Please wait a minute...

Landscape Architecture Frontiers

Landsc. Archit. Front.    2019, Vol. 7 Issue (3) : 32-45     https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-1-020004
PAPERS
COMPENSATING FLOOD RETENTION ON PRIVATE LAND IN AUSTRIA: TOWARDS POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT?
LÖSCHNER Lukas, NORDBECK Ralf(), SCHINDELEGGER Arthur, SEHER Walter
H73200 Institute of Forest, Environmental and Natural Resource Policy, Guttenberg, 2. Stock, Feistmantelstraße 4, 1180 Vienna, Austria
Download: PDF(3384 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Flood retention, in particular controlled flood retention, plays an increasingly prominent role in the portfolio of flood risk management strategies. Though a highly effective measure to reduce the risk of flooding for vulnerable areas, flood retention is land-intensive and infringes on landowners’ property rights. Implementation efforts are thus often hampered by the lack of availability of land as well as by the growing demands of (agricultural) landowners for compensation of flood retention services. The proliferation of flood retention not only changes riparian land uses but also results in a shift of authority, power, and agency to lower levels of government as well as to non-governmental actors, including the private landowners who provide the land for flooding but also those who benefit from flood retention. By the example of a compensation scheme for the controlled flood retention in Altenmarkt, an alpine municipality in Austria, this paper explores these nascent forms of governance through the lens of polycentricity. Along five core propositions in polycentric theory, the paper evaluates the governance implications of flood retention compensation in Austria and discusses the possibilities and limitations of flood retention for enhancing landscape resilience in riparian areas.

Keywords Controlled Flood Retention      Polycentric Governance      Compensation      Landscape Resilience     
Corresponding Author(s): NORDBECK Ralf   
Issue Date: 24 July 2019
 Cite this article:   
LÖSCHNER Lukas,NORDBECK Ralf,SCHINDELEGGER Arthur, et al. COMPENSATING FLOOD RETENTION ON PRIVATE LAND IN AUSTRIA: TOWARDS POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT?[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 32-45.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/10.15302/J-LAF-1-020004
http://journal.hep.com.cn/laf/EN/Y2019/V7/I3/32
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LÖSCHNER Lukas
NORDBECK Ralf
SCHINDELEGGER Arthur
SEHER Walter
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Zehui DU. ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION BASED ON A REGIONAL POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE MODEL — REGENERATION OF THE KAREZ WATER SYSTEM IN TURPAN REGION[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 146-155.
[2] Zheng LI, Xin PEI. POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE AND RESILIENCE ENHANCEMENT FOR MOUNTAIN LANDSCAPES IN METROPOLITAN AREAS: THE CASE OF THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS, THE USA[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 62-77.
[3] ORDÓÑEZ Camilo. POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE IN NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS: INSIGHTS FROM MELBOURNE URBAN FOREST MANAGERS[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 46-61.
[4] ZINGRAFF-HAMED Aude, MARTIN Juliette, LUPP Gerd, LINNEROOTH-BAYER Joanne, PAULEIT Stephan. DESIGNING A RESILIENT WATERSCAPE USING A LIVING LAB AND CATALYZING POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 12-31.
[5] Wei LIU. OPERATIONALIZING POLYCENTRICITY FOR LANDSCAPE RESILIENCE[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 8-11.
[6] Kongjian YU. LESSONS FROM THE SOCIAL FORM AND LANDSCAPE RESILIENCE OF THE PEACH BLOSSOM LAND[J]. Landsc. Archit. Front., 2019, 7(3): 4-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed