Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Front Phil Chin    2010, Vol. 5 Issue (4) : 631-651
“The End of History ” and the Fate of the Philosophy of History
School of Philosophy and Society, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
Download: PDF(645 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

The “end of history” by Fukuyama is mainly based on Hegel’s treatise of the end of history and Kojeve’s corresponding interpretation. But Hegel’s “end of history” is a purely philosophical question, i.e., an ontological premise that must be fulfilled to complete “absolute knowledge.” When Kojeve further demonstrates its “universal and homogeneous state,” Fukuyama extends it into a political view: The victory of the Western system of freedom and democracy marks the end of the development of human history and Marxist theory and practice. This is a misunderstanding of Hegel. Marx analyzes, scientifically, the historical limitation of Western capitalism and maintains, by way of a kind of revolutionary teleology, the expectation of and belief in human liberation, which is the highest historical goal. His philosophy of history is hence characterized by theoretical elements from both historical scientificalness and historical teleology.

Keywords history      the end of history      Marx’s philosophy of history     
Corresponding Author(s): ZHANG Dun,   
Issue Date: 05 December 2010
 Cite this article:   
ZHANG Dun. “The End of History ” and the Fate of the Philosophy of History[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2010, 5(4): 631-651.
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] LI Cunshan. Forty Years’ Study of Chinese Philosophy[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(4): 634-650.
[2] Tung Tin Wong. He Lin and German Philosophy in the Zhanguoce School: An Idealist Philosopher on History and Cultural Reform[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(4): 616-633.
[3] DONG Lihe, JIN Qianwen. The Study of Western Postmodern Philosophy of History in China in the Four Decades of Reform and Opening Up[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2018, 13(2): 254-264.
[4] GUO Yi. Research Findings Concerning Excavated Texts and Learning in Early China[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2016, 11(2): 168-184.
[5] Heinrich Geiger. Sign, Image and Language in The Book of Changes (Yijing 易经)[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(4): 607-623.
[6] Ralph Weber. Why Talk about Chinese Metaphysics?[J]. Front Phil Chin, 2013, 8(1): 99-119.
[7] CAO Feng. A return to intellectual history: A new approach to pre-Qin discourse on name[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2008, 3(2): 213-228.
[8] Ke Xiaogang. A Phenomenological Reading of Hegel’s Concept of History of Philosophy: An Analysis of “The Gallery of Opinions”, “The Gallery of Knowledge” and “The Gallery of Dresden”[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 51-59.
[9] Lou Yulie. Hu Shi’s Study of Chinese Medieval Intellectual History[J]. Front. Philos. China, 2006, 1(1): 66-78.
Full text