A novel strategy for gas mitigation during swine manure odour treatment using seaweed and a microbial consortium

PDF(1809 KB)
PDF(1809 KB)
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3) : 53. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-020-1230-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE

作者信息 +

A novel strategy for gas mitigation during swine manure odour treatment using seaweed and a microbial consortium

Author information +
History +

Highlight

• Comprehensive mitigation of gas emissions from swine manure was investigated.

• Additives addition for mitigation of gas from the manure has been developed.

Sargassum horneri, seaweed masking strategy controlled gas by 90%-100%.

• Immediate reduction in emitted gas and improving air quality has been determined.

• Microbial consortium with seaweed completely controlled gas emissions by 100%.

Abstract

Gas emissions from swine farms have an impact on air quality in the Republic of Korea. Swine manure stored in deep pits for a long time is a major source of harmful gas emissions. Therefore, we evaluated the mitigation of emissions of ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and amine gases from swine manure with biological products such as seaweed (Sargassum horneri) and a microbial consortium (Bacillus subtilis (1.2 × 109 CFU/mL), Thiobacillus sp. (1.0 × 1010 CFU/mL) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2.0 × 109 CFU/mL)) used as additives due to their promising benefits for nutrient cycling. Overall, seaweed powder masking over two days provided notable control of over 98%-100% of the gas emissions. Furthermore, significant control of gas emissions was especially pronounced when seaweed powder masking along with a microbial consortium was applied, resulting in a gas reduction rate of 100% for NH3, amines and H2S over 10 days of treatment. The results also suggested that seaweed powder masking and a microbial consortium used in combination to reduce the gas emissions from swine manure reduced odour compared with that observed when the two additives were used alone. Without the consortium, seaweed decreased total volatile fatty acid (VFA) production. The proposed novel method of masking with a microbial consortium is promising for mitigating hazardous gases, simple, and environmentally beneficial. More research is warranted to determine the mechanisms underlying the seaweed and substrate interactions.

Keywords

Seaweed / Consortium / Mitigation / Ammonia / H2S / Volatile fatty acids (VFAs)

引用本文

导出引用
. . Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 2020, 14(3): 53 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1230-4

参考文献

[1]
American Public Health Association, Eaton A D, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: APHA-AWWA-WEF
[2]
Awasthi M K, Zhang Z, Wang Q, Shen F, Li R, Li D S, Ren X, Wang M, Chen H, Zhao J (2017). New insight with the effects of biochar amendment on bacterial diversity as indicators of biomarkers support the thermophilic phase during sewage sludge composting. Bioresource Technology, 238: 589–601
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[3]
Badar R, Khan M, Batool B, Shabbir S (2015). Effects of organic amendments in comparison with chemical fertilizer on cowpea growth. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(5): 66–71
[4]
Benjamin M, Yik S (2019). Precision livestock farming in swine welfare: A review for swine practitioners. Animals (Basel), 9(4): 133–154
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[5]
Chowdhury M A, de Neergaard A, Jensen L S (2014). Potential of aeration flow rate and bio-char addition to reduce greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions during manure composting. Chemosphere, 97: 16–25
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[6]
Conn K L, Tenuta M, Lazarovits G (2005). Liquid swine manure can kill Verticillium dahliae microsclerotia in soil by volatile fatty acid, nitrous acid, and ammonia toxicity. Phytopathology, 95(1): 28–35
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[7]
Dennehy C, Lawlor P G, Jiang Y, Gardiner G E, Xie S, Nghiem L D, Zhan X (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions from different pig manure management techniques: A critical analysis. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(3): 11
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[8]
Ding X, Han X, Liang Y, Qiao Y, Li L, Li N (2012). Changes in soil organic carbon pools after 10 years of continuous manuring combined with chemical fertilizer in a Mollisol in China. Soil & Tillage Research, 122: 36–41
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[9]
Domozych D, Ciancia M, Fangel J, Mikkelsen M, Ulvskov P, Willats W (2012). The cell walls of green algae: A journey through evolution and diversity. Frontiers of Plant Science, 3: 82
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[10]
Dufossé L, Galaup P, Yaron A, Arad S M, Blanc P, Chidambara Murthy K N, Ravishankar G A (2005). Microorganisms and microalgae as sources of pigments for food use: A scientific oddity or an industrial reality? Trends in Food Science & Technology, 16(9): 389–406
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[11]
Feilberg A, Liu D, Adamsen A P, Hansen M J, Jonassen K E (2010). Odorant emissions from intensive pig production measured by online proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(15): 5894–5900
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[12]
Jumaidin R, Sapuan S, Jawaid M, Ishak M, Sahari J (2016). Effect of seaweed on physical properties of thermoplastic sugar palm starch/agar composites. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 10(3): 2214–2225
[13]
Kim J A, Bayo J, Cha J, Choi Y J, Jung M Y, Kim D H, Kim Y (2019). Investigating the probiotic characteristics of four microbial strains with potential application in feed industry. PLoS One, 14(6): e0218922
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[14]
Kuroda K, Tanaka A, Furuhashi K, Nakasaki K (2017). Application of Bacillus sp. TAT105 to reduce ammonia emissions during pilot-scale composting of swine manure. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 81(12): 2400–2406
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[15]
Le P D, Aarnink A J, Ogink N W, Becker P M, Verstegen M W (2005). Odour from animal production facilities: Its relationship to diet. Nutrition Research Reviews, 18(1): 3–30
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[16]
Machado L, Magnusson M, Paul N A, de Nys R, Tomkins N (2014). Effects of marine and freshwater macroalgae on in vitro total gas and methane production. PLoS One, 9(1): e85289
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[17]
Maia M R G, Fonseca A J M, Oliveira H M, Mendonça C, Cabrita A R J (2016). The potential role of seaweeds in the natural manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 32321
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[18]
Mandal S, Thangarajan R, Bolan N S, Sarkar B, Khan N, Ok Y S, Naidu R (2016). Biochar-induced concomitant decrease in ammonia volatilization and increase in nitrogen use efficiency by wheat. Chemosphere, 142: 120–127
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[19]
Manyi-Loh C E, Mamphweli S N, Meyer E L, Makaka G, Simon M, Okoh A I (2016). An overview of the control of bacterial pathogens in cattle manure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(9): 843
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[20]
Matsumura H, Sasaki M, Kato S I, Nakasaki K (2010). Unusual effects of triacylglycerol on the reduction of ammonia gas emission during thermophilic composting. Bioresource Technology, 101(7): 2300–2305
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[21]
Maurer D, Koziel J, Kalus K, Andersen D, Opaliński S (2017). Pilot-scale testing of non-activated biochar for swine manure treatment and mitigation of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, odorous Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), and greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainability, 9(6): 929
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[22]
Miller G W, Patterson G S (2002). Treatment of Animal Waste. United States Patent No.: US 6,410,305. Maple Grove: BioSun Systems Corporation
[23]
Okolie C L, Rajendran S R C K, Udenigwe C C, Aryee A N A, Mason B (2017). Prospects of brown seaweed polysaccharides (BSP) as prebiotics and potential immunomodulators. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 41(5): e12392
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[24]
Olson P J, Ban Y K (2018). Livestock and products semi-annual. GAIN Report KS1810. Seoul: Global Agricultural Information Network
[25]
Orpin C G, Greenwood Y, Hall F J, Paterson I W (1985). The rumen microbiology of seaweed digestion in Orkney sheep. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 58(6): 585–596
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[26]
Pacholczak A, Nowakowska K, Pietkiewicz S (2016). The effects of synthetic auxin and a seaweed-based biostimulator on physiological aspects of rhizogenesis in ninebark stem cuttings. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 44(1): 85–91
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[27]
Pulz O, Gross W (2004). Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 65(6): 635–648
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[28]
Qi Z, Liu H, Li B, Mao Y, Jiang Z, Zhang J, Fang J (2010). Suitability of two seaweeds, Gracilaria lemaneiformis and Sargassum pallidum, as feed for the abalone Haliotis discus hannai Ino. Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 300(1–4): 189–193
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[29]
Ravindran B, Nguyen D D, Chaudhary D K, Chang S W, Kim J, Lee S R, Shin J, Jeon B H, Chung S, Lee J (2019). Influence of biochar on physico-chemical and microbial community during swine manure composting process. Journal of Environmental Management, 232: 592–599
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[30]
Sanjeewa K K A, Fernando I P S, Kim S Y, Kim H S, Ahn G, Jee Y, Jeon Y J (2018). In vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activities of high molecular weight sulfated polysaccharide; containing fucose separated from Sargassum horneri: Short communication. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 107 (Part A): 803–807
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[31]
Sundberg C, Al-Soud W A, Larsson M, Alm E, Yekta S S, Svensson B H, Sørensen S J, Karlsson A (2013). 454-pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 85(3): 612–626
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[32]
Zahn J A, DiSpirito A A, Do Y S, Brooks B E, Cooper E E, Hatfield J L (2001). Correlation of human olfactory responses to airborne concentrations of malodorous volatile organic compounds emitted from swine effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30(2): 624–634
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[33]
Zhang W, Lau A (2007). Reducing ammonia emission from poultry manure composting via struvite formation. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 82(6): 598–602
CrossRef ADS Google scholar
[34]
Zhu J (2000). A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 78(2): 93–106
CrossRef ADS Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through the Agriculture and Livestock Machinery/Equipment Industry Technology Development Program (No. 318012-4) and funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), and the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Project No. PJ013307), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author contributions

G.H.H. conceived and designed the study; M.L. designed and performed the experiments; L.H.D. and K.M.K. analyzed the data; R.B. and D.H.K. contributed material/analysis tools; and M.L. wrote the paper.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1230-4 and is accessible for authorized users.

版权

2020 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
PDF(1809 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/