REVIEW ARTICLE

Glyco-functionalised quantum dots and their progress in cancer diagnosis and treatment

  • Jayshree Ashree 1 ,
  • Qi Wang 2 ,
  • Yimin Chao , 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Chemistry, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
  • 2. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

Received date: 25 Mar 2019

Accepted date: 11 May 2019

Published date: 15 Jun 2020

Copyright

2019 The Author(s) 2019. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn

Abstract

Despite all major breakthroughs in recent years of research, we are still unsuccessful to effectively diagnose and treat cancer that has express and metastasizes. Thus, the development of a novel approach for cancer detection and treatment is crucial. Recent progress in Glyconanotechnology has allowed the use of glycans and lectins as bio-functional molecules for many biological and biomedical applications. With the known advantages of quantum dots (QDs) and versatility of carbohydrates and lectins, Glyco-functionalised QD is a new prospect in constructing biomedical imaging platform for cancer behaviour study as well as treatment. In this review, we aim to describe the current utilisation of Glyco-functionalised QDs as well as their future prospective to interpret and confront cancer.

Cite this article

Jayshree Ashree , Qi Wang , Yimin Chao . Glyco-functionalised quantum dots and their progress in cancer diagnosis and treatment[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020 , 14(3) : 365 -377 . DOI: 10.1007/s11705-019-1863-7

Introduction

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death and a major threat to public health in the 21st century. Cancer is a complex type of disease affecting a verity of tissues. It is mainly characterised by uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells, with the ability to attack surrounding tissues and possibly metastasize. Despite of early stage diagnosis and therapeutics help to manage the disease, it remains to be never ending battle to prevent and treat cancer. Nanotechnology is a promising approach in diagnosis and treatment of cancer through the development of novel diagnostic imaging methods and targeted therapies. Quantum dots (QDs) are being intensively studied as a novel probe for biomedical imaging both in vitro and in vivo due to their unique optical and electronic properties. Extensive researches on the physicochemical properties of QDs, such as size, morphology, composition, and surface features suggest that QDs have great potential in cancer detection and treatment [16]. When conjugated with antibodies, peptides or other small biological molecules, QD-based probes can be used to target cancer cells with high specificity and sensitivity.
During the last decade, there has been a great deal of interest in the incorporation of nanotechnology with carbohydrates. Carbohydrates are prominently exposed on the surface of living cells and are critically involved in cell-cell interactions and regulate important biological functions such as cell growth and cell differentiation [7]. Cancer cells differ from normal cells in many aspects, which are often exploited as a strategy in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer cell undergoes a high rate of glycolysis to adapt the low oxygen environment, leading to increased glucose demand called Warburg effect. High glucose demand leads to overexpression of insulin independent glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1). Overexpressed GLUT-1 can be a potential target for chemotherapy. Glycoconjugates and carbohydrate derivatives can be effectively used for chemotherapy and also, conjugation of sugars to a known anti-cancer agent can increase the selectivity and hence reduce the toxicity [8]. The advances in nanotechnology have allowed the creation of different bioactive glyco-functionalised nanostructures for various biomedical applications such as drug delivery, gene therapy, pathogen detection and lectin-based biosensors [915].
Lectins were first introduced at the end of 19th century and are described as carbohydrate-binding proteins [16]. Lectins play important role in many biological process and living organism [17,18]. They are universally spread in nature and are also major component of the outer surface of mammalian cells. They have been widely used in researches involving carbohydrates recognition and detection on cell surfaces [19,20]. Several studies have conjugated carbohydrates and lectins to different nanostructures, such as polymers, liposomes, dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, metal nanoparticles and quantum dots [9,14]. The resulting glyco-functionalised nanoparticles have been used for cell imaging, cell separation, protein detection and enzyme immobilization [15]. Glyconanoparticles presented a highly multivalent method of interaction with cell surface structure like glycoprotein and glycolipid (Fig. 1). The major function of glyconanoparticles is to serve as recognition markers [21]. In particular, carbohydrate-protein interactions on normal cells and their malignant counterparts show significant differences [22], which is important strategy in cancer chemotherapy. Although carbohydrate-protein interactions are typically very weak but possess key role to biological processes that require temporary adhesion during cell adhesion, cancer metastasis, immune response and intracellular trafficking [15]. Moreover carbohydrate perform as essential intermediate in endocytosis processes, intercellular interaction and extracellular matrix, adhesion and cell growth [23,24], fertilisation [25], and also interactions between pathogen and host [26]. The unique functionalities of carbohydrates forming densely packed cluster on the surface of nanoparticles (NPs) is known as the “glycocluster effect” [27,28]. These glyconanoparticles behaves in a similar manner to mimic the naturally occurring glycocalyx. Therefore, the functionalisation and engineering of these glyconanoaprticles helps to further enhance their specific reorganisation properties on multivalent scaffolds in glycoscience.
Fig.1 Scheme of the cell membrane carbohydrate residues labelling with lectin-QDs.

Full size|PPT slide

Characteristic of QDs for biomedical application

QDs are semiconductors nanocrystals, are one of the first nanotechnologies to be integrated with the biological sciences. QDs are proven to be powerful probes for fluorescence imaging and are being developed for a range of additional applications including the detection of cancer, fluorescent assays for drug discovery, single protein tracking, and intracellular reporting. QDs have distinct properties that give them their unique capabilities.
QDs were first fabricated in the 80’s by Louis E. Brus [29] and the unique properties of these special nano-structures attracted interest from many fields. QDs are semiconductor nano-crystals in which excitons are confined in all three spatial dimensions. The confinement can be realised by fabricating the semiconductor in very small size, typically several hundred to thousands of atoms per particle. Due to quantum confinement effects, QDs act like artificial atoms, showing controllable discrete energy levels. QDs range from 2 nm to 10 nm in diameter and shows unique optical, physical and chemical properties. They offer great advantages over traditional organic fluorescent dyes. They present several beneficial characteristics for spectroscopy and microscopy, such as high fluorescence intensity, long lifetime, and good resistance to photobleaching. The brightness of QD based multifunctional probes affords high sensitivity for simultaneous cancer molecular imaging and targeted therapy. For spectrum application, the sensitivity of QD-based molecular imaging can be two to three orders larger than that of routine fluorescent dyes [30]. Furthermore, the fluorescence near-infrared (NIR) of NIR-QDs can be detected in deep tissues, making them suitable for in vivo imaging with high signal to background ratio. These properties are enabling a new generation of fluorescence imaging experiments in cancer research allowing investigators to unravel biological function at the molecular level. When functionalized with diagnostic and therapeutic agents, QDs can be used for cancer diagnosis, photodynamic therapy, cell labelling and biosensors. Biocompatibility and biological targeting of QDs are achieved through surface modification and conjugation with antibodies, peptides, or small molecules. The glyconanoparticles shows promising results in fluorescence-based techniques for biological studies when associated with QDs to lectins or carbohydrate.

Lectin-functionalised QDs in cancer diagnosis and theranostics

In 1998, first biocompatible QDs were announced for cancer imaging in in vitro. Despite of immeasurable technological advances thereafter in cancer diagnosis, the conventional medical imaging techniques in most of cases fail to offer sensitivity and resolution altogether for early stage diagnosis, as well as providing specific disease molecular information. Signal-to-background ratio is important and needs lot of improvement in order to effectively screening, staging and treatment of cancer. To achieve that proportional improvements in sensitivity and contrast targeting agent are required. The objective of cancer imaging is to detect and image the smallest number of tumour cells, ideally before the angiogenesis [31,32]. Current detection for solid tumours has a threshold of ~109 cells [31,33]. When assisted by the administration of specific exogenous contrast agents [3437], current imaging modalities can monitor biochemical processes as well as cross-sectional anatomy [38,39]. Though, they have certain limitations [4042], which are either due to their intrinsic characteristics or the potentially harmful effect of the contrast agents. QD-based imaging technique could overcome these limitations, make it as one of the most promising technologies for early diagnosis of cancer [43,44].
Glycans are carbohydrates that can be attached to proteins, lipids and other glycans through enzymic process known as glycosylation. Glycans have key roles in cancer biology, including cell signalling, tumorigenesis, immune modulation, angiogenesis and metastasis [45,46]. Aberrant changes in glycan structures have been shown to be associated with tumorigenesis, tumour progression and metastasis, thus a universal hallmark of cancer [46,47]. Compared to normal tissue, tumour cells have numerous changes in glycosylation, including changes to sialylation, fucosylation, the truncation of O-glycans, and N-glycan branching [47,48]. There is a huge potential to exploit glycans to improve early diagnosis, and as markers of specific therapeutic targets [45]. Lectin-QD bioconjugate could be an ideal tool to study glycan profile and glycosylation changes related to cancer. Table 1 presents a summary of Lectin functionalised QDs used for cancer diagnosis studies reported in literature.
Tab.1 Summary of lectin-functionalised QD conjugates for cancer diagnosis reported in literature
Application Carbohydrate detection Lectin Types of QDs Cancer model Ref.
Cancer diagnosis Glucose/mannose and L-fucose profile Con A, UEA I MSA-CdTe QDsa) Fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma cells [49]
Cancer detection GalNAc , GlcNAc and mannose profiles DSA, LCA TGA-CdTe QDsb) HepG2 cells [50]
Cancer diagnosis Mannose/glucose, and galactose profile Cramoll CdTe QDs [51]
Cancer theranostics Mannose triflate, cysteamine molecules (MTC) SNA lectin CdSe/CdS Caco-2, MCF-7 and A549 cells [52]
Cancer theranostics PHA-L CdSe/CdS QDs MCF-7 cells [53]

a) MSA: Mercaptosuccinic acid; b) Thioglycolic acid.

Lectin functionalised QDs in cancer diagnosis

Andrade et al. [49] formulated CdTe QDs functionalised with MSA and conjugated with concanavalin A (Con A) or Ulex europaeus agglutinin I (UEA I) lectins to investigate conceivable variations in carbohydrates profile in normal breast tissue, fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma (malign tumour). These CdTe QDs are used to detect a-D-glucose/mannose and L-fucose residues on cell surface. They showed to be more photostable and had higher luminescence intensity than the previously used glutaraldehyde CdS/Cd(OH)2 QDs [54]. They observed that the tissues stained with these CdTe QD conjugates showed different fluorescent patterns, which revealed distinct labelling patterns in the three tissue types. The stroma was favourably and intensely stained by CdTe QDs-Con A, due to higher expression of a-D-glucose/mannose residues. The ductal cells were preferentially labelled by CdTe QDs-UEA I, revealing intense expression of L-fucose residues. These results indicate differences in expression and distribution of carbohydrate residues in these tissues.
He et al. [50] synthesised hydrophilic TGA functionalised CdTe QDs conjugated with Datura stramonium agglutinin (DSA) and Lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA), which have different emission wavelength of 550 and 618 nm, respectively (Fig. 2(A)). The formed functionalised QD-lectin bioconjugates are used to investigate the GalNAc and GlcNAc/mannose profiles on hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) by fluorescence imaging (Fig. 2(B)) and flow cytometric analysis. Compared to normal endothelium cells (ECs) and liver cells (LO2), HepG2 cancer cells labelled with QDs-DSA and QDs-LCA exhibited 3 and 2-fold greater signal, respectively. Thus, the lectin-QD bioconjugates proved to be efficient tools to monitor the carbohydrate expression and evaluating the differential expression of these carbohydrates on normal and cancer cells, which is very important for helping the early diagnosis of cancer.
A recent study from Cunha et al. [51] evaluated two different strategies to conjugate cramoll lectin to QDs. Cramoll is a mannose/glucose–binding lectin with unique immunomodulatory and antitumor activities. Both adsorption and covalent bonding strategies have been used and tested at different pH values. The authors showed that QDs absorbed to cramoll at pH 7.0 had the best labelling efficiency on Candida albicans cells. Approximately 92% of cells were labelled after incubation with adsorption conjugates compared to 17% of cells were labelled by covalent conjugates. The cramoll lectin and QD conjugates remained brightly fluorescent and preserved identical biological activity as cramoll, thus it could be promising fluorescent tools for carbohydrate expression analysis in normal and cancer cells, which can provide valuable information about glycosylation changes related to cancer.

Lectin functionalised QDs in theranostics for cancer

Theranostics, is a term invented from merging diagnostics and therapeutics application of nanomaterials. QDs are excellent candidate for imaging and early cancer detection; they may also serve ideal delivery vehicles if the biocompatibility can be managed. Through surface functionalization of ligands and conjugation of “drugs” on QD one can construct an “all-in-one” multifunctional nanoplatform that features targeting, therapeutic and imaging modalities. Lectin-QDs are showing promising results in theranostics applications.
Akca et al. [52] synthesised CdSe/CdS QDs and conjugated with sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNA) lectin and MTC. Cysteamine can induce apoptosis in cells, and its capacity can be increased with radiation. Biological activities of 125I-, 125I-MTCQDs, MTC-QDs-Lec-125I, QDs-Lec-125I and Lec-125I were examined on various cancer cell lines such as Caco-2, MCF-7 and A-549. The results showed more specificity of SNA towards MCF-7 cells compared with other cells lines. In addition, the QDs-Lec-131I used in in vivo studies indicated that the conjugated QDs were accumulated in the liver and bladder. These results suggested that the conjugate QDs-Lec-125/131I presented both radioactive and fluorescent properties could be a useful tool for tumour imaging and radiotherapy.
Fig.2 (A) Schematic representation of lectin–QDs conjugates: QD550-DSA and QD618-LCA detecting cell surface carbohydrates. (B) Fluorescence microscopy images of HepG2 cells stained by functionalised QDs. (Adapted with permission from Ref. [50], published by The Royal Society of Chemistry)

Full size|PPT slide

Kara et al. [53] prepared CdSe/CdS QDs, conjugated with PHA-L and labelled with 125I to study the interface between phytohemagglutinin-L (PHA-L) and sialic acid. Sialic acid is abundant on the breast cancer cell (MCF-7) surface. The authors demonstrated that 125I labeled QD-PHA-L conjugates represent significant affinity on MCF-7 cells and the cell incorporation increased with time. This result was also confirmed by computational simulation using crystal structure of PHA-L, which revealed that the conjugates had a significant affinity for cells.

Carbohydrate-functionalised QDs in cancer diagnosis and treatment

Lack of specificity of formulated drug or nanomaterial is the major challenge for the effective cancer treatment. Therefore, the development of targeted system for cancer diagnosis and treatment is highly desirable. Cancer cell differ from its malignant counterparts, which provides valuable characteristic to develop specific targeted system for cancer. Targeted fluorescent biomarkers have found great advantage in the specific visualisation of cancer cells, which enables early-stage detection of cancers instead of depending on advanced morphological changes alone. Moreover, targeted system enhanced drug delivery to specific cancer cells or tissue thereby dramatically improving the selectivity and efficacy of anti-cancer drugs. Carbohydrates have attracted considerable attention in the development of targeting systems due to their ability to differentiate and recognise cells and the endocytic uptake resulting from specific carbohydrate–lectin interactions. Table 2 presents a summary of carbohydrate-functionaslied QDs targeting different cancer models for potential cancer treatment discussed in the text below.
Tab.2 Summary of carbohydrate-functionalised QDs targeting various types of cancer reported in literature
Applications Carbohydrate Types of QDs Targeting receptor Cancer model Ref.
Cancer imaging SialylLacNAc, LacNAc, Lex PC-QDs Mice model [55]
Cancer cell imaging Mannose and galactose CdSe/ZnS-TOPO QDs Asialoglycoprotein receptors HepG2 cells [56]
Cancer cell imaging β-Galactose and α-glucose CdTe/CdS QDs Asialoglycoprotein receptors, glucose receptor HepG2 cells [57]
Cancer cell imaging a-Glucose, a-N-acetylglucose, b-galactose, mannose or sialic acid ZnS-AgInS2 QDs Asialoglycoprotein receptors Leukemia (THP-1), macrophage (J774.A1) and HepG2 cells [58]
Cancer cell imaging D-Mannose Silicon QDs MCF-7 cells [59]
Cancer cell imaging Glucose, lactose Silicon QDs B16F10 melanoma cells [60]
Cancer cell imaging Glucose Silicon QDs HeLa cells [61]
Cancer targeting Galactose CdTe/ZnS-TOPO Asialoglycoprotein receptors HeLa and A549 cells [62]
Cancer targeting D-Mannose Silicon QDs MCF-7 cells [63]
Cancer targeting Galactose, glucose, mannose, and lactose Silicon QDs MCF-7, HepG2, A549, SK-Mel, HHL5, HeLa cells [64]
Cancer targeting Galactose CdSe-ZnS QDs Galactose receptors HepG2 and HeLa cells [65]
Cancer theranostics Mannose Albumin-CdTe QDs MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, Ehrlich ascites tumour in BALB/C mice [66]

Carbohydrate-functionalised QDs for cancer imaging

Ohyanagi et al. [55] investigated the dynamic distribution profiles of carbohydrate-functionalised QDs in model animals. The authors synthesised NIR fluorescent CdSeTe/CdS QDs and coated them with a mixed population of thiol. The obtained QDs were further coated with different carbohydrate to form a collection of carbohydrate-functionalised QDs for in vivo study. NIR images of mice injected with carbohydrate-coated QDs exhibited significant differences in time-dependent distribution (Fig. 3). The authors demonstrated that sialyl N-acetyllactosamine (sialylLacNAc) linked QDs accumulated in the spleen and intestine 2 h post injection, while LacNAc-functionalized QDs and Lex-QDs were localised in the liver, and no preferential distribution was observed for sLex-QDs. These results suggest that the structure of the carbohydrate residues in the individual sialylated oligosaccharides might influence significantly the organ-specific distribution of the glycan functionalised QDs.
Fig.3 Live animal imaging module of mice treated with glyco-functionalised QDs carrying Lewis antigen-related oligosaccharides. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [55], Copyright American Chemical Society)

Full size|PPT slide

It has been well reported in the literature that hepatocytes, especially hepatocellular carcinoma cells (e.g., HepG2) have overexpressed galactose receptors-Asialoglycoprotein receptors (ASGP-Rs) [6771]. Thus, ASGP-Rs could be an ideal target for liver cancer cells [70,71]. Bavireddia and Kikkeri [56] synthesised b-cyclodextrin (b-CD) capped with O-a-mannopyranoside (man) and O-b-galactopyranoside (gal) to CdSe/ZnS- TOPO QDs. They first studied the interaction of synthesised nanoparticles with different lectins like ConA, Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA) and peanut agglutinin (PNA) and observed that QDs-b-CD-man conjugates were successfully linked to ConA and GNA, while QDs-b-CD-gal conjugates only showed affinity with PNA. They later introduced these multivalent fluorescent nanoparticles in HepG2 cells and observed that only b-CD-gal QDs internalized in liver carcinoma cells, which confirms Asialoglycoprotein receptor mediate interaction. Shinchi et al. [57] also proved similar concept by synthesizing b-galactose and a-glucose CdTe/CdS QDs and studied there interaction with ConA and Ricinus communis agglutinin I (RCA 120). They proved that b-galactose CdTe/CdS QDs internalised in HepG2 cells, which express asialoglycoprotein receptors, whereas a-glucose QDs showed poor uptake in HepG2 liver carcinoma cells. They later then synthesised small library of cadmium free sugar ZnS-AgInS2 QDs such as a-glucose, a-N-acetylglucose, b-galactose, mannose or sialic acid [58]. They used three different cell lines, leukaemia (THP-1), macrophage (J774.A1) and HepG2 cells. The results showed that leukaemia cells only uptaken a-glucose QDs, perhaps due to the lack of carbohydrate receptors. All the QDs were internalised in Macrophage cells, whereas HepG2 cells were preferentially taken up b-galactose QDs, due to the high amount of asialoglycoprotein receptors in these cells’ membranes.
Zhai et al. [59] have also developed a straightforward synthesis method for carbohydrate-functionalised silicon quantum dots (SiQDs). The authors used three surface modifications to study SiQDs solubility in water and their biocompatibility within cells: L-alanine and pentanoic acid were chosen for their structural simplicity and D-mannose surface functionalities were used for targeted imaging of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated the D-mannose and L-alanine functionalised SiQDs could readily internalised by MCF-7 cells, however, the pentanoic acid terminated SiQD did not. This observation indicates carbohydrate-functionalised SiQDs can be effective luminescent imaging agents.
Lai et al. [60] created structurally defined and fluorescently labelled multifunctional carbohydrate-capped silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs) to study ultra-weak carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and cell imaging. An additional dye (ATTO647N) was added to create dual-fluorescent SiNPs. They synthesised three different sugar-capped SiNPs (Glc-dye@SiNP, Lac-dye@SiNP, and Gg3-dye@SiNP) and subsequently used to determine the low-affinity interaction of the two glycosphingolipids GM3 and Gg3. Specific binding of Gg3-dye@SiNPs to immobilized GM3-biotin-PAA was detected, and affinity analysis was performed by SPR confirming the existence of this carbohydrate-carbohydrate interaction. Moreover, they demonstrated that sugar-dye@SiNPs are valuable tools for cell imaging by the uptake of Gg3-dye@SiNPs into GM3-expressing B16F10 melanoma cells (Fig. 4).
Fig.4 Confocal fluorescent images showing the uptake of Gg3-dye@SiNPs by B16F10 cells after 2 h incubation. SiNPs inherent fluorescence-blue, DIC-differential interference contrast microscopy, early endosomes-green (stained with an anti-EEA1 antibody), actin cytoskeleton-red (stained with Alexa 555-labeled phalloidin). (Adapted with permission from Ref. [60], Copyright American Chemical Society)

Full size|PPT slide

Hsu et al. [61] also synthesized ultra-small SiNPs (i.e., SiQDs) for cancer cell imaging purpose. The SiQDs were functionalised with glucose moieties on their surface (Si-Glc). The amount of glucose on the surface of SiQDs could be well controlled by varying the ratio between the amount of SiQDs and the saccharide groups during the coupling reaction. The photophysical behaviour of the glucose functionalised SiQDs were not significantly different to that of the unmodified nanoparticles. In vitro studies performed on HeLa cells demonstrated faster internalisation (1 h) of Si-Glc into the cells compared to the unmodified NPs (24 h). Furthermore, CASY assay showed that Si-Glc exhibited high cell viability. These findings suggested these glucose functionalised SiQDs could be potentially interesting alternatives as cancer bioimaging probes.

Carbohydrate-functionalised QDs for cancer targeting and theranostics

Cheng et al. [62] developed hydrophilic L-cysteine coated CdSeTe QDs conjugated with Con A, and then with N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc). The QDs-ConA-GlcNAc bioconjugate was formed by lectin-carbohydrate interaction between Con A and GlcNAc. GlcNAc possesses a strong affinity for Hsp70 (70 kDa Heat Shock Protein), an important protein involved in tumour cell proliferation and may be a potential biomarker for cancer cells [62,7274]. The obtained bioconjugates has an emission wavelength at 650 nm and displayed a high fluorescence intensity with specific binding to HeLa cells (cervical cancer cells). The co-localization of red fluorescence from QDs-Con A-GlcNAc bioconjugate with the green fluorescence from FITC-immunoglobulin G suggested that these Glyo-QDs can target the Hsp70 protein. These results show that the QDs-Con A-GlcNAc bioconjugate can be a promising tool for direct localisation of the Hsp70 protein, therefore recognise cancers related to this protein.
Ahire et al. [63] developed D-mannose capped SiNPs for targeting MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Visualisation imaging of SiNPs in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells showed the fluorescence was distributed throughout the cytoplasm of these cells. Later the same research group prepared SiNPs capped with different carbohydrates including galactose, glucose, mannose, and lactose from amine terminated SiNPs [64,75]. The MTT analysis showed an extensive reduction in toxicity of SiNPs by functionalizing with carbohydrate moiety in vitro. In vivo toxicity assay on the X. laevis embryos showed that carbohydrate capped SiNPs do not induce severe toxicity, however the amine terminated SiNPs caused the death of the embryos (Fig. 5(A)). They reported that the carbohydrate-functionalised SiNPs internalized in the cells within 24 h of incubation and reached the optimal concentration within the cells (Fig. 5(B)). Furthermore, they showed a reduced internalization of the carbohydrate-functionalised SiNPs at 4°C compared to 37°C, which suggested the cellular uptake of the carbohydrate capped SiNPs is likely to be receptor-mediated and energy dependent. They also showed that the up-taken of the carbohydrate capped SiNPs were more readily by cancer cells (A549, MCF-7 and SK-Mel28) than non-cancerous cells (MDCK and HHL5, Fig. 5(C)). Moreover, they demonstrated the use of carbohydrates for the internalisation of a variety of similar compounds into cancer cells.
Fig.5 (A) In vivo toxicity assay using X. laevis embryos. Embryos exposed to carbohydrate capped SiNPs at a concentration of 200 mg·mL1: (a) control, (b) gal capped SiNPs, (c) man capped SiNPs, (d) Glu capped SiNPs, (e) Lac capped SiNPs, and (f) amine-terminated SiNPs. Embryos were exposed to the SiNPs at NF stage 15 and scored at NF stage 38; (B) Time dependent uptake efficiency of carbohydrate capped SiNPs in SK-Mel28 cells at various incubation times; (C) Uptake efficiency of carbohydrate capped SiNPs in cancer cells (A549, SK-Mel28, and MCF-7) and noncancerous cells (MDCK, HHL5) at 24 h. (Copyright Wiley, adapted with permission from Ref. [64])

Full size|PPT slide

It is well known that galactose receptors are overexpressed in certain types of cancer cells, for example hepatocellular carcinoma [70,71]. However, the role of galactose multivalency on cellular processes are largely unexplored. To study these, Dalal and Jana [65] have synthesised galactose functionalised multivalent QDs with the average numbers of galactose per QD of 25, 50, and 80 [QD(gal)25, QD(gal)50, and QD(gal)80]. The uptake mechanism of the multivalent QDs was investigated in galactose receptor overexpressed HepG2 cells. The authors have demonstrated that the cellular interaction and uptake kinetics of these galactose functionalised QDs increased with increasing galactose multivalency, while the uptake mechanism shifts from lipid raft/caveolae-mediated endocytosis to clathrin-mediated endocytosis as galactose multivalency increased. They have also found that lower multivalent QDs reside in the cytoplasm for a longer time compared to higher multivalent QDs, but their endosomal/lysozomal trapping and exocytosis increased as increasing galactose multivalency. The demonstrated finding is agreed with the extensive study done by Zhang and Monteiro-Riviere [76]. They have demonstrated that the uptake of un-conjugated QDs probably regulated via lipid raft/caveolae-mediated endocytosis. They also showed that after internalisation into the cytoplasm, the QDs entered early endosomes and then transferred into late endosomes or lysosomes. In addition, they showed that QD endocytic pathway is primarily regulated by the G-protein coupled receptor associated pathway. These findings demonstrate the functional role of galactose multivalency on cellular interaction, cell uptake mechanism, and subcellular targeting, which could be proposed for subcellular targeting applications.
By combining the carbohydrate specific targeting towards cancer cells and strong fluorescence imaging capability of QDs, Zayed et al. [66] have developed a smart cancer nano-theranostics system. The authors attached both biocompatible albumin backbone and mannose moieties to CdTe QDs for enhanced tumour targeting and reduced QDs toxicity. They have then used a combination therapy that co-loading anticancer drug pemetrexed and resveratrol to the QD platform for tumour site-specific release. The mannose functionalised albumin-QDs theranostics could be tracked by their high fluorescence quantum yield and showed enhanced cytotoxicity and internalization into MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Moreover, in vivo bioimaging demonstrated excellent tumour-specific accumulation of the mannose-grafted theranostic QDs. The theranostic QDs also showed effective anti-tumour activities including reduced tumour volume, increased apoptosis, and inhibited angiogenesis. Overall, mannose-grafted theragnostic QDs nanoplatform could be a potential nano-theranostic for bioimaging and targeted breast cancer therapy.

Challenges faced in using glyco-functionalised QDs in biomedical applications

Nanotoxicology

Despite of QDs showing great potential for biomedical imaging and detection, limitation of its application arises mainly from heavy metal, colloidal instability and oxidation of the nanoparticle core/shell material, which constraint the improvement towards the diagnosis and therapy of cancer. These concerns serve as great barrier for human application in vivo cancer imaging than the development of the application in vitro. Huge efforts have been made to generate novel QDs that minimize toxicity and maximize detection efficiency by changing their components such as sizes, surface coatings, and valences etc. Nanoparticles coating is a promising approach to reduce the cytotoxicity because these additional layers act as a physical barrier to the core/shell to prevent oxidation. Ligand shows a negative charge at biological pH have been widely used for solubilisation of QDs including carboxylic acid, hydroxyl or amine groups. PEG coated QD has been proven to be remarkably stable and almost completely removed cytotoxicity. However, such surface modification reveals reduced uptake by cells compared to other surface coatings. It is important to know that layers of coating should not only protect the QD core/shell from oxidation but must also proliferate the cellular uptake. Simply adding more layers to achieve desirable results is not a favourable strategy for biological applications, because it will largely increase the size of the QDs and become an issue.
Carbohydrate-functionalised nanomaterials showing outstanding biocompatibility, biodegradability, high diversity of chemical functionalities, and versatile biological functions in biomedical applications. The study of glyconanomaterials, on the other hand, is a new field and the progress has been relatively covering. The vast majority of glyconanomaterial are made from simple, low-cost carbohydrate structure such as monosaccharides. The conjugation process is mostly general chemistry and can be useful to attach these carbohydrates to an extensive diversity of nanomaterials. Glyconanomaterial act as a multivalent scaffold carrying multiple copies of carbohydrate molecules, thus elaborating the binding affinity with the recognition receptors. It has been reported that carbohydrate-functionalised QDs show no/minimal cytotoxicity both in vivo and in vitro environment. This carbohydrate functionality not only act as physical barrier to provide stability but also serves a specific targeting ligand.
Nevertheless, few additional objectives should also be considered such as coating shell degradation caused by modification of QDs, nonspecific accumulation by liver, spleen and lymphatic system, immune response and genotoxic effect etc. Considering the toxicity of Cd, Se, Zn, Te, Hg, and Pb, several low toxicity QDs have been established as substitutes. For example, carbon dots less than 10 nm appear to be an ideal alternative to Cd2/Pb based semiconductor QDs for their tunable stable fluorescence emission, low cost, and low toxicity [77]. The same group have also synthesised graphene quantum dots for direct and efficient stem cell labelling [78] and cancer diagnosis [79]. Non-toxic elements doping could be another way to achieve low toxicity. These doped QDs have tunable fluorescence and high quantum efficiency and are ideal candidates for biomedical applications. Silicon QDs are exceptional candidate and have been showing promising results in reduced cytotoxicity [75,80]. For in vivo applications, Silicon NPs provide attractive chemical alteration to heavy-metal containing QDs, which are shown to be toxic in biological environments. In addition silicon is a common trace element in human body, it is reported that silicic acid administrated to human is efficiently excreted from the body through urine [81]. It can be expected that multifunctional, non-toxic silicon nanostructure in future may provide promising application in clinical translation. Nevertheless, before employing QDs in any medical procedure extensive analysis and research on the toxicity profiles will be needed. Further studies are also needed to investigate the long-term toxicology and pharmacokinetics of QDs from living systems involving degradation, clearance, persistence, and immune response of QDs.

Design and generation of biocompatible and biodegradable glyco-functionalised QDs

The current limitation of QDs in vivo imaging is due to the non-specific organ uptake and reticuloendothelial system (RES) scavenging, which are mainly because of large size, colloidal instability and short circulation half-life in the blood vascular system. A number of literature demonstrated the fate of QDs in vivo has been affected by particle size and surface functionality [8284]. Choi et al. [85] have defined the requirements for renal filtration and urinary excretion of QD using rodents as a model system. They have also suggested to use zwitterionic or neutral organic coatings to prevent adsorption of serum proteins, which otherwise increased QD’s hydrodynamic diameter and prevent renal excretion. The author concluded that the size of QD should be controlled under 5.5 nm to achieve efficient urinary excretion and elimination of QDs. These findings have also been confirmed by other group, for example Zhu et al. [86] showed that the QD size less than 5 nm was mainly found in the bladder at 4 hours after intravenous injection, while QDs larger than 5 nm accumulated primarily in the lung, spleen, and liver, indicating a different excretion pattern.
Continuous efforts are attempted to prevent adsorption of QDs to the plasma proteins and prolong their circulation time by coating them with passivating molecules. The multivalent effect of glyconanomaterial increases the binding affinity with the recognition receptors, thus it is considered as simple glycan-presenting cell/virus-mimics able to interact with other biological entities. Compared to free, unbound carbohydrates, glyco-functionalised QDs exhibit several orders of magnitude higher binding affinity with lectins. However, the multivalent effect is dependent on several factors including conjugation chemistry, spacer linkage, ligand density and spatial arrangement. In order to produce effective glyco functionalised QDs for biomedical application, comprehensive understanding of all these issues is needed.
The unique physical properties of nanomaterial and recognition ability of carbohydrate ligands provide benefit to glyconanomaterial in biomedical application. Carbohydrate ligands selectively interact with the receptors on cell surface, and trigger binding, cell agglomeration, or particle internalisation. Altogether with glyco functionalisation and unique physical properties of nanomaterial advance to translate molecular events into noticeable or clear signals allowing for imaging and revealing of disease state. These glyconanoparticles have been used in fluorescence, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to distinguish normal and cancer cell lines or to detect tumours. Glyconanomaterials have demonstrated promising results in biocompatibility. Recent studies by Vela-Ramirez et al. [87] reported the safety and biocompatibility of carbohydrate-functionalized polyanhydride nanoparticles upon parenteral and intranasal administration. The results showed that a 5-mg dose of either linker- or di-mannose-functionalised nanoparticles did not induce hepatic or renal tissue damage or cause elevation of damage-related or functional biomarkers in serum or urine following subcutaneous administration.

Reproducibility, reliability, and comparability of glyco-functionalised QDs

The major limitation of QDs when using in clinical application is their reproducibility and comparability as well as their potential for quantification. Glyco-functionalised QDs are showing promising results for biomedical applications however there is insufficient amount of data on their reproducibility and comparability. Different functionalisation from various carbohydrate will results in different quantum yield based on various material and surface chemistries. Moreover, the absolute control on quantification of carbohydrate moiety on the surface of QDs is also in need when using surface chemistry. Purity is also one of the concerns when applying glyco-functionalised QDs in clinical trial. Thus, the origin and establishment of quality standards for these advance materials of various carbohydrate-functionalised QDs is the essential initial step in targeting cancer.

Future perspective

In the near future the research of glycol-conjugated QDs in cancer imaging will significantly improve their clinical application in targeting metastasis and in quantitative measurement of molecular targets. The ongoing development of glyco-functionalised QDs can target solid tumour tissues with mature vasculature, however it is challenged to target micro-metastasis without well-developed vasculature. Therefore, the surface of glyco functionalised QDs needs to be further engineered to enable efficient extravasation, to reach micro-metastasis and initiate binding to tumour antigens. The progressive research in glyco-conjugated QDs will improve early cancer detection and their clinical application in targeting metastasis tumour in near future. The ongoing development of glyco-functionalised QDs can target solid tumour tissues, however it is still challenged to target micro-metastatic tumour. Therefore, it is important to further engineered the carbohydrate moiety’s to target specific micro-metastasis tumour and initiate binding with antigens. It is also important to minimize the RES uptake and maximize the tumour specific uptake by engineering tumour specific targeting carbohydrate moiety on the surface of QDs. Because metastasis is possible in RES system, especially in liver and lymph node, non-specific RES uptake will result in false-positive results. Long circulation time in blood and colloidal stability is also another important aspect; moreover, it also helps in reducing RES uptake. Glycosilyated PEG proves to be good candidate for longer circulation in blood and minimizing RES uptake nonetheless finally size can become issue. When using for biomedical application or cancer therapy, systemic toxicity is an important feature. QD toxicity is well known and it is still a topic of concern, however it has shown that carbohydrate functionality helps reducing nanoparticle toxicity. Perhaps silicon QDs will emerge as a striking substitute to heavy metal-containing QDs, due to lower toxicity potential, and progress further biological and clinical applications. Optimal clearance of modified QDs from body is additional issue, which needs to be address; toxicity is also induced by poor clearance from body. Thus, it would be viable to design and create such promising therapeutic agent with more favourable clearance properties.

Conclusions

Glyconanotechnology’s emerging progress in cancer therapy, diagnosis and theranostic applications have revolved these nanoprobes very attractive branch of the world scientific research. Combining these tools along with unique fluorescent characteristic of QDs and specificity of carbohydrate functionality enables real-time studies, introduces new opportunities for several biomedical applications. More theranostic applications could be developed by selecting and engineering specific tumour carbohydrate functionality along with unique featured QDs.

Acknowledgments

This research received no external funding. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
1
Bentolila L A, Ebenstein Y, Weiss S. Quantum dots for in vivo small-animal imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine: Official Publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2009, 50(4): 493–496

DOI

2
Byers R J, Hitchman E R. Quantum dots brighten biological imaging. Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2011, 45(4): 201–237

DOI

3
Tholouli E, Sweeney E, Barrow E, Clay V, Hoyland J, Byers R. Quantum dots light up pathology. Journal of Pathology, 2008, 216(3): 275–285

DOI

4
He X, Gao J, Gambhir S S, Cheng Z. Near-infrared fluorescent nanoprobes for cancer molecular imaging: Status and challenges. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 2010, 16(12): 574–583

DOI

5
Hilderbrand S A, Weissleder R. Near-infrared fluorescence: Application to in vivo molecular imaging. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2010, 14(1): 71–79

DOI

6
Wang Y, Chen L. Quantum dots, lighting up the research and development of nanomedicine. Nanomedicine (London), 2011, 7(4): 385–402

DOI

7
Varki A, Cummings R D, Esko J D, Freeze H H, Stanley P, Bertozzi C R, Hart G W, Etzler M E. Essentials of Glycobiology. 3rd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2009

8
Calvaresi E C, Hergenrother P J. Glucose conjugation for the specific targeting and treatment of cancer. Chemical Science (Cambridge), 2013, 4(6): 2319–2333

DOI

9
Kottari N, Chabre Y M, Sharma R, Roy R. Applications of glyconanoparticles as “sweet” glycobiological therapeutics and diagnostics. In: Multifaceted Development and Application of Biopolymers for Biology, Biomedicine and Nanotechnology. Dutta P K, Dutta J, eds. Berlin: Springer International Publishing, 2013

10
Marradi M, Chiodo F, Garcia I, Penades S. Glyconanoparticles as multifunctional and multimodal carbohydrate systems. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 42(11): 4728–4745

DOI

11
Luczkowiak J, Munoz A, Sanchez-Navarro M, Ribeiro-Viana R, Ginieis A, Illescas B M, Martin N, Delgado R, Rojo J. Glycofullerenes inhibit viral infection. Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14(2): 431–437

DOI

12
Ribeiro-Viana R, Sánchez-Navarro M, Luczkowiak J, Koeppe J R, Delgado R, Rojo J, Davis B G. Virus-like glycodendrinanoparticles displaying quasi-equivalent nested polyvalency upon glycoprotein platforms potently block viral infection. Nature Communications, 2012, 3(1): 1303

DOI

13
Fasting C, Schalley C A, Weber M, Seitz O, Hecht S, Koksch B, Dernedde J, Graf C, Knapp E W, Haag R. Multivalency as a chemical organization and action principle. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2012, 51(42): 10472–10498

DOI

14
Liu B, Lu X, Ruan H, Cui J, Li H. Synthesis and applications of glyconanoparticles. Current Organic Chemistry, 2016, 20(14): 1502–1511

DOI

15
Reichardt N C, Martin-Lomas M, Penades S. Glyconanotechnology. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013, 42(10): 4358–4376

DOI

16
Sharon N, Lis H. History of lectins: From hemagglutinins to biological recognition molecules. Glycobiology, 2004, 14(11): 53R–62R

DOI

17
Sharon N, Lis H. Lectins as cell recognition molecules. Science, 1989, 246(4927): 227–234

DOI

18
Ashwell G, Harford J. Carbohydrate-specific receptors of the liver. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 1982, 51(1): 531–554

DOI

19
Belardi B, Bertozzi C R. Chemical lectinology: Tools for probing the ligands and dynamics of mammalian lectins in vivo. Chemistry & Biology, 2015, 22(8): 983–993

DOI

20
André S, Kaltner H, Manning J C, Murphy P V, Gabius H J. Lectins: Getting familiar with translators of the sugar code. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2015, 20(2): 1788–1823

DOI

21
Surolia A, Bachhawat B K, Podder S K. Interaction between lectin from ricinus communis and liposomes containing gangliosides. Nature, 1975, 257(5529): 802–804

DOI

22
Häuselmann I, Borsig L. Altered tumor-cell glycosylation promotes metastasis. Frontiers in Oncology, 2014, 4: 28

DOI

23
Friedel M, Andre S, Goldschmidt H, Gabius H J, Schwartz-Albiez R. Galectin-8 enhances adhesion of multiple myeloma cells to vascular endothelium and is an adverse prognostic factor. Glycobiology, 2016, 26(10): 1048–1058

DOI

24
Compagno D, Gentilini L D, Jaworski F M, Pérez I G, Contrufo G, Laderach D J. Glycans and galectins in prostate cancer biology, angiogenesis and metastasis. Glycobiology, 2014, 24(10): 899–906

DOI

25
Vazquez-Levin M H, Marin-Briggiler C I, Caballero J N, Veiga M F. Epithelial and neural cadherin expression in the mammalian reproductive tract and gametes and their participation in fertilization-related events. Developmental Biology, 2015, 401(1): 2–16

DOI

26
Ng K, Ferreyra J, Higginbottom S, Lynch J, Kashyap P, Gopinath S, Naidu N, Choudhury B, Weimer B, Monack D, Sonnenburg J L. Microbiota-liberated host sugars facilitate post-antibiotic expansion of enteric pathogens. Nature, 2013, 502(7469): 96–99

DOI

27
Becer C R. The glycopolymer code: Synthesis of glycopolymers and multivalent carbohydrate-lectin interactions. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2012, 33(9): 742–752

DOI

28
Kazunori M, Miki H, Takayasu I, Yoshinao Y, Kazukiyo K. Self-organized glycoclusters along DNA: Effect of the spatial arrangement of galactoside residues on cooperative lectin recognition. Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2004, 10(2): 352–359

DOI

29
Brus L E. Electron-electron and electron-hole interactions in small semiconductor crystallites: The size dependence of the lowest excited electronic state. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1984, 80(9): 4403–4409

DOI

30
Alivisatos A P, Gu W, Larabell C. Quantum dots as cellular probes. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2005, 7(1): 55–76

DOI

31
Foote M. The importance of planned dose of chemotherapy on time: Do we need to change our clinical practice? Oncologist, 1998, 3(5): 365–368

32
Naumov G, Akslen L, Folkman J. Role of angiogenesis in human tumor dormancy: Animal models of the angiogenic switch. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2006, 5(16): 1779–1787

DOI

33
Frangioni J V. New technologies for human cancer imaging. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008, 26(24): 4012–4021

DOI

34
Liu J, Levine A L, Mattoon J S, Yamaguchi M, Lee R J, Pan X, Rosol T J. Nanoparticles as image enhancing agents for ultrasonography. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2006, 51(9): 2179–2189

DOI

35
Massoud T F, Gambhir S S. Molecular imaging in living subjects: Seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes & Development, 2003, 17(5): 545–580

DOI

36
Albrecht T, Blomley M J K, Burns P N, Wilson S, Harvey C J, Leen E, Claudon M, Calliada F, Correas J M, LaFortune M, . Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: Multicenter study. Radiology, 2003, 227(2): 361–370

DOI

37
Blomley M J, Cooke J C, Unger E C, Monaghan M J, Cosgrove D O. Microbubble contrast agents: A new era in ultrasound. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 2001, 322(7296): 1222–1225

DOI

38
Cormode D P, Skajaa T, Fayad Z A, Mulder W J. Nanotechnology in medical imaging: Probe design and applications. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2009, 29(7): 992–1000

DOI

39
Weissleder R. Scaling down imaging: Molecular mapping of cancer in mice. Nature Reviews. Cancer, 2002, 2(1): 8–11

DOI

40
Caravan P, Ellison J J, McMurry T J, Lauffer R B. Gadolinium(iii) chelates as MRI contrast agents: Structure, dynamics, and applications. Chemical Reviews, 1999, 99(9): 2293–2352

DOI

41
Hoult D I, Phil D. Sensitivity and power deposition in a high-field imaging experiment. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2000, 12(1): 46–67

DOI

42
Jongmin S, Md A R, Kyeong K M, Ho I G, Hee L J, Su L I. Hollow manganese oxide nanoparticles as multifunctional agents for magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2009, 48(2): 321–324

DOI

43
Smith A M, Duan H, Mohs A M, Nie S. Bioconjugated quantum dots for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2008, 60(11): 1226–1240

DOI

44
Zhang H, Yee D, Wang C. Quantum dots for cancer diagnosis and therapy: Biological and clinical perspectives. Nanomedicine (London), 2008, 3(1): 83–91

DOI

45
Wang H, Li H, Zhang W, Wei L M, Yu H X, Yang P Y. Multiplex profiling of glycoproteins using a novel bead-based lectin array. Proteomics, 2014, 14(1): 78–86

DOI

46
Munkley J, Elliott D J. Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(23): 35478–35489

DOI

47
Liu X, Nie H, Zhang Y B, Yao Y F, Maitikabili A, Qu Y P, Shi S L, Chen C Y, Li Y. Cell surface-specific N-glycan profiling in breast cancer. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8): 11

DOI

48
Scott E, Munkley J. Glycans as biomarkers in prostate cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(6): 20

DOI

49
Andrade C G, Cabral Filho P E, Tenório D P L, Santos B S, Beltrão E I C, Fontes A, Carvalho L B. Evaluation of glycophenotype in breast cancer by quantum dot-lectin histochemistry. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2013, 8: 4623–4629

50
He D, Wang D, Shi X, Quan W, Xiong R, Yu C, Huang H. Simultaneous fluorescence analysis of the different carbohydrates expressed on living cell surfaces using functionalized quantum dots. RSC Advances, 2017, 7(20): 12374–12381

DOI

51
Cunha C R A, Andrade C G, Pereira M I A, Cabral Filho P E, Carvalho L B Jr, Coelho L C B B, Santos B S, Fontes A, Correia M T S. Quantum dot-cramoll lectin as novel conjugates to glycobiology. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. B, Biology, 2018, 178: 85–91

DOI

52
Akca O, Unak P, Medine E I, Sakarya S, Yurt Kilcar A, Ichedef C, Bekis R, Timur S. Radioiodine labeled CdSe/CdS quantum dots: Lectin targeted dual probes. Radiochimica Acta, 2014, 102(9): 849

DOI

53
Kara A, Ünak P, Selçuki C, Akça Ö, Medine E İ, Sakarya S. PHA-L lectin and carbohydrate relationship: Conjugation with CdSe/CdS nanoparticles, radiolabeling and in vitro affinities on MCF-7 cells. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2014, 299(1): 807–813

DOI

54
Santos B, de Farias P, de Menezes F, de Ferreira R, Júnior S, Figueiredo R, de Carvalho L, Beltrão E I C. CdS-Cd(OH)2 core shell quantum dots functionalized with concanavalin a lectin for recognition of mammary tumors. Physica Status Solidi. C, Current Topics in Solid State Physics, 2006, 3(11): 4017–4022

DOI

55
Ohyanagi T, Nagahori N, Shimawaki K, Hinou H, Yamashita T, Sasaki A, Jin T, Iwanaga T, Kinjo M, Nishimura S I. Importance of sialic acid residues illuminated by live animal imaging using phosphorylcholine self-assembled monolayer-coated quantum dots. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(32): 12507–12517

DOI

56
Bavireddi H, Kikkeri R. Glyco-β-cyclodextrin capped quantum dots: Synthesis, cytotoxicity and optical detection of carbohydrate-protein interactions. Analyst (London), 2012, 137(21): 5123–5127

DOI

57
Shinchi H, Wakao M, Nakagawa S, Mochizuki E, Kuwabata S, Suda Y. Stable sugar-chain-immobilized fluorescent nanoparticles for probing lectin and cells. Chemistry, an Asian Journal, 2012, 7(11): 2678–2682

DOI

58
Shinchi H, Wakao M, Nagata N, Sakamoto M, Mochizuki E, Uematsu T, Kuwabata S, Suda Y. Cadmium-free sugar-chain-immobilized fluorescent nanoparticles containing low-toxicity ZnS-AgInS2 cores for probing lectin and cells. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2014, 25(2): 286–295

DOI

59
Zhai Y, Dasog M, Snitynsky R B, Purkait T K, Aghajamali M, Hahn A H, Sturdy C B, Lowary T L, Veinot J G C. Water-soluble photoluminescent D-mannose and L-alanine functionalized silicon nanocrystals and their application to cancer cell imaging. Journal of Materials Chemistry. B, Materials for Biology and Medicine, 2014, 2(47): 8427–8433

DOI

60
Lai C H, Hütter J, Hsu C W, Tanaka H, Varela-Aramburu S, De Cola L, Lepenies B, Seeberger P H. Analysis of carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions using sugar-functionalized silicon nanoparticles for cell imaging. Nano Letters, 2016, 16(1): 807–811

DOI

61
Hsu C W, Septiadi D, Lai C H, Chen P K, Seeberger P H, De Cola L. Glucose-modified silicon nanoparticles for cellular imaging. ChemPlusChem, 2017, 82(4): 660–667

DOI

62
Cheng F F, Liang G X, Shen Y Y, Rana R K, Zhu J J. N-Acetylglucosamine biofunctionalized CdSeTe quantum dots as fluorescence probe for specific protein recognition. Analyst (London), 2013, 138(2): 666–670

DOI

63
Ahire J H, Chambrier I, Mueller A, Bao Y, Chao Y. Synthesis of D-mannose capped silicon nanoparticles and their interactions with MCF-7 human breast cancerous cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5(15): 7384–7391

DOI

64
Ahire J H, Behray M, Webster C A, Wang Q, Sherwood V, Saengkrit N, Ruktanonchai U, Woramongkolchai N, Chao Y. Synthesis of carbohydrate capped silicon nanoparticles and their reduced cytotoxicity, in vivo toxicity, and cellular uptake. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2015, 4(12): 1877–1886

DOI

65
Dalal C, Jana N R. Galactose multivalency effect on the cell uptake mechanism of bioconjugated nanoparticles. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(44): 25651–25660

DOI

66
Zayed D G, Ebrahim S M, Helmy M W, Khattab S N, Bahey-El-Din M, Fang J Y, Elkhodairy K A, Elzoghby A O. Combining hydrophilic chemotherapy and hydrophobic phytotherapy via tumor-targeted albumin-QDs nano-hybrids: Covalent coupling and phospholipid complexation approaches. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2019, 17(1): 19

DOI

67
Yin C, Ying L, Zhang P C, Zhuo R X, Kang E T, Leong K W, Mao H Q. High density of immobilized galactose ligand enhances hepatocyte attachment and function. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 2003, 67A(4): 1093–1104

DOI

68
Hata S, Ishii K. Effect of galactose on binding and endocytosis of asiaioglycoprotein in cultured rat hepatocytes. Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 1998, 12(5): 255–259

DOI

69
Mishra N, Yadav N P, Rai V K, Sinha P, Yadav K S, Jain S, Arora S. Efficient hepatic delivery of drugs: Novel strategies and their significance. BioMed Research International, 2013, 2013: 20

DOI

70
Yousef S, Alsaab H O, Sau S, Iyer A K. Development of asialoglycoprotein receptor directed nanoparticles for selective delivery of curcumin derivative to hepatocellular carcinoma. Heliyon, 2018, 4(12): e01071

DOI

71
Pranatharthiharan S, Patel M D, Malshe V C, Pujari V, Gorakshakar A, Madkaikar M, Ghosh K, Devarajan P V. Asialoglycoprotein receptor targeted delivery of doxorubicin nanoparticles for hepatocellular carcinoma. Drug Delivery, 2017, 24(1): 20–29

DOI

72
Abe M, Manola J B, Oh W K, Parslow D L, George D J, Austin C L, Kantoff P W. Plasma levels of heat shock protein 70 in patients with prostate cancer: A potential biomarker for prostate cancer. Clinical Prostate Cancer, 2004, 3(1): 49–53

DOI

73
Ciocca D R, Calderwood S K. Heat shock proteins in cancer: Diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and treatment implications. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2005, 10(2): 86–103

DOI

74
Garrido C, Brunet M, Didelot C, Zermati Y, Schmitt E, Kroemer G. Heat shock proteins 27 and 70: Anti-apoptotic proteins with tumorigenic properties. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2006, 5(22): 2592–2601

DOI

75
Ahire J H, Wang Q, Coxon P R, Malhotra G, Brydson R, Chen R, Chao Y. Highly luminescent and nontoxic amine-capped nanoparticles from porous silicon: Synthesis and their use in biomedical imaging. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2012, 4(6): 3285–3292

DOI

76
Zhang L W, Monteiro-Riviere N A. Mechanisms of quantum dot nanoparticle cellular uptake. Toxicological Sciences, 2009, 110(1): 138–155

DOI

77
Yuan F L, Li S H, Fan Z T, Meng X Y, Fan L Z, Yang S H. Shining carbon dots: Synthesis and biomedical and optoelectronic applications. Nano Today, 2016, 11(5): 565–586

DOI

78
Zhang M, Bai L L, Shang W H, Xie W J, Ma H, Fu Y Y, Fang D C, Sun H, Fan L Z, Han M, . Facile synthesis of water-soluble, highly fluorescent graphene quantum dots as a robust biological label for stem cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22(15): 7461–7467

DOI

79
Fan Z T, Zhou S X, Garcia C, Fan L Z, Zhou J B. pH-responsive fluorescent graphene quantum dots for fluorescence-guided cancer surgery and diagnosis. Nanoscale, 2017, 9(15): 4928–4933

DOI

80
Wang Q, Bao Y, Zhang X, Coxon P R, Jayasooriya U A, Chao Y. Uptake and toxicity studies of poly-acrylic acid functionalized silicon nanoparticles in cultured mammalian cells. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2012, 1(2): 189–198

DOI

81
Park J H, Gu L, von Maltzahn G, Ruoslahti E, Bhatia S N, Sailor M J. Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Nature Materials, 2009, 8(4): 331–336

DOI

82
Chen H, Cui S, Tu Z, Gu Y, Chi X. In vivo monitoring of organ-selective distribution of cdhgte/SiO2 nanoparticles in mouse model. Journal of Fluorescence, 2012, 22(2): 699–706

DOI

83
Qu Y, Li W, Zhou Y, Liu X, Zhang L, Wang L, Li Y F, Iida A, Tang Z, Zhao Y, . Full assessment of fate and physiological behavior of quantum dots utilizing caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism. Nano Letters, 2011, 11(8): 3174–3183

DOI

84
Schipper M L, Iyer G, Koh A L, Cheng Z, Ebenstein Y, Aharoni A, Keren S, Bentolila L A, Li J, Rao J, . Particle size, surface coating, and pegylation influence the biodistribution of quantum dots in living mice. Small, 2009, 5(1): 126–134

DOI

85
Choi HS, Liu W, Misra P, Tanaka E, Zimmer J P, Ipe B I, Bawendi M G, Frangioni J V. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nature Biotechnology, 2007, 25(10): 1165–1170

DOI

86
Zhu Y, Hong H, Xu Z P, Li Z, Cai W. Quantum dot-based nanoprobes for in vivo targeted imaging. Current Molecular Medicine, 2013, 13(10): 1549–1567

DOI

87
Vela-Ramirez J E, Goodman J T, Boggiatto P M, Roychoudhury R, Pohl N L B, Hostetter J M, Wannemuehler M J, Narasimhan B. Safety and biocompatibility of carbohydrate-functionalized polyanhydride nanoparticles. AAPS Journal, 2015, 17(1): 256–267

DOI

Outlines

/