%A Leslie J. MORAN %T THE PRESS AND THE JUDICIARY: COURT AND JUDICIAL REPORTS IN THE PRESS IN ENGLAND AND WALES %0 Journal Article %D 2014 %J Front. Law China %J Frontiers of Law in China %@ 1673-3428 %R 10.3868/s050-003-014-0009-6 %P 131-158 %V 9 %N 2 %U {https://journal.hep.com.cn/flc/EN/10.3868/s050-003-014-0009-6 %8 2014-06-03 %X

Western scholars have argued that image making and image management are a preoccupation of the judiciary. Images of the judiciary may take a variety of forms and be produced for kinds of audiences. One form of judicial image making and image management is live performances in the courtroom and other court settings. Another is the written judgment where the preoccupation is the style of the written text. Press and other mass media reports of judicial activity are another. The audience for judicial images is equally diverse, from fellow judges, lawyers in the courts and the wider legal community, the litigants before the courts to the executive, legislature and the public both in the courtroom and beyond. The image of the judiciary that is available to the public has a particular significance in Western rule of law democracies. As a general rule courts and the judiciary are required to operate in public and their activities must be open to public scrutiny. A recent policy manifestation of this goal is debated about confidence in the justice system and initiatives designed to improve confidence. In the majority of cases public scrutiny of judicial activity and public confidence in the judiciary relies upon the media. Objective and accurate press and media reports play a key role in shaping public understanding of the judiciary and generating or undermining confidence in that institution. Reports in regional and national newspapers have long been an important source of information, shaping public knowledge and facilitating public scrutiny of the justice system. In the UK, there is almost no scholarship on these representations past or present. The result is little known about the representation of the courts and the judiciary in press reports. Little is known about what the diligent reader of these reports can learn about judicial activity. The aim of this article is to take a first step towards changing that state of affairs. It uses a data set made up of 205 contemporary domestic newspaper reports of court and judicial activity. These come from a sample of 24 daily newspapers: 10 national newspapers and 14 from the regions. All were published on Thursday 16th February 2012, an unexceptional day in the life of the justice system and the press. The modest goal of this article is to offer an analysis of this snapshot of judicial activity in the press in England and Wales. The article concludes with some reflections on the significance of the findings of this study for our understanding of the role of the press in enabling public scrutiny of the judiciary.