Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (5) : 1033-1038     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0665-9
FOREFRONT PERSPECTIVE
River restoration challenges with a specific view on hydromorphology
Jianhua LI1, Stephan HOERBINGER2, Clemens WEISSTEINER3, Lingmin PENG1, Hans Peter RAUCH2,3()
1. Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Tongji University, Shanghai 100029, China
2. Institute of Soil Bioengineering and Landscape Construction, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
3. GeoVerde OG, Landscape Engineers, Vienna, Austria
Download: PDF(315 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Corresponding Author(s): Hans Peter RAUCH   
Online First Date: 10 October 2020    Issue Date: 16 November 2020
 Cite this article:   
Jianhua LI,Stephan HOERBINGER,Clemens WEISSTEINER, et al. River restoration challenges with a specific view on hydromorphology[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 1033-1038.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-020-0665-9
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2020/V14/I5/1033
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Jianhua LI
Stephan HOERBINGER
Clemens WEISSTEINER
Lingmin PENG
Hans Peter RAUCH
Fig.1  Correlations between river width-depth ratio and habitat diversity.
Fig.2  Correlations between habitat diversity and fish species richness.
Fig.3  Hydromorphological Assessment in (a) Nanxi River and (b) East Tiaoxi River.
1 M Everard, H L Moggridge. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Ecosystems, 2012, 15(2): 293–314
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7
2 WWF. Living Planet Report-2018: Aiming Higher. Gland: WWF, 2018
3 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2005
4 P Roland. River Ecosystem Management: Science for Governing Towards a Sustainable Future. Berlin: Springer Open, 2018
5 D L Strayer, D Dudgeon. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2010, 29(1): 344–358
https://doi.org/10.1899/08-171.1
6 E U Åberg, S Tapsell. Revisiting the River Skerne: The long-term social benefits of river rehabilitation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 113: 94–103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.009
7 M A Palmer, H L Menninger, E Bernhardt. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: A failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology, 2010, 55: 205–222
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02372.x
8 P Giller. River restoration: Seeking ecological standards. Editor’s introduction. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 42(2): 201–207
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01020.x
9 E S Bernhardt, M A Palmer. Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshwater Biology, 2007, 52(4): 738–751
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x
10 A M Gurnell, D Corenblit, D García de Jalón, M González del Tánago, R C Grabowski, M T O’Hare, M Szewczyk. A Conceptual model of vegetation-hydrogeomorphology interactions within river corridors. River Research and Applications, 2016, 32(2): 142–163
https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2928
11 B Belletti, M Rinaldi, M Bussettini, F Comiti, A M Gurnell, L Mao, L Nardi, P Vezza. Characterising physical habitats and fluvial hydromorphology: A new system for the survey and classification of river geomorphic units. Geomorphology, 2017, 283: 143–157
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.032
12 B Belletti, M Rinaldi, A D Buijse, A M Gurnell, E Mosselman. A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73(5): 2019–2100
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3558-1
13 M Rinaldi, N Surian, F Comiti, M Bussettini, B Belletti, L Nardi, B Lastoria, B. Golfieri Guidebook for the Evaluation of Stream Morphological Conditions by the Morphological Quality Index (MQI). Management, 2015
14 D Fernández, J Barquin, P J Raven. A review of river habitat characterisation methods: Indices vs. characterisation protocols. Limnetica, 2011, 30(2): 217–234
15 M González Del Tánago, D García De Jalón. Riparian qualityindex (RQI): A methodology for characterizing and assessing environmental conditions of riparian zones. Limnetica, 2011, 30(2): 235–254
16 K A Fryirs, A Arthington, J Grove. Principles of river condition assessment. In: Brierley G, Fryirs K A, eds. River Futures. An Integrative Scientific Approach to River Repair. Washington, D.C.: Society for Ecological Restoration International, Island Press, 2008, 100–124
17 N L Poff, J D Allan, M A Palmer, D D Hart, B D Richter, A H Arthington, K H Rogers, J L Meyer, J A Stanford. River flows and water wars: Emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2003, 1(6): 298–306
https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0298:RFAWWE]2.0.CO;2
18 F M R Hughes, A Colston, J O Mountford. Restoring riparian ecosystems: the challenge of accommodating variability and designing restoration trajectories. Ecology and Society, 2005, 10(1): art 12
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01292-100112
19 M Rinaldi, B Belletti, M Bussettini, F Comiti, B Golfieri, B Lastoria, E Marchese, L Nardi, N Surian. New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 202: 363–378
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.036
20 A Gurnell, M Lee, C Souch. Urban Rivers: Hydrology, Geomorphology, Ecology and Opportunities for Change. Geography Compass, 2007, 1(5): 1118–1137
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00058.x
21 M Rinaldi, A M Gurnell, M G del Tánago, M Bussettini, D Hendriks. Classification of river morphology and hydrology to support management and restoration. Aquatic Sciences, 2016, 78(1): 17–33
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-015-0438-z
22 A M Gurnell, M Rinaldi, B Belletti, S Bizzi, B Blamauer, G Braca, A D Buijse, M Bussettini, B Camenen, F Comiti, L Demarchi, D García De Jalón, M González Del Tánago, R Grabowski, I Gunn, H Habersack, D Hendriks, A Henshaw, M Klösch, B Lastoria, A Latapie, P Marcinkowski, V Martínez Fernández, E Mosselman, J O Mountford, L Nardi, T Okruszko, M T O’Hare, M Palma, C Percopo, N Surian, W van de Bund, C Weissteiner, L Ziliani. A multiscale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management. Aquatic Sciences, 2016, 78(1): 1–16
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-015-0424-5
23 M Palmer, K Hondula, B Koch. Ecological restoration of streams and rivers: Shifting strategies and shifting goals. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2014, 45(1): 247–269
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091935
24 J Deffner, P Haase. The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecology and Society, 2018, 23(4): 35
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10530-230435
25 R Francis. Urban rivers: Novel ecosystems, new challenges. WIREs. Water, 2014, 1(1): 19–29
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1007
26 M Kondolf, G Zolezzi. Reference river ecosystems: Historical states, best ecological potential and management challenges. Workshop summary. In: Proceedings of the IV ECRR. Venice, 2008, 1059–1063
27 J Nakajima, T Sato, L L Huang, J H Li. Fishes of the East Tiaoxi River in Zhejiang Province, China. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters, 2013, 23(4): 327–343
28 H L Moggridge, M J Hill, P J Wood. Urban aquatic ecosystems: The good, the bad and the ugly. Fundamental and Applied Limnology; Official Journal of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology, 2014, 185(1): 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1127/fal/2014/0716
29 Engineering Fronts 2019. Center for Strategic Studies. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2019
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed