1 Introduction
2 Basic characteristics of low-temperature plasma and its mechanism in auxiliary machining
Tab.1 Classification of plasma |
Classification | Macroscopic temperature/K | Thermodynamic property | Examples | |
---|---|---|---|---|
High-temperature plasma | 106–108 | Thermodynamic equilibrium | Solar core; thermonuclear fusion | |
Low-temperature plasma | Hot plasma | 103–2×104 | Local thermodynamic equilibrium | Arc plasma; high-frequency plasma; magnetic fluid discharge |
Cold plasma | 300–500 | Non-local thermodynamic equilibrium | Glow discharge; corona discharge; spark discharge |
Fig.2 Schematic diagram and experimental setup of the low-temperature plasma-assisted machining process: (a) schematic diagram and (b) experimental setup of hot plasma-assisted machining; (c) schematic diagram and (d) experimental setup of cold plasma-assisted machining. Reproduced with permissions from Refs. [46,47] from Taylor and Francis and Elsevier, respectively. |
3 Hot plasma-assisted machining
Tab.2 Summary of selected research papers that investigated HPAM |
Workpiece materials | Authors | Machining process | Effects compared with conventional machining | Optimal surface roughness Ra |
---|---|---|---|---|
18% Mn steel, 2.25% Cr cast iron | Kitagawa et al. [62] | Turning | Decrease in cutting force, disappearance of built-up edge and chatter | Not mentioned |
Stainless steel, alloy steel | Madhavulu and Ahmed [61] | Turning | 1.8 times gain in material removal rate, 1.67 times improvement in tool life | Not mentioned |
Inconel 718 | Leshock et al. [66] | Turning | 30% decrease in cutting force, 40% increase in tool life, two-fold improvement in Ra | ~0.4 μm |
Haynes 25, Inconel 718 | López de Lacalle et al. [49] | Milling | 25% decrease in cutting force and 350% increase in productivity for Haynes 25, 200% increase in tool life for Inconel 718 | Not mentioned |
Ti‒6Al‒4V | Lee and Lee [50] | Milling | 60.2% decrease in cutting force, 70.5% improvement in Ra | 0.111 μm |
AISI 1045 steel, Inconel 718 | Moon and Lee [63] | Milling | 61% decrease in cutting force and 79% improvement in Ra for AISI 1045 steel, 57% decrease in cutting force and 82% improvement in Ra for Inconel 718 | ~0.1 μm for each material |
Hardened AISI 4340 steel | Rao [48] | Turning | Tool wear form transferred from notch wear to flank wear, Ra was reduced | ~0.5 μm |
Inconel 718 | Wang et al. [64] | Turning (with liquid N2) | 30%–50% decrease in cutting force, 250% reduction in Ra, 170% increase in tool life | ~0.6 μm |
Inconel 718 | Feyzi and Safavi [65] | Turning (with liquid N2, ultrasonic vibration) | 4‒8 times increase in tool life, 88%–93% improvement in Ra | ~0.2 μm |
17-4PH stainless steel | Khani et al. [46] | Turning (with liquid N2) | 48% reduction in cutting force, 48% decrease in tool flank wear, 18% improvement in Ra, 117% increase in tool life | ~0.5 μm |
4 Cold plasma-assisted machining
4.1 Cold plasma-assisted polishing
4.2 Cold plasma-assisted cutting
Fig.20 Surface quality of Ti‒6Al‒4V machined by different micro-milling methods: (a) surface roughness Ra; scanning electron microscope images of (b1) surface microstructure and (b2) tool mark obtained by dry micro-milling; (c1) surface microstructure and (c2) tool mark obtained by cold plasma + minimum quantity lubrication (MQL)-assisted micro-milling. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [85] from Springer Nature. |
Tab.3 Summary of selected research papers in CPAM |
Workpiece material | Reference | Machining process | Effects compared with conventional machining | Optimal surface roughness |
---|---|---|---|---|
Silicon carbide | Yamamura et al. [84,89–94] | Polishing | Decrease in hardness from 37.4 to 4.5 GPa, achieving atomic flattening | RMS: ~0.1 nm |
Aluminum nitride | Sun et al. [95,96] | Polishing | 2 times gain in material removal rate, improvement in surface quality | Sa: ~3 nm |
Gallium nitride | Deng et al. [97] | Polishing | Decrease in hardness from 22.7 to 13.9 GPa | Sq: ~0.1 nm |
Single-crystal diamond | Yamamura et al. [98–101] | Polishing | 20 times gain in material removal rate | Sq: ~0.13 nm |
Single-crystal sapphire | Bastawros et al. [102] | Polishing | 2 times improvement in material removal rate | Sq: ~0.23 μm |
304 stainless steel | Liu [119] | Turning | 13%–17% reduction in cutting forces, 69% decrease in flank wear | Not mentioned |
NAK80 die steel | Huang et al. [86,121,122] | Turning (with ultrasonic vibration) | 50% decrease in flank wear | Ra: ~1.5 μm |
Ti‒6Al‒4V | Liu et al. [85] | Micro-milling (with MQL) | 25% reduction in main cutting force, 50% improvement in Ra, alleviation of cracks on machined surfaces | Ra: ~0.08 μm |
Silicon carbide | Katahira et al. [47] | Micro-milling | Significant improvements in surface quality and tool life | Ra: ~0.73 nm |
GCr15 | Liu et al. [124] | Micro-grinding (with MQL) | 82% reduction in main cutting force, 65% improvement in Ra, alleviation of chip adhesion | Ra: ~0.23 μm |
Note. RMS: root mean square. |