Genotypic variation in floral volatiles influences floral microbiome more strongly than interactions with herbivores and mycorrhizae in strawberries

Abstract

The floral microbiome is of significant relevance to plant reproduction and crop productivity. While plant genotype is key to floral microbiome assembly, whether and how genotypic variation in floral traits and plant-level mutualistic and antagonistic interactions at the rhizosphere and phyllosphere influence the microbiome in the anthosphere remain little known. Using a factorial field experiment that manipulated biotic interactions belowground (mycorrhizae treatments) and aboveground (herbivory treatments) in three strawberry genotypes, we assessed how genotypic variation in flower abundance and size and plant-level biotic interactions influence the bidirectional relationships between floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the floral microbiome using structural equation modeling. We found that plant genotype played a stronger role, overall, in shaping the floral microbiome than biotic interactions with mycorrhizae and herbivores. Genotypic variation in flower abundance and size influenced the emission of floral VOCs, especially terpenes (e.g. α- and β-pinene, ocimene isomers) and benzenoids (e.g. p-anisaldehyde, benzaldehyde), which in turn affected floral bacterial and fungal communities. While the effects of biotic interactions on floral traits including VOCs were weak, mycorrhizae treatments (mycorrhizae and herbivory + mycorrhizae) affected the fungal community composition in flowers. These findings improve our understanding of the mechanisms by which plant genotype influences floral microbiome assembly and provide the first evidence that biotic interactions in the rhizosphere and phyllosphere can influence the floral microbiome, and offer important insights into agricultural microbiomes.

References

[1] Wei N, Russell AL, Jarrett AR. et al. Pollinators mediate floral microbial diversity and network under agrochemical disturbance. Mol Ecol. 2021; 30: 2235-47.

[2] Rebolleda-Gómez M, Forrester NJ, Russell AL. et al. Gazing into the anthosphere: considering how microbes influence floral evolution. New Phytol. 2019; 224: 1012-20.

[3] Vannette RL . The floral microbiome: plant, pollinator, and microbial perspectives. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2020; 51: 363-86.

[4] Cullen NP, Fetters AM, Ashman T-L . Integrating microbes into pollination. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2021; 44: 48-54.

[5] Wei N, Ashman T-L . The effects of host species and sexual dimorphism differ among root, leaf and flower microbiomes of wild strawberries in situ. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 5195.

[6] Vannette RL, Hall G, Munkres I . Fungi are more dispersal-limited than bacteria among flowers. bioRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.104968.

[7] Toju H, Vannette RL, Gauthier MPL. et al. Priority effects can persist across floral generations in nectar microbial metacommunities. Oikos. 2018; 127: 345-52.

[8] Rering CC, Beck JJ, Hall GW. et al. Nectar-inhabiting microorganisms influence nectar volatile composition and attractiveness to a generalist pollinator. New Phytol. 2018; 220: 750-9.

[9] Farré-Armengol G, Filella I, Llusia J. et al. Bidirectional interaction between phyllospheric microbiotas and plant volatile emissions. Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 854-60.

[10] Hammerbacher A, Coutinho TA, Gershenzon J . Roles of plant volatiles in defence against microbial pathogens and microbial exploitation of volatiles. Plant Cell Environ. 2019; 42: 2827-43.

[11] Scala A, Allmann S, Mirabella R. et al. Green leaf volatiles: a plant’s multifunctional weapon against herbivores and pathogens. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14: 17781-811.

[12] Junker RR, Tholl D . Volatile organic compound mediated interactions at the plant-microbe interface. J Chem Ecol. 2013; 39: 810-25.

[13] Sharifi R, Lee SM, Ryu CM . Microbe-induced plant volatiles. New Phytol. 2018; 220: 684-91.

[14] Weisskopf L, Schulz S, Garbeva P . Microbial volatile organic compounds in intra-kingdom and inter-kingdom interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021; 19: 391-404.

[15] Barber NA, Gorden NLS . How do belowground organisms influence plant-pollinator interactions? J Plant Ecol. 2015; 8: 1-11.

[16] Humphrey PT, Whiteman NK . Insect herbivory reshapes a native leaf microbiome. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020; 4: 221-9.

[17] Perez JL, Victor French J, Summy KR. et al. Fungal phyllosphere communities are altered by indirect interactions among trophic levels. Microb Ecol. 2009; 57: 766-74.

[18] Whyle RL, Trowbridge AM, Jamieson MA . Effects of mycorrhizal inoculation and herbivory on strawberry functional traits. (In Prep).

[19] Rosseel Y . Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012; 48: 1-36.

[20] Lefcheck JS, Freckleton R . piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015; 7: 573-9.

[21] Pozo MI, Lievens B, Jacquemyn H . Impact of microorganisms on nectar chemistry, pollinator attraction and plant fitness. In: Nectar: Production, Chemical Composition and Benefits to Animals and Plants.Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, 2014, 1-40.

[22] Ye M-H, Fan S-H, Li X-Y. et al. Microbiota dysbiosis in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) larvae infected with brood diseases and foraging bees exposed to agrochemicals. R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8: 201805.

[23] Shoemaker RA, Babcock C . Phaeosphaeria. Can J Bot. 1989; 67: 1500-99.

[24] Kernaghan G, Mayerhofer M, Griffin A . Fungal endophytes of wild and hybrid Vitis leaves and their potential for vineyard biocontrol. Can J Microbiol. 2017; 63: 583-95.

[25] Farr DF, Rossman AY Fungal Databases. U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA.from https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/. (Retrieved February 28, 2021).

[26] Vuong HQ, McFrederick QS . Comparative genomics of wild bee and flower isolated Lactobacillus reveals potential adaptation to the bee host. Genome Biol Evol. 2019; 11: 2151-61.

[27] Kirk P, Cannon P, Minter D. et al. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. 10th ed. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2008.

[28] Nishikawa J, Nakashima C . Morphological and molecular characterization of the strawberry black leaf spot pathogen referred to as the strawberry pathotype of Alternaria alternata. Mycoscience. 2019; 60: 1-9.

[29] Khan ZU, Ahmad S, Hagen F. et al. Cryptococcus randhawai sp. nov., a novel anamorphic basidiomycetous yeast isolated from tree trunk hollow of Ficus religiosa (peepal tree) from New Delhi, India. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2010; 97: 253-9.

[30] Wei N, Kaczorowski RL, Arceo-Gómez G. et al. Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity. Nature. 2021; 597: 688-92.

[31] Burkle LA, Runyon JB . Drought and leaf herbivory influence floral volatiles and pollinator attraction. Glob Change Biol. 2016; 22: 1644-54.

[32] Schiestl FP, Kirk H, Bigler L. et al. Herbivory and floral signaling: phenotypic plasticity and tradeoffs between reproduction and indirect defense. New Phytol. 2014; 203: 257-66.

[33] Bernal JS, Medina RF . Agriculture sows pests: how crop domestication, host shifts, and agricultural intensification can create insect pests from herbivores. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2018; 26: 76-81.

[34] Fester T, Sawers R . Progress and challenges in agricultural applications of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2011; 30: 459-70.

[35] van Kleunen M, Ramponi G, Schmid B . Effects of herbivory simulated by clipping and jasmonic acid on Solidago canadensis. Basic Appl Ecol. 2004; 5: 173-81.

[36] Waterman JM, Cazzonelli CI, Hartley SE. et al. Simulated herbivory: the key to disentangling plant defence responses. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019; 34: 447-58.

[37] Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016; 13: 581-3.

[38] R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/, 2019).

[39] Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37: 852-7.

[40] McMurdie PJ, Holmes S . Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e61217.

[41] Bates D, Machler M, Bolker BM. et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015; 67: 1-48.

[42] Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2019).

[43] Fox J, Weisberg S . An R Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2011.

[44] Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB . lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017; 82: 1-26.

[45] Lenth, R. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.3.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2019).

[46] Kuhn, M. Caret: Classification and Regression Training. R package version 6.0-84. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret (2019).

[47] Liaw A, Wiener M . Classification and regression by randomForest. R News. 2002; 2: 18-22.

[48] Diaz-Uriarte R. GeneSrF and varSelRF: a web-based tool and R package for gene selection and classification using random forest. BMC Bioinform. 2007; 8: 328.

[49] Miller, A. Leaps: Regression Subset Selection. R package version 3.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=leaps (2020).

[50] Kline RB . Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. Guilford Publications; 2015.

[51] Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S. et al. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-152. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (2021).