RESEARCH ARTICLE

Kinematic, workspace and singularity analysis of a new parallel robot used in minimally invasive surgery

  • Alin STOICA ,
  • Doina PISLA ,
  • Szilaghyi ANDRAS ,
  • Bogdan GHERMAN ,
  • Bela-Zoltan GYURKA ,
  • Nicolae PLITEA
Expand
  • Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, RO-400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Received date: 10 Nov 2012

Accepted date: 20 Dec 2012

Published date: 05 Mar 2013

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

In the last ten years, due to development in robotic assisted surgery, the minimally invasive surgery has greatly changed. Until now, the vast majority of robots used in surgery, have serial structures. Due to the orientation parallel module, the structure is able to reduce the pressure exerted on the entrance point in the patient’s abdominal wall. The parallel robot can also handle both a laparoscope as well an active instrument for different surgical procedures. The advantage of this parallel structure is that the geometric model has been obtained through an analytical approach. The kinematic modelling of a new parallel architecture, the inverse and direct geometric model and the inverse and direct kinematic models for velocities and accelerations are being determined. The paper will demonstrate that with this parallel structure, one can obtain the necessary workspace required for a minimally invasive operation. The robot workspace was generated using the inverse geometric model. An in-depth study of different types of singularity is performed, allowing the development of safe control algorithms of the experimental model. Some kinematic simulation results and the experimental model of the robot are presented in the paper.

Cite this article

Alin STOICA , Doina PISLA , Szilaghyi ANDRAS , Bogdan GHERMAN , Bela-Zoltan GYURKA , Nicolae PLITEA . Kinematic, workspace and singularity analysis of a new parallel robot used in minimally invasive surgery[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 0 , 8(1) : 70 -79 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-013-0365-4

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the projects "Doctoral studies in engineering sciences for developing the knowledge based society-SIDOC" with contract No. POSDRU/88/1.5/S/ 60078, co-funded from European Social Fund through Sectorial Operational Program Human Resources 2007-2013 and Scopes International Grant IZ74Z0-137361 entitled “Creative Alliance in Research and Education focused on Medical and Service Robotics (CARE-Robotics)”.
1
Gherman B, Vaida C, Pisla D, Plitea N. Singularities and workspace analysis for a parallel robot for minimally invasive surgery. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Conference on Automation Quality and Testing Robotics (AQTR), 2010, 1-6

2
Taylor R, Stulberg S. Medical robotics working group section report. NSF Workshop on Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Medical Interventions, Bristol, England, 1996

3
Plitea N, Hesselbach J, Pisla D,Raatz A, Vaida C, Budde C, Vlad L, Burisch A, Senner R. Innovative development of surgical parallel robots. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference of Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology, 2007, 201-206

4
Kraft B M, Jäger C, Kraft K, Leibl B J, Bittner R. The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient? Surgical Endoscopy, 2004, 18(8): 1216-1223PMID:15457381

DOI

5
Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Human Reproduction, 1998, 13(10): 2748-2750

DOI PMID

6
Long J A, Descotes J L, Skowron O, Troccaz J, Cinquin P, Boillot B, Terrier N, Rambeaud J J. Use of robotics in laparoscopic urological surgery: state of the art. Progres en Urologie, 2006, 16(1): 3-11 PMID:16526532

7
Biomed Homepage. 2010, http://biomed.brown.edu

8
Taylor R H, Funda J, Eldridge B, Gomory S, Gruben K, LaRose D, Talamini M, Kavoussi L, Anderson J. A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 1995, 14(3): 279-288

DOI

9
Kobayashi E, Masamune K, Sakuma I, Dohi T, Hashimoto D. A new safe laparoscopic manipulator system with a five-bar linkage mechanism and an optical zoom. Computer Aided Surgery, 1999, 4(4): 182-192

DOI PMID

10
Rininsland H. ARTEMIS. A telemanipulator for cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1999, 16(Suppl 2): S106-S111

DOI PMID

11
Aiono S, Gilbert J M, Soin B, Finlay P A, Gordan A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy, 2002, 16(9): 1267-1270

DOI PMID

12
Degani A, Choset H, Wolf A, Zenati M A. Highly articulated robotic probe for minimally invasive surgery. In: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, 2006, 4167-4172

13
Lee Y J, Kim J, Ko S Y, Lee W J, Kwon D S. Design of a compact laparoscopic assistant robot: KaLAR. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Automation and Systems, Korea, 2003, 2648-2653

14
Berkelman P, Ma J. A compact modular teleoper-ated robotic minimally invasive surgery system. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003

15
Kim S K, Shin W H, Ko S Y, Kim J, Kwon D S. Design of a compact 5-DOF surgical robot of a spherical mechanism: Cures. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 2008, 990-995

16
Polet R, Donnez J. Using a laparoscope manipulator (LAPMAN) in laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Surgical Technology International XVII-Gynecology, 2008, 17: 187-191

PMID

17
Saing V, Sotthivirat S, Vilasrussamee J, Suthakornm J. Design of a new laparoscopic-holder assisting robot. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand, 2008, 278-281

18
Voros S, Haber G P, Menudet J F, Long J A, Cinquin P. ViKY robotic scope holder: initial clinical experience and preliminary results using instrument tracking. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2010, 15(6): 879-886

19
Intuitive Surgical Homepage. 2010, http://www.intuitivesurgical.com

20
Titan Medical Homepage. 2010, http://www.titanmedicalinc.com

21
Hagn U, Konietschke R, Tobergte A, Nickl M, Jörg S, Kübler B, Passig G, Gröger M, Fröhlich F, Seibold U, Le-Tien L, Albu-Schäffer A, Nothhelfer A, Hacker F, Grebenstein M, Hirzinger G. DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, 5(2): 183-193

DOI PMID

22
http://www.roboticstrends.com/research_academics/article/new_robot_with_force_feedback_promises_better_surgery

23
Pisla D, Plitea N, Vaida C. Kinematic modeling and workspace generation for a new parallel robot used in minimally invasive surgery. Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Design, 2008, 459- 468

24
Vaida C, Pisla D, Plitea N, Gherman B, Gyurka B, Stancel E, Hesselbach J, Raatz A, Vlad L, Graur F. Development of a control system for a parallel robot used in minimally invasive surgery. In: Proceeding of International conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology, 2009, 26, 171-176

25
Plitea N, Pisla D, Vaida C. On kinematics of a parallel robot for minimally invasive surgery. PAMM, 2007, 7(1): 4010033-4010034

DOI

26
Vaida C. Contributions to the development and kinematic-dynamic modelling of parallel robots for MIS. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, Cluj-Napoca, 2009

27
Merlet J P. Parallel Robots. Springer: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 2006

28
Gogu G. Structural Synthesis of Parallel Robots. New York: Springer, 2006

29
Lum M J H, Rosen J, Sinanan M N, Hannaford B. Kinematic optimization of a spherical mechanism for a minimally invasive surgical robot. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, USA, 2004, 829-834

30
Beasley R A, Howe R D, Dupont P E. Kinematic error correction for minimally invasive surgical robots. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, USA, 2004, 358-364

31
Pisla D, Plitea N, Gherman B, Pisla A, Vaida C. Kinematical analysis and design of a new surgical parallel robot. Computational Kinematics, 2009, 273-282

32
Graur F. Experimental laparoscopic cholecistectomy using PARAMIS parallel robot, In: Proceedings of SMIT 2009, Sinaia, Romania, 2009

33
Zlatanov D, Bonev I A, Gosselin C M. Constraint singularities of parallel mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, USA, 2002, 496-502

34
Gosselin C, Angeles J. Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1990, 6(3): 281-290

DOI

35
Pastorelli S, Battezzato A. Singularity analysis of a 3 degrees-of-freedom parallel manipulator. Computational Kinematics, 2009, 331-440

36
Staicu S. Recursive modelling in dynamics of delta parallel robot. Robotica, 2009, 27: 199-207

37
Maxon Motor A G. Maxon Motor Control. User CD-ROM, 2011

38
B&R. Automation Studio, Control Software. DVD-ROM, 2011

Outlines

/