Surface modification of mesoporous silica nanoparticle with 4-triethoxysilylaniline to enhance seawater desalination properties of thin-film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes
Surface modification of mesoporous silica nanoparticle with 4-triethoxysilylaniline to enhance seawater desalination properties of thin-film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes
• Mesoporous silica nanoparticle was modified with 4-triethoxysilylaniline.
• AMSN-based TFN-RO membranes were prepared for seawater desalination.
• Water transport capability of the AMSN was limited by polyamide.
• Polyamide still plays a key role in permeability of the TFN RO membranes.
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN), with higher water permeability than NaA zeolite, were used to fabricate thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. However, only aminoalkyl-modified MSN and low-pressure (less than 2.1 MPa) RO membrane were investigated. In this study, aminophenyl-modified MSN (AMSN) were synthesized and used to fabricate high-pressure (5.52 MPa) RO membranes. With the increasing of AMSN dosage, the crosslinking degree of the aromatic polyamide decreased, while the hydrophilicity of the membranes increased. The membrane morphology was maintained to show a ridge-and-valley structure, with only a slight increase in membrane surface roughness. At the optimum conditions (AMSN dosage of 0.25 g/L), when compared with the pure polyamide RO membrane, the water flux of the TFN RO membrane (55.67 L/m2/h) was increased by about 21.6%, while NaCl rejection (98.97%) was slightly decreased by only 0.29%. However, the water flux of the membranes was much lower than expected. We considered that the enhancement of RO membrane permeability is attributed to the reduction of the effective thickness of the PA layer.
Thin film nanocomposite membrane / Reverse osmosis / Seawater desalination / Aminophenyl-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles
[1] |
Amy G, Ghaffour N, Li Z, Francis L, Linares R V, Missimer T, Lattemann S (2017). Membrane-based seawater desalination: Present and future prospects. Desalination, 401: 16–21
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Baig M I, Ingole P G, Choi W K, Jeon J, Jang B, Moon J H, Lee H K (2017). Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite membranes incorporated with surface functionalized silicon nanoparticles for improved water vapor permeation performance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 308: 27–39
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Bao M, Zhu G, Wang L, Wang M, Gao C (2013). Preparation of monodispersed spherical mesoporous nanosilica–polyamide thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes via interfacial polymerization. Desalination, 309: 261–266
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Chae H, Lee C, Park P, Kim I, Kim J (2017). Synergetic effect of graphene oxide nanosheets embedded in the active and support layers on the performance of thin-film composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 525: 99–106
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Chen H, Sun Z, Shao J (2011). Investigation on FT-IR spectroscopy for eight different sources of SiO2. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 30(04): 934–937
|
[6] |
Cohen-Tanugi D, McGovern R K, Dave S H, Lienhard J H, Grossman J C (2014). Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 7(3): 1134–1141
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Das R, Ali M E, Hamid S B A, Ramakrishna S, Chowdhury Z Z (2014). Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: A bright future in water desalination. Desalination, 336: 97–109
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Farahbakhsh J, Delnavaz M, Vatanpour V (2017). Investigation of raw and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes in fabrication of reverse osmosis polyamide membranes for improvement in desalination and antifouling properties. Desalination, 410: 1–9
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Guo X, Li C, Li C, Wei T, Tong L, Shao H, Zhou Q, Wang L, Liao Y (2019). G-CNTs/PVDF mixed matrix membranes with improved antifouling properties and filtration performance. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(6): 81–91
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Han Y, Jiang Y, Gao C (2015). High-flux graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane intercalated by carbon nanotubes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 7(15): 8147–8155
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Han Y, Xu Z, Gao C (2013). Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Advanced Functional Materials, 23(29): 3693–3700
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Huang L, Zhang M, Li C, Shi G (2015). Graphene-Based Membranes for Molecular Separation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 6(14): 2806–2815
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Jeong B, Hoek E M V, Yan Y, Subramani A, Huang X, Hurwitz G, Ghosh A K, Jawor A (2007). Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: A new concept for reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 294(1-2): 1–7
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Kadhom M, Yin J, Deng B (2016). A thin film nanocomposite membrane with MCM-41 silica nanoparticles for brackish water purification. Membranes, 6(4): 50
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Kim E S, Hwang G, Gamal El-Din M G, Liu Y (2012). Development of nanosilver and multi-walled carbon nanotubes thin-film nanocomposite membrane for enhanced water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 394–395: 37–48
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Kim H J, Choi K, Baek Y, Kim D G, Shim J, Yoon J, Lee J C (2014). High-performance reverse osmosis CNT/polyamide nanocomposite membrane by controlled interfacial interactions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 6(4): 2819–2829
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Kim S G, Hyeon D H, Chun J H, Chun B, Kim S H (2013). Nanocomposite poly (arylene ether sulfone) reverse osmosis membrane containing functional zeolite nanoparticles for seawater desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 443: 10–18
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Lau W J, Gray S, Matsuura T, Emadzadeh D, Paul Chen J, Ismail A F (2015). A review on polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes: History, applications, challenges and approaches. Water Research, 80: 306–324
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Lee H S, Im S J, Kim J H, Kim H J, Kim J P, Min B R (2008). Polyamide thin-film nanofiltration membranes containing TiO2 nanoparticles. Desalination, 219(1–3): 48–56
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Lee J, Jang J H, Chae H R, Lee S H, LeeC H, Park P K, Won Y J, Kim I C (2015). A facile route to enhance the water flux of thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane: Incorporating thickness-controlled graphene oxide in highly porous support layer. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 3(44): 22053–22060
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Li L, Liu N, McPherson B, Lee R (2008). Influence of counter ions on the reverse osmosis through MFI zeolite membranes: Implications for produced water desalination. Desalination, 228(1-3): 217–225
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Li Q, Yu H, Wu F, Song J, Pan X, Zhang M (2016). Fabrication of semi-aromatic polyamide/spherical mesoporous silica nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane with superior permeability. Applied Surface Science, 363: 338–345
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Lind M L, Ghosh A K, Jawor A, Huang X, Hou W, Yang Y, Hoek E M V (2009). Influence of zeolite crystal size on zeolite-polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes. Langmuir, 25(17): 10139–10145
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Lind M L, Suk D E, Nguyen T V, Hoek E (2010). Tailoring the structure of thin film nanocomposite membranes to achieve seawater RO membrane performance. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(21): 8230–8235
|
[25] |
Liu L, Zhu G, Liu Z, Gao C (2016). Effect of MCM-48 nanoparticles on the performance of thin film nanocomposite membranes for reverse osmosis application. Desalination, 394: 72–82
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Liu Q, Xu G (2016). Graphene oxide (GO) as functional material in tailoring polyamide thin film composite (PA-TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. Desalination, 394: 162–175
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Lu S, Wang D, Jiang S P, Xiang Y, Lu J, Zeng J (2010). HPW/MCM-41 phosphotungstic acid/mesoporous silica composites as novel proton-exchange membranes for elevated-temperature fuel cells. Advanced Materials, 22(9): 971–976
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Mahmoud K A, Mansoor B, Mansour A, Khraisheh M (2015). Functional graphene nanosheets: The next generation membranes for water desalination. Desalination, 356: 208–225
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Manawi Y, Kochkodan V, Hussein M A, Khaleel M A, Khraisheh M, Hilal N (2016). Can carbon-based nanomaterials revolutionize membrane fabrication for water treatment and desalination? Desalination, 391: 69–88
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Niksefat N, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A (2014). The effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on morphology and performance of thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis application. Desalination, 343: 140–146
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Pang R, Zhang K (2018). Fabrication of hydrophobic fluorinated silica-polyamide thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes with dramatically improved salt rejection. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 510: 127–132
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Park H B, Kamcev J, Robeson L M, Elimelech M, Freeman B D (2017a). Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science, 356(6343): eaab0530
CrossRef
ADS
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Park H M, Jee K Y, Lee Y T (2017b). Preparation and characterization of a thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane using a polysulfone membrane including metal-organic frameworks. Journal of Membrane Science, 541: 510–518
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Park K T, Kim S G, Chun B, Bang J, Kim S H (2010). Sulfonated poly (arylene ether sulfone) thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane containing SiO2 nano-particles. Desalination and Water Treatment, 15(1–3): 69–75
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Pendergast M M, Hoek E M V (2011). A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy & Environmental Science, 4(6): 1946–1971
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Rajaeian B, Rahimpour A, Tade M O, Liu S (2013). Fabrication and characterization of polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) nanofiltration membrane impregnated with TiO2 nanoparticles. Desalination, 313: 176–188
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Tian X, Wang J, Zhang H, Cao Z, Zhao M, Guan Y, Zhang Y (2018). Establishment of transport channels with carriers for water in reverse osmosis membrane by incorporating hydrotalcite into the polyamide layer. RSC Advances, 8(22): 12439–12448
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Vatanpour V, Safarpour M, Khataee A, Zarrabi H, Yekavalangi M E, Kavian M (2017). A thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane containing amine-functionalized carbon nanotubes. Separation and Purification Technology, 184: 135–143
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Virgili F, Pankratz T (2016). IDA desalination yearbook 2016–2017, Media Analytics Ltd., Oxford.
|
[40] |
Wang J, Dlamini D S, Mishra A K, Pendergast M T M, Wong M C Y, Mamba B B, Freger V, Verliefde A R D, Hoek E M V (2014). A critical review of transport through osmotic membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 454: 516–537
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Werber J R, Osuji C O, Elimelech M (2016). Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nature Reviews. Materials, 1(5): 16018
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Wu H, Tang B, Wu P (2013). Optimizing polyamide thin film composite membrane covalently bonded with modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of Membrane Science, 428: 341–348
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Yang Z, Yin J, Deng B (2016). Enhancing water flux of thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane by incorporation of bimodal silica nanoparticles. AIMS Environmental Science, 3(2): 185–198
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Yin J, Kim E, Yang J, Deng B (2012). Fabrication of a novel thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane containing MCM-41 silica nanoparticles (NPs) for water purification. Journal of Membrane Science, 423–424: 238–246
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Yin J, Zhu G, Deng B (2016). Graphene oxide (GO) enhanced polyamide (PA) thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane for water purification. Desalination, 379: 93–101
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Zargar M, Hartanto Y, Jin B, Dai S (2016). Hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles: A peculiar structure for thin film nanocomposite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 519: 1–10
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Zargar M, Hartanto Y, Jin B, Dai S (2017). Understanding Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles Incorporation in Thin Film Composite Membranes: Interactions and Desalination Performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 521: 53–64
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Zhu B, Hong Z, Milne N, Doherty C M, Zou L, Lin Y S, Hill A J, Gu X, Duke M (2014). Desalination of seawater ion complexes by MFI-type zeolite membranes: Temperature and long term stability. Journal of Membrane Science, 453: 126–135
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Zhu G, Bao M, Liu Z, Gao C (2016). Preparation of spherical mesoporous aminopropyl-functionalized MCM-41 and its application in polyamide thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(53): 25411–25420
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |