Please wait a minute...

Landscape Architecture Frontiers

Landsc. Archit. Front.    2017, Vol. 5 Issue (2) : 72-85     https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-20170207
Views & Criticisms |
Age of the Tree
Cameron Barradale
1
Download: PDF(10461 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Throughout the history of human existence, the connection to ecology and — more specifically trees — has been central to human survival and tradition. But over several recent centuries of industrialization, urbanization, sprawl and the rise of technology, this central and symbiotic relationship has been lost. A trend has been established in which much of the developed — and developing — world now places a greater emphasis on the technologies and environment of the built realm and less upon the natural amenities provided to us for free every day.

The single most effective — and urban — remedy for extreme environments, increasingly stressful urban conditions and declining connection between humans and nature is the reemergence of the tree.

We are entering a new “Age of the Tree” where we must reconsider our relationship to the tree, as one of the focal elements in this emerging urban reality. Simply stated, creating a healthy, robust and mature tree canopy must become a critical focal point for all future development — without exception. Our future generations will thank us as they reap tremendous dividends for our collective efforts today.

Keywords Trees      City      Urban Canopy      Forest      Nature     
Issue Date: 25 May 2017
 Cite this article:   
Cameron Barradale. Age of the Tree[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(2): 72-85.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/10.15302/J-LAF-20170207
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2017/V5/I2/72
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cameron Barradale
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] ZHENG Nengshi, MA Haoran, PENG Chiyan, LIU Yuan, Rob GROTEWAL, Uwe KLAUS. RESILIENT ECOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE SYSTEMS OF THE FENGXINGLONG ECOLOGICAL PARK, SANYA[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(4): 32-41.
[2] Katarina BAJC, Antje STOKMAN. DESIGN FOR RESILIENCE: RE-CONNECTING COMMUNITIES AND ENVIRONMENTS[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(4): 14-31.
[3] Liang XIONG, Rik de VISSER. MARKER WADDEN, THE NETHERLANDS:A BUILDING-WITH-NATURE EXPLORATION[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(3): 58-75.
[4] Ying-Chun HSIEH. CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TRIBAL CIVILIZATION[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(3): 40-45.
[5] Satomi HIGASHI. LOCAL KNOWLEDGE OF SWIDDEN FARMERS AND CHALLENGES FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND USE: LESSONS FROM A WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROJECT IN NORTHERN LAOS[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(3): 130-137.
[6] Zhen BAI, Wenyu YU, Yu ZHANG, Tianyi DONG, Guoxiong LIN. FROM AN IGNORED GREY PLACE TO A RESILIENT URBAN WETLAND — DONG’AN WETLAND PARK IN SANYA, HAINAN PROVINCE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(3): 90-103.
[7] Thomas NIDEROEST. When the Only Water Left Is Gray — The Growing Quest for Foreign Watersheds[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(1): 139-147.
[8] Yan MENG. Exploring China’s Urban Development Pattern through Practice of Urban Village in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(1): 40-45.
[9] Kongjian YU, Hongqian YU,, Yu SONG. Restoring the Mother River back to the City: Puyangjiang River Corridor in Jinhua[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(1): 64-75.
[10] Landscape Architects of Bangkok. Local Design Responding to Urban Problems— The Metro-Forest Project, Bangkok[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2018, 6(1): 76-87.
[11] Atelier Starzak Strebicki. Temporary Public Space for Malta Festival Poznan in POLAND[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(5): 110-121.
[12] Bo LUAN, Xin WANG, Yueyan JIN, Minwei CHAI, Chunming HU. Collaborative Design of Site-scale Green Infrastructure: A Case Study on the Ecologica l Restoration Design of Weiliu Wetland Park in Xianyang[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(5): 26-43.
[13] Baokui LIU. THE IMPACTS OF THE 21ST CENTURY MARITIME SILK ROAD ON CHINESE COASTAL CITIES[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(4): 36-43.
[14] Creative Commons Korea. Sharing City Seoul: Solving social and urban issues through sharing[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(3): 52-59.
[15] Liqun CHEN. Cities in the Era of Sharing Economy: from a Perspective of Urban Space[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(3): 40-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed