Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2016, Vol. 10 Issue (3) : 491-501     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0837-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE |
Fate and removal of typical pharmaceutical and personal care products in a wastewater treatment plant from Beijing: a mass balance study
Jie GAO1,2,Jun HUANG1,*(),Weiwei CHEN1,3,Bin WANG1,Yujue WANG1,Shubo DENG1,Gang YU1
1. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (SKJLESPC), Beijing Key Laboratory of Emerging Organic Contaminants Control (BKLEOCC), School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2. Beijing Municipal Solid Waste and Chemical Management Center, Beijing 100084, China
3. Xiamen Urban Planning and Design Institute, Xiamen 361012, China
Download: PDF(646 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The fate and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has received great attention during the last decade. Numerous data concerning concentrations in the water phase can be found in the literature, however corresponding data from sludge as well as associated mass balance calculations are very limited. In the present study, the adsorbed and dissolved concentrations of 9 PPCPs were investigated in each unit of a WWTP in Beijing, China. Based on the calculation of mass balance, the relative mass distribution and removal efficiency of each target compound was obtained at each process. The amount of PPCPs entering into the WWTP ranged from 12 g·d-1 to 3848 g·d-1. Five target compounds (caffeine, chloramphenicol, bezafibrate, clofibric acid, and N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) were effectively removed, with rates of 57%–100%. Negative removal efficiencies were obtained for sulpiride, metoprolol, nalidixic acid, and carbamazepine, ranging from -19% to -79%. PPCPs mainly existed in dissolved form (≥92%) in both the raw influent and the final effluent. The sludge cake carried a much lower amount of PPCPs (17 g·d-1) compared with the discharged effluent (402 g·d-1). In A2/O treatment tanks, the anaerobic and anoxic tanks showed good performance for PPCPs removal, and the amount of adsorbed PPCPs was increased. The results reveal that both the dissolved and the adsorbed phases should be considered when assessing the removal capacity of each A2/O tank.

Keywords PPCPs      A2/O      mass balance      removal efficiency      sludge     
Corresponding Authors: Jun HUANG   
Online First Date: 16 March 2016    Issue Date: 05 April 2016
 Cite this article:   
Jie GAO,Jun HUANG,Weiwei CHEN, et al. Fate and removal of typical pharmaceutical and personal care products in a wastewater treatment plant from Beijing: a mass balance study[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 491-501.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-016-0837-y
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2016/V10/I3/491
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Jie GAO
Jun HUANG
Weiwei CHEN
Bin WANG
Yujue WANG
Shubo DENG
Gang YU
Fig.1  Schematic diagram of the treatment process and sampling sites
Fig.2  Concentrations (a) and composition profiles (b) of target PPCPs in water samples dissolved phase
Fig.3  Dissolved (a) and adsorbed (b) concentrations of target PPCPs in different types of sludge
PPCPs raw influent primary effluent anaerobic anoxic oxic secondary effluent primary sludge return sludge excess sludge digested sludge (in) digested sludge (out) thickened sludge sludge cake
SP 90 80 190 396 445 104 4 127 2 0 0 1 3
CF 3848 3684 316 206 65 2 17 31 1 2 0 0 4
MTP 70 61 136 280 296 83 1 68 1 0 0 0 1
CP 55 22 4 2 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
NA 12 14 31 57 37 21 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
CBZ 64 67 133 285 357 92 1 88 1 0 0 0 0
DEET 1040 989 644 1291 741 76 7 233 4 1 1 3 9
CA 31 21 29 67 59 13 0 11 0 0 0 0 0
BZ 26 35 41 84 37 11 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
Tab.1  Total mass of PPCPs in each process unit (g·d-1)
Fig.4  Variation of PPCPs dissolved mass in the receiving river with distance from the discharge point
Fig.5  Relative mass distribution of caffeine (a) and DEET (b) in each process unit
PPCPs primary treatment secondary treatment WWTP b)
anaerobic anoxic oxic total a)
SP 8 8 38 -125 -33 -19
CF 5 91 55 20 100 100
MTP 11 5 35 -112 -37 -19
CP 59 84 75 -350 98 99
NA -26 -36 16 -30 -44 -79
CBZ -6 14 42 -151 -39 -46
DEET 5 47 7 -15 93 92
CA 33 8 23 -74 36 57
BZ -38 7 -8 11 69 58
Tab.2  Removal efficiencies of PPCPs in each unit (%)
1 Li W C. Occurrence, sources, and fate of pharmaceuticals in aquatic environment and soil. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 187: 193–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.01.015
2 Kaplan S. Review: pharmacological pollution in water. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 43(10): 1074–1116
https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2011.627036
3 Wang D, Sui Q, Lu S G, Zhao W T, Qiu Z F, Miao Z W, Yu G. Occurrence and removal of six pharmaceuticals and personal care products in a wastewater treatment plant employing anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic and UV processes in Shanghai, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2014, 21(6): 4276–4285
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2363-9
4 Chang X, Meyer M T, Liu X, Zhao Q, Chen H, Chen J A, Qiu Z, Yang L, Cao J, Shu W. Determination of antibiotics in sewage from hospitals, nursery and slaughter house, wastewater treatment plant and source water in Chongqing region of Three Gorge Reservoir in China. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158(5): 1444–1450
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.034
5 Loos R, Carvalho R, António D C, Comero S, Locoro G, Tavazzi S, Paracchini B, Ghiani M, Lettieri T, Blaha L, Jarosova B, Voorspoels S, Servaes K, Haglund P, Fick J, Lindberg R H, Schwesig D, Gawlik B M. EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Research, 2013, 47(17): 6475–6487
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.024
6 Sui Q, Huang J, Deng S, Yu G, Fan Q. Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals, caffeine and DEET in wastewater treatment plants of Beijing, China. Water Research, 2010, 44(2): 417–426
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.010
7 Loos R, Locoro G, Contini S. Occurrence of polar organic contaminants in the dissolved water phase of the Danube River and its major tributaries using SPE-LC-MS2 analysis. Water Research, 2010, 44(7): 2325–2335
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.035
8 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Method 1694: Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Water, So il, Sediment, and Biosolids by HPLC/MS/MS. Washington, 2007. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/method_1694_2007.pdf (accessed February 15, 2016)
9 Sui Q, Huang J, Deng S, Yu G. Rapid determination of pharmaceuticals from multiple therapeutic classes in wastewater by solid-phase extraction and ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(24): 4633–4643
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009-0413-y
10 Martín J, Camacho-Muñoz D, Santos J L, Aparicio I, Alonso E. Simultaneous determination of a selected group of cytostatic drugs in water using high-performance liquid chromatography-triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Journal of Separation Science, 2011, 34(22): 3166–3177
https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201100461
11 Lin A Y, Yu T H, Lateef S K. Removal of pharmaceuticals in secondary wastewater treatment processes in Taiwan. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 167(1–3): 1163–1169
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.108
12 Guerra P, Kim M, Shah A, Alaee M, Smyth S A. Occurrence and fate of antibiotic, analgesic/anti-inflammatory, and antifungal compounds in five wastewater treatment processes. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 473–474: 235–243
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.008
13 Chen Y, Yu G, Cao Q, Zhang H, Lin Q, Hong Y. Occurrence and environmental implications of pharmaceuticals in Chinese municipal sewage sludge. Chemosphere, 2013, 93(9): 1765–1772
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.007
14 Carballa M, Omil F, Lema J M. Calculation methods to perform mass balances of micropollutants in sewage treatment plants. Application to pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs). Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(3): 884–890
https://doi.org/10.1021/es061581g
15 Miège C, Choubert J M, Ribeiro L, Eusèbe M, Coquery M. Fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment plants-conception of a database and first results. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157(5): 1721–1726
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.11.045
16 Sui Q, Huang J, Deng S, Chen W, Yu G. Seasonal variation in the occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in different biological wastewater treatment processes. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(8): 3341–3348
https://doi.org/10.1021/es200248d
17 Conkle J L, White J R, Metcalfe C D. Reduction of pharmaceutically active compounds by a lagoon wetland wastewater treatment system in Southeast Louisiana. Chemosphere, 2008, 73(11): 1741–1748
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.020
18 Gómez M J, Martínez Bueno M J, Lacorte S, Fernández-Alba A R, Agüera A. Pilot survey monitoring pharmaceuticals and related compounds in a sewage treatment plant located on the Mediterranean coast. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(6): 993–1002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.051
19 Trenholm R A, Vanderford B J, Holady J C, Rexing D J, Snyder S A. Broad range analysis of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals using gas chromatography and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(11): 1990–1998
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.004
20 Nakada N, Tanishima T, Shinohara H, Kiri K, Takada H. Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment. Water Research, 2006, 40(17): 3297–3303
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.039
21 Costanzo S D, Watkinson A J, Murby E J, Kolpin D W, Sandstrom M W. Is there a risk associated with the insect repellent DEET (N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) commonly found in aquatic environments? Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 384(1–3): 214–220
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.036
22 Sim W J, Lee J W, Oh J E. Occurrence and fate of pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants and rivers in Korea. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158(5): 1938–1947
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.10.036
23 Vanderford B J, Snyder S A. Analysis of pharmaceuticals in water by isotope dilution liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(23): 7312–7320
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0613198
24 Barron L, Tobin J, Paull B. Multi-residue determination of pharmaceuticals in sludge and sludge enriched soils using pressurized liquid extraction, solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2008, 10(3): 353–361
https://doi.org/10.1039/b717453e
25 McClellan K, Halden R U. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in archived U.S. biosolids from the 2001 EPA National Sewage Sludge Survey. Water Research, 2010, 44(2): 658–668
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.032
26 Miao X S, Yang J J, Metcalfe C D. Carbamazepine and its metabolites in wastewater and in biosolids in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(19): 7469–7475
https://doi.org/10.1021/es050261e
27 Lindqvist N, Tuhkanen T, Kronberg L. Occurrence of acidic pharmaceuticals in raw and treated sewages and in receiving waters. Water Research, 2005, 39(11): 2219–2228
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.003
28 Miège C, Choubert J M, Ribeiro L, Eusèbe M, Coquery M. Removal efficiency of pharmaceuticals and personal care products with varying wastewater treatment processes and operating conditions-conception of a database and first results. Water Science and Technology, 2008, 57(1): 49–56
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.823
29 Zhao X, Wang X C, Chen Z L, Xu H, Zhang Q F. Microbial community structure and pharmaceuticals and personal care products removal in a membrane bioreactor seeded with aerobic granular sludge. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 99(1): 425–433
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5984-0
30 Roberts J, Kumar A, Du J, Hepplewhite C, Ellis D J, Christy A G, Beavis S G. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Australia’s largest inland sewage treatment plant, and its contribution to a major Australian river during high and low flow. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 541: 1625–1637
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.145
31 Alder A C, Schaffner C, Majewsky M, Klasmeier J, Fenner K. Fate of b-blocker human pharmaceuticals in surface water: comparison of measured and simulated concentrations in the Glatt Valley Watershed, Switzerland. Water Research, 2010, 44(3): 936–948
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.002
32 Blair B D, Crago J P, Hedman C J, Treguer R J F, Magruder C, Royer L S, Klaper R D. Evaluation of a model for the removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and hormones from wastewater. Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 444: 515–521
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.103
33 Alvarino T, Suarez S, Lema J M, Omil F. Understanding the removal mechanisms of PPCPs and the influence ofmain technological parameters in anaerobic UASB and aerobic CAS reactors. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 278: 506–513
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.031
[1] FSE-16001-OF-GJ_suppl_1 Download
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Yanqing Duan, Aijuan Zhou, Kaili Wen, Zhihong Liu, Wenzong Liu, Aijie Wang, Xiuping Yue. Upgrading VFAs bioproduction from waste activated sludge via co-fermentation with soy sauce residue[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 3-.
[2] Guangrong Sun, Chuanyi Zhang, Wei Li, Limei Yuan, Shilong He, Liping Wang. Effect of chemical dose on phosphorus removal and membrane fouling control in a UCT-MBR[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 1-.
[3] Sijia Ai, Hongyu Liu, Mengjie Wu, Guangming Zeng, Chunping Yang. Roles of acid-producing bacteria in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 3-.
[4] Yonglei Wang, Baozhen Liu, Kefeng Zhang, Yongjian Liu, Xuexin Xu, Junqi Jia. Investigate of in situ sludge reduction in sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Performances, mechanisms and comparison of different carriers[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 5-.
[5] Yi Chen, Shilong He, Mengmeng Zhou, Tingting Pan, Yujia Xu, Yingxin Gao, Hengkang Wang. Feasibility assessment of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket treatment of sulfamethoxazole pharmaceutical wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 13-.
[6] Yujiao Sun, Juanjuan Zhao, Lili Chen, Yueqiao Liu, Jiane Zuo. Methanogenic community structure in simultaneous methanogenesis and denitrification granular sludge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 10-.
[7] Liguo Zhang, Qiaoying Ban, Jianzheng Li. Microbial community dynamics at high organic loading rates revealed by pyrosequencing during sugar refinery wastewater treatment in a UASB reactor[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 4-.
[8] Lin Lin, Ying-yu Li, Xiao-yan Li. Acidogenic sludge fermentation to recover soluble organics as the carbon source for denitrification in wastewater treatment: Comparison of sludge types[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 3-.
[9] Weichao Ma, Lei Zhao, Huiling Liu, Qianliang Liu, Jun Ma. Improvement of sludge dewaterability with modified cinder via affecting EPS[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(6): 19-.
[10] Xuemin Wu,Fenfen Zhu,Juanjuan Qi,Luyao Zhao,Fawei Yan,Chenghui Li. Challenge of biodiesel production from sewage sludge catalyzed by KOH, KOH/activated carbon, and KOH/CaO[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(2): 3-.
[11] Yun Zhou, Siqing Xia, Binh T. Nguyen, Min Long, Jiao Zhang, Zhiqiang Zhang. Interactions between metal ions and the biopolymer in activated sludge: quantification and effects of system pH value[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 7-.
[12] Ran Yu, Shiwen Zhang, Zhoukai Chen, Chuanyang Li. Isolation and application of predatory Bdellovibrio-and-like organisms for municipal waste sludge biolysis and dewaterability enhancement[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 10-.
[13] Ahmad Kalbasi Ashtari, Amir M. Samani Majd, Gerald L. Riskowski, Saqib Mukhtar, Lingying Zhao. Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(6): 3-.
[14] Mengchuan Shui, Feng Ji, Rui Tang, Shoujun Yuan, Xinmin Zhan, Wei Wang, Zhenhu Hu. Impact of roxarsone on the UASB reactor performance and its degradation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(6): 4-.
[15] Yuning YANG,Huan LI. Recovering humic substances from the dewatering effluent of thermally treated sludge and its performance as an organic fertilizer[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 578-584.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed