Core designing of a new type of TVS-2M FAs: neutronics and thermal-hydraulics design basis limits

Abstract

One of the most important aims of this study is to improve the core of the current VVER reactors to achieve more burn-up (or more cycle length) and more intrinsic safety. It is an independent study on the Russian new proposed FAs, called TVS-2M, which would be applied for the future advanced VVERs. Some important aspects of neutronics as well as thermal hydraulics investigations (and analysis) of the new type of Fas are conducted, and results are compared with the standards PWR CDBL. The TVS-2M FA contains gadolinium-oxide which is mixed with UO₂ (for different Gd densities and U-235 enrichments which are given herein), but the core does not contain BARs. The new type TVS-2M Fas are modeled by the SARCS software package to find the PMAXS format for three states of CZP and HZP as well as HFP, and then the whole core is simulated by the PARCS code to investigate transient conditions. In addition, the WIMS-D5 code is suggested for steady core modeling including TVS-2M FAs and/or TVS FAs. Many neutronics aspects such as the first cycle length (first cycle burn up in terms of MW_thd/kgU), the critical concentration of boric acid at the BOC as well as the cycle length, the axial, and radial power peaking factors, differential and integral worthy of the most reactive CPS-CRs, reactivity coefficients of the fuel, moderator, boric acid, and the under-moderation estimation of the core are conducted and benchmarked with the PWR CDBL. Specifically, the burn-up calculations indicate that the 45.6 d increase of the first cycle length (which corresponds to 1.18 MW_thd/kgU increase of burn-up) is the best improving aim of the new FA type called TVS-2M. Moreover, thermal-hydraulics core design criteria such as MDNBR (based on W3 correlation) and the maximum of fuel and clad temperatures (radially and axially), are investigated, and discussed based on the CDBL.

Key words： TVS-2M FAs; core design basis limits; VVER-1000; analysis; mixture of uranium-gadolinium oxides fuels; thermal-hydraulics; PARCS; WIMS-D5

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks are due to the Shiraz University Research Council for his financial support. Authors are thankful the manager of Shiraz University High Speed Computer Center for their time and efforts during past 4 years ago.

References

1 Bibilashvili Yu K, Kuleshov A V, Mikheev E N, Investigation of thermal-physical and mechanical properties of uranium-gadolinium oxide fuel. In: Proceedings of IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Improved Fuel Pellet Materials and Designs. Brussels, Belgium, 2003, 85–100

2 Une K. Thermal expansion of UO₂-Gd₂O₃ fuel pellets. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 1986, 23(11): 1020–1022

3 Lysikov A V, Kouleshova V, Novikova E A. Results of thermal-physical and mechanical property investigations of modified uranium-gadolinium oxide doped fuel. In: Russian Scientific Conference Materials for Nuclear Technics. Zvenigorod, Russia, 2007, 22–44

4 Nivikov V, Dolgov A, Molchanov V. In: TopFUEL Conference. Wurzburg, Germany, 2003

5 Kosourov E, Oleksuk D, Pavlovichev A, Shecherenko A. Optimization of gadolinium distribution in FAs for WWER-1000. In: 10th International Conference on WWER Performance, Modelling and Experimental Support. Sandanski, Bulgaria, 2013

6 Oka Y, Madarame H, Uesaka M. An advanced course in nuclear engineering: nuclear reactor design. Japan: Springer Press, 2014

7 Porhemmat M H, Hadad K, Faghihi F. PARCS cross-section library generator; part one: development and verification. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2015, 78: 155–162

8 Safaei Arshi S, Mirvakili S M, Faghihi F. Modified COBRA-EN code to investigate thermal-hydraulics analysis of the Iranian VVER-1000 core. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2010, 52(6): 589–595

9 Lunin G L, Novikov A N, Pavlov V I, Pavlovichev A M. Development of four-year fuel cycle based on the advanced fuel assembly with uranium-gadolinium fuel and it simple mentation to the operating VVER-1000 units. In: Proceeding of the 10th Symposium of AER. Moscow, Russia, 2000, 1:75–95

10 Amin Mozafari M, Faghihi F. Design of annular fuels for a typical VVER-1000 core: neutronic investigation, pitch optimization and MDNBR calculation. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2013, 60: 226–234

11 Mirvakili S M, Faghihi F, Khalafi H. Developing a computational tool for predicting physical parameters of a typical VVER-1000 core based on artificial neural network. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2012, 50: 82–93

12 Bagheri S, Faghihi F, Nematollahi M R, Behzadinejad B. Assessment of thermal hydraulics parameters of the VVER-1000 during transient conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(17): 7103–7111

13 Lamarsh J R. Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Theory. New York University: Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1966

14 Tong L S, Weisman J. Thermal Analysis of Pressurized Water Reactors. United States Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, OSTI Identifier: 5856843, 1979

15 Novikov V V, Mikheev E N, Lysikov A V, Property investigations of (U,Gd)O₂ fuel with higher content of gadolinium oxide. http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/41/081/41081142.pdf

16 Balestrieri D. A study of the UO₂/Gd₂O₃ composite fuel, IAEA Series. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:290547-47

17 Todreas N E, Kazimi M S. Nuclear Systems I: Thermal Hydraulics Fundamentals. CRC Press, 2001

18 Faghihi F, Fadaie A H, Sayareh R. Reactivity coefficients simulation of the Iranian VVER-1000 nuclear reactor using WIMS and CITATION codes. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2007, 49(1): 68–78

19 Downar T, Xu Y, Seker V, PARCS v2.7 US NRC Core Neutronics Simulator User Manual. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind, USA, 2006

20 Downar T, Xu Y, Seker V, PARCS v3 US NRC Core Neutronics Simulator User Manual. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2010

21 Lunin G, Novikov A, Pavlov V, Advanced fuel cycles of VVER-1000 reactors. In: 8th International Conference on WWER Fuel Performance, Modelling and Experimental Support. Helena Resort near Burgas, Bulgaria, 2003

22 Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. Album of Neutron and Physical Characteristics of the 1st Loading of Boushehr Nuclear Power Plant. BNPP FSAR, 2003

23 Faghihi F, Saidi nezhad M. Two safety coefficients for a typical 13 × 13 annular fuel assembly. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2011, 53(3): 250–254

24 Erfani Nia A, Faghihi F, Hadad K. Prompt and power reactivity coefficients for the next generation VVER-1000 reactor including hexagonal assemblies and annular fuels. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2012, 61: 41–47

25 Driscoll M J, Downar T J, Pilat E E. The Linear Reactivity Model for Nuclear Fuel Management. La Grange Park, Illinois: American Nuclear Society, 1990