Comparison of CO₂ with H₂O as the transport medium in a biomass supercritical water gasification system

Abstract

Supercritical water gasification is a clean technology for biomass conversion and utilization. In supercritical water gasification systems, H₂O is often used as the transport medium. Decreases in the reaction temperature at the gasification area and in the heating rate of biomass may limit the gasification rate and efficiency. In this paper, CO₂ is used as the transport medium due to its relatively low critical point and specific heat capacity. Moreover, a corn stalk gasification system with different transport media is established in this paper, and the influences of various operating parameters, such as temperature, pressure and feedstock concentration, are investigated. The results show that the gas yield in the CO₂-transport system decreases by no more than 5 wt %. In addition, thermodynamic analysis reveals that a system with CO₂ as transport medium consumes approximately 25% less electricity than a system with H₂O as the transport medium. In addition, the reaction heat absorption decreases. The results show the superiority of CO₂ to H₂O as a transport medium.

Keywords

biomass supercritical water gasification / hydrogen production / CO₂ transport / energy and exergy analyses

参考文献

[1] International Energy Agency. Electricity Market Report 2023, Electricity Market Report 2023 CC BY 4.0, 2023

[2] Güney T , Kantar K . Biomass energy consumption and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2020, 27(8): 762–767

[3] Joselin Herbert G M , Unni Krishnan A . Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 59: 292–308

[4] Husseien M , Amer A A , El-Maghraby A , Hamedallah N . A comprehensive characterization of corn stalk and study of carbonized corn stalk in dye and gas oil sorption. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2009, 86(2): 360–363

[5] Peng D , Ouyang F , Liang X , Guo X , Dang Z , Zheng L . Sorption of crude oil by enzyme-modified corn stalk vs. chemically treated corn stalk. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2018, 255: 324–332

[6] Wei N , Xu D , Hao B , Guo S , Guo Y , Wang S . Chemical reactions of organic compounds in supercritical water gasification and oxidation. Water Research, 2021, 190: 116634

[7] Wang Q , Zhang X , Cui D , Bai J , Wang Z , Xu F , Wang Z . Advances in supercritical water gasification of lignocellulosic biomass for hydrogen production. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2023, 170: 105934

[8] Cao W , Guo L , Yan X , Zhang D , Yao X . Assessment of sugarcane bagasse gasification in supercritical water for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(30): 13711–13719

[9] Akizuki M , Tomita K , Oshima Y . Kinetics of solid acid catalyzed 1-octene reactions with TiO₂ in sub- and supercritical water. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2011, 56(1): 14–20

[10] Peterson A A , Vogel F , Lachance R P , Fröling M , Antal J M J Jr , Tester J W . Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sub- and supercritical water technologies. Energy & Environmental Science, 2008, 1(1): 32–65

[11] Nurdiawati A , Zaini I N , Irhamna A R , Sasongko D , Aziz M . Novel configuration of supercritical water gasification and chemical looping for highly-efficient hydrogen production from microalgae. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 112: 369–381

[12] Nanda S , Dalai A K , Gökalp I , Kozinski J A . Valorization of horse manure through catalytic supercritical water gasification. Waste Management, 2016, 52: 147–158

[13] Su W , Cai C , Liu P , Lin W , Liang B , Zhang H , Ma Z , Ma H , Xing Y , Liu W . Supercritical water gasification of food waste: effect of parameters on hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(29): 14744–14755

[14] Gong M , Feng A , Wang L , Wang M , Hu J , Fan Y . Coupling of hydrothermal pretreatment and supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(41): 17914–17925

[15] Chen J , Liu Y , Wu X , E J , Leng E , Zhang F , Liao G . Thermodynamic, environmental analysis and comprehensive evaluation of supercritical water gasification of biomass fermentation residue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 361: 132126

[16] Chen Z , Zhang X , Han W , Gao L , Li S . Exergy analysis on the process with integrated supercritical water gasification of coal and syngas separation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 1003–1008

[17] Recalde M , Amladi A , Venkataraman V , Woudstra T , Aravind P V . Thermodynamic analysis of supercritical water gasification combined with a reversible solid oxide cell. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 270: 116208

[18] Jiang K , Shi J , Zhao Q , Jin H . Research progress of industrial application based on two-phase flow system of supercritical carbon dioxide and particles. Powder Technology, 2022, 407: 117621

[19] Sun B , Wang J , Wang Z , Gao Y , Xu J . Calculation of proppant-carrying flow in supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing fluid. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2018, 166: 420–432

[20] Yuan B , Zheng D , Moghanloo R G , Wang K . A novel integrated workflow for evaluation, optimization, and production predication in shale plays. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017, 180: 18–28

[21] Song X Z , Li G S , Guo B , Wang H Z , Li X J , Lü Z H . Transport feasibility of proppant by supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing in reservoir fractures. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(3): 507–513

[22] Gomaa A M , Hudson H , Nelson S , Brannon H . Computational fluid dynamics applied to investigate development of highly conductive channels within the fracture geometry. SPE Production & Operations, 2017, 32(4): 392–403

[23] Zhou Y , Ni H , Shen Z , Zhao M . Study on particle settling in supercritical carbon dioxide drilling and fracturing. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2020, 190: 107061

[24] Xu J , Miao Q , Peng Z , Liu S , Zhou Y , Yu L . Thermodynamic analysis of using CO₂ as a co-gasification agent in supercritical water gasification of glycerol. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2023, 11(6): 111359

[25] Hu Y , Lin J , Liao Q , Sun S , Ma R , Fang L , Liu X . CO₂-assisted catalytic municipal sludge for carbonaceous biofuel via sub- and supercritical water gasification. Energy, 2021, 233: 121184

[26] Bai B , Wang W , Jin H . Experimental study on gasification performance of polypropylene (PP) plastics in supercritical water. Energy, 2020, 191: 116527

[27] Wang W , Wang C , Huang Y , Lu H , Chen J , Shi J , Jin H . Heat, electricity, and fuel gas ploy-generation system on an Island based on plastic waste gasification in supercritical water. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10(41): 13786–13791

[28] Wang Y , Ren C , Guo S , Liu S , Du M , Chen Y , Guo L . Thermodynamic and environmental analysis of heat supply in pig manure supercritical water gasification system. Energy, 2023, 263: 125694

[29] Jin H , Wang C , Fan C . Simulation study on hydrogen-heating-power poly-generation system based on solar driven supercritical water biomass gasification with compressed gas products as an energy storage system. Journal of Thermal Science, 2020, 29(2): 365–377

[30] Chen X , Tian Z F , van Eyk P J , Lewis D , Nathan G G J . Numerical simulation of hydrothermal liquefaction of algae in a lab-scale coil reactor. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow, 2022, 4(2): 113–120

[31] Wang C , Jin H , Peng P , Chen J . Thermodynamics and LCA analysis of biomass supercritical water gasification system using external recycle of liquid residual. Renewable Energy, 2019, 141: 1117–1126

[32] Xu J , Peng Z , Rong S , Jin H , Guo L , Zhang X , Zhou T . Model-based thermodynamic analysis of supercritical water gasification of oil-containing wastewater. Fuel, 2021, 306: 121767

[33] Xu D , Liu L , Wei N , Guo Y , Wang S , Wu Z , Duan P . Catalytic supercritical water gasification of aqueous phase directly derived from microalgae hydrothermal liquefaction. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(48): 26181–26192

[34] Wang Y , Zhu Y , Liu Z , Wang L , Xu D , Fang C , Wang S . Catalytic performances of Ni-based catalysts on supercritical water gasification of phenol solution and coal-gasification wastewater. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(7): 3470–3480

[35] Zhang J , Ma C , Sun Y , Ren X . Hydroxyl radical reactions with 2-chlorophenol as a model for oxidation in supercritical water. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2014, 40(3): 973–990

[36] Wei Y , Kuanibieke J , Jin H . Experimental study of diphenylmethane gasification with supercritical CO₂. Fuel, 2024, 367: 131524

[37] Sun J , Feng H , Xu J , Jin H , Guo L . Investigation of the conversion mechanism for hydrogen production by coal gasification in supercritical water. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(17): 10205–10215

[38] Lu B , Ge Z , Chen Y , Shi J , Jin H . Study on supercritical water gasification reaction and kinetic of coal model compounds. Fuel Processing Technology, 2022, 230: 107210

[39] Ou G , Ren Y , Jin H , Guo L . K₂CO₃-catalyzed gasification of coal of different ranks in supercritical water for hydrogen production: ageneral kinetic model with good coal adaptability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(75): 29082–29096

[40] Ibrahim A B A , Akilli H . Supercritical water gasification of wastewater sludge for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(21): 10328–10349

[41] Guo Y , Wang S Z , Xu D H , Gong Y M , Ma H H , Tang X Y . Review of catalytic supercritical water gasification for hydrogen production from biomass. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(1): 334–343

[42] Youssef E A , Nakhla G , Charpentier P A . Oleic acid gasification over supported metal catalysts in supercritical water: hydrogen production and product distribution. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(8): 4830–4842

[43] Hu Y , Gong M , Xing X , Wang H , Zeng Y , Xu C C . Supercritical water gasification of biomass model compounds: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2020, 118: 109529

[44] Nanda S , Reddy S N , Hunter H N , Dalai A K , Kozinski J A . Supercritical water gasification of fructose as a model compound for waste fruits and vegetables. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2015, 104: 112–121

[45] Güngören Madenoğlu T , Sağlam M , Yüksel M , Ballice L . Hydrothermal gasification of biomass model compounds (cellulose and lignin alkali) and model mixtures. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2016, 115: 79–85

[46] Yoshida T , Matsumura Y . Gasification of cellulose, xylan, and lignin mixtures in supercritical water. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(23): 5469–5474

[47] Chen Z , Zheng Z , He C , Liu J , Zhang R , Chen Q . Oily sludge treatment in subcritical and supercritical water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 433: 128761

[48] Wu Z , Ren Y , Ou G , Jin H . Influence of special water properties variation on the heat transfer of supercritical water flow around a sphere. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 222: 115698

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFA0714400).

版权

2024 Higher Education Press