Design and preliminary evaluation of an exoskeleton for upper limb resistance training
Received date: 10 Jan 2012
Accepted date: 12 Mar 2012
Published date: 05 Jun 2012
Copyright
Resistance training is a popular form of exercise recommended by national health organizations, such as the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and the American Heart Association (AHA). This form of training is available for most populations. A compact design of upper limb exoskeleton mechanism for home-based resistance training using a spring-loaded upper limb exoskeleton with a three degree-of-freedom shoulder joint and a one degree-of-freedom elbow joint allows a patient or a healthy individual to move the upper limb with multiple joints in different planes. It can continuously increase the resistance by adjusting the spring length to train additional muscle groups and reduce the number of potential injuries to upper limb joints caused by the mass moment of inertia of the training equipment. The aim of this research is to perform a preliminary evaluation of the designed function by adopting an appropriate motion analysis system and experimental design to verify our prototype of the exoskeleton and determine the optimal configuration of the spring-loaded upper limb exoskeleton.
Key words： exoskeleton; free-weight exercise; upper limb; motion analysis
Tzong-Ming WU , Dar-Zen CHEN . Design and preliminary evaluation of an exoskeleton for upper limb resistance training[J]. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 0 , 7(2) : 188 -198 . DOI: 10.1007/s11465-012-0327-2
| 1 |
Kraemer W J, Ratamess N A. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2004, 36(4): 674-688
|
| 2 |
Kraemer W J, Adams K, Cafarelli E, Dudley G A, Dooly C, Feigenbaum M S, Fleck S J, Franklin B, Fry A C, Hoffman J R, Newton R U, Potteiger J, Stone M H, Ratamess N A, Triplett-McBride T. American College of Sports Medicine position stand: Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2002, 34(2): 364-380
|
| 3 |
Williams M A, Haskell W L, Ades P A, Amsterdam E A, Bittner V, Franklin B A, Gulanick M, Laing S T, Stewart K J. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation, 2007, 116(5): 572-584
|
| 4 |
Taylor N F, Dodd K J, Damiano D L. Progressive resistance exercise in physical therapy: a summary of systematic reviews. Physical Therapy, 2005, 85(11): 1208-1223
|
| 5 |
Wu T M, Wang S Y, Chen D Z. Design of an exoskeleton for strengthening the upper limb muscle for overextension injury prevention. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2011, 46(12): 1825-1839
|
| 6 |
Anglin C, Wyss U P. Review of arm motion analyses. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2000, 214(5): 541-555
|
| 7 |
Richards J G. The measurement of human motion: A comparison of commercially available system. Human Movement Science, 1999, 18(5): 589-602
|
| 8 |
Zhou H, Hu H. Human motion tracking for rehabilitation-A survey. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2008, 3(1): 1-18
|
| 9 |
Cappozzo A, Della Croce U, Leardini A, Chiari L. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: Theoretical background. Gait & Posture, 2005, 21(2): 186-196
|
| 10 |
Chiari L, Della Croce U, Leardini A, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: Instrumental errors. Gait & Posture, 2005, 21(2): 197-211
|
| 11 |
Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3: Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait & Posture, 2005, 21(2): 212-225
|
| 12 |
Della Croce U, Leardini A, Chiari L, Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: Assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. Gait & Posture, 2005, 21(2): 226-237
|
| 13 |
Schmidt R, Disselhorst-Klug C, Silny J, Rau G. A marker-based measurement procedure for unconstrained wrist and elbow motions. Journal of Biomechanics, 1999, 32(6): 615-621
|
| 14 |
Biryukova E V, Roby-Brami A, Frolov A A, Mokhtari M. Kinematics of human arm reconstructed from spatial tracking system recordings. Journal of Biomechanics, 2000, 33(8): 985-995
|
| 15 |
Prokopenko R A, Frolov A A, Biryukova E V, Roby-Brami A. Assessment of the accuracy of a human arm model with seven degrees of freedom. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001, 34(2): 177-185
|
| 16 |
Hingtgen B, McGuire J R, Wang M, Harris G F. An upper extremity kinematic model for evaluation of hemiparetic stroke. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006, 39(4): 681-688
|
| 17 |
http://www.vicon.com/
|
| 18 |
Romilly D P, Anglin C, Gosine R G, Hershler C, Raschke S U. A functional task analysis and motion simulation forthe development of a powered upper-limb orthosis. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 1994, 2(3): 119-129
|
| 19 |
The Stock Precision Engineered Components (SPEC). http://springming.sobuy.com/ezfiles/springming/img/img/61161/SPEC-04E.pdf.
|
| 20 |
Dumas R, Aissaoui R, de Guise J A. A 3D generic inverse dynamic method using wrench notation and quaternion algebra. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2004, 7(3): 159-166
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |