Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front. Philos. China    2016, Vol. 11 Issue (3) : 430-443     https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-005-016-0031-5
Orginal Article |
Reason and Besinnung: Heidegger’s Reflections on Science in Contributions to Philosophy
KE Xiaogang()
College of Humanities, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Download: PDF(280 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Heidegger’s reflection on modern sciences in his Contributions to Philosophy is a “questioning of philosophy” instead of an analysis of a “problem of logic.” Therefore, this Being-historical reflection is an ontological grounding effort of reason, instead of a rational critique of the sciences. Heidegger calls this ontological grounding a “Besinnung” or “mindful deliberation,” which is one of the most important words in the Contributions. This “Besinnung” is not only a kind of “philosophy of science,” but also a political critique of modern sciences.

Keywords Martin Heidegger      Contributions to Philosophy       reason      modern sciences      Besinnung (mindful deliberation)      ontological grounding     
Issue Date: 19 September 2016
 Cite this article:   
KE Xiaogang. Reason and Besinnung: Heidegger’s Reflections on Science in Contributions to Philosophy [J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 430-443.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/10.3868/s030-005-016-0031-5
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fpc/EN/Y2016/V11/I3/430
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
KE Xiaogang
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Selusi Ambrogio. Mou Zongsan and Martin Heidegger: Reopening a Debate on Ontology and Ethics[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(1): 55-71.
[2] Megan Altman. Heidegger on the Struggle for Belongingness and Being at Home[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(3): 444-462.
[3] López-Astorga Miguel. Logic, Pragmatics, and Types of Conditionals[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 279-297.
[4] ZHANG Liwen. Harmony and Justice[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2015, 10(4): 533-546.
[5] Olof Pettersson. Plato on Necessity and Disorder[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 546-565.
[6] John HYMAN. Acting for Reasons: Reply to Dancy[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 358-368.
[7] Jonathan DANCY. Acting in Ignorance[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(3): 345-357.
[8] ZHANG Yunyi. “The Westward Spread of Chinese Philosophy” and Marxism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 114-133.
[9] HAO Changchi. Lao-Zhuang and Augustine on the Issue of Suspension in the Philosophy of Religion[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2011, 6(1): 75-99.
[10] ZHANG Zhongyi, ZHANG Jialong, . The three-form reasoning of new Hetu-vidya in Indian logic from the perspective of modern logic[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2009, 4(4): 631-645.
[11] XIE Xialing. Aesthetic judgment: The power of the mind in understanding Confucianism[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2009, 4(1): 38-51.
[12] WANG Yunping. Confucian ethics and emotions[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(3): 352-365.
[13] Yi Junqing. Dimensions of Modernity and Their Contemporary Fate[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 6-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed