Please wait a minute...

Landscape Architecture Frontiers

Landsc. Archit. Front.    2017, Vol. 5 Issue (1) : 84-97     https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-20170109
Thematic practices
Sydney Park Water Re-Use Project
Turf Design Studio Environmental Partnership
Download: PDF(2215 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This project forms City of Sydney’s largest environmental project to date and an integral component of Sustainable Sydney 2030. It targets water demand to be met through local water capture and re-use. The City seized a once in a lifetime opportunity to use what was essentially an infrastructure project as a vehicle to breathe new life into the park.

Keywords Landscape Architecture      Water Management      Green Infrastructure      Sustainability      Collaboration     
Issue Date: 06 April 2017
 Cite this article:   
Turf Design Studio Environmental Partnership. Sydney Park Water Re-Use Project[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2017, 5(1): 84-97.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/10.15302/J-LAF-20170109
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2017/V5/I1/84
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Turf Design Studio Environmental Partnership
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Taro Zheming CAI. ECOLOGICAL OR NATURALISTIC:A BRIEF REVIEW AND SEVERAL THOUGHTS ON CONTEMPORARY PLANTING DESIGN[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(3): 102-113.
[2] Ulrika K. STIGSDOTTER, Ulrik SIDENIUS. KEEPING PROMISES—HOW TO ATTAIN THE GOAL OF DESIGNING HEALTH-SUPPORTING URBAN GREEN SPACE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(3): 78-89.
[3] Yiwei HUANG. RESPONSIBILITIES AND ROLES OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CHILD FRIENDLY CITY[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(2): 110-121.
[4] LI Dihua. OPPORTUNITIES OF THE DISCIPLINE AND PROFESSION OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE IN CHINA’S TERRITORIAL SPATIAL PLANNING REFORM[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2020, 8(1): 84-91.
[5] Ying ZENG. OBSERVATION AND REPRESENTATION: ON RECOGNITION AND EXPRESSION OF NATURAL SITES IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(5): 10-23.
[6] Jill DESIMINI. PLURAL PRACTICES: IDEAS FOR DRAWING RESPONSIBLY[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(5): 80-89.
[7] Hannes ZANDER. GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON LANDSCAPE AND TERRITORY[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(5): 98-107.
[8] Yuan LIU, Run WANG, Wenqin LU, Chiyan PENG. A Social-Economic-Natural Compound Ecosystem Constructed for Urban Rivers— Planning and Design for the remediation and Ecological Restoration of the Guitang River Watershed in Changsha City, China[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(4): 114-127.
[9] Li ZHANG. THOUGHTS ON ECOLOGICAL WATERSHED PLANNING UNDER THE TERRITORIAL SPATIAL PLANNING[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(4): 77-87.
[10] ORDÓÑEZ Camilo. POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE IN NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS: INSIGHTS FROM MELBOURNE URBAN FOREST MANAGERS[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 46-61.
[11] Pia FRICKER. VIRTUAL REALITY FOR IMMERSIVE DATA INTERACTION[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(2): 153-159.
[12] LUO Yadan. FROM TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE TO GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE — ADAPTABLE FUTURE ROADS IN AUTONOMOUS URBANISM[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(2): 92-99.
[13] Fu LI, Hexing CHANG. UAV MEASUREMENT IN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH AND PRACTICE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(2): 38-54.
[14] Kongjian YU. TO BE ALARMED BY THE TRAP OF INTELLIGENCE TOOLS[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(2): 4-7.
[15] RANKIN Chris. REGENERATION DESIGN OF THE HISTORIC DUNBAR BATTERY IN SCOTLAND[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(1): 125-135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed