Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2012, Vol. 7 Issue (1) : 112-127     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-001-012-0006-3
research-article
Can the West Save the East? Intrinsic Value and the Foundation of Chinese Environmental Ethics
GAO Shan()
Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas, 310920 Denton, USA
Download: PDF(259 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Intrinsic value in nature is a key concept in professional environmental ethics literature in the West. Western scholars such as Holmes Rolston III and Paul Taylor argue that the philosophical foundation of environmental ethics should be based on the concept of intrinsic value in nature. Influenced by this concept, some influential Chinese environmental ethics scholars such as Yu Mouchang and Lu Feng argue that the foundation of environmental ethics in China should be based on the concept of intrinsic value in nature. This paper holds that the metaphysical, epistemological and ethical meaning of intrinsic value in nature is the legacy of Western philosophical traditions, which is in conflict with the Chinese philosophical traditions. Meanwile, the paper argues that the Daoist conception of living in harmony with nature can become the foundation for Chinese environmental ethics. The Daoist conception of living in harmony with nature is based on aesthetic appreciation of nature and people’s participation in the beauty of nature.

Keywords intrinsic value      rationality      feelings, Qi      creativity      emptiness     
Corresponding Author(s): GAO Shan,Email:shangao@my.unt.edu   
Issue Date: 05 March 2012
 Cite this article:   
GAO Shan. Can the West Save the East? Intrinsic Value and the Foundation of Chinese Environmental Ethics[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 112-127.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-001-012-0006-3
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2012/V7/I1/112
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
GAO Shan
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Mark Kevin S. Cabural. Daoism and the German Mission in Martin Heidegger’s “The Thing”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(4): 570-592.
[2] LIN Guanghua. Exploring the Non-objectified Character of Dao in the Laozi : A Modern Articulation1[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 358-376.
[3] GAO Shan. Xujing (Emptiness and Stillness) in Daoism, Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature, and Environmental Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 224-236.
[4] Joanna Guzowska. The Spatiality of Cognition in the Zhuangzi[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(3): 415-429.
[5] YUAN Li. The Philosophical Underpinnings of Western HRM Theory[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 317-346.
[6] CHEN Zhen. Why We Care Whether Our Beliefs Are True: An Answer to Stephen Stich?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 142-153.
[7] LI Jinglin. On the creativity and innateness of the “strong, moving vital force”: A discussion of Feng Youlan’s “explanation of Mencius’ chapter on the ‘strong, moving vital force’ ”[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(2): 198-210.
[8] WANG Shuren. The roots of Chinese philosophy and culture — An introduction to “xiang” and “xiang thinking”[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 1-12.
[9] SUN Si. A critique of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2007, 2(1): 115-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed