1 Introduction
2 Metal oxides, NFs, PV/T systems, and optical filter
2.1 Metal oxides
2.2 PV/T systems
2.3 NFs
Tab.1 Thermophysical properties of metal oxide NPs |
Ref. | Metal oxide | Thermal conductivity, k/(W·(m·K)–1) | Specific heat, CP/(J·(kg·K)–1) | Density, /(kg·m–3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
[123] | Al2O3 | 40 | 773 | 3960 |
[123] | TiO2 | 8.4 | 692 | 4230 |
[124] | SiO2 | 1.4 | 745 | 2220 |
[125] | Fe3O4 | 9.7 | 670 | 5180 |
[123] | CuO | 33 | 551 | 6000 |
[64] | ZnO | 13 | 495 | 5600 |
[126] | MgO | 8.15 (at 699.8 K temp) | 925.92 (at 300 K temp) | 3650 (at 298 K temp) |
2.3.1 Preparation of NFs
2.3.2 NFs uses in PV/T energy system
2.4 Optical filters
3 Literature of the previous work
Tab.2 A summary of metal oxide-based NFs used in PV/T systems |
Ref. | Study type | NP, size and concentration | Base fluid | PM | Flowrate | PV panel specification | Collector type | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[62] | Num | AL2O3, 30–60 nm, 3% mass fraction; CuO, 35–45 nm, 3% mass fraction | H2O, gly and EG | 2-S | 0.025–0.225 kg/s | Solar module type APM-P 110–12 | PV/T | As a BF, the water presents the minimum pressure drop while glycerin shows the maximum value |
[66] | Exp and num | AL2O3,–, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.4% mass fraction | H2O, EG | 2-S | Constant flowrate | Conventional monocrystalline Si PV module | Sheet and tube | Electrical and thermal efficiency is increased with the increase of NPs addition |
[67] | Exp | Fe3O4, 45 nm, 1% and 3% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 30 L/h | 40 W monocrystalline Si PV module | PV/T | Overall efficiency is improved by about 76% at the concentration of 3% mass fraction Fe3O4-water NF |
[68] | Exp | SiO2, –, 0.5%, 1% and 2% mass fraction; TiO2, –, 0.5%, 1% and 2% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 0.068 to 0.170 kg/s | PV-M model STF–120P6 | PV/T | With the increase of mass flowrate and solar radiance, the PV/T system efficiency is increased |
[69] | Exp | AL2O3, 30 nm, 0.1% to 0.5% mass fraction | H2O | – | 0.2 L/s | Monocrystalline solar panel | PV/T | The electrical and thermal efficiency increase by about 12.1% and 34.4%, respectively |
[64] | Num and exp | ZnO, 35–45 nm, 0%– 12% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 30 to 70 kg/h | Two 40 W monocrystalline Si PV modules | Sheet and tube | With the increase of solar irradiance, the mass flowrate of coolant, NP mass fraction %, and ambient temperature PV/T systems efficiency was increased |
[70] | Exp | AL2O3, 10–30 nm, 0.2% mass fraction; TiO2, 20–60 nm, 0.2% mass fraction; ZnO, 35–45 nm, 0.2% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 30 kg/h | Two 40 W monocrystalline Si PV modules | Sheet and tube | Maximum electrical and thermal efficiency is shown by TiO2-water and ZnO-water NFs 13.63% and 46.05%, respectively |
[71] | Num | CuO, –, 0.7% mass fraction; AL2O3, –, 0.7% mass fraction | H2O | – | – | A monocrystalline Si cell | Sheet and tube | Thermal efficiency increases by up to 78.83% and 80.94% for Al2O3-water, and CuO-water NFs, respectively |
[65] | Exp and num | CuO, –, 1% mass fraction; SiO2, –, 1% mass fraction; ZnO, –, 1% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 0.01 to 0.04 kg/s | 120 W PV polycrystalline | Sheet and tube | Thermal, electrical, and overall efficiency increases for SiO2-water NF is about 64.40%, 12.70%, and 77.10%, respectively |
[72] | Exp | CuO, 35–45 nm, 0.5%–4% volume fraction; AL2O3, 30–60 nm, 0.5%–4% volume fraction | H2O | 2-S | – | Solar module type-APM-P 110-12 | PV/T | The enhancement in thermal conductivity is 1.96% and 3.42%, for Al2O3 and CuO NFs with 4% volume fraction, respectively |
[73] | Num | SiO2, –, 0%– 0.05% volume fraction | H2O | – | – | PV/T module | PV/T | Cylindrical shape particles show the greatest performance compared to others |
[74] | Exp and num | AL2O3, –, 3% and 0.2% mass fraction; TiO2, –, 3% and 0.2% mass fraction; ZnO, –, 3% and 0.2% mass fraction; SiO2, –, 1% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 30 kg/h | 40 W monocrystalline Si PV module | Sheet and tube | SiO2-water NF generates the maximum entropy and ZnO-water NF generates the lowest frictional entropy |
[75] | Exp | TiO2, –, 0.5% and 1% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 0.012 to 0.0255 kg/s | A standard polycrystalline 80 W PV module | PV/T | TiO2-water fluid with 1% mass fraction causes the maximum temperature change |
[76] | Num | CuO, –, 0%–0.75%; AL2O3, –, 0%–0.75%; SiO2, –, 0%–0.75% | H2O | – | 0 to 0.03 kg/s | A standard monocrystalline Si PV panel | Dual-fluid PV/T | Heat transfer performance is tremendously dependent on NPs concentrations |
[77] | Exp | CuO, 50–100 nm, 0.05% mass fraction; AL2O3, 50 nm, 0.05% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 3 L/min | 10 monocrystalline Si | Flat plate | Thermal and electrical efficiency is about (48.88% and 46.95%) and (13.20% and 12.22%) for CuO-water and Al2O3-water NFs in PV/T systems, respectively |
[41] | Exp | AL2O3, ˂50 nm, 0.5% volume fraction | H2O | 2-S | – | PV panel | Flat plate | NFs increase the thermal and electrical efficiency of PV/T systems as it is used as a working fluid |
[78] | Exp and num | AL2O3, –, 3% and 0.2% mass fraction; TiO2, –, 3% and 0.2% mass fraction; ZnO, –, 3% and 0.2% mass fraction; SiO2, –, 1% mass fraction and for num. study up to 10% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 30 kg/h | A 40 W monocrystalline Si PV module | PV/T | The increase of thermal exergy efficiency, with the addition of NPs is promising, but in the case of increased electrical exergy efficiency, it is very negligible |
[79] | Exp | CuO, 75 nm, 0.05% volume fraction | H2O | 2-S | 0.01 kg/s | PV module | PV/T | The maximum thermal and electrical efficiency is about 30.43% and 7.62%, respectively |
[80] | Exp | SiO2, 11–14 nm, 1% and 3% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 20, 30 and 40 L/h | Two 40 W monocrystalline Si PV modules | Sheet and tube | Maximum electrical efficiency is about 13.31% for silica-water NF with 3% mass fraction |
[81] | Exp and num | AL2O3, 20 nm, 0.2% mass fraction (exp); TiO2, 10–30 nm, 0.2% mass fraction (exp); ZnO, 10–25 nm, 0.2% mass fraction (exp) | H2O | 2-S | 30 kg/h | A 40 W, monocrystalline Si, PV modules | Sheet and tube | In the case of the exp study, maximum electrical efficiency is about 15.1% for ZnO-water NF and maximum electrical efficiency of num study is about 14.9% for Al2O3-water NF |
[82] | Exp | TiO2, –, 1% mass fraction; SiO2, –, 1% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 0.05 to 0.167 kg/s | Polycrystalline Si PV module | PV/T | The maximum thermal and electrical efficiency is about 86% and 80%, 12.25% and 11.6%, for TiO2-water and SiO2-water NFs, respectively |
[83] | Exp | SiO2, 22 nm, 0.5% mass fraction; Fe3O4, 50 nm, 0.5% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | – | Crystalline Si PV-cell | PV cell | SiO2-water NF shows a better performance compared with the Fe3O4-water NF |
[84] | Num | AL2O3, –, 0%–0.2% volume fraction | H2O | – | 0.00982–0.00996 kg/s | PV module | PV/T | Overall efficiency is increased with an increase of NPs volume fraction fraction and fin length. |
[85] | Num | AL2O3, 20 nm, 0%–4% volume fraction | H2O | – | – | Polycrystalline Si solar module | LFL | The cell electrical efficiency increases by up to 13.7% for Al2O3-water NF with 4% volume fraction at Re of 12.5 |
[86] | Exp | AL2O3, ˂50 nm, 0.1%, 0.3% and 0.5% volume fraction | H2O | 2-S | – | Polycrystalline solar module | PV/T | PV/T system thermal and electrical efficiency is increased by (84%, 82%, and 79%) and (17%, 14% and 12%) for 0.5%, 0.3% and 0.1% volume fraction of NF, respectively |
[87] | Exp | AL2O3, 47 nm, 1% and 3% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | – | Polycrystalline solar cell | Flat plate | Al2O3-water NF as a coolant on the PV/T collector no noticeable effect of the NPs fraction on the overall efficiency is recorded |
[88] | Num | CuO, –, 0%–0.8% mass fraction; AL2O3, –, 0%–0.8% mass fraction | H2O | – | – | Monocrystalline PV module | Fin and tube | Using CuO-water and Al2O3-water NF, the net CO2 mitigation and net CO2 credit is 7.4 t and US $181.6 and 6.9 t and US $ 171.2, respectively |
[89] | Num | TiO2, –, 0.5%–1.5% volume fraction | H2O | – | 0.125, 0.134, 0.142, 0.151, 0.164 and 0.174 kg/s | Monocrystalline PV module | PV/T | The maximum thermal efficiency is found at about 71.7% with 0.5% volume fraction, mass flowrates of 0.174 kg/s, and solar irradiance of 650 W/m2 |
[90] | Exp and num | AL2O3, –, 0.2% mass fraction; SiO2, –, 1% and 3% mass fraction; ZnO, –, 0.2% mass fraction; TiO2, –, 0.2% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 30 kg/h | A 40 W monocrystalline Si PV module | Sheet and tube | Compared to pure water maximum thermal efficiency is shown by ZnO-water NF to be about 6.88%. |
[91] | Exp | ZnO, 35–45 nm, 0.2% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 40 kg/h | 40 W monocrystalline Si | Sheet and tube | The average thermal and electrical power output is about 183 W/m2 and 99.63 W/m2, respectively |
[92] | Exp | AL2O3, –, 0.02% mass | H2O | – | 15 L/h | PV cells | PV/T | The electrical and thermal efficiency is about 14.43% and 73.56%, respectively |
[93] | Num | AL2O3, –, 1%–4% volume fraction | EG and H2O mix. 50:50 | – | – | PV module | PTC | In the laminar flow condition with the increase of volume fraction, the thermal and electrical energy efficiency increasing steer to an improvement in overall energy efficiency |
[94] | Exp | TiO2, 21 nm, 0%–4% volume fraction | H2O | – | 0.02 and 0.18 kg/s | PV panel | L-PTC | Applying the NFs in PV/T and CPV/T systems is not appropriable in the turbulent flow condition but appropriable in the laminar flow condition |
[95] | Num | AL2O3, 38.4 nm, 0% and 4% volume fraction | H2O | – | – | Silicon (Si) solar cell | CPV/T | For the better use of incoming solar energy, the study proposes a combined CPV/T system |
[96] | Exp | AL2O3, 30 nm, 0.1%–0.5% | H2O | – | 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 L/s | Monocrystalline solar cell | PV/T | At a mass flowrate of 0.2 L/s, the maximum electrical and thermal efficiency is found for Al2O3-water NF at a concentration ratio of 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively |
[97] | Num | AL2O3, 20 nm, 0%–4% volume fraction | H2O | – | Re | Polycrystalline Si solar cell | LFL | With the increase of CR value, the thermal efficiency is increased, whereas the electrical efficiency is found in a decreasing trend. |
[63] | Exp | MgO, 10 nm, 0.02%, 0.06%, and 0.1% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 8 L/h | 25 W PV module | PV/T | The thermal and electrical efficiency for the PV/T system with a 2 mm thick liquid film is about 47.2% and 14.7%, respectively |
[98] | Num and exp | SiO2, (5, 10, 25, 50) nm, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% volume fraction | H2O | 1-S | 0.015 m/s (flow velocity) | Monocrystalline Si solar cell | De-coupled PV/T | SiO2-water NF with a size of 5 nm and volume fraction of 2%, seemed to very favorable for the PV/T system. |
[99] | Exp | ZnO, –, 0.2% mass fraction; AL2O3, –, 0.2% mass fraction; TiO2, –, 0.2% mass fraction | H2O | 2-S | 30 and 40 L/h | Two 40 W monocrystalline Si PV module | Sheet and tube | Using ZnO-H2O in PV/T systems, there is a size reduction of about 33% and in the energy point of ZnO-H2O PV/T systems, emission production is decreased by 17% compared with conventional PV unit. |
[100] | Num | AL2O3, 50 nm, 1% and 2% volume fraction | H2O | – | 0.00136 kg/s | PV panel | Sheet and tube | Using Al2O3-water NF with a 2% volume fraction, the thermal and electrical efficiencies are always higher than those of pure water. |
Notes: PM= Preparation method, 2-S= Two-step, 1-S= Single-step, PTC= Parabolic trough collector, LFL= Linear fresnel lens. |
Tab.3 Parameter studied in the previous literature |
Metal oxide | Ref. | Use of NF | Studied parameter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thermal conductivity | Mass flowrate | Solar radiance | Electrical efficiency/output | Thermal efficiency/output | Overall efficiency | |||
Al2O3 | [62] | Coolant | – | √ | – | – | – | – |
[66] | Coolant | √ | – | √ | √ | √ | – | |
[69] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[70] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[71] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[72] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[74] | Coolant | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
[76] | Coolant | √ | √ | – | √ | √ | – | |
[77] | Coolant | √ | √ | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[41] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[78] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[81] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[84] | Coolant | – | – | – | – | – | √ | |
[85] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[86] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[87] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[88] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[93] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[90] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[92] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[95] | Coolant | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
[96] | Coolant | – | √ | – | √ | √ | – | |
[97] | Coolant | – | √ | – | √ | √ | – | |
[99] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[100] | Coolant | – | – | √ | √ | √ | – | |
TiO2 | [68] | Coolant | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
[70] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[74] | Coolant | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
[75] | Coolant | – | √ | – | – | – | – | |
[78] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[81] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[82] | Coolant | – | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | |
[89] | Coolant | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | |
[99] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[94] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[90] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
SiO2 | [68] | Coolant | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
[65] | Coolant | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
[73] | Coolant | √ | – | √ | – | √ | – | |
[74] | Coolant | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
[76] | Coolant | √ | √ | – | √ | √ | – | |
[78] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[80] | Coolant | – | √ | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[82] | Coolant | – | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | |
[83] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | – | √ | |
[90] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[98] | Optical filter and Coolant | √ | – | – | – | – | √ | |
Fe3O4 | [67] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ |
[83] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | – | √ | |
CuO | [62] | Coolant | – | √ | – | – | – | – |
[71] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[65] | Coolant | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | – | |
[72] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[76] | Coolant | √ | √ | – | √ | √ | – | |
[77] | Coolant | √ | √ | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[79] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[88] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
ZnO | [64] | Coolant | – | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
[70] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[65] | Coolant | √ | √ | √ | √ | – | – | |
[74] | Coolant | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
[78] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[81] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[90] | Coolant | √ | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
[91] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ | |
[99] | Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | – | |
MgO | [63] | Optical filter and Coolant | – | – | – | √ | √ | √ |
4 Discussion
Tab.4 Discussions about previous literature |
Metal oxide | Authors, years and references | Discussion | Maximum electrical efficiency | Maximum thermal efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Al2O3 | Al-Waeli et al., 2018 [62] Rejeb et al., 2016 [66] Hussien et al., 2015 [69] Sardarabadi et al., 2017 [70] Hussain and Kim, 2018 [71] Al-Waeli et al., 2017 [72] Kolahan, 2017 [74] Hussain et al., 2019 [76] Lee et al., 2019 [77] Gangadevi et al., 2013 [41] Maadi et al., 2017 [78] Sardarabadi and Passandideh-Fard, 2016 [81] Hader and Al-Kouz, 2018 [84] Radwan and Ahmed, 2018 [85] Elayarani, 2017 [86] Cieslinski and Dawidowicz, 2016 [87] Hussain and Kim, 2018 [88] Yazdanifard and Ebrahimnia-Bajestan, 2018 [93] Maadi, 2017 [90] Tang and Zhu, 2014 [92] Xu and Kleinstreuer, 2014 [95] Hussein et al., 2017 [96] Radwan et al., 2016 [97] Abadeh et al., 2018 [99] Khanjari et al., 2017 [100] | Using Al2O3-based NF, a maximum electrical and thermal efficiency of about 17% and 84% is attained by Elayarani [86] who used Al2O3-water NF at a volume fraction 0.5% and a spiral flow thermal collector which is attached below the PV panel | 17% [86] | 84% [86] |
TiO2 | Al-Shamani et al., 2016 [68] Sardarabadi et al., 2017 [70] Kolahan, 2017 [74] Binti Rukman et al., 2019 [75] Maadi et al., 2017 [78] Sardarabadi and Passandideh-Fard, 2016 [81] Hasan et al., 2017 [82] Mustafa et al., 2017 [89] Abadeh et al., 2018 [99] Yazdanifard et al., 2017 [94] Maadi, 2017 [90] | Using TiO2-based NF, a maximum electrical efficiency of about 15% is achieved by Sardarabadi and Passandideh-Fard [81] who use TiO2-water NF at a mass fraction of 0.2% and a mass flowrate of 30 kg/h and a maximum thermal efficiency of about 86% is attained by Hasan et al. [82] by using TiO2-water NF at a mass fraction of 1% and a mass flowrate of 0.05 to 0.1666 kg/s. | 15% [81] | 86% [82] |
SiO2 | Al-Shamani et al., 2016 [68] Al-Shamani et al., 2018 [65] Chamkha and Selimefendigil, 2018 [73] Kolahan, 2017 [74] Hussain et al., 2019 [76] Maadi et al., 2017 [78] Sardarabadi et al., 2014 [80] Hasan et al., 2017 [82] Soltani et al., 2017 [83] Maadi, 2017 [90] Jing et al., 2015 [98] | Using SiO2-based NF, the maximum electrical efficiency of around 13.31% is achieved by Sardarabadi et al. [80] who use silica-water NF at a mass fraction of 3% while a maximum thermal efficiency of around 80% is attained by Hasan et al. [82] using SiO2-water NF at a mass fraction of 1% and a mass flowrate of 0.05 to 0.1666 kg/s | 13.31% [80] | 80% [82] |
Fe3O4 | Ghadiri et al., 2015 [67] Soltani et al., 2017 [83] | Using Fe3O4-based NF, a maximum electrical and thermal efficiency of about 7.7% and 74.96% is attained by Ghadiri et al. [67] by using Fe3O4-water NF at a mass fraction of 3% and a mass flowrate of 30 L/h | 7.7% [67] | 74.96% [67] |
CuO | Al-Waeli et al., 2018 [62] Hussain and Kim, 2018 [71] Al-Shamani et al., 2018 [65] Al-Waeli et al., 2017 [72] Hussain et al., 2019 [76] Lee et al., 2019 [77] Michael and Iniyan, 2015 [79] Hussain and Kim, 2018 [88] | Using CuO-based NF, a maximum thermal efficiency of about 80.94% is achieved by Hussain and Kim [71] by using CuO-water NF at mass fraction of 0.7% while a maximum electrical efficiency of about 13.20% is attained by Lee et al. [77] using CuO-water NF at a mass fraction of 0.05% and a mass flowrate of 3 L/min | 13.20% [77] | 80.94% [71] |
ZnO | Hosseinzadeh et al., 2018 [64] Sardarabadi et al., 2017 [70] Al-Shamani et al., 2018 [65] Kolahan, 2017 [74] Maadi et al., 2017 [78] Sardarabadi and Passandideh-Fard, 2016 [81] Maadi et al., 2017 [90] Sardarabadi et al., 2017 [91] Abadeh et al., 2018 [99] | Using ZnO-based NF, Sardarabadi and Passandideh-Fard [81] achieve a maximum electrical efficiency of about 15.1% by using ZnO-water NF at a mass fraction of 0.2% and a mass flowrate of 30 kg/h while a maximum thermal efficiency of 46.05% is attained by Sardarabadi et al. [70] who use ZnO-water NF at a mass fraction 0.2% and a mass flowrate of 30 kg/h | 15.1% [81] | 46.05% [70] |
MgO | Cui and Zhu, 2012 [63] | By using MgO-water NF at mass fraction of 0.02% and a mass flowrate of 8 L/h, Cui and Zhu [63] achieve a maximum electrical and thermal efficiency of about 14.7% and 47.2% | 14.7% [63] | 47.2% [63] |