Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (2) : 239-257     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0136-4
research-article |
Marxism and Morality: Reflections on the History of Interpreting Marx in Moral Philosophy
QU Hongmei()
School of Philosophy and Sociology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
Download: PDF(541 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The well-known paradox between Marxism and morality is that on the one hand, Marx claims that morality is a form of ideology that should be abandoned, while on the other hand, Marx makes quite a few moral judgments in his writings. It is in the research after Marx’s death that the paradox is found, explored and solved. This paper surveys the history of interpreting Marx from the aspect of moral philosophy by dividing it into three sequential phases. Then it presents the research on Marx in each phase, points out conflicting questions within the different periods and puts forward the solution in the end. This paper points out that a philosophical viewpoint based on Marx’s theory of historical materialism is the key to solving the paradox between Marxism and morality.

Keywords morality      Marx      historical materialism      humanism     
Corresponding Authors: QU Hongmei,Email:Qulax@sina.com   
Issue Date: 05 June 2011
 Cite this article:   
QU Hongmei. Marxism and Morality: Reflections on the History of Interpreting Marx in Moral Philosophy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(2): 239-257.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.1007/s11466-011-0136-4
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2011/V6/I2/239
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
QU Hongmei
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] SUN Zhengyu. Chinese Marxist Philosophy Since Reform and Opening-Up[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(3): 430-448.
[2] PENG Guoxiang. Contemporary Chinese Philosophy in the Chinese-Speaking World: An Overview[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 91-119.
[3] Jana S. Rošker. From Humanized Nature to Naturalized Humans―Li Zehou’s Transformation of the Classical Chinese “Tianren Heyi ” Paradigm Through the Lens of Kant and Early Marx[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 72-90.
[4] DONG Xinchun. Western Marxism’s Misreading of Marx’s Critique of Capitalism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(3): 466-482.
[5] TAN Mingran. The Problem of Confucian Moral Cultivation and Its Solution: Using Ritual Propriety to Support Rule by Law[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(1): 88-103.
[6] ZANG Fengyu. How to Construct Marxian Thoughts as a Political Philosophy?[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 601-614.
[7] Marina F. Bykova. On the Philosophical Relevance of Marx’s Views Today[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 370-380.
[8] James Swindal. Marx on Nature[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 358-369.
[9] Jung-Yeup Kim. Confucian Ethical Practice as a Method of Creating and Sustaining Whiteheadian Beauty[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(2): 318-328.
[10] Gerard Walmsley. Is There a Place for Traditional Values and Virtues in Society Today?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 31-52.
[11] WU Xiaoming. The End of the Supersensory World’s Mythology: Marx’s Ontological Revolution and Its Contemporary Significance[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 128-141.
[12] ZHANG Yunyi. “The Westward Spread of Chinese Philosophy” and Marxism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 114-133.
[13] ZHANG Dun. “The End of History ” and the Fate of the Philosophy of History[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(4): 631-651.
[14] YU Weidong , XU Jin , . Morality and nature: The essential difference between the Dao of Chinese philosophy and metaphysics in Western philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(3): 360-369.
[15] TANG Yijie. The contemporary significance of Confucianism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2008, 3(4): 477-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed