Machine learning for Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface-based prosthetic control: current applications and clinical translation

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms and control systems have changed the design of modern-day prosthetic devices. This narrative review explores the evolution and application of machine learning in advanced prosthetic devices. Despite all the advancements created in prosthetic technology over the years, we still have not achieved the necessary level of functional rehabilitation or a seamless interface that allows users to truly mirror natural movement. Challenges persist in creating intuitive control strategies that can both interpret complex neural signals and translate them into fluid, multi-articulated movements. There is a need for better control strategies for these advanced prosthetic devices. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) surgery has emerged in the field as a promising new way of enhancing prosthetic functionality. However, significant work is still needed to bridge the gap between current capabilities and the seamless, intuitive control required for naturalistic movement and true prosthetic embodiment. For continuous control, Kalman and Wiener filters have successfully translated EMG signals into smooth finger movements. In a study with rhesus macaques, a Kalman filter-based system achieved closed-loop continuous hand control using RPNI signals. For pose identification, Naïve Bayes (NB) classifiers and Hidden Markov Models combined with NB (HMM-NB) have shown high accuracy. One study reported > 96% accuracy in classifying finger movements using a NB classifier in rhesus macaques with RPNIs. In human participants, researchers decoded five different finger postures using only RPNI signals, both offline and in real time. Long-term stability of RPNI-based control has been demonstrated, with controllers maintaining high accuracy using calibration data collected up to 246 days prior. In a practical application, a human participant with RPNIs successfully completed a Coffee Making Task using four distinct grip patterns, showcasing the system’s functional utility.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence / prosthesis / robotic prosthesis / artificial neural networks / machine learning / EMG signals / deep learning / pattern recognition

References

[1] Amputee Coalition. 5.6 million++ Americans are living with limb loss and limb difference: new study published. Amputee Coalition (​​Washington​​, DC), February 14, 2024. Available from https://amputee-coalition.org/5-6-million-americans-living-with-limb-loss-limb-difference/ [accessed 10 October 2025].

[2] Biddiss E.The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2007;2:71-84

[3] Bosman CE,Geertzen JHB,Vrieling AH.User-relevant factors influencing the prosthesis use of persons with a transfemoral amputation or knee-disarticulation: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.PLoS One2023;18:e0276874 PMCID:PMC9844830

[4] Van Der Riet D,Bright G.An overview and comparison of upper limb prosthetics. In: 2013 Africon; 2013 Sep 9-12; Pointe aux Piments, Mauritius. New York: IEEE; 2014. pp. 1-8.

[5] Toro-Ossaba A,Sanin-Villa D.Myoelectric control in rehabilitative and assistive soft exoskeletons: a comprehensive review of trends, challenges, and integration with soft robotic devices.Biomimetics2025;10:214 PMCID:PMC12024817

[6] Santosa KB,Cederna PS.Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for prevention and management of neuromas.Clin Plast Surg2020; 47:311-21

[7] Dumont NA,Sincennes MC.Satellite cells and skeletal muscle regeneration.Compr Physiol2015;5:1027-59

[8] Chávez OHG,Mariscal SC.Quick review and technical approach for Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface surgery.MPS2023;13:126-31

[9] Vu PP,Bullard AJ.Closed-loop continuous hand control via chronic recording of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2018;26:515-26

[10] Irwin ZT,Vu PP.Chronic recording of hand prosthesis control signals via a Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface in a rhesus macaque.J Neural Eng2016;13:046007

[11] Kung TA,Martin DC,Cederna PS.Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode.Plast Reconstr Surg2014;133:1380-94

[12] Planitzer U,Meixensberger J,Hammer N.Median nerve fascicular anatomy as a basis for distal neural prostheses.Ann Anat2014;196:144-9

[13] Murphy KA. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Median Nerve. Nih.gov. Published January 12, 2020. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448084/. [Last accessed on 12 Sep 2025]

[14] Kim SP,Hochberg LR,Black MJ.Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia.J Neural Eng2008;5:455-76 PMCID:PMC2911243

[15] Wu W,Bienenstock E,Black MJ.Bayesian population decoding of motor cortical activity using a Kalman filter.Neural Comput2006;18:80-118

[16] Kalman RE.A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems.J Basic Eng1960;82:35-45

[17] Hardie R.A fast image super-resolution algorithm using an adaptive Wiener filter. IEEE Trans Image Process 2007;16:2953-64.

[18] Jarrah YA,Samuel OW.Enhancement of upper limb movement classification based on wiener filtering technique. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HEALTHCOM); 2021 Mar 1-2; Shenzhen, China. New York: IEEE; 2021. pp. 1-6.

[19] Avogaro A,Rosenhahn B.Markerless human pose estimation for biomedical applications: a survey.Front Comput Sci2023;5:1153160

[20] Toshev A.DeepPose: human pose estimation via deep neural networks. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014 Jun 23-38; Columbus, OH, USA. New York: IEEE; 2014. pp. 1653-60.

[21] Desmarais Y,Slangen P.A review of 3D human pose estimation algorithms for markerless motion capture.Comput Vis Image Und2021;212:103275

[22] John GH.Estimating continuous distributions in bayesian classifiers.arXiv2013;arXiv:13024964. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4964 [accessed 12 September 2025]

[23] Navone HD,Downs T.Boosting Naive-Bayes classifiers to predict outcomes for hip prostheses. In: IJCNN’99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36339); 1999 Jul 10-16; Washington, DC, USA. New York: IEEE; 1999. pp. 3622-6.

[24] Yang X.EigenJoints-based action recognition using Naïve-Bayes-Nearest-Neighbor. In: 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops; 2012 Jun 16-21; Providence, RI, USA. New York: IEEE; 2012. pp. 14-9.

[25] Galata A,Hogg D.Learning variable-length markov models of behavior.Comput Vis Image Und2001;81:398-413

[26] Oliver NM,Pentland A.A Bayesian computer vision system for modeling human interactions.IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell2000;22:831-43

[27] Malešević N,Kanitz G,Cipriani C.Decoding of individual finger movements from surface EMG signals using vector autoregressive hierarchical hidden Markov models (VARHHMM). In: 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); 2017 Jul 17-20; London, UK. New York: IEEE;2017. pp. 1518-23.

[28] Yamato J,Ishii K.Recognizing human action in time-sequential images using hidden Markov model.IEEE Xplore1992;92:379-85

[29] Yoon BJ.Hidden markov models and their applications in biological sequence analysis.Curr Genomics2009;10:402-15 PMCID:PMC2766791

[30] Avilés-arriaga H,Mendoza-durán C.A comparison of dynamic naive bayesian classifiers and hidden.JART2011;9:81-102

[31] Liu J,Rymer WZ.EMG burst presence probability: a joint time-frequency representation of muscle activity and its application to onset detection.J Biomech2015;48:1193-7 PMCID:PMC6376246

[32] Vaskov AK,North N.Surgically implanted electrodes enable real-time finger and grasp pattern recognition for prosthetic hands.IEEE Trans Robot2022;38:2841-57 PMCID:PMC10168021

[33] Kuiken TA,Lock BA.Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms.JAMA2009;301:619-28 PMCID:PMC3036162

[34] Li G,Kuiken TA.Quantifying pattern recognition-based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2010;18:185-92 PMCID:PMC3024915

[35] Cipriani C,Controzzi M.Online myoelectric control of a dexterous hand prosthesis by transradial amputees.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2011;19:260-70

[36] Lee C,Gonzalez MA.Use of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces and intramuscular electrodes to improve prosthetic grasp selection: a case study.J Neural Eng2022;19:066010 PMCID:PMC9942093

[37] Vu PP,Irwin ZT.A Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees.Sci Transl Med2020;12:eaay2857 PMCID:PMC8082695

[38] Garcia GP,Lavieri MS.Using Kalman filtering to forecast disease trajectory for patients with normal tension glaucoma.Am J Ophthalmol2019;199:111-9 PMCID:PMC6662653

[39] Zhalechian M,Lavieri MS.Augmenting Kalman filter machine learning models with data from OCT to predict future visual field loss: an analysis using data from the african descent and glaucoma evaluation study and the diagnostic innovation in glaucoma study.Ophthalmol Sci2022;2:100097 PMCID:PMC9560647

[40] Foussier J,Jia J,Leonhardt S.An adaptive Kalman filter approach for cardiorespiratory signal extraction and fusion of non-contacting sensors.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2014;14:37 PMCID:PMC4029942

[41] Li Z,Lebedev MA.Adaptive decoding for brain-machine interfaces through Bayesian parameter updates.Neural Comput2011;23:3162-204 PMCID:PMC3335277

[42] Vu PP,Lee C.Long-term upper-extremity prosthetic control using Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces and implanted EMG electrodes.J Neural Eng2023;20:026039 PMCID:PMC10126717