Riding towards a sustainable future: an evaluation of bike sharing’s environmental benefits in Xiamen Island, China

Jianxiao Liu , Meilian Wang , Pengfei Chen , Chaoxiang Wen , Yue Yu , KW Chau

Geography and Sustainability ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 276 -288.

PDF
Geography and Sustainability ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :276 -288. DOI: 10.1016/j.geosus.2024.01.002
Research Article
review-article

Riding towards a sustainable future: an evaluation of bike sharing’s environmental benefits in Xiamen Island, China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

In the pursuit of sustainable urbanization, Bike-Sharing Services (BSS) emerge as a pivotal instrument for promoting green, low-carbon transit. While BSS is often commended for its environmental benefits, we offer a more nuanced analysis that elucidates previously neglected aspects. Through the Dominant Travel Distance Model (DTDM), we evaluate the potential of BSS to replace other transportation modes for specific journey based on travel distance. Utilizing multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR), we illuminate the relationship between BSS’s environmental benefits and built-environment attributes. The life cycle analysis (LCA) quantifies greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from production to operation, providing a deeper understanding of BSS’s environmental benefits. Notably, our study focuses on Xiamen Island, a Chinese “Type II large-sized city” (1–3 million population), contrasting with the predominantly studied “super large-sized cities” (over 10 million population). Our findings highlight: (1) A single BSS trip in Xiamen Island reduces GHG emissions by an average of 19.97 g CO2-eq, accumulating monthly savings of 144.477 t CO2-eq. (2) Areas in the southwest, northeast, and southeast of Xiamen Island, characterized by high population densities, register significant BSS environmental benefits. (3) At a global level, the stepwise regression model identifies five key built environment factors influencing BSS’s GHG mitigation. (4) Regionally, MGWR enhances model precision, indicating that these five factors function at diverse spatial scales, affecting BSS’s environmental benefits variably.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases / Shared mobility / Carbon emission / Multiscale geographically weighted regression / Travel behavior / Urban mobility

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jianxiao Liu, Meilian Wang, Pengfei Chen, Chaoxiang Wen, Yue Yu, KW Chau. Riding towards a sustainable future: an evaluation of bike sharing’s environmental benefits in Xiamen Island, China. Geography and Sustainability, 2024, 5(2): 276-288 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2024.01.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Declaration of competing interests

The authors affirm that they have no known financial or interpersonal conflicts that would have seemed to influence the research presented in this study.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2023A1515011174), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42101351).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2024.01.002.

References

[1]

Abdulrazzaq, L. R., Abdulkareem, M. N., Yazid, M. R. M., Borhan, M. N., Mahdi, M. S., 2020. Traffic congestion: shift from private car to public transportation. Civ. Eng. J., 6 (8), pp. 1547-1554. doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091566.

[2]

Abdulazim, T, Abdelgawad, H, Habib, K. M. N., Abdulhai, B., 2526. (1), pp. 136-142. doi: 10.3141/2526-15.

[3]

Anderson, N. A., 2015. Portland bicycle share health impact assessment. M.S. Thesis, University of Southern Maine, Portland

[4]

Burnham, K, Anderson, D. R., 2004. Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: A Practical Information – Theoretic Approach. (2nd ed), Springer-Verlag, New York

[5]

Brunsdon, C, Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M. E., 1996. Fotheringham, M.E. Charlton. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geogr. Anal., 28 (4), pp. 281-298. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x.

[6]

China Academy of Urban Planning and Design, 2023. Bicycle sharing and motorcycle sharing riding report for major cities in China, 2023. (2023-10).

[7]

Cervero, R, Duncan, M., 2003. Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the san francisco bay area. Am. J. Public Health, 93 (9), pp. 1478-1483. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478.

[8]

Cui, S, Meng, F, Wang, W, Lin, J., 2011. GHG accounting for pubilc transport in Xiamen city, China. Carbon. Manag., 2 (4), pp. 383-395. doi: 10.4155/cmt.11.32.

[9]

Corcoran, J, Li, T, Rohde, D, Charles-Edwards, E, Mateo-Babiano, D., 2014. Spatio-temporal patterns of a public bicycle sharing program: the effect of weather and calendar events. J. Transp. Geogr., 41, pp. 292-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.09.003.

[10]

Chen, J, Zhou, D, Zhao, Y, Wu, B, Wu, T., 2020. Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions of bike sharing in China: production, operation, and recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 162, Article 105011. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105011.

[11]

Chen, Y, Zhang, Y, Coffman, D. M., Mi, Z., 2022. An environmental benefit analysis of bike sharing in New York City. Cities, 121, Article 103475. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103475.

[12]

Cervero, R, Sarmiento, O. L., Jacoby, E, Gomez, L. F., Neiman, A., 2009. Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogotá. Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 3 (4), pp. 203-226. doi: 10.1080/15568310802178314.

[13]

de Chardon, C. M., 2016. A geographical analysis of bicycle sharing systems. Ph.D. theis, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg

[14]

Eren, E, Uz, V. E., 2020. A review on bike-sharing: the factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustain. Cities Soc., 54, Article 101882. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882.

[15]

Fishman, E., Washington, S., Haworth, N., 2014. Bike share’s impact on car use: evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 31, 13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013.

[16]

Frank, L. D., Pivo, G., 1994. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transp. Res. Rec., 1466, 44-52.

[17]

Fan, Q, Wang, W, Hua, X, Wei, X, Liang, M., 2018. Dominant transportation distance for multi transportation modes in urban integrated transportation network based on general travel costs. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 18(4), 25-31.

[18]

Guo, Y, Yang, L, Chen, Y., 2022. 10, Article 848169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.848169.

[19]

Gebhart, K, Noland, R. B., 2014. The impact of weather conditions on bikeshare trips in Washington, DC. Transportation, 41, pp. 1205-1225. doi: 10.1007/s11116-014-9540-7.

[20]

Hyland, M, Hong, Z, de Farias Pinto, H. K. R., Chen, Y., 2018. Hybrid cluster-regression approach to model bikeshare station usage. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 115, pp. 71-89. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.009.

[21]

Iyanda, A. E., Osayomi, T., 2021. Is there a relationship between economic indicators and road fatalities in Texas? A multiscale geographically weighted regression analysis. GeoJournal, 86 (6), pp. 2787-2807. doi: 10.1007/s10708-020-10232-1.

[22]

Kou, Z, Wang, X, Chiu, S. F. A., Cai, H., 2020. Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions reduction from bike share systems: a model considering real-world trips and transportation mode choice patterns. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 153, Article 104534. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104534.

[23]

Kim, K., 2018. Investigation on the effects of weather and calendar events on bike-sharing according to the trip patterns of bike rentals of stations. J. Transp. Geogr., 66, pp. 309-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.01.001.

[24]

Liu, J., Shi, W., Chen, P., 2020a. Exploring travel patterns during the holiday season —a case study of Shenzhen Metro system during the Chinese Spring Festival. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf. 9 (11), 651. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9110651.

[25]

Liu, J, Shi, W., 2021. A cross-boundary travel tale: unraveling Hong Kong residents’ mobility pattern in Shenzhen by using metro smart card data. Appl. Geogr., 130, Article 102416. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102416.

[26]

Liu, J, Chau, K. W., Bao, Z., 2023. Multiscale spatial analysis of metro usage and its determinants for sustainable urban development in Shenzhen, China. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 133, Article 104912. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104912.

[27]

Liu, J., Bi, H., Wang, M., 2020b. Using multi-source data to assess livability in Hong Kong at the community-based level: a combined subjective-objective approach. Geogr. Sustain. 1 (4), 284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.12.001.

[28]

Li, A, Gao, K, Zhao, P, Qu, X, Axhausen, K. W., 2021. High-resolution assessment of environmental benefits of dockless bike-sharing systems based on transaction data. J. Clean. Prod., 296, Article 126423. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126423.

[29]

Luo, H, Zhao, F, Chen, W. Q., Cai, H., 2020. Optimizing bike sharing systems from the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 117, Article 102705. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102705.

[30]

Loh, T. H., Walljasper, J, Sonenklar, D, Mills, K, Levinger, D., 2012. Active transportation beyond urban centers: walking and bicycling in small towns and rural America. Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, Washington, D.C

[31]

Mollalo, A, Vahedi, B, Rivera, K. M., 2020. GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States. Sci. Total Environ., 728, Article 138884. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138884.

[32]

Maiti, A, Zhang, Q, Sannigrahi, S, Pramanik, S, Chakraborti, S, Cerda, A, Pilla, F., 2021. Exploring spatiotemporal effects of the driving factors on COVID-19 incidences in the contiguous United States. Sustain. Cities Soc., 68, Article 102784. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102784.

[33]

O'brien, R. M., 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant., 41 (5), pp. 673-690. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.

[34]

Oshan, T. M., Smith, J. P., Fotheringham, A. S., 2020. Targeting the spatial context of obesity determinants via multiscale geographically weighted regression. Int. J. Health Geogr., 19, p. 11. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00204-6.

[35]

Ou, Y, Zheng, J, Nam, K. M., 2022. Impacts of urban rail transit on on-road carbon emissions: a structural equation modeling approach. Atmosphere, 13 (11), p. 1783. doi: 10.3390/atmos13111783.

[36]

Ou, Y, Bao, Z, Ng, S. T., Song, W., 2023. Estimating the effect of air quality on bike-sharing usage in Shanghai, China: an instrumental variable approach. Travel. Behav. Soc., 33, Article 100626. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100626.

[37]

Ou, Y, Song, W, Nam, K. M., 2024. Metro-line expansions and local air quality in Shenzhen: focusing on network effects. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 126, Article 103991. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103991.

[38]

Pucher, J, Renne, J. L., 2004. Urban-rural differences in mobility and mode choice: evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Rrunswick

[39]

Qiu, L. Y., He, L. Y., 2018. Bike sharing and the economy, the environment, and health-related externalities. Sustainability, 10 (4), p. 1145. doi: 10.3390/su10041145.

[40]

Ricci, M., 2015. Bike sharing: a review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 15, pp. 28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.03.003.

[41]

Scheiner, J., 2010. Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: trends in Germany 1976–2002. J. Transp. Geogr., 18 (1), pp. 75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.001.

[42]

Singleton, P. A., Clifton, K. J., 2014. Exploring synergy in bicycle and transit use: empirical evidence at two scales. Transp. Res. Rec., 2417 (1), pp. 92-102. doi: 10.3141/2417-10.

[43]

Sun, F., Chen, P., Jiao, J., 2018. Promoting public bike-sharing: a lesson from the unsuccessful Pronto system. Transp. Res. D: Transp. Environ. 63, 533–547. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.021.

[44]

Shang, W. L., Chen, J. Y., Bi, H. B., Sui, Y, Chen, Y. Y., Yu, H. T., 2021. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on user behaviors and environmental benefits of bike sharing: a big-data analysis. Appl. Energy, 285, Article 116429. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116429.

[45]

Teixeira, J. F., Silva, C, Moura e Sá, F., 2021. Empirical evidence on the impacts of bikesharing: a literature review. Transp. Rev., 41 (3), pp. 329-351. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2020.1841328.

[46]

Wang, J., 2019. Study on the influence of bike-sharing on carbon emissions in traffic field and its policy implications. Ph.D. thesis, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing

[47]

Xiao, L, Yang, L, Liu, J, Yang, H., 2020. Built environment correlates of the propensity of walking and cycling. Sustainability, 12 (20), p. 8752. doi: 10.3390/su12208752.

[48]

Xu, P, Huang, H, Dong, N, Wong, S. C., 2017. Revisiting crash spatial heterogeneity: a Bayesian spatially varying coefficients approach. Accid. Anal. Prev., 98, pp. 330-337. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.015.

[49]

Xu, Y, Chen, D, Zhang, X, Tu, W, Chen, Y, Shen, Y, Ratti, C., 2019. Unravel the landscape and pulses of cycling activities from a dockless bike-sharing system. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 75, pp. 184-203. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.02.002.

[50]

Yuniar, D, Djakfar, L, Wicaksono, A, Efendi, A., 2020. Truck driver behavior and travel time effectiveness using smart GPS. Civ. Eng. J., 6 (4), pp. 724-732. doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091504.

[51]

Zhang, Y, Mi, Z., 2018. Environmental benefits of bike sharing: a big data-based analysis. Appl. Energy, 220, pp. 296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

144

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/