The surface composition and chemical states of SZ33 and its single counterparts were determined by XPS characterization. The results are shown in Figs. 5, S6 (cf. ESM), and S7 (cf. ESM). The Ti 2p XPS spectrum exhibited two signals of Ti 2p
3/2 and Ti 2p
1/2 with the binding energies of 458.2 and 464.0 eV, respectively (Fig. 5(a)), which could be ascribed to Ti
4+. The Sr 3d XPS spectrum (Fig. 5(b)) showed two peaks at 132.6 and 134.4 eV, corresponding to the characteristic binding energies of Sr 3d
5/2 and 3d
3/2 of Sr
2+, respectively. The Cd 3d XPS spectrum (Fig. 5(c)) exhibited two peaks at the binding energies of 404.6 and 411.3 eV, corresponding to Cd 3d
5/2 and 3d
3/2 of Cd
2+, respectively [
40]. Figure 5(d) showed that two peaks of Zn 2p
3/2 and Zn 2p
1/2 were discerned at 1021.9 and 1044.5 eV, which were the typical values of Zn
2+. As depicted in Fig. 5(e), the O 1s XPS spectrum revealed several components. The peak at 529.6 eV corresponded to the lattice stoichiometric oxygen in STO, whereas the peak at 531.6 eV could be assigned to the chemisorbed oxygen species, which could be related to the surface defective oxygen [
41]. The S 2p XPS spectrum of SZ33 (Fig. 5(f)) can be deconvoluted into three peaks with binding energies at 161.2, 162.7, and 164.1 eV. The peaks located at 161.2 and 162.7 eV could be, respectively, ascribed to the S 2p
3/2 and 2p
1/2 peaks of S
2– [
42], which can also be observed in the S 2p XPS spectrum of pure ZCS (Fig. S5(c)). Notably, a new peak at 164.1 eV appeared in the S 2p XPS spectrum of SZ33 but not pure ZCS. It could be assigned to the formation of an interfacial metal−sulfur bond (e.g., Ti‒S bond) [
43], which should facilitate charge transfer through the interface.