RESEARCH ARTICLE

Exergy-energy analysis of full repowering of a steam power plant

  • S. NIKBAKHT NASERABAD ,
  • K. MOBINI ,
  • A. MEHRPANAHI ,
  • M. R. ALIGOODARZ
Expand
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran 7591618439, Iran

Received date: 20 Feb 2014

Accepted date: 15 Jun 2014

Published date: 02 Mar 2015

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

A 320 MW old steam power plant has been chosen for repowering in this paper. Considering the technical conditions and working life of the power plant, the full repowering method has been selected from different repowering methods. The power plant repowering has been analyzed for three different feed water flow rates: a flow rate equal to the flow rate at the condenser exit in the original plant when it works at nominal load, a flow rate at maximum load, and a flow rate when all the extractions are blocked. For each flow rates, two types of gas turbines have been examined: V94.2 and V94.3A. The effect of a duct burner has then been investigated in each of the above six cases. Steam is produced by a double-pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with reheat which obtains its required heat from the exhaust gases coming from the gas turbines. The results obtained from modeling and analyzing the energy-exergy of the original steam power plant and the repowered power plant indicate that the maximum efficiency of the repowered power plant is 52.04%. This maximum efficiency occurs when utilizing two V94.3A gas turbines without duct burner in the steam flow rate of the nominal load.

Cite this article

S. NIKBAKHT NASERABAD , K. MOBINI , A. MEHRPANAHI , M. R. ALIGOODARZ . Exergy-energy analysis of full repowering of a steam power plant[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2015 , 9(1) : 54 -67 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-014-0342-6

1
Melli R, Naso V, Sciubba E. Modular repowering of power plants with nominal ratings lower than 180 MW: a rational design approach and its application to the Italian utility system. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 1994, 116(3): 201–210

DOI

2
Brander J A, Chase D L. Repowering application considerations. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1992, 114(4): 643–652

DOI

3
Fränkle M. SRS. The Standardized Repowering Solution for 300 MW Steam Power Plants in Russia. Siemens Power Generation (PG), Germany, 2006

4
Karellas S, Doukelis A, Zanni G, Kakaras E. Energy and exergy analysis of repowering option for Greek lignite-fired power plant. Proceeding of ECOS 2012—the 25th International Conference on Efficiency Cost Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, Perugia, 2012

5
Kudlu N. Major options and considerations for repowering with gas turbines. BETCHEL Project Report, Electric Power Research (EPRI), Project 2565–18, Final Report. 1989

6
Escosa J M, Romeo L M. Optimizing CO2 avoided cost by means of repowering. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(11): 2351–2358

DOI

7
Stenzel W, Sopocy D M, Pace S. Repowering existing fossil steam plants. 2014-01-16

8
Mehrpanahi A, Hossienalipour S M, Mobini K. Investigation of the effects of repowering options on electricity generation cost on Iran steam power plants. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2013, 32(4): 229–243

DOI

9
Walters A B. Power plant topping cycle repowering. Journal of the Association of Energy Engineering, 1995, 92(5): 49–71

10
Mobini K, Mehrpanahi A, Hosseinalipour S M. Thermo-economic analysis of the existing options for feed water heating repowering using a stepwise method. Journal of Mechanical Aerospace, 2012, 8(2): 13–29 (propulsion and heat transfer)

11
Sanaye S, Hamzeie Y. Modeling and techno-economic optimization of steam power plant repowering by using gas turbine. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Power System Conference, Tehran, 2004

12
Heyen G, Kalitventzeff B. A comparison of advanced thermal cycles suitable for upgrading existing power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1999, 19(3): 227–237

DOI

13
Bracco S, Siri S. Exergetic optimization of single level combined gas-steam power plants considering different objective functions. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 5365–5373

DOI

14
Cârdu M. Preoccupations for some thermopower equipment and installations rehabilitation and repowering. Energy Conversion and Management, 1995, 36(1): 35–40

DOI

15
Bassily A M. Enhancing the efficiency and power of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle by means of gas reheat gas recuperation and reduction of the irreversibility in the heat recovery steam generator. Applied Energy, 2008, 85(12): 1141–1162

DOI

16
Srinivas T, Gupta A V S S K S, Reddy B V. Sensitivity analysis of STIG based combined cycle with dual pressure HRSG. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2008, 47(9): 1226–1234

DOI

17
Franco A. Analysis of small size combined cycle plants based on the use of supercritical HRSG. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(5): 785–794

DOI

18
Sanjay Y. Investigation of effect of variation of cycle parameters on thermodynamic performance of gas-steam combined cycle. Energy, 2011, 36(1): 157–167

DOI

19
Hossienalipour S M, Mehrpanahi A. Optimization of parallel feed water heating repowering of ShahidRajaee power plant based to production electrical cost. Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011, 13(1): 32–50

20
Sharifi H. Heat Recovery Steam Generator. Pendar Pars Publication, Iran. 2011

21
Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Khanmohammadi S. Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plant. International Journal of Energy Research, 2008, 32(2): 175–183

DOI

22
Judes M, Vigerske S, Tsatsaronis G. Optimization in Energy Industry. Berlin, Springer, 2008

23
Balli O, Aras H, Hepbasli A. Exergetic performance evaluation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system in Turkey. International Journal of Energy Research, 2007, 31(9): 849–866

DOI

24
Bilgen S, Kaygusuz K. Second law (exergy) analysis of cogeneration system. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2008, 30(13): 1267–1280

DOI

25
Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996

26
Tajik Mansouri M, Ahmadi P, Ganjeh Kaviri A, Jaafar M N M. Exergetic and economic evaluation of the effect of HRSG configurations on the performance of combined cycle power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 58: 47–58

DOI

27
Moran J M. Availability Analysis: A Guide to Efficient Energy Use. New York: ASME Press, 1989

28
Franco A, Russo A. Combined cycle plant efficiency increase based on the optimization of the heat recovery steam generator operating parameters. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2002, 41(9): 843–859

DOI

29
Godoy E, Benz S J, Scenna N J. A strategy for the economic optimization of combined cycle gas turbine power plants by taking advantage of useful thermodynamic relationships. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(5): 852–871

DOI

30
Godoy E, Benz S J, Scenna N J. Optimal economic strategy for the multi period design and long-term operation of natural gas combined cycle power plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 51(1–2): 218–230

DOI

31
Ahmadi P, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis and thermoeconomic optimization of a dual pressure combined cycle power plant with a supplementary firing unit. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(5): 2296–2308

DOI

32
Kumar N R, Krishna K R, Raju A V S R. Thermodynamic analysis of heat recovery steam generator in combined cycle power plant. Thermal Science, 2007, 11(4): 143–156

DOI

Outlines

/