Evaluation of site response characteristic using nonlinear method (Case study: Babol, Iran)

Asskar Janalizadeh CHOOBBASTI, Sadegh REZAEI, Farzad FARROKHZAD, Pedram Haidarzaeh AZAR

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 0

PDF(1230 KB)
PDF(1230 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› DOI: 10.1007/s11709-014-0231-4
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY

Evaluation of site response characteristic using nonlinear method (Case study: Babol, Iran)

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this the present study, an attempt has been made to evaluate the seismic hazard considering local site effects by carrying out detailed geotechnical site characterization in Babol, Iran. Use of geotechnical data and synthesis of drilling data extracted from the Babol’s subsurface database have enabled authors to determine the geotechnical properties of each site. These data are consisted of twenty five boreholes up to depth of 40 m. Based on the obtained data from geotechnical investigation the study area is divided to five zones. Dynamic analysis was performed in time domain, using fully nonlinear model by PLAXIS. A series of analysis in the study area showed the site period, ranging from 0.4 to 0.8 s. Finally the obtained response spectra from fully nonlinear method were compared with site response spectra of Iran’s 2800 (earthquake) code.

Keywords

fully nonlinear method / site effect / dynamic analysis / response spectra

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Asskar Janalizadeh CHOOBBASTI, Sadegh REZAEI, Farzad FARROKHZAD, Pedram Haidarzaeh AZAR. Evaluation of site response characteristic using nonlinear method (Case study: Babol, Iran). Front Struc Civil Eng, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0231-4

References

[1]
Kramer S. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, 1996
[2]
Aki K. Local Site Effects on Weak and Strong Ground Motions. Prentice Hall, 1993
[3]
Mittal H, Kamal, Kumar A, Singh S K. Estimation of site effect in Delhi using standard spectral ratio. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 50: 53–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Hasancebi N, Ulusay R. Evaluation of site amplification and site period using different methods for an earthquake-prone settlement in Western Turkey. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2006, 87(1–2): 85–104
[5]
Assimaki D, Kausel E. An equivalent linear algorithm with frequency and pressure-dependent moduli and damping for the seismic analysis of deep sites. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(9–12): 959–965
[6]
Carvajal J C, Taboada-Urtuzuástegui V M, Romo M P. Influence of earthquake frequency content on soil dynamic properties at Cao site. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(4): 297–308
[7]
Crandall S H. Is stochastic equivalent linearization a subtly flawed procedure? Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 16(2): 169–176
[8]
Cundall P A. FLAC Manual: A Computer Program for Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2001
[9]
Ishihara K. Soil Behavior in Earthquake Geotechnics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996
[10]
Schnabel P B, Seed H B, Lysmer J. SHAKE: A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Site. Research Center, Berkeley, California, 1972
[11]
Takewaki I. Critical excitaion for elastic-plastic structures via Statistical Equivalent linear method. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2002, 17(1): 73–84
[12]
Yoshida N, Kobayashi S, Suetomi I, Miura K. Equivalent linear method considerating frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2002, 22(3): 205–222
[13]
Lu T, Huo J, Rong M. Nonlinear response analysis of soil layers under severe earthquake. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 12: 940–948
[14]
Semblat J F, Duval A M, Dangla P. Numerical analysis of seismic wave amplification in Nice (France) and comparisons with experiments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 19(5): 347–362
[15]
Bardet J P, Ichii K, Lin C H. EERA Manual: A Computer Program for Equivalent-linear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits. University of Southern California, 2000
[16]
Grigoriu M. Equivalent linearization for systems driven by Le’vy white noise. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 200(15): 185–190
[17]
Guéguen P, Chatelain J L, Guillier B, Yepes H, Egred J. Site effect and damage distribution in Pujili (Ecuador) after the 28 March 1996 earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1998, 17(5): 329–334
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of building. 3rd ed. Building and Housing Research Center, 2005
[19]
Moya A, Schmidt V, Segura C, Boschini I, Atakan K. Empirical evaluation of site effects in the metropolitan area of San Jose, Costa Rica. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 20(1–4): 177–185
[20]
Fernandez L M, Brandt M B C. The reference spectral noise ratio method to evaluate the seismic response of a site. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2000, 20(5–8): 381–388
[21]
Godano C, Oliveri F. Nonlinear seismic waves: A model for site effects. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 1998, 34(3): 457–468
[22]
Seed H B. Earthquake Effects on Soil-Foundation System: Foundation Engineering Handbook. Winterkom and Frang, 1975
[23]
Brinkgreve R B J, Vermeer P A. Plaxis Manual (Version8). A.A.Balkema/Rotterdm/Brookfield-D, University of Stuttgart, Germany, 1998
[24]
Anbazhagan P, Sitharam T G. Seismic microzonation of Bangalore, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 2008, 117(S2): 833–852
[25]
Technical Committee for Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering(TC4). Revised Manual for Zonation on Seismic Geotechnical Hazards: Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1999
[26]
Goel R K, Chopra A K. Period formulas for moment-resisting frame building. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1997, 123(11): 1454–1461

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1230 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/