Impact assessment of the “Grain for Green Project” and discussion on the development models in the mountain-gorge regions

Xiaoqing ZHAO, Xing LV, Jinhua DAI

Front. Earth Sci. ›› 0

PDF(131 KB)
PDF(131 KB)
Front. Earth Sci. ›› DOI: 10.1007/s11707-010-0011-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact assessment of the “Grain for Green Project” and discussion on the development models in the mountain-gorge regions

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To restore China’s degraded ecological environment, the government has launched an environmental restoration project named the “Grain for Green Project” (GGP) in 1999. From 1999 to 2010, the government will spend 40 billion dollars to convert 147 million ha of croplands and 173 million ha of wastelands into forestlands and grasslands in 25 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions. A primary goal is to replace cropping and livestock grazing in fragile areas with trees and grass. Given the tremendous scale and great number of participants in the project, the attitudes of the affected farmers and the future development in the area where GGP is implemented have a direct influence on the success of the project. To gain a clear idea about the farmers’ attitudes towards the project and put forward the development models for the forestlands converted from croplands, two case sites in the mountain-gorge region in Nujiang River are selected as the study areas, and the methods of field survey and semi-structured interview are adopted to make interviews with more than 100 households in 2002 and 2003 in order to quantify the farmers’ opinions about the GGP and how it has affected their livelihood, socio-cultural and industrial structures, etc. The results are as follows: 1) the project has a certain influence on the farmers with better economic basis and exerts greater influence on the farmers living in the low-elevation regions than on those living in the regions with middle-high elevation; 2) the production models of the local farmers has changed from cultivation and animal husbandry to forestry and sidelines due to the project and the income structure has changed from animal husbandry as main income source to state subsidy and sideline as main income sources; 3) the reduction in the grain income and decrease in the quantity of livestock because of the project have led to the diminution in the total income of the farmers; 4) the project has resulted in changes in the lifestyles and architecture styles of the local farmers, and the traditional “huotang” culture has gone away after the implementation of the project; 5) energy utilization has changed from firewood to methane and electricity in the wake of the implementation of the project. The above-mentioned study results have indicated that the GGP has truly exerted influence on the livelihood and production of the local farmers. Therefore, it is very necessary to make a research into the development models in the forestlands converted from croplands to resolve the problems of the farmers’ livelihood and production. The study results will provide some references for the sustainable development of the mountain-gorge regions.

Keywords

the mountain-gorge region / the “Grain for Green Project” (GGP) / impact / development model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoqing ZHAO, Xing LV, Jinhua DAI. Impact assessment of the “Grain for Green Project” and discussion on the development models in the mountain-gorge regions. Front Earth Sci Chin, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-010-0011-y

References

[1]
CaoS, ChenL, LiuZ (2007). Disharmony between society and environmental carrying capacity: a historical review, with an emphasis on China. Ambio, 36 (5): 409–415
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
ChenG J (2001). Problems and countermeasures on “Grain for Green” project and “logging ban” in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Resources & Environment in the Yangtze River Basin, 10: 544–549 (in Chinese)
[3]
ChenQ, WangK, QiS (2002). Dynamics of land use and change of sloping field productivity in hilly and gully area of Loess Plateau in Xiji County, Ningxia. J. Soil Water Conservation, 16: 28–29 (in Chinese)
[4]
EhrlichP R (2001). Intervention in evolution: ethics and actions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98: 5477–5480
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
HeF, SongX Q (1999). Mountain water-forest: the thinking after the devastating foods occurred in the Yangtze River of China in 1998. Economic Forest Researches, 17: 1–5 (in Chinese)
[6]
LambD, ErskineP D, ParrottaJ A (2005). Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science, 310: 1628–1632
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
LiW H (1999). Flood of Yangtze River and ecological restoration. Journal of Natural Resources, 14: 1–8 (in Chinese)
[8]
LubchencoJ (1998). Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science, 279: 491–497
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
LvX, ZhaoX Q (2003). Impact assessment of forest protection and the “Grain for Green” (GGP) protection in the Nujiang watershed. ICRAF-Yunnan Project Document (in Chinese)
[10]
YangY X (2001). Impacts and effectiveness of logging bans in natural forests: People’s Republic of China. In: BrownC, DurstP, EntersT eds. Natural Forests in Asia-Pacific. Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 81–102 (in Chinese)
[11]
ZhangP C, ShaoG F, ZhaoG, DennisC L M, GeorgeR P, JohnB D J, LiQ L (2000). China’s forest policy for the 21st century. Science, 288: 2135–2136
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
ZhaoX Q, LvX (2004). Impact assessment of forest protection and the “Grain for Green” (GGP) project in the Chashan watershed. ICRAF-Yunnan Project Document (in Chinese)
[13]
ZhaoX Q, LvX, YanQ, LiX H (2004). Present situation and exploitation modes of the upland in the Zhongyuan small watershed in Nujiang prefecture, Yunan. Tropical geography, 24(2): 163–167 (in Chinese)
[14]
ZuoT (2002). Implementation of the SLCP. In: Western China Forests and Grasslands Task Force of the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development ed. Implementing the Natural Forest Protection Program and the Sloping Land Conversion Program: Lessons and Policy Recommendations. (in Chinese) http://www.harbour.sfu.ca/dlam/Taskforce/grassfindingindex. html

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the World Agro-forestry Centre, Yunnan Office (ICRAF-Yunnan), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40961031), the Project of Applied Basic Research of Yunnan Province (No. 2009CD022) and the Training Project of Young and Mid-aged Backbone Teachers (Specially-funded Project of Yunnan University). We would like to express our heartfelt thanks to the staff of the Forest Bureau of Lushui County and the Forestry Department of Baoshan City for their great help and active cooperation. We are also grateful to the agencies that provided us with sufficient information and data. This investigation was made possible by the active cooperation and assistance of many local people in the Nujiang Watershed Prefecture. We are truly grateful to them.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(131 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/