. Genome-wide identification, expression and functional analysis of the phosphofructokinase gene family in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . Gene. 2019; 702: 133-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2019.03.005.

[10] Song B et al. Mining and evolution analysis of lateral organ boundaries domain (LBD) genes in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . BMC Genomics. 2020; 21: 644. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06999-9.

[11] Sun M, Zhang M, Singh J et al. Contrasting genetic variation and positive selection followed the divergence of NBS-encoding genes in Asian and European pears. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21: 809. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07226-1.

[12] Hussain S, Niu Q, Qian M et al. Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of the dehydrin gene family in Asian pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) . Tree Genet Genomes. 2015; 11: 110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0938-y.

[13] Cao Y, Han Y, Meng D et al. B-BOX genes: genome-wide identification, evolution and their contribution to pollen growth in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) . BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17: 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1105-4.

[14] Li L, Deng CH, Knabel M et al. Integrated high-density consensus genetic map of Pyrus and anchoring of the ’Bartlett’ v1.0 (Pyrus communis) genome. DNA Res. 2017; 24: dsw063-301. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsw063.

[15] Wu J, Li LT, Li M et al. High-density genetic linkage map construction and identification of fruit-related QTLs in pear using SNP and SSR markers. J Exp Bot. 2014; 65: 5771-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru311.

[16] Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Affourtit J et al. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) . Nat Genet. 2010; 42: 833-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.654.

[17] Shi D et al. Single-pollen-cell sequencing for gamete-based phased diploid genome assembly in plants. Genome Res. 2019; 29: 1889-99. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.251033.119.

[18] Qin G, Tao S, Cao Y et al. Evaluation of the volatile profile of 33 Pyrus ussuriensis cultivars by HS-SPME with GC-MS. Food Chem. 2012; 134: 2367-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.053.

[19] Suwanagul A, Richardson DG . Identification of headspace volatile compounds from different pear (Pyrus communis L.) varieties . Acta Hortic. 1998; 475: 605-24. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.475.73.

[20] Chagne D, Crowhurst RN, Pindo M et al. The draft genome sequence of European pear (Pyrus communis L. ’Bartlett’) . PLoS One. 2014; 9: e92644. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092644.

[21] Linsmith G, Rombauts S, Montanari S et al. Pseudo-chromosome-length genome assembly of a double haploid "Bartlett" pear (Pyrus communis L.) . Giga Science. 2019; 8: giz138. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz138.

[22] Dong X, Wang Z, Tian L et al. De novo assembly of a wild pear (Pyrus betuleafolia) genome . Plant Biotechnol J. 2020; 18: 581-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13226.

[23] Ou C, Wang F, Wang J et al. A de novo genome assembly of the dwarfing pear rootstock Zhongai 1. Scientific data. 2019; 6: 281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0291-3.

[24] Jung S, Lee T, Cheng CH et al. 15 years of GDR: new data and functionality in the genome database for Rosaceae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: D1137-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1000.

[25] Cao K, Zheng Z, Wang L et al. Comparative population genomics reveals the domestication history of the peach, Prunus persica, and human influences on perennial fruit crops. Genome Biol. 2014; 15: 415. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0415-1.

[26] Zhou Y, Massonnet M, Sanjak JS et al. Evolutionary genomics of grape (Vitis vinifera ssp. vinifera) domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114: 11715-20. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1709257114.

[27] Duan N, Bai Y, Sun H et al. Genome re-sequencing reveals the history of apple and supports a two-stage model for fruit enlargement. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7.

[28] Wu J, Wang Y, Xu J et al. Diversification and independent domestication of Asian and European pears. Genome Biol. 2018; 19: 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1452-y.

[29] Silva GJ, Souza TM, Barbieri RL et al. Origin, domestication, and dispersing of pear (Pyrus spp.) . 82d Cong, 2d sess House of Representatives Report ; no 2356. 2014; 2014: 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/541097.

[30] Li X, Li L, Ming M et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides insight into the domestication and improvement of pear (P. pyrifolia) fruit . Plant Physiol. 2019; 180: 435-52. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01322.

[31] Zhang, M.Y, Xue, C, Xu, L. et al. Distinct transcriptome profiles reveal gene expression patterns during fruit development and maturation in five main cultivated species of pear (Pyrus L.) . Sci Rep 6, ???, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28130 (2016).

[32] Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e19379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019379.

[33] Kumar S, Kirk C, Deng C et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing of pear (Pyrus spp.) accessions unravels novel patterns of genetic diversity and selection footprints . Hortic. Res. 2017; 4: 17015. https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.15.

[34] Kumar S, Kirk C, Deng CH et al. Fine-mapping and validation of the genomic region underpinning pear red skin colour. Hortic Res. 2019; 6: 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0112-4.

[35] Kumar S, Kirk C, Deng CH et al. Marker-trait associations and genomic predictions of interspecific pear (Pyrus) fruit characteristics . Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 9072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45618-w.

[36] Han ML, Liu YL, Zheng XY et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL analysis for some fruit traits in pear. J Fruit Sci. 2010; 27: 496-503.

[37] Gabay G, Dahan Y, Izhaki Y et al. High-resolution genetic linkage map of European pear (Pyrus communis) and QTL fine-mapping of vegetative budbreak time . BMC Plant Biol. 2018; 18: 175. 10.1186/s12870-018-1386-2.

[38] Xue L, Liu Q, Hu H et al. The southwestern origin and eastward dispersal of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) in East Asia revealed by comprehensive genetic structure analysis with SSR markers . Tree Genet Genomes. 2018; 14: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-018-1255-z.

[39] Beissinger TM, Hirsch CN, Sekhon RS et al. Marker density and read depth for genotyping populations using genotyping-by-sequencing. Genetics. 2013; 193: 1073-81. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.147710.

[40] Li X, Singh J, Qin M et al. Development of an integrated 200K SNP genotyping array and application for genetic mapping, genome assembly improvement and genome wide association studies in pear (Pyrus) . Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 1582-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13085.

[41] Montanari S, Bianco L, Allen BJ et al. Development of a highly efficient axiom 70 K SNP array for Pyrus and evaluation for high-density mapping and germplasm characterization. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20: 331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5712-3.

[42] Iketani H, Abe K, Yamamoto T et al. Mapping of disease-related genes in Japanese pear using a molecular linkage map with RAPD markers. Breed Sci. 2001; 51: 179-84. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.51.179.

[43] Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Shoda M et al. Genetic linkage maps constructed by using an interspecific cross between Japanese and European pears. Theor Appl Genet. 2002; 106: 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0966-5.

[44] Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Saito T et al. Genetic linkage maps of Japanese and European pears aligned to the apple consensus map. Acta Hortic. 2004; 663: 51-6. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.663.2.

[45] Dondini L, Pierantoni L, Gaiotti F et al. Identifying QTLs for fire-blight resistance via a European pear (Pyrus communis L.) genetic linkage map . Mol Breed. 2005; 14: 407-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-005-0505-6.

[46] Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Tekakami S et al. Integrated reference genetic linkage maps of pear based on SSR and AFLP markers. Breed Sci. 2007; 57: 321-9. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.57.321.

[47] Zhang R, Wu J, Li XG et al. An AFLP, SRAP, and SSR genetic linkage map and identification of QTLs for fruit traits in pear (Pyrus L.) . plant Mol. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2013; 31: 678-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-012-0544-1.

[48] Dondini L, Pierantoni L, Sansavini S et al. The inheritance of the red colour character in European pear (Pyrus communis) and its map position in the mutated cultivar ‘max red Bartlett’ . Plant Breed. 2008; 127: 524-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01500.x.

[49] Yao G, Ming M, Allan AC et al. Map-based cloning of the pear gene MYB114 identifies an interaction with other transcription factors to coordinately regulate fruit anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant J. 2017; 92: 437-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13666.

[50] Pierantoni L, Dondini L, Cho KH et al. Pear scab resistance QTLs via a European pear (Pyrus communis) linkage map . Tree Genet Genomes. 2007; 3: 311-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0070-0.

[51] Wu J, Qin M . Linkage mapping in pear. In: Korban SS, ed. The Pear Genome.Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019, 103-12.

[52] Yamamoto T, Terakami S, Kimura T et al. Reference genetic linkage maps of European and Japanese pears. Acta Hortic. 2009; 814: 599-602. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2009.814.101.

[53] Terakami S, Kimura T, Nishitani C et al. Genetic linkage map of the Japanese pear ’Housui’ identifying three homozygous genomic regions. Horticulture journal. 2009; 78: 417-24. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.78.417.

[54] Sun W, Zhang Y, Le W et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL analysis for some leaf traits in pear (Pyrus L.) . Front Agric China. 2009; 3: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-009-0013-2.

[55] Pierantoni L, Dondini L, De Franceschi P et al. Mapping of an anthocyanin-regulating MYB transcription factor and its expression in red and green pear, Pyrus communis . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010; 48: 1020-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.09.002.

[56] Choi JK, Na DY, Kim D et al. Genetic linkage mapping using inter-specific hybrid population between Korean wild pear (Pyrus ussuriensis) and Japanese pear (P. pyrifolia) . Hortic Environ Biotech. 2010; 51: 319-25.

[57] Hao Y, Zhao Y, Guo Y et al. Genetic linkage maps of pear based on SRAP markers. Pak JBot. 2013; 45: 1265-71.

[58] Yamamoto T, Terakami S, Moriya S et al. DNA markers developed from genome sequencing analysis in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) . Acta Hortic. 2013; 976: 477-83. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.976.67.

[59] Won K, Bastiaanse H, Song JH et al. Genetic mapping of polygenic scab (Venturia pirina) resistance in an interspecific pear family . Mol Breed. 2014; 34: 2179-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0172-6.

[60] Yamamoto T, Terakami S, Takada N et al. Identification of QTLs controlling harvest time and fruit skin color in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) . Breed Sci. 2014; 64: 351-61. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.64.351.

[61] Chen H, Song Y, Li LT et al. Construction of a high-density simple sequence repeat consensus genetic map for pear (Pyrus spp.) . Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015; 33: 316-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-014-0745-x.

[62] Wang C, Tian Y, Buck EJ et al. Genetic mapping of PcDw determining pear dwarf trait. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2011; 136: 48-53.

[63] Wang L, Li X, Wang L et al. Construction of a high-density genetic linkage map in pear (Pyrus communis × Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) using SSRs and SNPs developed by SLAF-seq . Sci Hortic. 2017; 218: 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.015.

[64] Xue H, Wang S, Yao JL et al. Chromosome level high-density integrated genetic maps improve the Pyrus bretschneideri ’DangshanSuli’ v1.0 genome. BMC Genomics. 2018; 19: 833. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5224-6.

[65] Zurn JD, Norelli JL, Montanari S et al. Dissecting genetic resistance to fire blight in three pear populations. Phytopathology. 2020;110:1305-11. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-20-0051-R.

[66] Pritchard JK, Stephens MJ, Donnelly PJ . Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155: 945-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945.

[67] Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade CM et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics. 2008; 178: 1709-23. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.080101.

[68] Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A et al. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23: 1294-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108.

[69] Abney M, Ober C, McPeek MS . Quantitative-trait homozygosity and association mapping and empirical genome-wide significance in large, complex pedigrees: fasting serum-insulin level in the hutterites. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 70: 920-34. 10.1086/339705.

[70] Aulchenko YS, de Koning DJ, Haley C . Genomewide rapid association using mixed model and regression: a fast and simple method for genome-wide pedigree-based quantitative trait loci association analysis. Genetics. 2007; 177: 577-85. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.075614.

[71] Zhou X, Stephens M . Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 821-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2310.

[72] Mariette S, Tai FWJ, Roch G et al. Genome-wide association links candidate genes to resistance to plum pox virus in apricot (Prunus armeniaca) . New Phytol. 2016; 209: 773-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13627.

[73] Cao K, Zhou Z, Wang Q et al. Genome-wide association study of 12 agronomic traits in peach. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 13246. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13246.

[74] Zhang MY, Xue C, Hu H et al. Genome-wide association studies provide insights into the genetic determination of fruit traits of pear. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21378-y.

[75] Peace CP . DNA-informed breeding of rosaceous crops: promises, progress and prospects. Hortic. Res. 2017; 4: 17006. https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.6.

[76] Collard BC, Mackill DJ . Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2008; 363: 557-72. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2170.

[77] Itai A, Kotaki T, Tanabe K et al. Rapid identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) synthase genotypes in cultivars of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) using CAPS markers . Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 106: 1266-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1186-8.

[78] Xu M, Huaracha E, Korban SS . Development of sequence-characterized amplified regions (SCARs) from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers tightly linked to the Vf gene in apple. Genome. 2001; 44: 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-44-1-63.

[79] Moriya Y, Yamamoto K, Okada K et al. Development of a CAPS marker system for genotyping European pear cultivars harboring 17 S alleles. Plant Cell Rep. 2007; 26: 345-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0254-y.

[80] Terakami S, Moriya S, Adachi Y et al. Fine mapping of the gene for susceptibility to black spot disease in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) . Breed Sci. 2016; 66: 271-80. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.66.271.

[81] Khan MA, Zhao YF, Korban SS . Identification of genetic loci associated with fire blight resistance in Malus through combined use of QTL and association mapping. Physiol Plant. 2013; 148: 344-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12068.

[82] Meuwissen TH, Goddard ME . Prediction of identity by descent probabilities from marker-haplotypes. Genet Sel Evol. 2001; 33: 605-34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-33-6-605.

[83] Iwata H, Hayashi T, Terakami S et al. Potential assessment of genome-wide association study and genomic selection in Japanese pear Pyrus pyrifolia . Breed Sci. 2013; 63: 125-40. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.63.125.

[84] Minamikawa MF, Takada N, Terakami S et al. Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction using parental and breeding populations of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) . Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 11994. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30154-w.

[85] Wang R, Ming M, Li J et al. Genome-wide identification of the MADS-box transcription factor family in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) reveals evolution and functional divergence . PeerJ. 2017; 5: e3776. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3776.

[86] Li J, Qin M, Qiao X et al. A new insight into the evolution and functional divergence of SWEET transporters in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . Plant Cell Physiol. 2017; 58: 839-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcx025.

[87] Yu L, Li J, Li L et al. Characterisation of the whole-genome wide hexokinase gene family unravels the functional divergence in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2018; 93: 244-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2017.1362961.

[88] Cao Y, Meng D, Li X et al. A Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) BZR gene PbBZR1 act as a transcriptional repressor of lignin biosynthetic genes in fruits . Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 1087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01087.

[89] Cheng X, Li M, Abdullah M et al. In Silico genome-wide analysis of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) KNOX family and the functional characterization of PbKNOX1, an Arabidopsis BREVIPEDICELLUS orthologue gene, involved in cell wall and lignin biosynthesis. Front Genet. 2019; 10: 632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00632.

[90] Liu C, Qiao X, Li Q et al. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the BAHD superfamily in seven Rosaceae species and expression analysis in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2230-z.

[91] Zeng W, Qiao X, Li Q et al. Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of the ADH gene family in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) and other Rosaceae species . Genomics. 2020; 112: 3484-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.06.031.

[92] Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M . RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10: 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2484.

[93] Zhou H, Yin H, Chen J et al. Gene-expression profile of developing pollen tube of Pyrus bretschneideri . Gene Expr Patterns. 2016; 20: 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gep.2015.10.004.

[94] Li QH, Qiao X, Yin H et al. Unbiased subgenome evolution following a recent whole-genome duplication in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) . Hortic. Res. 2019; 6: 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0110-6.

[95] Yang YN, Yao GF, Yue WQ et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals differential gene expression in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis associated with red/green skin color mutant of pear (Pyrus communis L.) . Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6: 795. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00795.

[96] Liu BY, Wang L, Wang S et al. Transcriptomic analysis of bagging-treated ’Pingguo’ pear shows that MYB4-like1, MYB4-like2, MYB1R1 and WDR involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis are up-regulated in fruit peels in response to light . Sci Hortic. 2019; 244: 428-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.040.

[97] Wang ZG, Du H, Zhai R et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals candidate genes related to color fading of ’Red Bartlett’ (Pyrus communis L.) . Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 455. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00455.

[98] Wang YZ, Dai MS, Zhang SJ et al. Exploring candidate genes for pericarp russet pigmentation of sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) via RNA-seq data in two genotypes contrasting for pericarp color . PLoS One. 2014; 9: e83675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083675.

[99] Ou C, Zhang X, Wang F et al. A 14 nucleotide deletion mutation in the coding region of the PpBBX24 gene is associated with the red skin of "Zaosu red" pear (Pyrus pyrifolia white pear group): a deletion in the PpBBX24 gene is associated with the red skin of pear . Hortic. Res. 2020; 7: 39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-0259-7.

[100] Bai SL, Saito T, Sakamoto D et al. Transcriptome analysis of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) flower buds transitioning through endodormancy . Plant Cell Physiol. 2013; 54: 1132-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pct067.

[101] Nham NT, Macnish AJ, Zakharov F et al. ’Bartlett’ pear fruit (Pyrus communis L.) ripening regulation by low temperatures involves genes associated with jasmonic acid, cold response, and transcription factors . Plant Sci. 2017; 260: 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.03.008.

[102] Yang TY, Huang XS . Deep sequencing-based characterization of transcriptome of Pyrus ussuriensis in response to cold stress. Gene. 2018; 661: 109-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.03.067.

[103] Li KQ, Xu XY, Huang XS . Identification of differentially expressed genes related to dehydration resistance in a highly drought-tolerant pear, Pyrus betulaefolia, as through RNA-Seq . PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0149352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149352.

[104] Li H, Lin J, Yang QS et al. Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes under salt stress in pear (Pyrus betulaefolia) using RNA-Seq . Plant Growth Regul. 2017; 82: 409-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0266-3.

[105] Kan JL, Liu T, Ma N et al. Transcriptome analysis of Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) reveals a comprehensive signalling network in response to Alternaria alternata . PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0184988. 10.1371/journal.pone.0184988.

[106] Yang XP, Hu H, Yu D et al. Candidate resistant genes of sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) to Alternaria alternata revealed by transcriptome sequencing. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0135046. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135046.

[107] Li JM, Huang X, S, Ting, L. T. et al. Proteome analysis of pear reveals key genes associated with fruit development and quality. Planta. 2015; 241: 1363-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2263-y.

[108] Reuscher S, Fukao Y, Morimoto R et al. Quantitative proteomics-based reconstruction and identification of metabolic pathways and membrane transport proteins related to sugar accumulation in developing fruits of pear (Pyrus communis) . Plant Cell Physiol. 2016; 57: 505-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcw004.

[109] Liu X, Zhai R, Feng W et al. Proteomic analysis of ’Zaosu’ pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) and its early-maturing bud sport . Plant Sci. 2014; 224: 120-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.04.012.

[110] Qin G, Tao S, Zhang H et al. Evolution of the aroma volatiles of pear fruits supplemented with fatty acid metabolic precursors. Molecules. 2014; 19: 20183-96. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191220183.

[111] Wu X, Yin H, Shi Z et al. Chemical composition and crystal morphology of epicuticular wax in mature fruits of 35 pear (Pyrus spp.) cultivars . Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9: 679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00679.

[112] Kidner CA, Martienssen RA . The developmental role of microRNA in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005; 8: 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2004.11.008.

[113] Wu J, Wang D, Liu Y et al. Identification of miRNAs involved in pear fruit development and quality. BMC Genomics. 2014; 15: 953. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-953.

[114] Ma L, Zhou L, Quan S et al. Integrated analysis of mRNA-seq and miRNA-seq in calyx abscission zone of Korla fragrant pear involved in calyx persistence. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19: 192. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1792-0.

[115] Qian M, Ni J, Niu Q et al. Response of miR156-SPL module during the red peel coloration of bagging-treated Chinese sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) . Front Physiol. 2017; 8: 500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00550.

[116] Xue C, Yao JL, Qin MF et al. PbrmiR397a regulates lignification during stone cell development in pear fruit. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 103-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12950.

[117] Cheng X, Yan C, Zhang J et al. The effect of different pollination on the expression of Dangshan Su pear microRNA. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2794040.

[118] Niu Q, Qian M, Liu G et al. A genome-wide identification and characterization of mircoRNAs and their targets in ‘Suli’ pear (Pyrus pyrifolia white pear group) . Planta. 2013; 238: 1095-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1954-5.

[119] Shi F, Zhou X, Yao MM et al. miRNAs play important roles in aroma weakening during the shelf life of ’Nanguo’ pear after cold storage. Food Res Int. 2019; 116: 942-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.031.

[120] Liu J, Zhang X, Zhang FP et al. Identification and characterization of microRNAs from in vitro-grown pear shoots infected with apple stem grooving virus in response to high temperature using small RNA sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16: 945. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2126-8.

[121] Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Wang S et al. Characterization of genome-wide microRNAs and their roles in development and biotic stress in pear. Planta. 2019; 249: 693-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-018-3027-2.

[122] Niu Q, Li J, Cai D et al. Dormancy-associated MADS-box genes and microRNAs jointly control dormancy transition in pear (Pyrus pyrifolia white pear group) flower bud . J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 239-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv454.

[123] Jiang SH, Sun QG, Chen M et al. Methylome and transcriptome analyses of apple fruit somatic mutations reveal the difference of red phenotype. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20: 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5499-2.

[124] Zhu YC, Zhang B, Allan AC et al. DNA demethylation is involved in the regulation of temperature-dependent anthocyanin accumulation in peach. Plant J. 2020; 102: 965-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14680.

[125] Daccord N, Celton JM, Linsmith G et al. High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development. Nat Genet. 2017; 49: 1099-106. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3886.

[126] Cheng J, Niu Q, Zhang B et al. Downregulation of RdDM during strawberry fruit ripening. Genome Biol. 2018; 19: 212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1587-x.

[127] Qian M, Sun Y, Allan AC et al. The red sport of ’Zaosu’ pear and its red-striped pigmentation pattern are associated with demethylation of the PyMYB10 promoter. Phytochemistry. 2014;107:16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.08.001.

[128] Wang Z, Meng D, Wang A et al. The methylation of the PcMYB10 promoter is associated with green-skinned sport in max red Bartlett pear. Plant Physiol. 2013; 162: 885-96. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.214700.

[129] Smith WW . The course of stone cell formation in pear fruits. Plant Physiol. 1935; 10: 587-611. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.10.4.587.

[130] Martin-Cabrejas MA, Waldron KW, Selvendran RR et al. Ripening-related changes in the cell walls of Spanish pear (Pyrus communis) . Physiol Plant. 1994; 91: 671-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb03004.x.

[131] Tao S, Khanizadeh S, Zhang H et al. Anatomy, ultrastructure and lignin distribution of stone cells in two Pyrus species. Plant Sci. 2009; 176: 413-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.12.011.

[132] Cai Y, Li M, Li D et al. Study of the structure and biosynthetic pathway of lignin in stone cells of pear. Sci Hortic. 2010; 125: 374-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.04.029.

[133] Jin Q, Yan C, Qiu J et al. Structural characterization and deposition of stone cell lignin in Dangshan Su pear. Sci Hortic. 2013; 155: 123-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.03.020.

[134] Zhang J, Li J, Xue C et al. The variation of stone cell dontent in 236 germplasms of sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) and identification of related candidate genes . Hortic Plant J. 2021; 7: 108-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2020.09.003.

[135] Xue Y-S, Xu S, Z, Xue, C. et al . Pearprocess: a new phenotypic tool for stone cell trait evaluation in pear fruit. J Integr Agric. 2020; 19: 1625-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(20)63193-8.

[136] Vanholme R, Cesarino I, Rataj K et al. Caffeoyl Shikimate esterase (CSE) is an enzyme in the lignin biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis. Science. 2013; 341: 1103-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241602.

[137] Zhao Q . Lignification: flexibility, biosynthesis and regulation. Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 713- 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.006.

[138] Dean JF, Eriksson KEL . Laccase and the deposition of lignin in vascular plants. Holzforschung. 1994; 48: 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1994.48.s1.21.

[139] Cao Y, Han Y, Li D et al. Systematic analysis of the 4-coumarate: coenzyme a ligase (4CL) related genes and expression profiling during fruit development in the Chinese pear. Genes. 2016; 7: 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes7100089.

[140] Cao Y, Han Y, Meng D et al. Structural, evolutionary, and functional analysis of the class III peroxidase gene family in Chinese pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01874.

[141] Cheng X, Xiong Y, Li DH et al. Bioinformatic and expression analysis of the OMT gene family in Pyrus bretschneideri cv. GMR . 2016; 15: 15038664. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15038664.

[142] Cheng X et al. Characterization and analysis of CCR and CAD gene families at the whole-genome level for lignin synthesis of stone cells in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit. Biol Open. 2017;6:1602-13. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.026997.

[143] Cheng X, Li G, Ma C et al. Comprehensive genome-wide analysis of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) laccase gene (PbLAC) family and functional identification of PbLAC1 involved in lignin biosynthesis . PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0210892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210892.

[144] Xue C, Yao JL, Xue YS et al. PbrMYB169 positively regulates lignification of stone cells in pear fruit. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70: 1801-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz039.

[145] Cheng X, Li G, Muhammad A et al. Molecular identification, phylogenomic characterization and expression patterns analysis of the LIM (LIN-11, Isl1 and MEC-3 domains) gene family in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) reveal its potential role in lignin metabolism . Gene. 2019; 686: 237-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.064.

[146] Su X, Meng T, Zhao Y et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the IDD genes in five Rosaceae species and expression analysis in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . PeerJ. 2019; 7: e6628. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6628.

[147] Cao Y, Han Y, Li D et al. MYB transcription factors in Chinese pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.): genome-wide identification, classification, and expression profiling during fruit development . Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00577.

[148] Gong X, Xie Z, Qi K et al. PbMC1a/1b regulates lignification during stone cell development in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit . Hortic. Res. 2020; 7: 59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-0280-x.

[149] Yang YN et al. Expression differences of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes reveal regulation patterns for red pear coloration. Plant Cell Rep. 2015; 34: 189-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-014-1698-0.

[150] Feng S, Wang Y, Yang S et al. Anthocyanin biosynthesis in pears is regulated by a R2R3-MYB transcription factor PyMYB10. Planta. 2010; 232: 245-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1170-5.

[151] Zhang X, Allan AC, Yi Q et al. Differential gene expression analysis of Yunnan red pear, Pyrus pyrifolia, during fruit skin coloration. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011; 29: 305-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0231-z.

[152] Yu B, Zhang D, Huang C et al. Isolation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in red Chinese sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) and their expression as affected by organ/tissue, cultivar, bagging and fruit side . Sci Hortic. 2012; 136: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.12.026.

[153] Zhai R, Wang Z, Zhang S et al. Two MYB transcription factors regulate flavonoid biosynthesis in pear fruit (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) . J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 1275-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv524.

[154] Liu H, Su J, Zhu Y et al. The involvement of PybZIPa in light-induced anthocyanin accumulation via the activation of PyUFGT through binding to tandem G-boxes in its promoter. Hortic. Res. 2019; 6: 134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0217-4.

[155] Wu J, Zhao G, Yang Y et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes related to coloration in red/green mutant pear (Pyrus communis L.) . Tree Genet Genomes. 2013; 9: 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0534-3.

[156] Li C, Wu J, Hu KD et al. PyWRKY26 and PybHLH3 cotargeted the PyMYB114 promoter to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis and transport in red-skinned pears. Hortic. Res. 2020; 7: 37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-0254-z.

[157] Ni J, Bai S, Zhao Y et al. Ethylene response factors Pp4ERF24 and Pp12ERF96 regulate blue light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in ’Red Zaosu’ pear fruits by interacting with MYB114. Plant Mol Biol. 2019; 99: 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0802-1.

[158] Tao R, Bai S, Ni J et al. The blue light signal transduction pathway is involved in anthocyanin accumulation in ’Red Zaosu’ pear. Planta. 2018; 248: 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-018-2877-y.

[159] Bai S, Tao R, Tang Y et al. BBX16, a B-box protein, positively regulates light-induced anthocyanin accumulation by activating MYB10 in red pear. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 1985-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13114.

[160] Bai S, Tao R, Yin L et al. Two B-box proteins, PpBBX18 and PpBBX21, antagonistically regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis via competitive association with Pyrus pyrifolia ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 in the peel of pear fruit. Plant J. 2019; 100: 1208-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14510.

[161] Bieleski RL, Redgwell RJ . Sorbitol metabolism in nectaries from flowers of Rosaceae. Funct Plant Biol. 1980; 7: 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9800015.

[162] Zhang HP, Wu JY, Tao ST et al. Evidence for apoplasmic phloem unloading in pear fruit. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2014; 32: 931-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-013-0696-7.

[163] Cheng R, Cheng Y, Lu J et al. The gene PbTMT4 from pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) mediates vacuolar sugar transport and strongly affects sugar accumulation in fruit . Physiol Plant. 2018; 164: 307-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12742.

[164] Wang LF, Qi XX, Huang XS et al. Overexpression of sucrose transporter gene PbSUT2 from Pyrus bretschneideri, enhances sucrose content in Solanum lycopersicum fruit . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016; 105: 150-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.019.

[165] Oura Y, Yamada K, Shiratake K et al. Purification and characterization of a NAD(+)-dependent sorbitol dehydrogenase from Japanese pear fruit. Phytochemistry. 2000; 54: 567-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00158-8.

[166] Kim HY, Ahn JC, Choi JH et al. Expression and cloning of the full-length cDNA for sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and NAD-dependent sorbitol dehydrogenase from pear (Pyrus pyrifolia N.) . Sci Hortic. 2007; 112: 406-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.01.015.

[167] Moriguchi T, Abe K, Sanada T et al. Levels and role of sucrose synthase, sucrose-phosphate synthase, and acid invertase in sucrose accumulation in fruit of Asian pear. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1992; 117: 274-8. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.117.2.274.

[168] Moore B, Zhou L, Rolland F et al. Role of the Arabidopsis glucose sensor HXK1 in nutrient, light, and hormonal signaling. Science. 2003; 300: 332-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1080585.

[169] Kim YM, Heinzel N, Giese JO et al. A dual role of tobacco hexokinase 1 in primary metabolism and sugar sensing. Plant Cell Environ. 2013; 36: 1311-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12060.

[170] Zhao B, Qi K, Yi X et al. Identification of hexokinase family members in pear (Pyrus × bretschneideri) and functional exploration of PbHXK1 in modulating sugar content and plant growth . Gene. 2019; 711: 143932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2019.06.022.

[171] Chen J, Wang Z, Wu J et al. Chemical compositional characterization of eight pear cultivars grown in China. Food Chem. 2007; 104: 268-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.11.038.

[172] Popova TN, Pinheiro de Carvalho MA . Citrate and isocitrate in plant metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998; 1364: 307-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(98)00008-5.

[173] Sadka A, Dahan E, Or E et al. NADP+-isocitrate dehydrogenase gene expression and isozyme activity during citrus fruit development. Plant Sci. 2000; 158: 173-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00328-9.

[174] Sadka A, Dahan E, Cohen L et al. Aconitase activity and expression during the development of lemon fruit. Physiol Plant. 2000; 108: 255-62. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.108003255.x.

[175] Canel C, Bailey-Serres JN, Roose ML . Molecular characterization of the mitochondrial citrate synthase gene of an acidless pummelo (Citrus maxima) . Plant Mol Biol. 1996; 31: 143-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020613.

[176] Suzuki Y, Kanayama Y, Shiratake K et al. Vacuolar H(+)-pyrophosphatase purified from pear fruit. Phytochemistry. 1999; 50: 535-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00554-8.

[177] Hosaka M, Kanayama Y, Shiratake K et al. Tonoplast H+-ATPase of mature pear fruit. Phytochemistry. 1994; 36: 565-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)89775-7.

[178] Suzuki Y, Shiratake K, Yamaki S . Seasonal changes in the activities of vacuolar H+-pumps and their gene expression in the developing Japanese pear fruit. Engei Gakkai zasshi. 2000; 69: 15-21. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.69.15.

[179] Hiratake K, Kanayama Y, Maeshima M et al. Changes in H(+)-pumps and a tonoplast intrinsic protein of vacuolar membranes during the development of pear fruit. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997; 38: 1039-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029269.

[180] Yasuo S, Masayoshi M, Shohei Y . Molecular cloning of vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase and its expression during the development of pear fruit. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999; 40: 900-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029620.

[181] Lu XP, Liu YZ, Zhou GF et al. Identification of organic acid-related genes and their expression profiles in two pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) cultivars with difference in predominant acid type at fruit ripening stage . Sci Hortic. 2011; 129: 680-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.05.014.

[182] Willner B, Granvogl M, Schieberle P . Characterization of the key aroma compounds in Bartlett pear brandies by means of the sensomics concept. J Agric Food Chem. 2013; 61: 9583-93. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf403024t.

[183] Wang C, Zhang W, Li H et al. Analysis of volatile compounds in pears by HS-SPME-GCxGC-TOFMS. Molecules. 2019; 24: 1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24091795.

[184] El Hadi MA, Zhang FJ, Wu FF et al. Advances in fruit aroma volatile research. Molecules. 2013; 18: 8200-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules18078200.

[185] Shi F, Zhou X, Yao MM et al. Low-temperature stress-induced aroma loss by regulating fatty acid metabolism pathway in ’Nanguo’ pear. Food Chem. 2019; 297: 124927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.201.

[186] Shi F, Zhou X, Zhou Q et al. Transcriptome analyses provide new possible mechanisms of aroma ester weakening of ‘Nanguo’ pear after cold storage. Sci Hortic. 2018; 237: 247-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.013.

[187] Li M, Dunwell JM, Zhang H et al. Network analysis reveals the co-expression of sugar and aroma genes in the Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) . Gene. 2018; 677: 370-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.08.042.

[188] Wei S, Tao S, Qin S et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals the candidate genes associated with aroma metabolites and emission of pear (Pyrus ussuriensis cv.) . Sci Hortic. 2016; 206: 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.04.019.

[189] Luo M, Zhou X, Sun H et al. Insights into profiling of volatile ester and LOX-pathway related gene families accompanying post-harvest ripening of ’Nanguo’ pears. Food Chem. 2021; 335: 127665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127665.

[190] Gonzalez M, Gaete-Eastman C, Valdenegro M et al. Aroma development during ripening of Fragaria chiloensis fruit and participation of an alcohol acyltransferase (FcAAT1) gene . J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57: 9123-32. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901693j.

[191] Zhou D, Sun Y, Li M et al. Postharvest hot air and UV-C treatments enhance aroma-related volatiles by simulating the lipoxygenase pathway in peaches during cold storage. Food Chem. 2019; 292: 294-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.049.

[192] Singh RK, Srivastava S, Chidley HG et al. Overexpression of mango alcohol dehydrogenase (MiADH1) mimics hypoxia in transgenic tomato and alters fruit flavor components. Agri gene. 2018; 7: 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aggene.2017.10.003.

[193] Bapat VA, Trivedi PK, Ghosh A et al. Ripening of fleshy fruit: molecular insight and the role of ethylene. Biotechnol Adv. 2010; 28: 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.10.002.

[194] Lelievre J-M, Tichit L, Dao P et al. Effects of chilling on the expression of ethylene biosynthetic genes in Passe-Crassane pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruits . Plant Mol Biol. 1997; 33: 847-55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005750324531.

[195] Yuan H, Zhang L, Jiang Z et al. Characterization of ripening-telated PuARP4 in pear (Pyrus ussuriensis) . J Plant Growth Regul. 2017; 36: 766-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-017-9680-z.

[196] Song L, Wang Z, Wang Z et al. Screening of cell wall-related genes that are expressed differentially during ripening of pears with different softening characteristics. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016; 115: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.12.012.

[197] Mercy WM, Mathooko FM, Matsuzaki M et al. Expression characteristics of seven members of the β-galactosidase gene family in ‘La France’ pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruit during growth and their regulation by 1-methylcyclopropene during postharvest ripening . Postharvest Biol Technol. 2005; 36: 253-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.02.002.

[198] Sekine D, Munemura I, Gao M et al. Cloning of cDNAs encoding cell-wall hydrolases from pear (Pyrus communis) fruit and their involvement in fruit softening and development of melting texture . Physiol Plant. 2006; 126: 163-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00583.x.

[199] Hiwasa K, Rose JKC, Nakano R et al. Differential expression of seven α-expansin genes during growth and ripening of pear fruit. Physiol Plant. 2003; 117: 564-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00064.x.

[200] Peil A . Inoculation of Malus × robusta 5 progeny with a strain breaking resistance to fire blight reveals a minor QTL on LG5 . Acta Hortic. 2011; 896: 357-62. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2011.896.49.

[201] Perchepied L, Guerif P, Ravon E et al. Polygenic inheritance of resistance to Cacopsylla pyri in a Pyrus communis × P. ussuriensis progeny is explained by three QTLs involving an epistatic interaction . Tree Genet Genomes. 2016; 12: 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-016-1072-1.

[202] De Franceschi, P. & Dondini, L. Molecular mapping of major genes and QTLs in pear. In: Korban, S.S. (ed.) The Pear Genome, pp 113-131, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11048-2_6 (2019).

[203] Bokszczanin K, Dondini L, Przybyla AA . First report on the presence of fire blight resistance in linkage group 11 of Pyrus ussuriensis maxim. J Appl Genet. 2009; 50: 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03195660.

[204] Montanari S, Perchepied L, Renault D et al. A QTL detected in an interspecific pear population confers stable fire blight resistance across different environments and genetic backgrounds. Mol Breed. 2016; 36: 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0473-z.

[205] Abe K, Saito T, Terai O et al. Genotypic difference for the susceptibility of Japanese, Chinese and European pears to Venturia nashicola, the cause of scab on Asian pears. Plant Breed. 2008; 127: 407-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01482.x.

[206] Bouvier L, Bourcy M, Boulay M et al. A new pear scab resistance gene Rvp1 from the European pear cultivar ’Navara’ maps in a genomic region syntenic to an apple scab resistance gene cluster on linkage group 2. Tree genet. Tree Genet Genomes. 2012; 8: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0419-x.

[207] Liu Y, Yang T, Lin Z et al. A WRKY transcription factor Pbr-WRKY53 from Pyrus betulaefolia is involved in drought tolerance and AsA accumulation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 1770-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13099.

[208] Li K, Xing C, Yao Z et al. PbrMYB21, a novel MYB protein of Pyrus betulaefolia, functions in drought tolerance and modulates polyamine levels by regulating arginine decarboxylase gene. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15: 1186-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12708.

[209] Xing C, Liu Y, Zhao L et al. A novel MYB transcription factor regulates AsA synthesis and effects cold tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2019; 42: 832-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13387.

[210] Jin C, Huang XS, Li KQ et al. Overexpression of a bHLH1 transcription factor of Pyrus ussuriensis confers enhanced cold tolerance and increases expression of stress-responsive genes. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00441.

[211] Jin C, Li KQ, Xu X et al. A novel NAC transcription factor, PbeNAC1, of Pyrus betulifolia confers cold and drought tolerance via interacting with PbeDREBs and activating the expression of stress-responsive genes. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01049.

[212] Dong H, Wang C, Xing C et al. Overexpression of PbrNHX2 gene, a Na+/H+ antiporter gene isolated from Pyrus betulaefolia, confers enhanced tolerance to salt stress via modulating ROS levels . Plant Sci. 2019; 285: 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.04.021.

[213] Wang CH, Li W, Tian YK et al. Development of molecular markers for genetic and physical mapping of the PcDw locus in pear (Pyrus communis L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2016; 91: 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2016.1155319.

[214] Xiao Y, Wang C, Tian Y et al. Candidates responsible for dwarf pear phenotype as revealed by comparative transcriptome analysis. Mol Breed. 2019; 39: 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-018-0907-x.

[215] Foster TM, Celton JM, Chagne D et al. Two quantitative trait loci, Dw1 and Dw2, are primarily responsible for rootstock-induced dwarfing in apple. Hortic. Res. 2015; 2: 15001. https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2015.1.

[216] Knäbel M, Friend AP, Palmer JW et al. Genetic control of pear rootstock-induced dwarfing and precocity is linked to a chromosomal region syntenic to the apple Dw1 loci. BMC Plant Biol. 2015; 15: 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0620-4.

[217] Celton J-M, Chagne D, Tustin SD et al. Update on comparative genome mapping between Malus and Pyrus . BMC Res Notes. 2009; 2: 182-2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-182.

[218] Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D et al. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat Biotechnol. 2013; 31: 691-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2655.

[219] Chandrasekaran J, Brumin M, Wolf D et al. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016; 17: 1140-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12375.

[220] Peng A, Chen S, Lei T et al. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017; 15: 1509-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12733.

[221] Tashkandi M, Ali Z, Aljedaani F et al. Engineering resistance against tomato yellow leaf curl virus via the CRISPR/-Cas9 system in tomato. Plant Signal Behav. 2018; 13: e1525996. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2018.1525996.

[222] Tang X, Ren Q, Yang L et al. Single transcript unit CRISPR 2.0 systems for robust Cas9 and Cas12a mediated plant genome editing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 1431-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13068.

[223] Endo A, Masafumi M, Kaya H et al. Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida . Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 38169. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38169.

[224] Malzahn AA, Tang X, Lee K et al. Application of CRISPR-Cas12a temperature sensitivity for improved genome editing in rice, maize, and Arabidopsis . BMC Biol. 2019; 17: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0629-5.

[225] Xu J, Hua K, Lang Z . Genome editing for horticultural crop improvement. Hortic. Res. 2019; 6: 113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0196-5.

[226] Kaur N, Alok A, Kaur N et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient editing in phytoene desaturase (PDS) demonstrates precise manipulation in banana cv. Rasthali genome. Funct. Integr. Genomics. 2018; 18: 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-017-0577-5.

[227] Wang Z, Wang S, Li D et al. Optimized paired-sgRNA/Cas9 cloning and expression cassette triggers high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in kiwifruit. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 1424-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12884.

[228] Wang X, Tu M, Wang D et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 844-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12832.

[229] Zhang F, LeBlanc C, Irish VF et al. Rapid and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in citrus using the YAO promoter . Plant Cell Rep. 2017; 36: 1883-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2202-4.

[230] Nishitani C, Hirai N, Komori S et al. Efficient genome editing in apple using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 31481. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31481.

[231] Xing S, Jia M, Wei L et al. CRISPR/Cas9-introduced single and multiple mutagenesis in strawberry. J Genet Genomics. 2018; 45: 685-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2018.04.006.

[232] Zhou J, Wang G, Liu Z . Efficient genome editing of wild strawberry genes, vector development and validation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018; 16: 1868-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12922.

[233] Malnoy M, Viola R, Jung MH et al. DNA-free genetically edited grapevine and apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01904.

[234] Arkonyi-Gasic E, Wang T, Voogd C et al. Mutagenesis of kiwifruit CENTRORADIALIS-like genes transforms a climbing woody perennial with long juvenility and axillary flowering into a compact plant with rapid terminal flowering. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019; 17: 869-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13021.

[235] Charrier A, Vergne E, Dousset N et al. Efficient targeted mutagenesis in apple and first time edition of pear using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00040.

[236] Wang X, Gao L, Jiao C et al. Genome of Solanum pimpinellifolium provides insights into structural variants during tomato breeding. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 5817. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19682-0.

[237] Guo J, Cao K, Deng C et al. An integrated peach genome structural variation map uncovers genes associated with fruit traits. Genome Biol. 2020; 21: 258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02169-y.

[238] Zhou Y, Minio A, Massonnet M et al. The population genetics of structural variants in grapevine domestication. Nat Plants. 2019; 5: 965-79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0507-8.