%A YU Weidong , XU Jin , %T Morality and nature: The essential difference between the Dao of Chinese philosophy and metaphysics in Western philosophy %0 Journal Article %D 2009 %J Front. Philos. China %J Frontiers of Philosophy in China %@ 1673-3436 %R 10.1007/s11466-009-0023-4 %P 360-369 %V 4 %N 3 %U {https://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-009-0023-4 %8 2009-09-05 %X Both thinkings on Dao in Chinese philosophy and metaphysics in Western philosophy investigate things on a spiritual level that transcends experience, but there are incommensurable differences between them. The objective of “metaphysics” is ontological knowledge about nature from the perspective of epistemological “truth-pursuing”. Western metaphysics is thus a “metaphysics of nature”. Dao in Chinese philosophy, on the other hand, more often manifests itself in “good-pursuing” by means of the internal, experiential pursuit of moral stature and spiritual security. Philosophy of Dao is thus a “metaphysics of ethics”. The cause of this difference can be traced back to the differences between the rational tradition of the West, characterized by the dualism of the subject and the object, and the moral tradition of China, characterized by the integration of man and nature.