Highly hydrophobic oil−water separation membrane: reutilization of waste reverse osmosis membrane
Highly hydrophobic oil−water separation membrane: reutilization of waste reverse osmosis membrane
The increasing applications of seawater desalination technology have led to the wide usage of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes, resulting in a large number of wasted reverse osmosis membranes. In this work, the base nonwoven layer of the wasted reverse osmosis membrane was successfully modified into the hydrophobic membrane via surface deposition strategy including TiO2 and 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyltrichlorosilane (PFOTS), respectively. Various techniques were applied to characterize the obtained membranes, which were then used to separate the oil–water system. The optimally modified membrane displayed good hydrophobicity with a contact angle of 135.2° ± 0.3°, and its oil–water separation performance was as high as 97.8%. After 20 recycle tests, the oil–water separation performance remained more than 96%, which was attributed to the film adhesion of the anchored TiO2 and PFOTS layer on the surface. This work might provide a new avenue for recycling the wasted reverse osmosis membrane used in oily wastewater purification.
oil–water separation / wasted reverse osmosis membrane / hydrophobic modification
[1] |
Stefano C, Mirko F, Francesca M, Enrico D. A review on membrane distillation in process engineering: design and exergy equations, materials and wetting problems. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 592–613
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[2] |
UNESCO . UN-Water. United Nations World Water Development Report 2020: Water and Climate Change. Paris: UNESCO, 2020,
|
[3] |
Lejarazu-Larraaga A, Molina S, Ortiz J M, Riccardelli G, García-Calvo E. Influence of acid/base activation treatment in the performance of recycled electromembrane for fresh water production by electrodialysis. Chemosphere, 2020, 248: 126027
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Jeffrey J M, Gina M V. Framework for Direct Potable Re-use. Alexandria: Water Reuse Research Foundation, 2015,
|
[5] |
Guo H, Li X H, Yang W L, Yao Z K, Mei Y, Peng L E, Yang Z, Shao S L, Tang C Y. Nanofiltration for drinking water treatment: a review. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 681–698
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[6] |
García-Pachecoa R, Landaburu-Aguirrea J, Terrero-Rodríguezc P, Camposc E, Molina-Serranoc F, Rabadána J, Zarzoc D, García-Calvo E. Validation of recycled membranes for treating brackish water at pilot scale. Desalination, 2018, 433: 199–208
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Zhao Y, Qiu Y B, Mamrol N, Ren L F, Li X, Shao J H, Yang X, Bart V D B. Membrane bioreactors for hospital wastewater treatment: recent advancements in membranes and processes. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 634–660
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Chen R Z, Dong X F, Ge Q C. Lithium-based draw solute for forward osmosis to treat wastewater discharged from lithium-ion battery manufacturing. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 755–763
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Jorge S S, Alberto B, Raquel G P, Junkal L A, Eloy G C. Prospective life cycle assessment and economic analysis of direct recycling of wasted reverse osmosis membranes based on geographic information systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 282: 124400
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Liyanaarachchi S, Shu L, Muthukumaran S, Jegatheesan V, Baskaran K. Problems in seawater industrial desalination processes and potential sustainable solutions: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2014, 13(2): 203–214
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Ismail A F, Padaki M, Hilal N, Matsuura T, Lau W J. Thin film composite membrane: recent development and future potential. Desalination, 2015, 356: 140–148
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Shenvi S S, Isloor A M, Ismail A F. A review on RO membrane technology: developments and challenges. Desalination, 2015, 368: 10–26
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Greenlee L F, Lawler D F, Freeman B D, Marrot B, Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Research, 2009, 43(9): 2317–2348
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[14] |
YearbookI D A. Topsfield. Water Desalination Report, 2018–2019, 2019
|
[15] |
Ziolkowska J R. Is desalination affordable?—regional cost and price analysis.. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(5): 1385–1397
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Junkal L A, Raquel G P, Serena M, Laura R S, Javier R, Eloy G C. Fouling prevention, preparing for re-use and membrane recycling. Towards circular economy in RO desalination. Desalination, 2016, 393: 16–30
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Jorge S S, Raquel G P, Junkal L A, Eloy G C. Recycling of wasted reverse osmosis membranes: comparative LCA and cost-effectiveness analysis at pilot scale. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 150: 104423
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Li W C, Tse H F, Fok L. Plastic waste in the marine environment: a review of sources, occurrence and effects. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566: 333–349
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Raquel G P, Junkal L A, Amaia L L, Laura R S, Serena M, Thomas R, Eloy G C. Free chlorine exposure dose (ppm∙h) and its impact on RO membranes ageing and recycling potential. Desalination, 2019, 457: 133–143
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Paula E C D, Amaral M C S. Extending the life-cycle of reverse osmosis membranes: a review. Waste Management & Research, 2017, 35(5): 456–470
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Goosen M F A, Sablani S S, Al-Hinai H, Al-Obeidani S, Al-Belushi R, Jackson D. Fouling of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration membranes: a critical review. Separation Science and Technology, 2005, 39(10): 2261–2297
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Mohammad R M, Arto P, Mehrdad H, Jonni A, Mika M. Wasted RO membranes recycling: re-use as NF membranes by polyelectrolyte layer-by-layer deposition. Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 584: 300–308
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Jesús M L, Lucía N R, Jorge S S, Serena M, Rehab E S. Recycled desalination membranes as a support material for biofilm development: a new approach for microcystin removal during water treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 647: 785–793
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Jesús M L, Serena M. Optimization of recycled-membrane biofilm reactor (R-MBfR) as a sustainable biological treatment for microcystins removal. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 153: 107422
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Will L, Zenah B H, Marlene J C, Mikel D, Greg L, Bradley P L, Pierre L C. Towards new opportunities for re-use, recycling and disposal of used reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination, 2012, 299: 103–112
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Eduardo C D P, Míriam C S A. Environmental and economic evaluation of wasted reverse osmosis membranes recycling by means of chemical conversion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 194: 85–93
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Hou L, Zhang Y Q. Research status on the system of spiralwound reverse osmosis membrane module for sea water desalination. Technology of Water Treatment, 2015, 41(10): 21–25
|
[28] |
Goh P S, Wong K C, Wong T W, Ismail A F. Surface-tailoring chlorine resistant materials and strategies for polyamide thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(5): 564–591
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Plopeanu M C, Dascalescu L, Yahiaoui B, Antoniu A, Hulea M, Notingher P V. Repartition of electric potential at the surface of nonwoven fabrics for air filtration. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2012, 48(3): 851–856
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Anandjiwala R D, Boguslavsky L. Development of needle-punched nonwoven fabrics from flax fibers for air filtration applications. Textile Research Journal, 2008, 78(7): 614–624
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Sugioka M, Yoshida N, Yamane T, Kakihana Y, Higa M, Matsumura T, Sakoda M, Iida K. Long-term evaluation of an air-cathode microbial fuel cell with an anion exchange membrane in a 226 L wastewater treatment reactor. Environmental Research, 2022, 205: 112416
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Zhao P, Qin N, Ren C L, Wen J Z. Surface modification of polyamide meshes and nonwoven fabrics by plasma etching and a PDA/cellulose coating for oil/water separation. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 481: 883–891
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Yuan Z S, Ke Z W, Qiu Y H, Zheng L J, Yang Y, Gu Q S, Wang C Y. Prewetting polypropylene-wood pulp fiber composite nonwoven fabric for oil–water separation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2020, 12(41): 46923–46932
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Babiker D M D, Zhu L P, Yagoub H, Lin F, Altam A A, Liang S M, Jin Y, Yang S G. The change from hydrophilicity to hydrophobicity of HEC/PAA complex membrane for water-in-oil emulsion separation: thermal versus chemical treatment. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020, 241: 116343
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Sun F, Li T T, Zhang X Y, Shiu B C, Zhang Y, Lou C W, Lin J H. Preparation and oil–water separation evaluations of polypropylene/low-melt-point polyester composites reinforced by thermal bonding and one-step solution immersion. Polymer International, 2020, 69(9): 752–762
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Pandit S K, Tudu B K, Mishra I M, Kumar A. Development of stain resistant, superhydrophobic and self-cleaning coating on wood surface. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2020, 139: 105453
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Nanda D, Swetha T, Varshney P, Gupta P K, Mohapatra S S, Kumar A. Temperature dependent switchable superamphiphobic coating on steel alloy surface. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 727: 1293–1301
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Ma Z, Shu G M, Lu X L. Preparation of an antifouling and easy cleaning membrane based on amphiphobic fluorine island structure and chemical cleaning responsiveness. Journal of Membrane Science, 2020, 611: 118403
CrossRef
ADS
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |