Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2014, Vol. 9 Issue (3) : 417-430
research-article |
On Generalization: Pragmatists’ Contributions to Constructivism
Sun Ning()
School of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Download: PDF(248 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Constructivism has been an important program in contemporary philosophy, but cannot itself cannot provide sufficient context for grasping its key points. To fully understand its power and potential we must borrow tools from other programs: specifically, Charles Peirce and John Dewey’s pragmatism. By exploring these two pragmatists’ articulations of “generalization,” which I hold is the most crucial question in constructivism, their prospective contributions to constructivism can be brought to light. If, as I argue, constructivism can incorporate the lessons of pragmatism, then it can still be considered a highly workable interpretation of reality and of human endeavors.

Keywords Charles Peirce      John Dewey      pragmatism      constructivism      generalization     
Issue Date: 23 September 2014
 Cite this article:   
Sun Ning. On Generalization: Pragmatists’ Contributions to Constructivism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2014, 9(3): 417-430.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Sun Ning
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] SUN Ning. Natural Realism or Transactionalism: On the Relationships between Putnam and Two Pragmatists, James and Dewey[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2017, 12(2): 295-305.
[2] ZHOU Lian. Can Rawls’ Constructivism Avoid the Euthyphro Dilemma? In Reply to Shafer-Landau[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 568-578.
[3] Richard Shusterman. Somaesthetics and Chinese Philosophy: Between Unity and Pragmatist Pluralism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 201-211.
[4] Roger T. Ames. “Bodyheartminding” (Xin 心): Reconceiving the Inner Self and the Outer World in the Language of Holographic Focus and Field[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(2): 167-180.
[5] CHEN Zhen. Why We Care Whether Our Beliefs Are True: An Answer to Stephen Stich?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2012, 7(1): 142-153.
[6] Cong Hangqing, Cheng Xiaodong. Pragmatic commitments to naturalized epistemology[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(3): 477-490.
[7] Tong Shijun. “Critique” immanent in “practice”: New Frankfurt School and American pragmatism[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(2): 295-316.
Full text