Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2013, Vol. 8 Issue (4) : 566-584
research-article |
Plato’s Attempts at Defining Sophistry
LIU Wei()
School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100871, China
Download: PDF(435 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

In the Sophist, Plato offers seven definitions of a sophist. In this paper I will consider the relationship between these definitions, and examine how the first six definitions contribute to the final definition, and how the final definition, in turn, incorporates elements of the first six. Through this examination, we can also have a better grasp of Plato’s method of division, and Plato’s aporetic approach to philosophy.

Keywords Plato      sophist      definition      division      aporetic approach     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Wei,   
Issue Date: 05 December 2013
 Cite this article:   
LIU Wei. Plato’s Attempts at Defining Sophistry[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 566-584.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Yumi Suzuki. Moral Falsity in the Eyes of the Superhuman: The Cases of Socrates and Mozi[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(4): 515-532.
[2] CHEN Yuehua. Principle, Knowledge, and Personality: Some Reflections on “the Good” according to Plato[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 585-606.
[3] Olof Pettersson. Plato on Necessity and Disorder[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 546-565.
[4] Thomas M. Robinson. Plato the Democrat? Some Thoughts on the Politics of the Laws[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 530-545.
[5] WANG Keping. Plato’s poetic wisdom in the myth of Er[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 282-293.
[6] Cao Jianbo. A critique to the significance of Gettier counter-examples[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(4): 675-687.
Full text