Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

Front. Mech. Eng.    2020, Vol. 15 Issue (3) : 351-364     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0594-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A novel six-legged walking machine tool for in-situ operations
Jimu LIU, Yuan TIAN, Feng GAO()
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
Download: PDF(3350 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The manufacture and maintenance of large parts in ships, trains, aircrafts, and so on create an increasing demand for mobile machine tools to perform in-situ operations. However, few mobile robots can accommodate the complex environment of industrial plants while performing machining tasks. This study proposes a novel six-legged walking machine tool consisting of a legged mobile robot and a portable parallel kinematic machine tool. The kinematic model of the entire system is presented, and the workspace of different components, including a leg, the body, and the head, is analyzed. A hierarchical motion planning scheme is proposed to take advantage of the large workspace of the legged mobile platform and the high precision of the parallel machine tool. The repeatability of the head motion, body motion, and walking distance is evaluated through experiments, which is 0.11, 1.0, and 3.4 mm, respectively. Finally, an application scenario is shown in which the walking machine tool steps successfully over a 250 mm-high obstacle and drills a hole in an aluminum plate. The experiments prove the rationality of the hierarchical motion planning scheme and demonstrate the extensive potential of the walking machine tool for in-situ operations on large parts.

Keywords legged robot      parallel mechanism      mobile machine tool      in-situ machining     
Corresponding Author(s): Feng GAO   
Just Accepted Date: 10 July 2020   Online First Date: 31 July 2020    Issue Date: 03 September 2020
 Cite this article:   
Jimu LIU,Yuan TIAN,Feng GAO. A novel six-legged walking machine tool for in-situ operations[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(3): 351-364.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-020-0594-2
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2020/V15/I3/351
Fig.1  Physical prototype of the six-legged walking machine tool.
Fig.2  Dimensions of the front and side views of the walking machine tool.
Fig.3  Control architecture of the walking machine tool.
Fig.4  Three motion layers of the walking machine tool.
Fig.5  Schematic diagram of the parallel leg mechanism.
Fig.6  Definition of coordinate systems in the legged mobile platform.
Fig.7  Schematic diagram of the PKM head.
Fig.8  Workspace of different components of the walking machine tool. (a) Leg; (b) body; (c) head.
Fig.9  Workflow of the walking machine tool for performing mobile machining tasks.
Fig.10  Feet trajectories in two walking cycles. (a) Horizontal and (b) vertical displacements of feet and body; (c) feet trajectories with respect to the body frame.
Fig.11  Snapshots of the walking simulation.
Fig.12  Snapshots of the body twisting simulation.
Fig.13  Snapshots of the PKM head twisting simulation.
Fig.14  Experiment setup of the repeatability test. (a) Overall setup; (b) SMR holders on the moving platform; (c) commanded poses.
Fig.15  Repeatability test results of different motion layers. (a) Walking; (b) body motion; (c) head motion.
Fig.16  Multi tasks in an application scenario. (a) Stepping over an obstacle; (b) adjusting body pose; (c) drilling a hole on the workpiece.
1 L Uriarte, M Zatarain, D Axinte, et al. Machine tools for large parts. CIRP Annals, 2013, 62(2): 731–750
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.009
2 R Bostelman, T Hong, J Marvel. Survey of research for performance measurement of mobile manipulators. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2016, 121: 342–366
https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.121.015
3 R Suárez, L Palomo-Avellaneda, J Martinez, et al. Development of a dexterous dual-arm omnidirectional mobile manipulator. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51(22): 126–131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.529
4 J L Olazagoitia, S Wyatt. New PKM Tricept T9000 and Its Application to Flexible Manufacturing at Aerospace Industry. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-3820, 2007
https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-3820
5 M Law, H Rentzsch, S Ihlenfeldt. Development of a dynamic substructuring framework to facilitate in situ machining solutions using mobile machine tools. Procedia Manufacturing, 2015, 1: 756–767
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.054
6 B Hazel, J Côté, Y Laroche, et al. In-situ robotic interventions in hydraulic turbines. In: Proceedings of the 2010 1st International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry. Montreal: IEEE, 2010, 11637498
https://doi.org/10.1109/CARPI.2010.5624460
7 B Hazel, E Boudreault, J Côté, et al. Robotic post-weld heat treatment for in situ repair of stainless steel turbine runners. In: Proceedings of the 2014 3rd International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry. Foz do Iguassu: IEEE, 2014, 14903693
https://doi.org/10.1109/CARPI.2014.7030051
8 V Collado, J Arana, A Saenz. A Crawling Portable Robot for Drilling Operations in Large Air Frame Components. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3337, 2005
https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-3337
9 B Marguet, C Cibiel, Ó De Francisco, et al. Crawler Robots for Drilling and Fastener Installation: An Innovative Breakthrough in Aerospace Automation. SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2292, 2008
https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2292
10 P Pessi, H Wu, H Handroos, et al. A mobile robot with parallel kinematics to meet the requirements for assembling and machining the ITER vacuum vessel. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2007, 82(15–24): 2047–2054
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.06.012
11 A Irawan, K Nonami. Optimal impedance control based on body inertia for a hydraulically driven hexapod robot walking on uneven and extremely soft terrain. Journal of Field Robotics, 2011, 28(5): 690–713
https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20404
12 P G D Santos, E Garcia, J A Cobano, et al. SIL06: A six-legged robot for humanitarian de-mining tasks. In: Proceedings of World Automation Congress. Seville: IEEE, 2004, 15: 523–528
13 N Kashiri, L Baccelliere, L Muratore, et al. CENTAURO: A hybrid locomotion and high power resilient manipulation platform. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2019, 4(2): 1595–1602
https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2896758
14 H Yang, S Krut, F Pierrot, et al. On the design of mobile parallel robots for large workspace applications. In: Proceedings of ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 6: 35th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Parts A and B. Washington, D.C.: ASME, 2011, 767–776
https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-48101
15 H Yang, S Krut, C Baradat, et al. Locomotion approach of REMORA: A reonfigurable mobile robot for manufacturing Applications. In: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. San Francisco: IEEE, 2011: 5067–5072
https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2011.6094897
16 A Rushworth, D Axinte, M Raffles, et al. A concept for actuating and controlling a leg of a novel walking parallel kinematic machine tool. Mechatronics, 2016, 40: 63–77
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2016.10.010
17 A Olarra, D Axinte, L Uriarte, et al. Machining with the WalkingHex: A walking parallel kinematic machine tool for in situ operations. CIRP Annals, 2017, 66(1): 361–364
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.050
18 Y G Li, H T Liu, X M Zhao, et al. Design of a 3-DOF PKM module for large structural component machining. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2010, 45(6): 941–954
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.01.008
19 L T Tunc, J Shaw. Experimental study on investigation of dynamics of hexapod robot for mobile machining. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 84: 817–830
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7600-6
20 J D Barnfather, M J Goodfellow, T Abram. Positional capability of a hexapod robot for machining applications. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 89(1–4): 1103–1111
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9051-0
21 T Huang, P F Wang, X M Zhao, et al. Design of a 4-DOF hybrid PKM module for large structural component assembly. CIRP Annals, 2010, 59(1): 159–162
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.098
22 Y Pan, F Gao. Kinematic Performance Analysis for Hexapod Mobile Robot Using Parallel Mechanism. In: Proceedings of ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 5A: 38th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference. Buffalo: ASME, 2014, V05AT08A089
https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2014-34591
23 Z J Chen, F Gao, Y Pan. Novel door-opening method for six-legged robots based on only force sensing. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 30(5): 1227–1238
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0172-7
24 Y Zhao, F Gao, Y Hu. Novel method for six-legged robots turning valves based on force sensing. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 133: 64–83
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.11.010
25 A B K Rao, P V M Rao, S K Saha. Workspace and dexterity analyses of hexaslide machine tools. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Taipei: IEEE, 2003, 3: 4104–4109
https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2003.1242228
26 BS EN ISO 9283:1998 Manipulating Industrial Robots—Performance Criteria and Related Test Methods. 1998
[1] FME-20010-OF-LJ_suppl_1 Download
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Haitao YU, Haibo GAO, Liang DING, Zongquan DENG. Sagittal SLIP-anchored task space control for a monopode robot traversing irregular terrain[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(2): 193-208.
[2] Xiaodong JIN, Yuefa FANG, Dan ZHANG, Xueling LUO. Design and analysis of a class of redundant collaborative manipulators with 2D large rotational angles[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(1): 66-80.
[3] Yue WANG, Jingjun YU, Xu PEI. Fast forward kinematics algorithm for real-time and high-precision control of the 3-RPS parallel mechanism[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(3): 368-375.
[4] Yuzhe LIU,Liping WANG,Jun WU,Jinsong WANG. A comprehensive analysis of a 3-P (Pa) S spatial parallel manipulator[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, 10(1): 7-19.
[5] Zhihuai MIAO, Yan’an YAO, Xianwen KONG. A rolling 3-UPU parallel mechanism[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8(4): 340-349.
[6] D. GOUBET, J. C. FAUROUX, G. GOGU. Gripping mechanisms in current wood harvesting machines[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8(1): 42-61.
[7] Kejia LI, Xilun DING, Marco CECCARELL. A total torque index for dynamic performance evaluation of a radial symmetric six-legged robot[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2012, 7(2): 219-230.
[8] Haibo QU, Yuefa FANG, Sheng GUO. Parasitic rotation evaluation and avoidance of 3-UPU parallel mechanism[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2012, 7(2): 210-218.
[9] T. ESSOMBA, M. A. LARIBI, J. P. GAZEAU, S. ZEGHLOUL, G. POISSON. Contribution to the design of robotized tele-echography system[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2012, 7(2): 135-149.
[10] Wanghui BU, Zhenyu LIU, Jianrong TAN, Jin CHENG. A redundantly actuated PRPRP radial mechanism in the segment erector of a shield machine for synchronization control[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2011, 6(4): 463-467.
[11] Jialun YANG, Feng GAO, . Singularity loci of an orthogonal spherical two-degree-of-freedom parallel mechanism[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2009, 4(4): 379-385.
[12] YANG Zhiyong, XU Meng, HUANG Tian, NI Yanbing. Variable identification and automatic tuning of the main module of a servo system of parallel mechanism[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2007, 2(1): 82-88.
[13] CHAO Dai-hong, LIU Rong, WU Yue-min, SHI Long, ZONG Guang-hua. Manufacturing error analysis of compliant 3-DOF microrobot[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2006, 1(3): 299-304.
[14] YANG Zhi-yong, WU Jiang, HUANG Tian, NI Yan-bing. Kinematic Model Building and Servo Parameter Identification of 3-HSS Parallel Mechanism[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2006, 1(1): 60-66.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   0
  Discussed