Life cycle analysis of green technologies: Assessing the impact of environmental policies on carbon emissions and energy efficiency

Khan Baz, Zhen Zhu

Geoscience Frontiers ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 102004.

Geoscience Frontiers ›› 2025, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 102004. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102004

Life cycle analysis of green technologies: Assessing the impact of environmental policies on carbon emissions and energy efficiency

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A growing trend in environmental contamination has highlighted the need for greater access to green technologies and clean energy to alleviate environmental stress. This study seeks to quantify the impact of climate mitigation technologies, particularly those related to environmental technology, on environmental quality and economic development. The relationship between environment-related technologies, disaggregated energy use, carbon dioxide emissions, and the stringency of environmental policies was analyzed using Westerlund co-integration, FGLS, and Granger causality techniques across 19 member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The findings show that an increase in fossil fuel use leads to a rise in carbon emissions. Similarly, the use of renewable energy also contributes to higher carbon emissions, while environment-related technologies have a positive impact on environmental quality. In contrast, stricter environmental policies have a negative effect on carbon dioxide emissions. A one-way causality was identified, with environment-related technologies, renewable energy adoption, and environmental policy stringency influencing carbon dioxide emissions, rather than being influenced by them. These findings underscore the significance of environment-related technology in enhancing both environmental quality and economic productivity. Policymakers are encouraged to focus on allocating resources for research, establishing robust regulatory frameworks, fostering collaboration, promoting education and awareness, and providing support for sectors transitioning toward climate change mitigation technologies.

Keywords

Environment-related technology / Environment policy / Renewable energy / Revealed technological advantage

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Khan Baz, Zhen Zhu. Life cycle analysis of green technologies: Assessing the impact of environmental policies on carbon emissions and energy efficiency. Geoscience Frontiers, 2025, 16(2): 102004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102004

References

W.J. Abernathy, J.M. Utterback. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol. Rev., 80 (1978), pp. 40-47
T.S. Adebayo, M. Ağa, M.T. Kartal. Analyzing the co-movement between CO2 emissions and disaggregated nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption in BRICS: evidence through the lens of wavelet coherence. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023), pp. 38921-38938
S. Afshan, I. Ozturk, T. Yaqoob. Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: evidence from MM-QR method. Renew. Energy, 196 (2022), pp. 151-160
E.B. Ali, S. Shayanmehr, R. Radmehr, R. Bayitse, E. Agbozo. Investigating environmental quality among G20 nations: The impacts of environmental goods and low-carbon technologies in mitigating environmental degradation. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101695
I. Ali, H. Sun, G. Tariq, H. Ali, K. Baz, H. Mahmood, I. Khan, J. Yao. Asymmetric impact of coal and gas on carbon dioxide emission in six Asian countries: Using asymmetric and non-linear approach. J. Clean. Prod., 367 (2022), Article 132934
H.A. AlNemer, B. Hkiri, K. Tissaoui. Dynamic impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emission and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: Fresh evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. Renew. Energy, 209 (2023), pp. 340-356
M. Appiah, M. Li, M.A. Naeem, S. Karim. Greening the globe: uncovering the impact of environmental policy, renewable energy, and innovation on ecological footprint. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 192 (2023), Article 122561
P.-A. Balland, D. Rigby. The geography of complex knowledge. Econ. Geogr, 93 (2017), pp. 1-23
K. Baz, D. Xu, H. Ali, I. Ali, I. Khan, M.M. Khan, J. Cheng. Asymmetric impact of energy consumption and economic growth on ecological footprint: using asymmetric and nonlinear approach. Sci. Tot. Environ., 718 (2020), Article 137364
K. Baz, J. Cheng, D. Xu, K. Abbas, I. Ali, H. Ali, C. Fang. Asymmetric impact of fossil fuel and renewable energy consumption on economic growth: A nonlinear technique. Energy, 226 (2021), Article 120357
L. Chang, F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, M. Mohsin. Role of artificial intelligence on green economic development: Joint determinates of natural resources and green total factor productivity. Resour. Policy, 82 (2023), Article 103508
C. Chen, M. Pinar, T. Stengos. Renewable energy and CO2 emissions: New evidence with the panel threshold model. Renew. Energy, 194 (2022), pp. 117-128
X. Chen, M.A. Rahaman, M. Murshed, H. Mahmood, M.A. Hossain. Causality analysis of the impacts of petroleum use, economic growth, and technological innovation on carbon emissions in Bangladesh. Energy, 267 (2023), Article 126565
C.D. Daudu, A. Adefemi, O.O. Adekoya, C.E. Okoli, O.B. Ayorinde, A.I. Daraojimba. LNG and climate change: Evaluating its carbon footprint in comparison to other fossil fuels. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5 (2024), pp. 412-426
M. Demiral, E.E. Akça, I. Tekin. Predictors of global carbon dioxide emissions: Do stringent environmental policies matter?. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 23 (2021), pp. 18337-18361
Y. Dong, Y. Zhang, S. Liu. The impacts and instruments of energy transition regulations on environmental pollution. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 105 (2024), Article 107448
S. Fankhauser, S.M. Smith, M. Allen, K. Axelsson, T. Hale, C. Hepburn, J.M. Kendall, R. Khosla, J. Lezaun, E. Mitchell-Larson. The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nat. Clim. Chang., 12 (2022), pp. 15-21
J.L. Gallup. Added-variable plots for panel-data estimation. Stata J., 20 (2020), pp. 30-50
C.W. Granger. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica (1969), pp. 424-438
Y. Guo, Y. Yu, H. Ren, L. Xu. Scenario-based DEA assessment of energy-saving technological combinations in aluminum industry. J. Clean. Prod., 260 (2020), Article 121010
Hannah Ritchie, P.R.a.V.S., 2023. Average temperature anomaly, Global. Our World in Data.
Hannah Ritchie, M.R.a.P.R., 2024a. Renewable Energy. Our World in Data.
Hannah Ritchie, P.R.a.M.R., 2024b. CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data.
R.L. Ibrahim, K.B. Ajide, M. Usman, R. Kousar. Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment?. Renew. Energy, 200 (2022), pp. 244-256
M.T. Kartal. Production-based disaggregated analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emission nexus: evidence from the USA by novel dynamic ARDL simulation approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023), pp. 6864-6874
M.T. Kartal, U.K. Pata, S.K. Depren, Ö. Depren. Effects of possible changes in natural gas, nuclear, and coal energy consumption on CO2 emissions: evidence from France under Russia’s gas supply cuts by dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Appl. Energy, 339 (2023), Article 120983
I. Khan, H. Lei, A.A. Shah, I. Khan, K. Baz, M.A. Koondhar, A.A. Hatab. Environmental quality and the asymmetrical nonlinear consequences of energy consumption, trade openness and economic development: prospects for environmental management and carbon neutrality. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 29 (2022), pp. 14654-14664
M.E. Kraft. Environmental Policy and Politics. Routledge (2021)
H. Kuang, Y. Liang, W. Zhao, J. Cai. Impact of natural resources and technology on economic development and sustainable environment–Analysis of resources-energy-growth-environment linkages in BRICS. Resour. Policy, 85 (2023), Article 103865
C.K. Lau, G. Gozgor, M.K. Mahalik, G. Patel, J. Li. Introducing a new measure of energy transition: Green quality of energy mix and its impact on CO2 emissions. Energy Econ., 122 (2023), Article 106702
F. Li, H. Liu, Y. Ma, X. Xie, Y. Wang, Y. Yang. Low-carbon spatial differences of renewable energy technologies: Empirical evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 183 (2022), Article 121897
S. Li, A. Samour, M. Irfan, M. Ali. Role of renewable energy and fiscal policy on trade adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of environmental policy stringency. Renew. Energy, 205 (2023), pp. 156-165
B. Lin, R. Sai. Towards low carbon economy: Performance of electricity generation and emission reduction potential in Africa. Energy, 251 (2022), Article 123952
J. Meckling, C. Galeazzi, E. Shears, T. Xu, L.D. Anadon. Energy innovation funding and institutions in major economies. Nat. Energy, 7 (2022), pp. 876-885
M. Mohsin, F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, N. Iqbal, H.B. Saydaliev. The role of technological progress and renewable energy deployment in green economic growth. Renew. Energy, 190 (2022), pp. 777-787
M. Mongo, F. Belaïd, B. Ramdani. The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe. Environ Sci Policy, 118 (2021), pp. 1-9
A.C. Ozdemir. Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in electricity generation by primary fossil fuels in Turkey. Energy, 273 (2023)
M.H. Pesaran. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. J. Appl. Economet., 22 (2007), pp. 265-312
M.H. Pesaran. General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empir. Econ., 60 (2021), pp. 13-50
Pesaran, M.H., 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Available at SSRN 572504.
H. Ritchie. Global fossil fuel consumption. Our World in Data (2022)
Rosado, H.R.a.P., 2023. Fossil fuel consumption per capita, 2023. Our World in Data.
N. Saqib, M. Usman, I. Ozturk, A. Sharif. Harnessing the synergistic impacts of environmental innovations, financial development, green growth, and ecological footprint through the lens of SDGs policies for countries exhibiting high ecological footprints. Energy Policy, 184 (2024), Article 113863
M.I. Shah, M. Usman, H.O. Obekpa, S. Abbas. Nexus between environmental vulnerability and agricultural productivity in BRICS: what are the roles of renewable energy, environmental policy stringency, and technology?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 30 (2023), pp. 15756-15774
A. Sharif, U. Bashir, S. Mehmood, C.W. Cheong, M.F. Bashir. Exploring the impact of green technology, renewable energy and globalization towards environmental sustainability in the top ecological impacted countries. Geosci. Front., 15 (2024), Article 101895
S. Sikiru, T.L. Oladosu, T.I. Amosa, J.O. Olutoki, M. Ansari, K.J. Abioye, Z.U. Rehman, H. Soleimani. Hydrogen-powered horizons: Transformative technologies in clean energy generation, distribution, and storage for sustainable innovation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 56 (2024), pp. 1152-1182
H.B. Smith, N.E. Vaughan, J. Forster. Long-term national climate strategies bet on forests and soils to reach net-zero. Commun. Earth Environ., 3 (2022), p. 305
D. Töbelmann, T. Wendler. The impact of environmental innovation on carbon dioxide emissions. J. Clean. Prod., 244 (2020), Article 118787
M. Usman, N. Khan, A. Omri. Environmental policy stringency, ICT, and technological innovation for achieving sustainable development: Assessing the importance of governance and infrastructure. J. Environ. Manage., 365 (2024), Article 121581
F. Vona, D. Consoli. Innovation and skill dynamics: a life-cycle approach. Ind. Corp. Chang., 24 (2015), pp. 1393-1415
Z. Wang, Y. Zhu. Do energy technology innovations contribute to CO2 emissions abatement?. A Spatial Perspective. Sci. Tot. Environ., 726 (2020), Article 138574
K.M. Weber, H. Rohracher. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Res. Policy, 41 (2012), pp. 1037-1047
J. Wen, C.V. Okolo, I.C. Ugwuoke, K. Kolani. Research on influencing factors of renewable energy, energy efficiency, on technological innovation. Does trade, investment and human capital development matter?. Energy Policy, 160 (2022), Article 112718
J. Westerlund. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat., 69 (2007), pp. 709-748
Y. Wolde-Rufael, E.M. Weldemeskel. Environmental policy stringency, renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions: Panel cointegration analysis for BRIICTS countries. Int. J. Green Energy, 17 (2020), pp. 568-582
J. Xiao, Y. Karavias, A. Juodis, V. Sarafidis, J. Ditzen. Improved tests for Granger noncausality in panel data. Stata J., 23 (2023), pp. 230-242
P. Xie, Y. Xu, X. Tan, Q. Tan. How does environmental policy stringency influence green innovation for environmental managements?. J. Environ. Manage., 338 (2023), Article 117766
X. Zhao, X. Ma, B. Chen, Y. Shang, M. Song. Challenges toward carbon neutrality in China: Strategies and countermeasures. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 176 (2022), Article 105959

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/