Modification of tomato breeding traits and plant hormone signaling by Target-AID, the genome-editing system inducing efficient nucleotide substitution

Abstract

Target activation-induced cytidine deaminase (Target-AID), a novel CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing tool, confers the base-editing capability on the Cas9 genome-editing system. It involves the fusion of cytidine deaminase (CDA), which catalyzes cytidine (C) to uridine (U) substitutions, to the mutated nickase-type nCas9 or deactivated-type dCas9. To confirm and extend the applicability of the Target-AID genome-editing system in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.), we transformed the model tomato cultivar “Micro-Tom” and commercial tomato cultivars using this system by targeting SlDELLA, which encodes a negative regulator of the plant phytohormone gibberellic acid (GA) signaling pathway. We confirmed that the nucleotide substitutions were induced by the Target-AID system, and we isolated mutants showing high GA sensitivity in both “Micro-Tom” and the commercial cultivars. Moreover, by successfully applying this system to ETHYLENE RECEPTOR 1 (SlETR1) with single sgRNA targeting, double sgRNA targeting, as well as dual-targeting of both SlETR1 and SlETR2 with a single sgRNA, we demonstrated that the Target-AID genome-editing system is a promising tool for molecular breeding in tomato crops. This study highlights an important aspect of the scientific and agricultural potential of the combinatorial use of the Target-AID and other base-editing systems.

References

[1] Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA . RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature. 2012; 482: 331-8.

[2] Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, et al. CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019; 70: 667-97.

[3] Ruan J, Xu J, Chen-Tsai RY, et al. Genome editing in livestock: are we ready for a revolution in animal breeding industry? Transgenic Res . 2017; 26: 715-26.

[4] Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012; 337: 816-21.

[5] Nishimasu H, Ran FA, Hsu PD, et al. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell. 2014; 156: 935-49.

[6] Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, et al. Programmable base editing of T to G C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 2017; 551: 464-71.

[7] Nishida K, Arazoe T, Yachie N, et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science. 2016.

[8] Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, et al. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell. 2000; 102: 553-63.

[9] Quinlan EM, King JJ, Amemiya CT, et al. Biochemical regulatory features of activation-induced cytidine deaminase remain conserved from lampreys to humans. Mol Cell Biol. 2017; 37.

[10] Zhigang W, Smith DG, Mosbaugh DW . Overproduction and characterization of the uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor of bacteriophage PBS2. Gene. 1991; 99: 31-7.

[11] Ryan MD, King AMQ, Thomas GP . Cleavage of foot-and-mouth disease virus polyprotein is mediated by residues located within a 19 amino acid sequence. J Gen Virol. 1991; 72: 2727-32.

[12] Shimatani Z, Kashojiya S, Takayama M, et al. Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat Biotechnol. 2017; 35: 441-3.

[13] Martinelli F, Uratsu SL, Reagan RL, et al. Gene regulation in parthenocarpic tomato fruit. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60: 3873-90.

[14] Shinozaki Y, Hao S, Kojima M, et al. Ethylene suppresses tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit set through modification of gibberellin metabolism. Plant J. 2015; 83: 237-51.

[15] Martí C, Orzáez D, Ellul P, et al. Silencing of DELLA induces facultative parthenocarpy in tomato fruits. Plant J. 2007; 52: 865-76.

[16] Shinozaki Y, Beauvoit BP, Takahara M, et al. Fruit setting rewires central metabolism via gibberellin cascades. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117: 23970-81.

[17] Bassel GW, Mullen RT, Bewley JD . Procera is a putative DELLA mutant in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): effects on the seed and vegetative plant. J Exp Bot. 2008; 59: 585-93.

[18] Van De Velde K, Ruelens P, Geuten K, et al. Exploiting DELLA signaling in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 2017; 22: 880-93.

[19] Harberd NP, Belfield E, Yasumura Y . The angiosperm gibberellin-GID1-DELLA growth regulatory mechanism: how an ‘inhibitor of an inhibitor’ enables flexible response to fluctuating environments. Plant Cell. 2009; 21: 1328-39.

[20] Livne S, Lor VS, Nir I, et al. Uncovering DELLA-independent gibberellin responses by characterizing new tomato procera mutants. Plant Cell. 2015; 27: 1579-94.

[21] Shinozaki Y, Ezura K, Hu J, et al. Identification and functional study of a mild allele of SlDELLA gene conferring the potential for improved yield in tomato. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 1-15.

[22] Rodríguez FI, Esch JJ, Hall AE, et al. A copper cofactor for the ethylene receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis. Science. 1999; 283: 996-8.

[23] Lashbrook CC, Tieman DM, Klee HJ . Differential regulation of the tomato ETR gene family throughout plant development. Plant J. 1998; 15: 243-52.

[24] Damayanti F, Lombardo F, Masuda J-I, et al. Functional disruption of the tomato putative Ortholog of HAWAIIAN SKIRT results in facultative Parthenocarpy, reduced fertility and leaf morphological defects. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 1-18.

[25] Okabe Y, Asamizu E, Saito T, et al. Tomato TILLING technology: development of a reverse genetics tool for the efficient isolation of mutants from micro-tom mutant libraries. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011; 52: 1994-2005.

[26] Achard P, Genschik P . Releasing the brakes of plant growth: how GAs shutdown della proteins. J Exp Bot vol. 60 1085-1092 (Oxford University Press, 2009).

[27] Jiang C, Fu X . GA action: turning on de-DELLA repressing signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007; 10: 461-5.

[28] Li S, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, et al. Crystal structure of the GRAS domain of SCARECROW-LIKE7 in oryza sativa. Plant Cell. 2016; 28: 1025-34.

[29] Hakoshima T . Structural basis of the specific interactions of GRAS family proteins. FEBS Lett. 2018; 592: 489-501.

[30] Bleecker AB, Kende H . Ethylene: a gaseous signal molecule in plant. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000; 16: 1-18.

[31] Seymour GB, Chapman NH, Chew BL, et al. Regulation of ripening and opportunities for control in tomato and other fruits. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013; 11: 269-78.

[32] Lacey RF, Binder BM . How plants sense ethylene gas - the ethylene receptors. J Inorg Biochem. 2014; 133: 58-62.

[33] Kevany BM, Tieman DM, Taylor MG, et al. Ethylene receptor degradation controls the timing of ripening in tomato fruit. Plant J. 2007; 51: 458-67.

[34] Wang W, Esch JJ, Shiu S-H, et al. Identification of important regions for ethylene binding and signaling in the transmembrane domain of the ETR1 ethylene receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 3429-42.

[35] Ramiro AR, Barreto VM . Activation-induced cytidine deaminase and active cytidine demethylation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015; 40: 172-81.

[36] Roldán-Arjona T, Ariza RR, Córdoba-Cañero D . DNA Base excision repair in plants: an unfolding story with familiar and novel characters. Front Plant Sci. 2019; 10: 1-18.

[37] Córdoba-Cañero D, Morales-Ruiz T, Roldán-Arjona T, et al. Single-nucleotide and long-patch base excision repair of DNA damage in plants. Plant J. 2009; 60: 716-28.

[38] Córdoba-Cañero D, Dubois E, Ariza RR, et al. Arabidopsis uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) is required for base excision repair of uracil and increases plant sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil. J Biol Chem. 2010; 285: 7475-83.

[39] Arazoe T, Kondo A, Nishida K . Targeted nucleotide editing Technologies for Microbial Metabolic Engineering. Biotechnol J. 2018; 13: 1-12.

[40] Fauser F, Schiml S, Puchta H . Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2014; 79: 348-59.

[41] Sun HJ, Uchii S, Watanabe S, et al. A highly efficient transformation protocol for micro-tom, a model cultivar for tomato functional genomics. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006; 47: 426-31.