Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Engineering Management

Front. Eng    2016, Vol. 3 Issue (3) : 197-202     https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2016033
LARGE-SCALE PROJECTS MANAGEMENT |
Large Scale Infrastructure Projects: The Art of Project or Change Management?
Geert Letens1(),Kurt Verweire2,Peter De Prins3
1. Department of Economics, Management & Leadership, Royal Military Academy, Av. De la Renaissance 30, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
2. Vlerick Business School Ghent, Reep 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
3. Vlerick Business School Leuven, Vlamingenstraat 83, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Download: PDF(224 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Although it is generally understood that change is a fundamental component of managing projects in the construction industry in general and an inevitable challenge for large scale infrastructure project in particular, there has been little to no attention in the literature to understand change in this context from a more holistic perspective. For this purpose, this work looks at change through the eyes of a framework of six batteries of change that seem essential to charge an organization’s capabilities for change. The framework brings together the expertise of four specialists that all have developed their insights over many years of study and practice, and has been validated through an extensive review of the management literature on organization development and change. Reflections on the application of this model in the construction industry and in large scale infrastructure projects demonstrate that energizing organizations to successfully deal with change goes beyond the traditional techniques of managing change from a program or project management perspective. Assessing the six batteries of change in this context can help organizations to develop capabilities for change that build change energy by balancing formal/rational methods with informal/emotional interventions at both a local (department/subproject) and global (business) level.

Keywords large scale project management      organization development and change      batteries of change model     
Corresponding Authors: Geert Letens   
Issue Date: 22 December 2016
 Cite this article:   
Geert Letens,Kurt Verweire,Peter De Prins. Large Scale Infrastructure Projects: The Art of Project or Change Management?[J]. Front. Eng, 2016, 3(3): 197-202.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.15302/J-FEM-2016033
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2016/V3/I3/197
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Geert Letens
Kurt Verweire
Peter De Prins
Fig.1  The batteries of change model.
1 Akintoye, A.S., & MacLeod, M.J. (1997). Risk analysis and management in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 15, 31–38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X
2 Barrett, R. (1998). Liberating the corporate soul: building a visionary organization. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
3 Beckhard, R., & Harris, R.T. (1987). Organizational transitions: managing complex change. Boston: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
4 Beer, M. (2001). How to develop an organization capable of sustained high performance: embrace the drive for results-capability development paradox. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 233–247doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00030-4.
5 Biloslavo, R., & Friedl, P. (2009). Influence factors in change methods choice and their impact on change deficiencies: a case study of construction industry in transition economy. Journal for East European Management Studies, 14, 241–264.
6 Burell, G., & Morgan, G. (1985). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
7 Butler, C.J. (2005). The relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership behavior in construction industry leaders (Doctoral dissertation). Boulder: University of Colorado.
8 Cacioppe, R., & Edwards, M.G. (2005). Adjusting blurred visions: a typology of integral approaches to organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, 230–246.
https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/09534810510599399
9 Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7, 191–207.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.191
10 Dubrovski, D. (2009). Management mistakes as causes of corporate crises: managerial implications for countries in transition. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 20, 39–59.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802614281
11 Edwards, M.G. (2005). The integral holon—a holonomic approach to organizational change and transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18, 269–288.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810510599425
12 Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. London: Pitman Paperbacks.
13 French, W.L., & Bell, C.H. (1999). Organizational development: Behavioral science interventions for improvement. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
14 Hao, Q., Shen, W., Neelamkavil, J., & Thomas, R. (2008). Change management in construction projects. NRC Institute for Research in Construction, NRCC-50325.
15 Harrington, H.J., Voehl, F., & Wiggin, H. (2012). Applying TQM to the construction industry. TQM Journal, 24, 352–362.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731211247373
16 Jashapara, A. (2003). Cognition, culture and competition: an empirical test of the learning organization. Learning Organization, 10, 31–50.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470310457487
17 Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: a leadership fable. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18 Love, P.E.D., Holt, G.D., Shen, L.Y., Li, H., & Irani, Z. (2002). Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 425–436.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00039-4
19 Love, P.E., Li, H., Irani, Z., & Faniran, O. (2000). Total quality management and the learning organization: a dialogue for change in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 321–331.
https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370681
20 Mechanda, P. (2005). A framework for reducing change order processing time in university construction projects (Doctoral dissertation). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
21 Nesan, L.J., & Holt, G.D. (1999). Empowerment in construction: the way forward for performance improvement. Baldock, Hertfordshire: Research Studies Press.
22 Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2002). Who says change can be managed? Positions, perspectives and problematics. Strategic Change, 11, 243–251.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.600
23 Rajagopalan, N., & Spreitzer, G.M. (1997). Toward a theory of strategic change: a multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 22, 48–79.
24 Reed, M. (1997). In Praise of duality and dualism: rethinking agency and structure in organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 18, 21–42.
https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800103
25 Shang, G., & Sui Pheng, L. (2014). Barriers to lean implementation in the construction industry in China. Journal of Technology Management in China, 9, 155–173.
https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/JTMC-12-2013-0043
26 Sidwell, A.C. (1990). Project management: dynamics and performance. Construction Management and Economics, 8, 159–178.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199000000014
27 Smith, J., Love, P.E., & Wyatt, R. (2001). To build or not to build? Assessing the strategic needs of construction industry clients and their stakeholders. Structural Survey, 19, 121–132.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800110393941
28 White, M.C., Marin, D.B., Brazeal, D.V., & Friedman, W.H. (1997). The evolution of organizations: suggestions from complexity theory about the interplay between natural selection and adaptation. Human Relations, 50, 1383–1401.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679705001103
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed