RESEARCH ARTICLE

A numerical study of non-Darcy flow in EGS heat reservoirs during heat extraction

  • Wenjiong CAO 1 ,
  • Wenbo HUANG 1 ,
  • Guoling WEI 2 ,
  • Yunlong JIN 2 ,
  • Fangming JIANG , 1
Expand
  • 1. Laboratory of Advanced Energy Systems, Guangdong Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development, CAS Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • 2. Guangdong Hydrogeology Battalion, Guangzhou 510510, China

Received date: 08 Jul 2018

Accepted date: 06 Oct 2018

Published date: 15 Sep 2019

Copyright

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

Abstract

Underground non-Darcy fluid flow has been observed and investigated for decades in the petroleum industry. It is deduced by analogy that the fluid flow in enhanced geothermal system (EGS) heat reservoirs may also be in the non-Darcy regime under some conditions. In this paper, a transient 3D model was presented, taking into consideration the non-Darcy fluid flow in EGS heat reservoirs, to simulate the EGS long-term heat extraction process. Then, the non-Darcy flow behavior in water- and supercritical CO2 (SCCO2)-based EGSs was simulated and discussed. It is found that non-Darcy effects decrease the mass flow rate of the fluid injected and reduce the heat extraction rate of EGS as a flow resistance in addition to the Darcy resistance which is imposed to the seepage flow in EGS heat reservoirs. Compared with the water-EGS, the SCCO2-EGS are more prone to experiencing much stronger non-Darcy flow due to the much larger mobility of the SCCO2. The non-Darcy flow in SCCO2- EGSs may thus greatly reduce their heat extraction performance. Further, a criterion was analyzed and proposed to judge the onset of the non-Darcy flow in EGS heat reservoirs. The fluid flow rate and the initial thermal state of the reservoir were taken and the characteristic Forchheimer number of an EGS was calculated. If the calculated Forchheimer number is larger than 0.2, the fluid flow in EGS heat reservoirs experiences non-negligible non-Darcy flow characteristic.

Cite this article

Wenjiong CAO , Wenbo HUANG , Guoling WEI , Yunlong JIN , Fangming JIANG . A numerical study of non-Darcy flow in EGS heat reservoirs during heat extraction[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2019 , 13(3) : 439 -449 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-019-0612-4

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB1501804), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA21060700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41702256), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030310328).
1
Tester J W, Anderson B J, Batchelor A S, Blackwell D D, Di Pippo R, Drake E M, Garnish J, Livesay B, Moore M C, Nichols K, Petty S, Toksoz M N, Veatch R W. The Future of Geothermal Energy: Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century. DOE Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 Final Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006

2
Yang Y, Yeh H. Modeling heat extraction from hot dry rock in a multi-well system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2009, 29(8–9): 1676–1681

DOI

3
Olasolo P, Juárez M C, Morales M P, D´Amico S, Liarte I A. Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56: 133–144

DOI

4
Forchheimer P. Water moving through soil. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieuer, 1901, 45: 1782–1788

5
Gelet R, Loret B, Khalili N. A thermo-hydro-mechanical coupled model in local thermal non-equilibrium for fractured HDR reservoir with double porosity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2012, 117: B07205

DOI

6
Held S, Genter A, Kohl T, Kölbel T, Sausse J, Schoenball M. Economic evaluation of geothermal reservoir performance through modeling the complexity of the operating EGS in Soultz-sous-Forêts. Geothermics, 2014, 51: 270–280

DOI

7
Brown D W. A hot dry rock geothermal energy concept utilizing supercritical CO2 instead of water. In: The 25th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 2000

8
Pruess K. On production behavior of enhanced geothermal systems with CO2 as working fluid. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008, 49: 1446–1454

9
Jiang F M, Luo L, Chen J L. A novel three-dimensional transient model for subsurface heat exchange in enhanced geothermal systems. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2013, 41: 57–62

DOI

10
Kohl T, Evans K F, Hopkirk R J, Jung R, Rybach L. Observation and simulation of non-Darcian flow transients in fractured rock. Water Resources Research, 1997, 33(3): 407–418

DOI

11
Zhang J, Xing H L. Numerical modeling of non-Darcy flow in near-well region of a geothermal reservoir. Geothermics, 2012, 42: 78–86

DOI

12
Haghshenas Fard M, Hooman K, Chua H T. Numerical simulation of a supercritical CO2 geothermosiphon. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010, 37(10): 1447–1451

DOI

13
Xu C S, Dowd P, Li Q. Carbon sequestration potential of the Habanero reservoir when carbon dioxide is used as the heat exchange fluid. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 8: 50–59

14
Borgia A B, Oldenburg C M, Zhang R, Pan L, Daley T M, Finsterle S, Ramakrishnan T S. Simulations of CO2 injection into fractures and faults for improving their geophysical characterization at EGS sites. Geothermics, 2017, 69: 189–201

DOI

15
Wang C L, Cheng W L, Nian Y L, Yang L, Han B B, Liu M H. Simulation of heat extraction from CO2-based enhanced geothermal systems considering CO2 sequestration. Energy, 2018, 142: 157–167

DOI

16
Cao W J, Huang W B, Jiang F M. Numerical study on variable thermophysical properties of heat transfer fluid affecting EGS heat extraction. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 92: 1205–1217

DOI

17
Chen J L, Jiang F M. A numerical study of EGS heat extraction process based on a thermal non-equilibrium model for heat transfer in subsurface porous heat reservoir. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 52(2): 255–267

DOI

18
Chen J L, Jiang F M. Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy. Renewable Energy, 2015, 74: 37–48

DOI

19
Jiang F M, Chen J L, Huang W B, Luo L. A three-dimensional transient model for EGS subsurface thermo-hydraulic process. Energy, 2014, 72: 300–310

DOI

20
Friedel T, Voigt H D. Investigation of non-Darcy flow in tight-gas reservoirs with fractured wells. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2006, 54(3-4): 112–128

DOI

21
Janicek J D, Katz D L. Applications of unsteady state gas flow calculations. In: Research Conference on Flow of Natural Gas Reservoirs, University of Michigan, 1955

22
Pascal H, Quillian R G, Kingston J. Analysis of vertical fracture length and non-Darcy flow coefficient using variable rate tests. SPE 9348, 1980

23
Koтяxoв Ф И. The Physical Foundation of Reservoir. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1958

24
Li C. The research of natural gas small leakage & dispersion rule. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, 2011

25
Saboorian-Jooybari H, Pourafshary P. Significance of non-Darcy flow effect in fractured tight reservoirs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 24: 132–143

DOI

26
Wen Z, Huang G, Zhan H. An analytical solution for non-Darcian flow in a confined aquifer using the power law function. Advances in Water Resources, 2008, 31(1): 44–55

DOI

27
Zhang Z Y, Nemcik J. Fluid flow regimes and nonlinear flow characteristics in deformable rock fractures. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2013, 477: 139–151

DOI

28
Brinkman H C. A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles. Applied Scientific Research, 1949, 1: 27–34

Outlines

/