Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Earth Science

Front. Earth Sci.    2019, Vol. 13 Issue (2) : 290-302     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0729-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE |
The relationships between urban-rural temperature difference and vegetation in eight cities of the Great Plains
Yaoping CUI1,2, Xiangming XIAO2,3(), Russell B DOUGHTY2, Yaochen QIN1, Sujie LIU1, Nan LI1, Guosong ZHAO4, Jinwei DONG4()
1. Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
2. Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Spatial Analysis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
3. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Download: PDF(5673 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Interpreting the relationship between urban heat island (UHI) and urban vegetation is a basis for understanding the impacts of underlying surfaces on UHI. The calculation of UHI intensity (UHII) requires observations from paired stations in both urban and rural areas. Due to the limited number of paired meteorological stations, many studies have used remotely sensed land surface temperature, but these time-series land surface temperature data are often heavily affected by cloud cover and other factors. These factors, together with the algorithm for inversion of land surface temperature, lead to accuracy problems in detecting the UHII, especially in cities with weak UHII. Based on meteorological observations from the Oklahoma Mesonet, a world-class network, we quantified the UHII and trends in eight cities of the Great Plains, USA, where data from at least one pair of urban and rural meteorological stations were available. We examined the changes and variability in urban temperature, UHII, vegetation condition (as measured by enhanced vegetation index, EVI), and evapotranspiration (ET). We found that both UHI and urban cold islands (UCI) occurred among the eight cities during 2000–2014 (as measured by impervious surface area). Unlike what is generally considered, UHII in only three cities significantly decreased as EVI and ET increased (p<0.1), indicating that the UHI or UCI cannot be completely explained simply from the perspective of the underlying surface. Increased vegetative cover (signaled by EVI) can increase ET, and thereby effectively mitigate the UHI. Each study station clearly showed that the underlying surface or vegetation affects urban-rural temperature, and that these factors should be considered during analysis of the UHI effect over time.

Keywords urbanization      evapotranspiration      urban cold island      background climate      air temperature     
Corresponding Authors: Xiangming XIAO,Jinwei DONG   
Just Accepted Date: 12 October 2018   Online First Date: 16 November 2018    Issue Date: 16 May 2019
 Cite this article:   
Yaoping CUI,Xiangming XIAO,Russell B DOUGHTY, et al. The relationships between urban-rural temperature difference and vegetation in eight cities of the Great Plains[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(2): 290-302.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-018-0729-5
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2019/V13/I2/290
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Yaoping CUI
Xiangming XIAO
Russell B DOUGHTY
Yaochen QIN
Sujie LIU
Nan LI
Guosong ZHAO
Jinwei DONG
Fig.1  Study area and stations. The red and cyan dots are the meteorological stations located in urban and rural areas, respectively. The red and cyan circles are 5 km buffer areas of each station. The red regions show the impervious surface areas in 2011.
City Urban station Rural station
Name Altitude/m Major climate regulations Name Altitude/m Major climate regulations
Oklahoma City OKCN 362 Grasslands/Herbaceous SPEN 373 Grasslands/Herbaceous
ELRE 419 Grasslands/Herbaceous
OKCE 355 Grasslands/Herbaceous GUTH 330 Grasslands/Herbaceous
MINC 430 Grasslands/Herbaceous
Tulsa BIXB 184 Cultivated Crop HECT 243 Pasture/Hay
Norman NRMN 357 Grasslands/Herbaceous WASH 345 Pasture/Hay
Stillwater STIL 272 Grasslands/Herbaceous MARE
PERK
327
292
Grasslands/Herbaceous
Cultivated Crop
Tahlequah TAHL 290 Pasture/Hay COOK 299 Pasture/Hay
McAlester MCAL 230 Grasslands/Herbaceous STUA 256 Pasture/Hay
Chickasha CHIC 328 Cultivated Crop NINN 356 Developed Low Intensity
Pauls Valley PAUL 291 Developed Open Space BYAR 345 Pasture/Hay
Tab.1  The basic station information within 5 km at the eight cities. All the station information comes from Oklahoma Mesonet
Fig.2  The relationship between urban temperature and rural temperature at the eight cities. Blue dotted lines indicate the linear fitting lines over time; black lines mean the “y = x” lines.
City Temperature trend/(°C·yr1) EVI trend ET trend/(mm·yr1) Impervious surface percentage/%*
Urban Rural UHII Urban Rural DEVI Urban Rural DET Urban 2001 Rural 2001 Urban 2011 Rural 2011
Oklahoma City –0.007 0.021 –0.028 0.003 0.002 0.000 –4.149 –3.106 –1.043 29.07 1.76 32.26 1.85
Tulsa –0.032 –0.060 0.028 0.000 0.000 0.000 –0.719 –1.649 0.930 5.27 0.72 8.01 0.76
Norman 0.018 0.009 0.001 –0.001 0.000 –0.001 –3.232 –1.406 –1.826 24.26 0.15 29.21 0.15
Stillwater 0.009 0.004 0.005 –0.001 –0.001 0.000 –2.635 –2.393 –0.242 12.58 0.98 14.54 1.12
Tahlequah 0.007 –0.004 0.011 0.000 –0.001 0.001 –2.718 1.143 –3.860 0.86 0.12 1.09 0.12
McAlester –0.028 –0.006 –0.021 –0.001 0.000 0.000 –1.971 –3.582 1.610 3.81 0.26 4.80 0.33
Chickasha –0.004 –0.010 0.006 0.000 0.000 –0.001 –1.410 –1.223 –0.187 8.66 1.25 9.50 1.33
Pauls Valley 0.001 0.001 0.000 –0.001 0.001 –0.002 –4.212 –0.647 –3.565 4.49 0.43 5.07 0.44
Tab.2  The annual linear trends (slope) of temperature, EVI, and ET from 2000 to 2014, and percentage of impervious surface for urban and rural stations in 2001 and 2011. DEVI and DET is the trend difference between EVI or ET for urban and rural areas (EVIurban– EVIrural; ETurban– ETrural). All the value is the trends over time (year) accordingly except the urban impervious percentage (*) in 2001 and 2011
Fig.3  The relationship between temperature trends of UHII and rural temperature in the eight cities from 2000 to 2014.
Fig.4  The relationship between annual mean EVI and urban temperature, and between DEVI (EVIurban– EVIrural) and UHII or UCII in the eight cities from 2000 to 2014.
Fig.5  The relationship between annual mean ET and urban temperature, and between DET (ETurban– ETrural) and UHII or UCII in the eight cities from 2000 to 2014.
Fig.6  The urban/vegetation expansion and intensification (UEI/VEI) in an urban area. Human-managed vegetation in urban areas: (a) introduced plants; (b) irrigation; (c) natural vegetation decline in winter; and (d) urban vegetation growth in winter (Oklahoma, December 9, 2016), possibly due to irrigation and UHI. The comparison of (e) to (f) demonstrates the coexistence of increases in UEI and VEI. The two photos were taken in August 2003 and September 2016 and accessed via Google Earth.
1 DArgüeso, J P Evans, L Fita, K JBormann (2014). Temperature response to future urbanization and climate change. Clim Dyn, 42(7–8): 2183–2199
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1789-6
2 CBang, J L Sabo, S H Faeth (2010). Reduced wind speed improves plant growth in a desert city. PLoS One, 5(6): e11061
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011061
3 J BBasara, H G Basara, B G Illston, K C Crawford (2010). The impact of the urban heat island during an intense heat wave in Oklahoma City. Adv Meteorol, 2010: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/230365
4 MBokaie, M K Zarkesh, P D Arasteh, A Hosseini (2016). Assessment of Urban Heat Island based on the relationship between land surface temperature and Land Use/Land Cover in Tehran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 23: 94–104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.009
5 F VBrock, K C Crawford, R L Elliott, G W Cuperus, S J Stadler, H L Johnson, M D Eilts (1995). The Oklahoma Mesonet: a technical overview. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 12(1): 5–19
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0005:TOMATO>2.0.CO;2
6 PBrohan, J J Kennedy, I Harris, S FTett, P DJones (2006). Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: a new data set from 1850. J Geophys Res Atmos, 111(D12 D12106): D12106
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006548
7 T JChandler (1976). Urban climatology and its relevance to urban design. WMO Tech, Note 149, WMO, Geneva
8 GChurkina (2016). The role of urbanization in the global carbon cycle. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 3, doi: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00144
9 NClinton, P Gong (2013). MODIS detected surface urban heat islands and sinks: global locations and controls. Remote Sens Environ, 134: 294–304
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.008
10 YCui, J Jiu, XZhang, YHu, J Wang (2012a). Modeling urban heat energy balance and temperature differences of different underlying surfaces. Geogr Res, 31(7): 1257–1268
11 YCui, J Liu, YHu, JWang, W Kuang (2012b). Modeling the radiation balance of different urban underlying surfaces. Chin Sci Bull, 57(9): 1046–1054
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4933-x
12 YCui, J Liu, XZhang, YQin, J Dong (2015). Modeling urban sprawl effects on regional warming in Beijing-Tianjing-Tangshan urban agglomeration. Acta Ecol Sin, 35(4): 993–1003
13 YCui, X Xiao, YZhang, JDong, Y Qin, RDoughty, GZhang, JWang, X Wu, YQin, SZhou, J Joiner, BMoore III (2017). Temporal consistency between gross primary production and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in the ten most populous megacity areas over years. Sci Rep, 7(1): 14963
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13783-5
14 YCui, X Xu, JDong, YQin (2016). Influence of urbanization factors on surface urban heat island intensity: a comparison of countries at different developmental phases. Sustainability, 8(8): 706
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080706
15 JDong, X Xiao, PWagle, GZhang, YZhou, C Jin, M STorn, T PMeyers, A ESuyker, JWang, H Yan, CBiradar, BMoore III (2015). Comparison of four EVI-based models for estimating gross primary production of maize and soybean croplands and tallgrass prairie under severe drought. Remote Sens Environ, 162: 154–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.022
16 IEliasson (1996). Urban nocturnal temperatures, street geometry and land use. Atmos Environ, 30(3): 379–392
https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00033-X
17 JFang, J Zhu, CYue, SWang, T Zheng (2018). Carbon Emissions from China and the World. Beijing: Science Press
18 N EGolubiewski (2006). Urbanization increases grassland carbon pools: effects of landscaping in Colorado’s front range. Ecol Appl, 16(2): 555–571
https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0555:UIGCPE]2.0.CO;2
19 N BGrimm, S H Faeth, N E Golubiewski, C L Redman, J Wu, XBai, J MBriggs (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864): 756–760
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
20 GGuo, Z Wu, RXiao, YChen, X Liu, XZhang (2015). Impacts of urban biophysical composition on land surface temperature in urban heat island clusters. Landsc Urban Plan, 135: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.007
21 SHaashemi, Q Weng, ADarvishi, S KAlavipanah (2016). Seasonal variations of the surface urban heat island in a semi-arid city. Remote Sens, 8(4): 352
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040352
22 B GHeusinkveld, G JSteeneveld, van L W AHove, C M JJacobs, A A MHoltslag (2014). Spatial variability of the Rotterdam urban heat island as influenced by urban land use. J Geophys Res Atmos, 119(2): 677–692
https://doi.org/10.1002/2012JD019399
23 LHu, N A Brunsell (2013). The impact of temporal aggregation of land surface temperature data for surface urban heat island (SUHI) monitoring. Remote Sens Environ, 134: 162–174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.022
24 XHu, W Zhou, YQian, WYu (2017). Urban expansion and local land-cover change both significantly contribute to urban warming, but their relative importance changes over time. Landsc Ecol, 32(4): 763–780
25 L RHutyra, R Duren, K RGurney, NGrimm, E AKort, ELarson, GShrestha (2014). Urbanization and the carbon cycle: current capabilities and research outlook from the natural sciences perspective. Earths Futur, 2(10): 473–495
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000255
26 M LImhoff, L Bounoua, RDeFries, W TLawrence, DStutzer, C JTucker, TRicketts (2004). The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sens Environ, 89(4): 434–443
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.015
27 M LImhoff, P Zhang, R EWolfe, LBounoua (2010). Remote sensing of the urban heat island effect across biomes in the continental USA. Remote Sens Environ, 114(3): 504–513
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008
28 G DJenerette, S LHarlan, ABuyantuev, W LStefanov, JDeclet-Barreto, B LRuddell, S WMyint, SKaplan, XLi (2016). Micro-scale urban surface temperatures are related to land-cover features and residential heat related health impacts in Phoenix, AZ, USA. Landsc Ecol, 31(4): 745–760
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0284-3
29 PJones, D Lister, QLi (2008). Urbanization effects in large-scale temperature records, with an emphasis on China. J Geophys Res Atmos, 113(D16): D16122
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009916
30 EKalnay, M Cai (2003). Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature, 423(6939): 528–531
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01675
31 YKamarianakis, X Li, B LTurner II, A JBrazel (2017). On the effects of landscape configuration on summer diurnal temperatures in urban residential areas: application in Phoenix, AZ. Front Earth Sci, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-017-0678-4
32 MKottek, J Grieser, CBeck, BRudolf, FRubel (2006). World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z, 15(3): 259–263
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
33 HKusaka, F Kimura (2004). Coupling a single-layer urban canopy model with a simple atmospheric model: impact on urban heat island simulation for an idealized case. J Meteorol Soc Jpn, 82(1): 67–80
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.82.67
34 JLi, C Song, LCao, FZhu, X Meng, JWu (2011). Impacts of landscape structure on surface urban heat islands: a case study of Shanghai, China. Remote Sens Environ, 115(12): 3249–3263
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.008
35 XLi, Y Zhou, G RAsrar, MImhoff, XLi (2017). The surface urban heat island response to urban expansion: a panel analysis for the conterminous united states. Sci Total Environ, 605–606: 426–435
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.229
36 BLietzke, R Vogt (2013). Variability of CO2 concentrations and fluxes in and above an urban street canyon. Atmos Environ, 74: 60–72
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.030
37 KLiu, X Gu, TYu, ZGao, W Gao, CLiu (2011). Relationships between urban heat island effect and land use and land cover change around urban weather stations. Climatic and Environmental Research, 16(6): 707–716 (in Chinese)
38 KLiu, H Su, XLi, WWang, L Yang, HLiang (2016). Quantifying spatial–temporal pattern of urban heat island in Beijing: an improved assessment using land surface temperature (LST) time series observations from LANDSAT, MODIS, and Chinese new satellite GaoFen-1. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 9(5): 2028–2042
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2513598
39 ZLiu, C He, YZhou, JWu (2014). How much of the world’s land has been urbanized, really? A hierarchical framework for avoiding confusion. Landsc Ecol, 29(5): 763–771
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0034-y
40 XLuo, Y Peng (2016). Scale effects of the relationships between urban heat islands and impact factors based on a geographically-weighted regression model. Remote Sens, 8(9): 760
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090760
41 B HLynn, T N Carlson, C Rosenzweig, RGoldberg, LDruyan, JCox, S Gaffin, LParshall, KCiverolo (2009). A modification to the NOAH LSM to simulate heat mitigation strategies in the New York City metropolitan area. J Appl Meteorol Climatol, 48(2): 199–216
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1774.1
42 WMao, X Wang, JCai, MZhu (2016). Multi-dimensional histogram-based information capacity analysis of urban heat island effect using Landsat 8 data. Remote Sens Lett, 7(10): 925–934
https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2016.1182656
43 R AMcPherson, C AFiebrich, K CCrawford, J RKilby, D LGrimsley, J EMartinez, J BBasara, B GIllston, D AMorris, K AKloesel, A DMelvin, HShrivastava, J MWolfinbarger, J PBostic, D BDemko, R LElliott, S JStadler, J DCarlson, A JSutherland (2007). Statewide monitoring of the mesoscale environment: a technical update on the Oklahoma Mesonet. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 24(3): 301–321
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1976.1
44 D JMildrexler, MZhao, S W Running (2011). A global comparison between station air temperatures and MODIS land surface temperatures reveals the cooling role of forests. J Geophys Res Biogeosci, 116(G03025)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001486
45 QMu, F A Heinsch, M Zhao, S WRunning (2007). Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sens Environ, 111(4): 519–536
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015
46 T ROke (1973). City size and the urban heat island. Atmos Environ, 7(8): 769–779
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(73)90140-6
47 T ROke (2004). Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites. IOM Rep. 81, WMO/TD-No. 1250,  1–47. [Available online at  ]
48 D EParker (2010). Urban heat island effects on estimates of observed climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang, 1(1): 123–133
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.21
49 SPeng, S Piao, PCiais, PFriedlingstein, COttle, F MBréon, HNan, L Zhou, R BMyneni (2012). Surface urban heat island across 419 global big cities. Environ Sci Technol, 46(2): 696–703
https://doi.org/10.1021/es2030438
50 T CPeterson (2003). Assessment of urban versus rural in situ surface temperatures in the contiguous United States: no difference found. J Clim, 16(18): 2941–2959
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2941:AOUVRI>2.0.CO;2
51 SPiao, S Sitch, PCiais, PFriedlingstein, PPeylin, XWang, A Ahlström, AAnav, J GCanadell, NCong, C Huntingford, MJung, SLevis, P ELevy, JLi, X Lin, M RLomas, MLu, Y Luo, YMa, R BMyneni, BPoulter, Z ZSun, TWang, N Viovy, SZaehle, NZeng (2013). Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends. Glob Change Biol, 19(7): 2117–2132
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12187
52 J CPrice (1979). Assessment of the urban heat island effect through the use of satellite data. Mon Weather Rev, 107(11): 1554–1557
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1979)107<1554:AOTUHI>2.0.CO;2
53 YQian, W Zhou, WLi, LHan (2015). Understanding the dynamic of greenspace in the urbanized area of Beijing based on high resolution satellite images. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1): 39–47
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.006
54 GQiu, H Li, QZhang, WChen, X Liang, XLi (2013). Effects of evapotranspiration on mitigation of urban temperature by vegetation and urban agriculture. J Integr Agric, 12(8): 1307–1315
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60543-2
55 GRen, Y Zhou, ZChu, JZhou, A Zhang, JGuo, XLiu (2008). Urbanization effects on observed surface air temperature trends in North China. J Clim, 21(6): 1333–1348
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1348.1
56 K KRoman, T O’Brien, J BAlvey, OWoo (2016). Simulating the effects of cool roof and PCM (phase change materials) based roof to mitigate UHI (urban heat island) in prominent US cities. Energy, 96: 103–117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.11.082
57 HSchmid, H Cleugh, CGrimmond, TOke (1991). Spatial variability of energy fluxes in suburban terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 54(3): 249–276
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183956
58 GSteeneveld, S Koopmans, BHeusinkveld, LVan Hove, AHoltslag (2011). Quantifying urban heat island effects and human comfort for cities of variable size and urban morphology in the Netherlands. J Geophys Res Atmos, 116(D20): D20129
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015988
59 I DStewart (2011). A systematic review and scientific critique of methodology in modern urban heat island literature. Int J Climatol, 31(2): 200–217
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2141
60 I DStewart, T R Oke (2012). Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc, 93(12): 1879–1900
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
61 JWalker, K de Beurs, GHenebry (2015). Land surface phenology along urban to rural gradients in the US Great Plains. Remote Sens Environ, 165: 42–52
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.019
62 ZWan (2008). New refinements and validation of the MODIS land-surface temperature/emissivity products. Remote Sens Environ, 112(1): 59–74
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026
63 MWatts, S Schultz, TBailey, EAst, B Russell, EMorris, K, S LVines (2015). Climate action in megacities 3.0: Networking works, there is no global solution without local action. London: C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group
64 QWeng, D Lu, JSchubring (2004). Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sens Environ, 89(4): 467–483
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.005
65 N HWong, Y Chen, C LOng, ASia (2003). Investigation of thermal benefits of rooftop garden in the tropical environment. Build Environ, 38(2): 261–270
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00066-5
66 XYang, Y Li, ZLuo, P WChan (2017). The urban cool island phenomenon in a high- rise high- density city and its mechanisms. Int J Climatol, 37(2): 890–904
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4747
67 RYao, L Wang, XHuang, YNiu, Y Chen, ZNiu (2018). The influence of different data and method on estimating the surface urban heat island intensity. Ecol Indic, 89: 45–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.044
68 XZhang, M A Friedl, C B Schaaf, A H Strahler (2004a). Climate controls on vegetation phenological patterns in northern mid- and high latitudes inferred from MODIS data. Glob Change Biol, 10(7): 1133–1145
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00784.x
69 XZhang, M A Friedl, C B Schaaf, A H Strahler, A Schneider (2004b). The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology. Geophys Res Lett, 31(12): L12209
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020137
70 GZhao, J Dong, YCui, JLiu, J Zhai, THe, YZhou, X Xiao (2018). Evapotranspiration-dominated biogeophysical warming effect of urbanization in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Clim Dyn, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4189-0
71 LZhao, X Lee, R BSmith, KOleson (2014). Strong contributions of local background climate to urban heat islands. Nature, 511(7508): 216–219
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13462
72 SZhao, S Liu, DZhou (2016). Prevalent vegetation growth enhancement in urban environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 113(22): 6313–6318
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602312113
73 BZhou, D Rybski, JKropp (2013). On the statistics of urban heat island intensity. Geophys Res Lett, 40(20): 5486–5491
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057320
74 DZhou, L Zhang, LHao, GSun, Y Liu, CZhu (2016). Spatiotemporal trends of urban heat island effect along the urban development intensity gradient in China. Sci Total Environ, 544: 617–626
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.168
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Qianfeng WANG, Jingyu ZENG, Song LENG, Bingxiong FAN, Jia TANG, Cong JIANG, Yi HUANG, Qing ZHANG, Yanping QU, Wulin WANG, Wei SHUI. The effects of air temperature and precipitation on the net primary productivity in China during the early 21st century[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(4): 818-833.
[2] Erfu DAI, Zhuo WU, Xiaodian DU. A gradient analysis on urban sprawl and urban landscape pattern between 1985 and 2000 in the Pearl River Delta, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(4): 791-807.
[3] Junyong AI,Lan FENG,Xiaowei DONG,Xiaodong ZHU,Yangfan LI. Exploring coupling coordination between urbanization and ecosystem quality (1985–2010): a case study from Lianyungang City, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(3): 527-545.
[4] Weichun MA,Liguo ZHOU,Hao ZHANG,Yan ZHANG,Xiaoyan DAI. Air temperature field distribution estimations over a Chinese mega-city using MODIS land surface temperature data: the case of Shanghai[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(1): 38-48.
[5] Yu SUN,Lili WANG,Hong YIN. Influence of climatic factors on tree-ring maximum latewood density of Picea schrenkiana in Xinjiang, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(1): 126-134.
[6] Junyong AI,Xiang SUN,Lan FENG,Yangfan LI,Xiaodong ZHU. Analyzing the spatial patterns and drivers of ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Taihu Lake Basin of China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(3): 531-545.
[7] Kun TAN,Songyang ZHOU,Erzhu LI,Peijun DU. Assessing the impact of urbanization on net primary productivity using multi-scale remote sensing data: a case study of Xuzhou, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(2): 319-329.
[8] Yongxue LIU,Jieli CHEN,Wangyu CHENG,Chao SUN,Saishuai ZHAO,Yingxia PU. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the urban sprawl in a typical urban agglomeration: a case study on Southern Jiangsu, China (1983–2007)[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(4): 490-504.
[9] Yanying BAI,Thomas A. SCOTT,Qingwen MIN. Climate change implications of soil temperature in the Mojave Desert, USA[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(2): 302-308.
[10] Di HE, Yaling LIU, Zhihua PAN, Pingli AN, Liwei WANG, Zhiqiang DONG, Jingting ZHANG, Xuebiao PAN, Peiyi ZHAO. Climate change and its effect on reference crop evapotranspiration in central and western Inner Mongolia during 1961–2009[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(4): 417-428.
[11] Aiping PANG, Chuihui LI, Tao SUN, Zhifeng YANG. An improved ET control method to determine the water-saving potential for farmland in Baiyangdian Watershed, China[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(2): 151-158.
[12] Zhuoqi CHEN, Runhe SHI, Shupeng Zhang. An artificial neural network approach to estimate evapotranspiration from remote sensing and AmeriFlux data[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(1): 103-111.
[13] Xiaoduo PAN, Xin Li, Xiaokang SHI, Xujun HAN, Lihui LUO, Liangxu WANG. Dynamic downscaling of near-surface air temperature at the basin scale using WRF–a case study in the Heihe River Basin, China[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2012, 6(3): 314-323.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed