Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (4) : 585-608
Form and Formless: A Discussion with the Authors of Anticipating China
ZHANG Gang()
Kaiser-Friedrich-Strasse 7/3, A-3500 Krems, Austria
Download: PDF(308 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Chinese culture is neither the first problematic thinking (analogy) claimed by the authors of Anticipating China, nor the second one (logical inference). On the one hand, analogies are one of the most remarkable aspects of Chinese thinking, while on the other hand, Yin-Yang, Dao and Fo are all universal codes that could neither be reached by analogy nor by logical inference. In fact, both the first and second problematic thinking share the same world view, taking the world as a composite, and the difference lies merely in whether the components are irreplaceable particulars or substitutable elements. Both build their knowledge on the components and how they combine. In the terms of this paper, both systems are constructed with spatially definable forms, real or nominal. The highest codes in Chinese culture are not built upon the physical properties of an object, and could never be found by analysing the object, physically or logically. Yin-Yang, Dao and Fo are names without form, and thus are thinking modes that cannot be described by a spatial concept. They are non-structural systems and a way of formless thinking.

Keywords form      formless      name-differentiation      thinking in form      formless thinking     
Corresponding Author(s): ZHANG Gang,   
Issue Date: 05 December 2011
 Cite this article:   
ZHANG Gang. Form and Formless: A Discussion with the Authors of Anticipating China[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(4): 585-608.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Michael Erler. Role as Norm, Role and Norm: Homer’s Hero, Hesiod’s Just City, and Plato’s Kallipolis[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2019, 14(1): 14-28.
[2] LI Cunshan. Forty Years’ Study of Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(4): 634-650.
[3] SUN Zhengyu. Chinese Marxist Philosophy Since Reform and Opening-Up[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(3): 430-448.
[4] Giulio Tononi, Owen Flanagan. Philosophy and Science Dialogue: Consciousness[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(3): 332-348.
[5] Ady Van Den Stock. The Semantics of Wisdom in the Philosophy of Tang Junyi: Between Transformative Knowledge and Transcendental Reflexivity[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 39-54.
[6] WANG Miquan. The Meaning of Xing 形and Moral Transformation in Wuxing [J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 222-235.
[7] Jim Shelton. Li Zehou and Moritz Schlick on the Roots of Beauty[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(4): 602-614.
[8] John Sallis. Effacements of Form[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 641-654.
[9] CHEN Yuehua. Principle, Knowledge, and Personality: Some Reflections on “the Good” according to Plato[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 585-606.
[10] Sven Ove Hansson. Beyond Language: Using Logic to Introduce New Philosophical Distinctions[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(3): 498-506.
[11] James O. Young. Music and the Representation of Emotion[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(2): 332-348.
[12] Lü Chunshan. Review of Nie Minli’s Being and Substance: On Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z1–9[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(4): 662-681.
[13] Oliver Davies. Religion, Politics and Ethics: Towards a Global Theory of Social Transformation[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(4): 572-597.
[14] DING Ji. The Manifestation Range of Innately Good Knowledge and Ability, and the Danger of Separation: On Zhuzi’s Question about Understanding Words[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(2): 217-243.
[15] ZHANG Zhongyi, ZHANG Jialong, . The three-form reasoning of new Hetu-vidya in Indian logic from the perspective of modern logic[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(4): 631-645.
Full text