Ceramic membrane fouling mechanisms and control for water treatment

Highlight

● The fouling is summarized based on ceramic membrane performance and pollutants.

● The current research methods and theoretical models are summarized.

● The membrane fouling control methods and collaborative technology are reviewed.

Abstract

Membrane separation, as an important drinking water treatment technology, has wide applications. The remarkable advantages of ceramic membranes, such as chemical stability, thermal stability, and high mechanical strength, endow them with broader prospects for development. Despite the importance and advantages of membrane separation in water treatment, the technique has a limitation: membrane fouling, which greatly lowers its effectiveness. This is caused by organics, inorganic substances, and microorganisms clogging the pore and polluting the membrane surface. The increase in membrane pollution greatly lowers purification effectiveness. Controlling membrane fouling is critical in ensuring the efficient and stable operation of ceramic membranes for water treatment. This review analyzes four mechanisms of ceramic membrane fouling, namely complete blocking, standard blocking, intermediate blocking, and cake filtration blocking. It evaluates the mechanisms underlying ceramic membrane fouling and summarizes the progress in approaches aimed at controlling it. These include ceramic membrane pretreatment, ceramic membrane surface modification, membrane cleaning, magnetization, ultrasonics, and nanobubbles. This review highlights the importance of optimizing ceramic membrane preparation through further research on membrane fouling and pre-membrane pretreatment mechanisms. In addition, combining process regulations with ceramic membranes as the core is an important research direction for ceramic membrane-based water treatment.

Keywords

Ceramic membrane / Fouling model / Fouling control

参考文献

[1] Ağtaş M , Yılmaz Ö , Dilaver M , Alp K , Koyuncu I . (2020). Hot water recovery and reuse in textile sector with pilot scale ceramic ultrafiltration/nanofiltration membrane system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256: 120359

[2] Al-Amoudi A , Lovitt R W . (2007). Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency. Journal of Membrane Science, 303(1): 4–28

[3] Anis S F , Lalia B S , Hashaikeh R , Hilal N . (2022). Ceramic nanofiltration membranes for efficient fouling mitigation through periodic electrolysis. Separation and Purification Technology, 303: 122228

[4] Asif M B , Zhang Z . (2021). Ceramic membrane technology for water and wastewater treatment: a critical review of performance, full-scale applications, membrane fouling and prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal, 418: 129481

[5] Atkinson S . (2019). PUB opens upgraded waterworks which houses the world’s largest ceramic membrane water treatment plant. Membrane Technology, 2019(10): 5–6

[6] Bai Z, Fan C, Zhang J, Peng W (2018). Experimental Research and Numerical Simulation of Ceramic Membrane Modules. Beijing: Editorial Board of Environmental Engineering, 214–217, 225 (in Chinese)

[7] Baker J S , Judd S J . (1996). Magnetic amelioration of scale formation. Water Research, 30(2): 247–260

[8] Byun S , Davies S H , Alpatova A L , Corneal L M , Baumann M J , Tarabara V V , Masten S J . (2011). Mn oxide coated catalytic membranes for a hybrid ozonation-membrane filtration: comparison of Ti, Fe and Mn oxide coated membranes for water quality. Water Research, 45(1): 163–170

[9] CaiWZhangJLiYChenQXieWWangJ (2022). Characterizing membrane fouling formation during ultrafiltration of high-salinity organic wastewater. Chemosphere, 287(Pt 1): 132057

[10] Cheng X , Liang H , Ding F , Shao S , Wu D . (2016). Effects of pre-ozonation on the ultrafiltration of different natural organic matter (NOM) fractions: membrane fouling mitigation, prediction and mechanism. Journal of Membrane Science, 505: 15–25

[11] Chiou Y T , Hsieh M L , Yeh H H . (2010). Effect of algal extracellular polymer substances on UF membrane fouling. Desalination, 250(2): 648–652

[12] Cho J , Amy G , Pellegrino J . (2000). Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes. Desalination, 127(3): 283–298

[13] Fan Y , Xing W . (2013). Research progress on surface properties of ceramic membranes. Membrane Science and Technology, 33(05): 1–7

[14] Gabelich C J , Ishida K P , Gerringer F W , Evangelista R , Kalyan M , Suffet I H M . (2006). Control of residual aluminum from conventional treatment to improve reverse osmosis performance. Desalination, 190(1): 147–160

[15] Garmsiri E , Rasouli Y , Abbasi M , Izadpanah A A . (2017). Chemical cleaning of mullite ceramic microfiltration membranes which are fouled during oily wastewater treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 19: 81–95

[16] Gentleman M M , Ruud J A . (2010). Role of hydroxyls in oxide wettability. Langmuir, 26(3): 1408–1411

[17] Gong B , Chen W , Qian C , Sit P H L , Liu X W , Yu H Q . (2023). Contribution of proteins to ceramic membrane fouling at the early stage of membrane filtration. Separation and Purification Technology, 312: 123450

[18] Ghadimkhani A , Zhang W , Marhaba T . (2016). Ceramic membrane defouling (cleaning) by air Nano Bubbles. Chemosphere, 146: 379–384

[19] Gruskevica K , Mezule L . (2021). Cleaning methods for ceramic ultrafiltration membranes affected by organic fouling. Membranes (Basel), 11(2): 131

[20] Guo Y , Song Z , Xu B , Li Y , Qi F , Croue J P , Yuan D . (2018). A novel catalytic ceramic membrane fabricated with CuMn₂O₄ particles for emerging UV absorbers degradation from aqueous and membrane fouling elimination. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 344: 1229–1239

[21] GwiS O (2017). See how the world’s major MBR manufacturers seize the market through the international MBR technology trend. Shanghai: China Membrane Industry Association

[22] Her N , Amy G , Mcknight D , Sohn J , Yoon Y . (2003). Characterization of DOM as a function of MW by fluorescence EEM and HPLC-SEC using UVA, DOC, and fluorescence detection. Water Research, 37(17): 4295–4303

[23] Ho C C , Zydney A L . (2000). A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 232(2): 389–399

[24] Huang H , Young T A , Jacangelo J G . (2008). Unified membrane fouling index for low pressure membrane filtration of natural waters: principles and methodology. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(3): 714–720

[25] Huang R , Pan H , Zheng X , Fan C , Si W , Bao D , Gao S , Tian J . (2023). Effect of membrane pore size on membrane fouling of corundum ceramic membrane in MBR. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5): 4558

[26] Jeong Y , Kim Y , Jin Y , Hong S , Park C . (2018). Comparison of filtration and treatment performance between polymeric and ceramic membranes in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 199: 182–188

[27] Jin L , Ong S L , Ng H Y . (2010). Comparison of fouling characteristics in different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors. Water Research, 44(20): 5907–5918

[28] Karnik B , Davies S , Baumann M , Masten S . (2005). Fabrication of catalytic membranes for the treatment of drinking water using combined ozonation and ultrafiltration. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(19): 7656–7661

[29] Khalil A , Rosset R , Gabrielli C , Keddam M , Perrot H . (1999). Characterization of the efficiency of antiscale treatments of water. Part II: Physical processes. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 29(3): 339–346

[30] Kim J , Van Der Bruggen B . (2010). The use of nanoparticles in polymeric and ceramic membrane structures: Review of manufacturing procedures and performance improvement for water treatment. Environmental Pollution, 158(7): 2335–2349

[31] KimJDaviesSBaumannM JTarabaraV VMastenS J (2008). Effect of ozone dosage and hydrodynamic conditions on the permeate flux in a hybrid ozonation–ceramic ultrafiltration system treating natural waters. Journal of Membrane Science, 311(1–2): 165–172

[32] Kim P , Park K , Kim H , Kim J . (2020). Comparative analysis of fouling mechanisms of ceramic and polymeric microfiltration membrane for algae harvesting. Desalination and Water Treatment, 173: 12–20

[33] Kimura K , Yamamura H , Watanabe Y . (2006). Irreversible fouling in MF/UF membranes caused by natural organic Matters (NOMs) isolated from different origins. Separation Science and Technology, 41(7): 1331–1344

[34] KoniecznyKKlomfasG (2002). Using activated carbon to improve natural water treatment by porous membranes. Desalination, 147(1–3): 109–116

[35] Law K Y . (2014). Definitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the basics right. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 5(4): 686–688

[36] Lee S J , Dilaver M , Park P K , Kim J H . (2013). Comparative analysis of fouling characteristics of ceramic and polymeric microfiltration membranes using filtration models. Journal of Membrane Science, 432: 97–105

[37] Li C , Sun W , Lu Z , Ao X , Li S . (2020). Ceramic nanocomposite membranes and membrane fouling: a review. Water Research, 175: 115674

[38] Lu D , Cheng W , Zhang T , Lu X , Liu Q , Jiang J , Ma J . (2016). Hydrophilic Fe₂O₃ dynamic membrane mitigating fouling of support ceramic membrane in ultrafiltration of oil/water emulsion. Separation and Purification Technology, 165: 1–9

[39] LvYLiuHWangZLiuSHaoLSangYLiuDWangJBoughtonR I (2009). Silver nanoparticle-decorated porous ceramic composite for water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 331(1–2): 50–56

[40] Ma J H, Xiang J, Li Juan (2010a). The fouling mechanism of ceramic membrane cross-flow microfiltration of seawater. Membrane Science and Technology, 30(3): 87−92 (in Chinese)

[41] Ma N , Zhang Y , Quan X , Fan X , Zhao H . (2010b). Performing a microfiltration integrated with photocatalysis using an Ag-TiO₂/HAP/Al₂O₃ composite membrane for water treatment: evaluating effectiveness for humic acid removal and anti-fouling properties. Water Research, 44(20): 6104–6114

[42] Madaeni S S , Mohamamdi T , Moghadam M K . (2001). Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination, 134(1): 77–82

[43] Marti-Calatayud M C , Schneider S , Yuece S , Wessling M . (2018). Interplay between physical cleaning, membrane pore size and fluid rheology during the evolution of fouling in membrane bioreactors. Water Research, 147(12): 393–402

[44] Meng F , Zhang S , Oh Y , Zhou Z , Shin H S , Chae S R . (2017). Fouling in membrane bioreactors: an updated review. Water Research, 114: 151–180

[45] Moritz T , Benfer S , Árki P , Tomandl G . (2001). Influence of the surface charge on the permeate flux in the dead-end filtration with ceramic membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 25(1): 501–508

[46] Motta Cabrera S , Winnubst L , Richter H , Voigt I , Nijmeijer A . (2021). Industrial application of ceramic nanofiltration membranes for water treatment in oil sands mines. Separation and Purification Technology, 256: 117821

[47] Mustafa G , Wyns K , Buekenhoudt A , Meynen V . (2016). New insights into the fouling mechanism of dissolved organic matter applying nanofiltration membranes with a variety of surface chemistries. Water Research, 93: 195–204

[48] Mustafa G , Wyns K , Janssens S , Buekenhoudt A , Meynen V . (2018). Evaluation of the fouling resistance of methyl grafted ceramic membranes for inorganic foulants and co-effects of organic foulants. Separation and Purification Technology, 193: 29–37

[49] NingMFanXXieQZhangY (2009). Ag–TiO₂/HAP/Al₂O₃ bioceramic composite membrane: fabrication, characterization and bactericidal activity. Journal of Membrane Science, 336(1–2): 1–2

[50] OhH KTakizawaSOhgakiSKatayamaHOgumaKYuM J (2007). Removal of organics and viruses using hybrid ceramic MF system without draining PAC. Desalination, 202(1–3): 191–198

[51] Psoch C , Schiewer S . (2006). Resistance analysis for enhanced wastewater membrane filtration. Journal of Membrane Science, 280(1): 284–297

[52] Qasim M , Darwish N N , Mhiyo S , Darwish N A , Hilal N . (2018). The use of ultrasound to mitigate membrane fouling in desalination and water treatment. Desalination, 443: 143–164

[53] Qu F , Liang H , Tian J , Yu H , Chen Z , Li G . (2012). Ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouling caused by cyanobateria: fouling effects of cells and extracellular organics matter (EOM). Desalination, 293: 30–37

[54] Sakamoto H , Hafuka A , Tsuchiya T , Kimura K . (2022). Intensive routine cleaning for mitigation of fouling in flat-sheet ceramic membranes used for drinking water production: unique characteristics of resulting foulants. Separation and Purification Technology, 301: 121950

[55] Schäfer A I , Schwicker U , Fischer M M , Fane A G , Waite T D . (2000). Microfiltration of colloids and natural organic matter. Journal of Membrane Science, 171(2): 151–172

[56] Schlichter B , Mavrov V , Chmiel H . (2004). Study of a hybrid process combining ozonation and microfiltration/ultrafiltration for drinking water production from surface water. Desalination, 168: 307–317

[57] Song J, Zhang Z, Tang S, Tan Y, Zhang X (2018). Does pre-ozonation or in-situ ozonation really mitigate the protein-based ceramic membrane fouling in the integrated process of ozonation coupled with ceramic membrane filtration? Journal of Membrane Science, 548: 254–262

[58] Stoller M . (2009). On the effect of flocculation as pretreatment process and particle size distribution for membrane fouling reduction. Desalination, 240(1): 209–217

[59] Ullah A , Tanudjaja H J , Ouda M , Hasan S W , Chew J W . (2021). Membrane fouling mitigation techniques for oily wastewater: A short review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 43: 102293

[60] Wang J , Li K , Wei Y , Cheng Y , Wei D , Li M . (2015). Performance and fate of organics in a pilot MBR–NF for treating antibiotic production wastewater with recycling NF concentrate. Chemosphere, 121: 92–100

[61] Weerasekara N A , Choo K H , Lee C H . (2014). Hybridization of physical cleaning and quorum quenching to minimize membrane biofouling and energy consumption in a membrane bioreactor. Water Research, 67(12): 1–10

[62] Wei X , Wang Z , Wang J , Wang S . (2009). Nanofiltration advanced treatment of antibiotics pharmaceutical wastewater membrane pollution and its control. Membrane Science and Technology, 29(04): 91–97

[63] WeisABirdM RNystroemM (2003). The chemical cleaning of polymeric UF membranes fouled with spent sulphite liquor over multiple operational cycles. Journal of Membrane Science, 216(1–2): 67–79

[64] Wiesner M R , Clark M M , Mallevialle J . (1989). Membrane filtration of coagulated suspensions. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 115(1): 20–40

[65] Wu Z , Chen H , Dong Y , Mao H , Sun J , Chen S , Craig V , Hu J . (2008). Cleaning using nanobubbles: defouling by electrochemical generation of bubbles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 328(1): 10–14

[66] Xing J , Du L , Quan X , Luo X , Snyder S A , Liang H . (2021). Combining chlor(am)ine-UV oxidation to ultrafiltration for potable water reuse: promoted efficiency, membrane fouling control and mechanism. Journal of Membrane Science, 635: 119511

[67] Xu J , Xie J , Lu Y , Ren J , Chen S . (2020). Membrane fouling characteristics of disc tube nanofiltration membranes in domestic water treatment. Chemical Engineering Progress, 39(05): 2000–2008

[68] Yang Y , Qiu Y , Liu Y , Zhao Y . (2021). Analysis of Fouling Characteristics of Diatomite Ceramic Membrane Using Filtration Models. E3S Web of Conferences, 233: 01049

[69] YuWGrahamN J DFowlerG D (2016). Coagulation and oxidation for controlling ultrafiltration membrane fouling in drinking water treatment: application of ozone at low dose in submerged membrane tank. Water Research, 95(May 15): 1–10

[70] Zhang X , Guo J , Wang L , Hu J , Zhu J . (2013). In situ ozonation to control ceramic membrane fouling in drinking water treatment. Desalination, 328(11): 1–7

[71] Zhang X L , Fan L H , Roddick F A . (2014). Feedwater coagulation to mitigate the fouling of a ceramic MF membrane caused by soluble algal organic matter. Separation and Purification Technology, 133: 221–226

[72] Zhou X, Liu W, Xiao K, Luo Y, Zou S, Huang B (2010). Membrane fouling mechanism and its control technology. Journal of Dongguan University of Technology, 17(01): 57−61 (in Chinese)

[73] Zhu H , Wen X , Huang X . (2009). Influence of ozone on membrane fouling in membrane water treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 30(1): 302–312

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2021YFC3201304).

Declaration of Interests

The authors state that they have no known competitive financial interests or personal relationships that may affect the work reported in this paper.

版权

2023 Higher Education Press