Drivers of the development of global climate-change- mitigation technology: a patent-based decomposition analysis

PDF(1526 KB)
PDF(1526 KB)
Frontiers in Energy ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2) : 487-498. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-021-0739-y

作者信息 +

Drivers of the development of global climate-change- mitigation technology: a patent-based decomposition analysis

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The development of the climate-change- mitigation technology has received widespread attention from both academic and policy studies. Nevertheless, very few studies have explained how and why economies contribute differently to global development. This paper decomposed the development of the global climate-change-mitigation technology, proxied by patent-based indicators, from 1996 to 2015 into several predefined factors. The results show that the worldwide surge of climate-change-mitigation-technology patents from 1996 to 2011 is driven by increased concentration on green invention, improved research intensity, and enlarged economic scale, while the falling of patent counts from 2011 to 2015 is predominantly due to less concentration on green invention. Among different climate-change-mitigation technologies, the type-specific development is attributed to different dominant factors, and the resulting priority change can reflect the shift of both global research and development (R&D) resource and market demand. Regarding regional contributions, the resulting economy-specific contributions to each driving factor can be used to design the policies to promote the development of the global climate-change-mitigation technology.

Keywords

climate change mitigation / technology development / logarithmic mean Divisia index / green patents

引用本文

导出引用
. . Frontiers in Energy. 2021, 15(2): 487-498 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0739-y

参考文献

[1]
Batten J A, Kinateder H, Szilagyi P G, Addressing COP21 using a stock and oil market integration index. Energy Policy, 2018, 116: 127–136
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[2]
Costa-Campi M T, García-Quevedo J, Martínez-Ros E. What are the determinants of investment in environmental R&D? Energy Policy, 2017b, 104: 455–465
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[3]
Duan H, Zhang G, Wang S, Robust climate change research: a review on multi-model analysis. Environmental Research Letters, 2019, 14(3): 033001
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[4]
Geng Y, Fujita T, Chiu A, Responding to the Paris Climate Agreement: global climate change mitigation efforts. Frontiers in Energy, 2018, 12(3): 333–337
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[5]
Buchholz W, Dippl L, Eichenseer M. Subsidizing renewables as part of taking leadership in international climate policy: the German case. Energy Policy, 2019, 129: 765–773
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[6]
Costa-Campi M T, del Rio P, Trujillo-Baute E. Trade-offs in energy and environmental policy. Energy Policy, 2017, 104: 415–418
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[7]
Shao S, Yang L, Gan C, Using an extended LMDI model to explore techno-economic drivers of energy-related industrial CO2 emission changes: a case study for Shanghai (China). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016b, 55: 516–536
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[8]
International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Technology Perspectives 2017. Paris, France, 2017
[9]
Dussaux D, Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M. Intellectual property rights protection and the international transfer of low-carbon technologies. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 288, 2018
[10]
He J. Situation and measures of China’s CO2 emission mitigation after the Paris Agreement. Frontiers in Energy, 2018, 12(3): 353–361
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[11]
Fujii H, Managi S. Decomposition analysis of sustainable green technology inventions in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 139: 10–16
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[12]
Dechezleprêtre A, Martin R. Low-carbon innovation in the UK: evidence from patent data. Policy Paper of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. London School of Economics and Political Science, 2010
[13]
Albino V, Ardito L, Dangelico R M, Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: a patent analysis. Applied Energy, 2014, 135: 836–854
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[14]
Dechezleprêtre A, Glachant M, Haščič I, Invention and transfer of climate change–mitigation technologies: a global analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2011, 5(1): 109–130
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[15]
Gallagher K S, Holdren J P, Sagar A D. Energy-technology innovation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006, 31(1): 193–237
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[16]
Yan Z, Du K, Yang Z, Convergence or divergence? Understanding the global development trend of low-carbon technologies. Energy Policy, 2017, 109: 499–509
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[17]
Aghion P, Dechezleprêtre A, Hémous D, Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: evidence from the auto industry. Journal of Political Economy, 2016, 124(1): 1–51
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[18]
Ghisetti C, Quatraro F. Beyond inducement in climate change: does environmental performance spur environmental technologies? A regional analysis of cross-sectoral differences. Ecological Economics, 2013, 96: 99–113
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[19]
Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010, 45(1): 133–155
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[20]
Verdolini E, Galeotti M. At home and abroad: an empirical analysis of innovation and diffusion in energy technologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2011, 61(2): 119–134
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[21]
Gallagher K S, Anadon L D, Kempener R, Trends in investments in global energy research, development, and demonstration. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2011, 2(3): 373–396
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[22]
Shao S, Hu Z, Cao J, Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: a review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(3): 1465–1478
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[23]
Li K, Lin B. Impact of energy technology patents in China: evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Policy, 2016, 89: 214–223
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[24]
Sun H, Edziah B K, Sun C, Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 2019, 135: 111002
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[25]
Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1990, 28: 1661–1707
[26]
Haščič I, Migotto M. Measuring environmental innovation using patent data. Paris: OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 89. OECD Publishing, 2015
[27]
Jaffe A B, Palmer K. Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997, 79(4): 610–619
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[28]
Lanjouw J O, Pakes A, Putnam J. How to count patents and value intellectual property: the uses of patent renewal and application data. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1998, 46(4): 405–432
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[29]
Popp D. The effect of new technology on energy consumption. Resource and Energy Economics, 2001, 23(3): 215–239
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[30]
Pasimeni F. SQL query to increase data accuracy and completeness in PATSTAT. World Patent Information, 2019, 57: 1–7
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[31]
Shao S, Liu J, Geng Y, Uncovering driving factors of carbon emissions from China’s mining sector. Applied Energy, 2016, 166: 220–238
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[32]
Wang Q, Hang Y, Su B, Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: an integrated decomposition analysis. Energy Economics, 2018, 70: 12–25
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[33]
Zha D, Zhou D, Zhou P. Driving forces of residential CO2 emissions in urban and rural China: an index decomposition analysis. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(7): 3377–3383
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[34]
Zhang X, Zhao X, Jiang Z, How to achieve the 2030 CO2 emission-reduction targets for China’s industrial sector: retrospective decomposition and prospective trajectories? Global Environmental Change, 2017, 44: 83–97
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[35]
Ang B W. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(7): 867–871
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[36]
Zheng J, Mi Z, Coffman D M, Regional development and carbon emissions in China. Energy Economics, 2019, 81: 25–36
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[37]
Ley M, Stucki T, Woerter M. The impact of energy prices on green innovation. Energy Journal, 2016, 37(1): 41–75
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[38]
Wang X, Bai M, Xie C. Investigating CO2 mitigation potentials and the impact of oil price distortion in China’s transport sector. Energy Policy, 2019, 130: 320–327
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[39]
Yang Z, Shao S, Li C, Alleviating the misallocation of R&D inputs in China’s manufacturing sector: from the perspectives of factor-biased technological innovation and substitution elasticity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 151: 119878
CrossRef ADS Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 72003145, 72074184, and 71603148), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M683437), and the Humanities and Social Science Research Project of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 18YJC790194).

版权

2021 Higher Education Press
PDF(1526 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/