Exergy-energy analysis of full repowering of a steam power plant

Abstract

A 320 MW old steam power plant has been chosen for repowering in this paper. Considering the technical conditions and working life of the power plant, the full repowering method has been selected from different repowering methods. The power plant repowering has been analyzed for three different feed water flow rates: a flow rate equal to the flow rate at the condenser exit in the original plant when it works at nominal load, a flow rate at maximum load, and a flow rate when all the extractions are blocked. For each flow rates, two types of gas turbines have been examined: V94.2 and V94.3A. The effect of a duct burner has then been investigated in each of the above six cases. Steam is produced by a double-pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with reheat which obtains its required heat from the exhaust gases coming from the gas turbines. The results obtained from modeling and analyzing the energy-exergy of the original steam power plant and the repowered power plant indicate that the maximum efficiency of the repowered power plant is 52.04%. This maximum efficiency occurs when utilizing two V94.3A gas turbines without duct burner in the steam flow rate of the nominal load.

Keywords

full repowering / exergy analysis / V94.2 and V94.3A gas turbines / double-pressure HRSG / duct burner / Bandarabbas steam power plant / efficiency

参考文献

[1] Melli R, Naso V, Sciubba E. Modular repowering of power plants with nominal ratings lower than 180 MW: a rational design approach and its application to the Italian utility system. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 1994, 116(3): 201–210

[2] Brander J A, Chase D L. Repowering application considerations. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1992, 114(4): 643–652

[3] Fränkle M. SRS. The Standardized Repowering Solution for 300 MW Steam Power Plants in Russia. Siemens Power Generation (PG), Germany, 2006

[4] Karellas S, Doukelis A, Zanni G, Kakaras E. Energy and exergy analysis of repowering option for Greek lignite-fired power plant. Proceeding of ECOS 2012—the 25th International Conference on Efficiency Cost Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, Perugia, 2012

[5] Kudlu N. Major options and considerations for repowering with gas turbines. BETCHEL Project Report, Electric Power Research (EPRI), Project 2565–18, Final Report. 1989

[6] Escosa J M, Romeo L M. Optimizing CO₂ avoided cost by means of repowering. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(11): 2351–2358

[7] Stenzel W, Sopocy D M, Pace S. Repowering existing fossil steam plants. 2014-01-16

[8] Mehrpanahi A, Hossienalipour S M, Mobini K. Investigation of the effects of repowering options on electricity generation cost on Iran steam power plants. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 2013, 32(4): 229–243

[9] Walters A B. Power plant topping cycle repowering. Journal of the Association of Energy Engineering, 1995, 92(5): 49–71

[10] Mobini K, Mehrpanahi A, Hosseinalipour S M. Thermo-economic analysis of the existing options for feed water heating repowering using a stepwise method. Journal of Mechanical Aerospace, 2012, 8(2): 13–29 (propulsion and heat transfer)

[11] Sanaye S, Hamzeie Y. Modeling and techno-economic optimization of steam power plant repowering by using gas turbine. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Power System Conference, Tehran, 2004

[12] Heyen G, Kalitventzeff B. A comparison of advanced thermal cycles suitable for upgrading existing power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1999, 19(3): 227–237

[13] Bracco S, Siri S. Exergetic optimization of single level combined gas-steam power plants considering different objective functions. Energy, 2010, 35(12): 5365–5373

[14] Cârdu M. Preoccupations for some thermopower equipment and installations rehabilitation and repowering. Energy Conversion and Management, 1995, 36(1): 35–40

[15] Bassily A M. Enhancing the efficiency and power of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle by means of gas reheat gas recuperation and reduction of the irreversibility in the heat recovery steam generator. Applied Energy, 2008, 85(12): 1141–1162

[16] Srinivas T, Gupta A V S S K S, Reddy B V. Sensitivity analysis of STIG based combined cycle with dual pressure HRSG. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2008, 47(9): 1226–1234

[17] Franco A. Analysis of small size combined cycle plants based on the use of supercritical HRSG. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(5): 785–794

[18] Sanjay Y. Investigation of effect of variation of cycle parameters on thermodynamic performance of gas-steam combined cycle. Energy, 2011, 36(1): 157–167

[19] Hossienalipour S M, Mehrpanahi A. Optimization of parallel feed water heating repowering of ShahidRajaee power plant based to production electrical cost. Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011, 13(1): 32–50

[20] Sharifi H. Heat Recovery Steam Generator. Pendar Pars Publication, Iran. 2011

[21] Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Khanmohammadi S. Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plant. International Journal of Energy Research, 2008, 32(2): 175–183

[22] Judes M, Vigerske S, Tsatsaronis G. Optimization in Energy Industry. Berlin, Springer, 2008

[23] Balli O, Aras H, Hepbasli A. Exergetic performance evaluation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system in Turkey. International Journal of Energy Research, 2007, 31(9): 849–866

[24] Bilgen S, Kaygusuz K. Second law (exergy) analysis of cogeneration system. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2008, 30(13): 1267–1280

[25] Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996

[26] Tajik Mansouri M, Ahmadi P, Ganjeh Kaviri A, Jaafar M N M. Exergetic and economic evaluation of the effect of HRSG configurations on the performance of combined cycle power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 58: 47–58

[27] Moran J M. Availability Analysis: A Guide to Efficient Energy Use. New York: ASME Press, 1989

[28] Franco A, Russo A. Combined cycle plant efficiency increase based on the optimization of the heat recovery steam generator operating parameters. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2002, 41(9): 843–859

[29] Godoy E, Benz S J, Scenna N J. A strategy for the economic optimization of combined cycle gas turbine power plants by taking advantage of useful thermodynamic relationships. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(5): 852–871

[30] Godoy E, Benz S J, Scenna N J. Optimal economic strategy for the multi period design and long-term operation of natural gas combined cycle power plants. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013, 51(1–2): 218–230

[31] Ahmadi P, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis and thermoeconomic optimization of a dual pressure combined cycle power plant with a supplementary firing unit. Energy Conversion and Management, 2011, 52(5): 2296–2308

[32] Kumar N R, Krishna K R, Raju A V S R. Thermodynamic analysis of heat recovery steam generator in combined cycle power plant. Thermal Science, 2007, 11(4): 143–156

版权

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg