Integrated transcriptomic and metabolic analyses reveal that ethylene enhances peach susceptibility to Lasiodiplodia theobromae-induced gummosis

Abstract

Gummosis, one of the most detrimental diseases to the peach industry worldwide, can be induced by Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Ethylene (ET) is known to trigger the production of gum exudates, but the mechanism underlying fungus-induced gummosis remains unclear. In this study, L. theobromae infection triggered the accumulation of ET and jasmonic acid (JA) but not salicylic acid (SA) in a susceptible peach variety. Gaseous ET and its biosynthetic precursor increased gum formation, whereas ET inhibitors repressed it. SA and methyl- jasmonate treatments did not influence gum formation. RNA-seq analysis indicated that L. theobromae infection and ET treatment induced a shared subset of 1808 differentially expressed genes, which were enriched in the category “starch and sucrose, UDP-sugars metabolism”. Metabolic and transcriptional profiling identified a pronounced role of ET in promoting the transformation of primary sugars (sucrose, fructose, and glucose) into UDP-sugars, which are substrates of gum polysaccharide biosynthesis. Furthermore, ethylene insensitive3-like1 (EIL1), a key transcription factor in the ET pathway, could directly target the promoters of the UDP-sugar biosynthetic genes UXS1a, UXE, RGP and MPI and activate their transcription, as revealed by firefly luciferase and yeast one-hybrid assays. On the other hand, the supply of SA and inhibitors of ET and JA decreased the lesion size. ET treatment reduced JA levels and the transcription of the JA biosynthetic gene OPR but increased the SA content and the expression of its biosynthetic gene PAL. Overall, we suggest that endogenous and exogenous ET aggravate gummosis disease by transactivating UDP-sugar metabolic genes through EIL1 and modulating JA and SA biosynthesis in L. theobromae-infected peach shoots. Our findings shed light on the molecular mechanism by which ET regulates plant defense responses in peach during L. theobromae infection.

References

[1] Biggs AR . Presymptom histopathology of peach trees inoculated with Botryosphaeria obtusa and B. dothidea . Phytopathology. 1988; 78: 1109-18.

[2] Wang F, Zhao L, Li G. et al. Identification and characterization of Botryosphaeria spp. causing gummosis of peach trees in Hubei Province, Central China . Plant Dis. 2011; 95: 1378-84.

[3] Adesemoye A, Mayorquin JS, Wang DH. et al. Identification of species of Botryosphaeriaceae causing bot gummosis in citrus in California . Plant Dis. 2014; 98: 55-61.

[4] Beckman TG, Pusey PL, Bertrand PF . Impact of fungal gummosis on peach trees. HortScience. 2003; 38: 1141-43.

[5] Ezra D, Hershcovich M, Shtienberg D . Insights into the etiology of gummosis syndrome of deciduous fruit trees in Israel and its impact on tree productivity. Plant Dis. 2017; 101: 1354-61.

[6] Gao L, Zhang H, Cheng Y . et al. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum causing gummosis of peach trees in Hubei province, Central China. Plant Dis. 2019; 103: 2673-4.

[7] Urbez-Torres JR, Gubler WD . Susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Neofusicoccum parvum . Plant Pathol. 2011; 60: 261-70.

[8] Mancero-Castillo D, Beckman TG, Harmon PF . et al. A major locus for resistance to Botryosphaeria dothidea in Prunus. Tree Genet Genomes. 2018; 14: 26.

[9] Broekgaarden C, Caarls L, Vos I. et al. Ethylene: traffic controller on hormonal crossroads to defense. Plant Physiol. 2015; 169: 2371-79.

[10] Guan R, Su J, Meng X. et al. Multilayered regulation of ethylene induction plays a positive role in Arabidopsis resistance against pseudomonas syringae . Plant Physiol. 2015; 169: 299-312.

[11] Foroud NA, Pordel R, Goyal RK . et al. Chemical activation of the ethylene signaling pathway promotes resistance in detached wheat heads . Phytopathology. 2019; 109: 796-803.

[12] Chen HM, Xue L, Chintamanani S . et al. ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE1 repress salicylic acid induction deficient2 expression to negatively regulate plant innate immunity in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 2527-40.

[13] Casteel CL, De Alwis M, Bak A. et al. Disruption of ethylene responses by turnip mosaic virus mediates suppression of plant defense against the green peach aphid vector . Plant Physiol. 2015; 169: 209-18.

[14] Miyamoto K, Saniewski M, Ueda J . Gummosis and leaf abscission in Yoshino cherry (Prunus yedoensis): relevance to hormonal regulation and chemical composition of gums . Acta Hortic. 2019; 1235: 467-74.

[15] Miyamoto K, Kotake T, Boncela AJ. et al. Hormonal regulation of gummosis and composition of gums from bulbs of hyacinth (Hyacinthus orientalis) . J Plant Physiol. 2015; 174: 1-4.

[16] Li M, Liu M, Peng F . et al. Influence factors and gene expression patterns during MeJA-induced gummosis in peach . J Plant Physiol. 2015; 182: 49-61.

[17] Carolina A, Kusumoto D . Gum duct formation mediated by various concentrations of ethephon and methyl jasmonate treatments in Cerasus x yedoensis, Prunus mume and Liquidambar styraciflua . IAWA J. 2020; 41: 98-108.

[18] Li Z, Gao L, Wang YT . et al. Carbohydrate metabolism changes in Prunus persica gummosis infected with Lasiodiplodia theobromae . Phytopathology. 2014b; 104: 445.

[19] Simas FF, Gorin PAJ, Wagner R. et al. Comparison of structure of gum exudate polysaccharides from the trunk and fruit of the peach tree (Prunus persica) . Carbohydr Polym. 2008; 71: 218-28.

[20] Lazarowski ER, Harden TK . UDP-sugars as extracellular signaling molecules: cellular and physiologic consequences of P2Y(14) receptor activation. Mol Pharmacol. 2015; 88: 151-60.

[21] Gao L, Wang Y, Li Z . et al. Gene expression changes during the gummosis development of peach shoots in response to Lasiodiplodia theobromae infection using RNA-Seq . Front Physiol. 2016; 7: 170.

[22] Li Z, Zhu W, Fan YC . et al. Effects of pre- and post-treatment with ethephon on gum formation of peach gummosis caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae . Plant Pathol. 2014; 63: 1306-15.

[23] Zhang W, Wen CK . Preparation of ethylene gas and comparison of ethylene responses induced by ethylene, ACC, and ethephon. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010; 48: 45-53.

[24] Huang PY, Catinot J, Zimmerli L . Ethylene response factors in Arabidopsis immunity. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67: 1231-41.

[25] Liu Y, Sun T, Sun Y. et al. Diverse roles of the salicylic acid receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in plant immunity. Plant Cell. 2020; 32: 4002-16.

[26] Kohlberger M, Thalhamer T, Weiss R . et al. Arabidopsis MAP-kinase 3 phosphorylates UDP-glucose dehydrogenase: a key enzyme providing UDP-sugar for cell wall biosynthesis. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2018; 36: 870-7.

[27] Zablackis E, Huang J, Muller B. et al. Characterization of the cell-wall polysaccharides of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves . Plant Physiol. 1995; 107: 1129-38.

[28] Caffall KH, Mohnen D . The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydr Res. 2009; 344: 1879-900.

[29] Malinovsky FG, Fangel JU, Willats WGT . The role of the cell wall in plant immunity. Front Plant Sci. 2014; 5: 12.

[30] Kosugi S, Ohashi Y . Cloning and DNA-binding properties of a tobacco ethylene-Insensitive3 (EIN3) homolog. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28: 960-7.

[31] Han X, Kahmann R . Manipulation of phytohormone pathways by effectors of filamentous plant pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 822.

[32] Balsells-Llaurado M, Silva CJ, Usall J. et al. Depicting the battle between nectarine and Monilinia laxa: the fruit developmental stage dictates the effectiveness of the host defenses and the pathogen’s infection strategies . Hortic Res. 2020; 7: 167.

[33] Glazebrook J . Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005; 43: 205-27.

[34] Félix C, Meneses R, Goncalves MFM. et al. A multi-omics analysis of the grapevine pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae reveals that temperature affects the expression of virulence- and pathogenicity-related genes . Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 13144.

[35] Saniewski M, Miyamoto K, Ueda J . Methyl jasmonate induces gums and stimulates anthocyanin accumulation in peach shoots. J Plant Growth Regul. 1998; 17: 121-4.

[36] Olien WC, Bukovac MJ . Ethephon-induced gummosis in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.). I. Effect on xylem function and shoot water status. Plant Physiol. 1982; 70: 547-55.

[37] Goraj-Koniarska J, Saniewski M, Ueda J . et al. Effect of methyl jasmonate on gummosis in petioles of culinary rhubarb (Rheum rhabarbarum L.) and the determination of sugar composition of the gum. Acta Physiol Plant. 2018; 40: 8.

[38] Seifert GJ . Nucleotide sugar interconversions and cell wall biosynthesis: how to bring the inside to the outside. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004; 7: 277-84.

[39] Schaper S, Wendt H, Bamberger J. et al. A bifunctional UDP-sugar 4-epimerase supports biosynthesis of multiple cell surface polysaccharides in Sinorhizobium meliloti . J Bacteriol. 2019; 201: 15.

[40] Li Z, Wang YT, Gao L. et al. Biochemical changes and defence responses during the development of peach gummosis caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae . Eur J Plant Pathol. 2014a; 138: 195-207.

[41] Parker JL, Newstead S . Structural basis of nucleotide sugar transport across the Golgi membrane. Nature. 2017; 551: 521-4.

[42] Yang W, Zhao L, Hao L . et al. Evaluating the susceptibility of six peach cultivars to gummosis . Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University. 2015; 34: 13-8.

[43] Zhang H, Zhang D, Wang F . et al. Lasiodiplodia theobromae-induced alteration in ROS metabolism and its relation to gummosis development in Prunus persica . Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020; 154: 43-53.

[44] Zhang L, Kou X, Huang X . et al. Peach-gum: a promising alternative for retarding the ripening and senescence in postharvest peach fruit . Postharvest Biol Technol. 2020; 161: 111088.

[45] Liu HB, Li XH, Xiao JH . et al. A convenient method for simultaneous quantification of multiple phytohormones and metabolites: application in study of rice-bacterium interaction . Plant Methods. 2012; 8: 12.

[46] Yun Z, Gao H, Liu P . et al. Comparative proteomic and metabolomic profiling of citrus fruit with enhancement of disease resistance by postharvest heat treatment . BMC Plant Biol. 2013; 13: 16.

[47] Verde I, Abbott AG, Scalabrin S. et al. The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution . Nat Genet. 2013; 45: 487-94.

[48] Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K. et al. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008; 5: 621-8.

[49] Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD . Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−ΔΔCT) method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402-8.