Please wait a minute...
 首页  期刊列表 期刊订阅 开放获取 关于我们
English
在线预览  |  当期目录  |  过刊浏览  |  热点文章  |  下载排行
Frontiers of Engineering Management    2019, Vol. 6 Issue (1) : 38-51     https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0010-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Geoengineering and the blockchain: Coordinating Carbon Dioxide Removal and Solar Radiation Management to tackle future emissions
Andrew LOCKLEY, Zhifu MI, D’Maris COFFMAN()
Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK
全文: PDF(207 KB)   HTML
导出: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Geoengineering is a proposed response to anthropogenic global warming (AGW). Conventionally it consists of two strands: Solar Radiation Management (SRM), which is fast-acting, incomplete but inexpensive, and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), which is slower acting, more expensive, and comprehensive. Pairing SRM and CDR offers a contractually complete solution for future emissions if effectively-scaled and coordinated. SRM offsets warming, while CDR takes effect. We suggest coordination using a blockchain, i.e. smart contracts and a distributed ledger. Specifically, we integrate CDR futures with time and volume-matched SRM orders, to address emissions contractually before release. This provides an economically and environmentally proportionate solution to CO2 emissions at the wellhead, with robust contractual transparency, and minimal overhead cost.

Our proposal offers a ‘polluter pays’ implementation of Long & Shepherds SRM ‘bridge’ concept. This ‘polluter geoengineers’ approach mandates and verifies emissions-linked payments with minimal friction, delay, or cost. Finally, we compare alternative market designs against this proposal, finding that this proposal offers several advantages. We conclude that blockchain implementation of the ‘polluter geoengineers’ approach is attractive and feasible for larger wellhead contracts. We also identify a handful of advantages and disadvantages that merit further study.

Keywords Geoengineering      Solar Radiation Management      Carbon Dioxide Removal      futures markets      smart contracts      blockchain     
在线预览日期:    发布日期: 2019-03-12
服务
推荐给朋友
免费邮件订阅
RSS订阅
作者相关文章
Andrew LOCKLEY
Zhifu MI
D’Maris COFFMAN
引用本文:   
Andrew LOCKLEY,Zhifu MI,D’Maris COFFMAN. Geoengineering and the blockchain: Coordinating Carbon Dioxide Removal and Solar Radiation Management to tackle future emissions[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(1): 38-51.
网址:  
https://journal.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.1007/s42524-019-0010-y     OR     https://journal.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2019/V6/I1/38
Fig.1  Shepherd’s Napkin Diagram of SRM bridge
AGW Anthropogenic Global Warming
CDR Carbon Dioxide Removal
CBOT Chicago Board of Trade
BECCS Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage
DAC Direct Air Capture
ETS European Union Emissions Trading Scheme
EW Enhanced Weathering
GGR Greenhouse Gas Removal
GHG Greenhouse Gas
IEAGHG IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme
IPCC The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IT Information Technology
ITCZ Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone
MCB Marine Cloud Brightening
MTF Missing Trader Fraud
OIF Ocean Ion Fertilisation
SAI Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
SRM Solar Radiation Management
TPO Tradable Put Options
VAT Value Added Tax
VCO Voluntary Carbon Offset
  
1 EAl Kawasmi, E Arnautovic, DSvetinovic (2015). Bitcoin-based decentralized carbon emissions trading infrastructure model. Systems Engineering, 18(2): 115–130
https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21291
2 AAntonopoulos (2014). Mastering Bitcoin—Unlocking Digital Cryptocurrencies. New York: O'Reilly Media
3 RBayon, A Hawn, KHamilton (2012). Voluntary Carbon Markets: An International Business Guide to What They Are and How They Work. Abingdon: Routledge
4 M JBrennan, N Crew (1997). Hedging long maturity commodity commitments with short-dated futures contracts. In: Dempster M, Pliska S, eds. Mathematics of Derivatives Securities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–190
5 M L MBroeren, DSaygin, M KPatel (2014). Forecasting global developments in the basic chemical industry for environmental policy analysis. Energy Policy, 64: 273–287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.025
6 CBrühl, J Lelieveld, HTost, MHöpfner, NGlatthor (2015). Stratospheric sulfur and its implications for radiative forcing simulated by the chemistry climate model EMAC. Journal of Geophysical Research, D, Atmospheres, 120(5): 2103–2118
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022430
7 MBui, C S Adjiman, A Bardow, E JAnthony, ABoston, SBrown, P SFennell, SFuss, A Galindo, L AHackett, J PHallett, H JHerzog, GJackson, JKemper, SKrevor, G CMaitland, MMatuszewski, I SMetcalfe, CPetit, GPuxty, JReimer, D MReiner, E SRubin, S AScott, NShah, B Smit, J P MTrusler, PWebley, JWilcox, NMac Dowell (2018). Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(5): 1062–1176
https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02342A
8 JCarl, D Fedor (2016). Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world. Energy Policy, 96: 50–77
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.023
9 ACarlsson-Kanyama, A DGonzález (2009). Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(5): 1704S–1709S
https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736AA
10 M ACelia, J M Nordbotten, S Bachu, EDobossy, BCourt (2009). Risk of leakage versus depth of injection in geological storage. Energy Procedia, 1(1): 2573–2580
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.022
11 GChapron (2017). The environment needs cryptogovernance. NATNews, 545: 403
12 DChen (2018). Utility of the blockchain for climate mitigation. Journal of the British Blockchain Association, 1(1): 3577
https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-1-1-(6)2018
13 G QChen, M K Patel (2012). Plastics derived from biological sources: Present and future: A technical and environmental review. Chemical Reviews, 112(4): 2082–2099
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200162d
14 RChitchya, J Murkin (2018). Review of blockchain technology and its expectations: Case of the energy sector.
15 DCoffman, A Lockley (2017). Carbon dioxide removal and the futures market. Environmental Research Letters, 12(1): 015003
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa54e8
16 ECorbera, M Estrada, KBrown (2009). How do regulated and voluntary carbon-offset schemes compare? Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 6(1): 25–50
https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430802703958
17 RCourtland (2008). Planktos dead in the water. NATNews, 451: 879
18 ZDai, D K Weisenstein, D W Keith (2018). Tailoring meridional and seasonal radiative forcing by sulfate aerosol solar geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(2): 1030–1039
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076472
19 DDuffle, H Zhu (2011). Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk? Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 1(1): 74–95
https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/rar001
20 CDwork, M Naor (1993). Pricing via Processing, Or, Combatting Junk Mail. Advances in Cryptology. CRYPTO’92: Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 740. Berlin: Springer, 139–147
21 MFrunza, D Guegan, ALassoudiere (2011). Missing trader fraud on the emissions market. Journal of Financial Crime, 18(2): 183–194
https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791111127750
22 AGalenovich, S Lonshakov, AShadrin (2018). Blockchain ecosystem for carbon markets, environmental assets, rights, and liabilities: Concept design and implementation. In: Marke A, eds. Transforming Climate Finance and Green Investment with Blockchains. Cambridge: Academic Press, 229–242
23 J NGalloway, A R Townsend, J W Erisman, M Bekunda, ZCai, J RFreney, L AMartinelli, S PSeltzinger, M ASutton (2008). Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science, 320(5878): 889–892
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136674
24 M BGarman (1976). Market microstructure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(3): 257–275
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90006-4
25 M BGerrard, T Hester (2018). Climate Engineering and the Law: Regulation and Liability for Solar Radiation Management and Carbon Dioxide Removal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
26 PGiungato, R Rana, ATarabella, CTricase (2017). Current trends in sustainability of bitcoins and related blockchain technology. Sustainability, 9(12): 2214
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122214
27 J FGreen (2017). The strength of weakness: Pseudo-clubs in the climate regime. Climatic Change, 144(1): 41–52
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1481-4
28 VGutknecht, S Ó Snæbjörnsdóttir, B Sigfússon, E SAradóttir, LCharles (2018). Creating a carbon dioxide removal solution by combining rapid mineralization of CO2 with direct air capture. Energy Procedia, 146: 129–134
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.017
29 CHamilton, H Turton (2002). Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 30(1): 63–71
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00060-X
30 JHaywood, A Jones, NBellouin, DStephenson (2013). Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall. Nature Climate Change, 3(7): 660–665
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1857
31 B GHermann, K Blok, M KPatel (2007). Producing bio-based bulk chemicals using industrial biotechnology saves energy and combats climate change. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(22): 7915–7921
https://doi.org/10.1021/es062559q
32 DHeyen, T Wiertz, P JIrvine (2015). Regional disparities in SRM impacts: The challenge of diverging preferences. Climatic Change, 133(4): 557–563
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1526-8
33 SHill, Y Ming (2012). Nonlinear climate response to regional brightening of tropical marine stratocumulus. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(15): L15707
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052064
34 G WHoffman (1941) Grain prices and the futures market: A 15-year survey, 1923–1938. USDA Technical Bulletin, 747
35 IEAGHG (2011) Potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage.
36 Interpol (2013). Guide to Carbon Trading Crime. Lyon: Interpol Environmental Crime Programme Publications
37 IPCC (2013). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
38 IPCC (2018). Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C —an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
39 AJones, J Haywood, OBoucher (2010). A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud. Atmospheric Science Letters, 12(2): 176–183
https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.291
40 KKaskaloglu (2014). Near zero bitcoin transaction fees cannot last forever. Proceedings of the Society of Digital Information and Wireless Communication, 91–99
41 DKeith (2010). Photophoretic levitation of engineered aerosols for geoengineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(38): 16428–16431
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009519107
42 D WKeith, G Wagner, C LZabel (2017). Solar geoengineering reduces atmospheric carbon burden. Nature Climate Change, 7(9): 617–619
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3376
43 T IKiviat (2015). Beyond bitcoin: Issues in regulating blockchain tranactions. Duke Law Journal, 65: 569–608
44 PKohler, J Hartmann, D AWolf-Gladrow (2010). Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(47): 20228–20233
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000545107
45 AKollmuss, L Schneider, VZhezherin (2015). Has joint implementation reduced GHG emissions? Lessons learned for the design of carbon market mechanisms. Stockholm: SEI Working Paper No. 2015–07
46 K SLackner, S Brennan, J MMatter, A H APark, AWright, BVan Der Zwaan (2012). The urgency of the development of CO2 capture from ambient air. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(33): 13156–13162
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108765109
47 H NLarsen, E G Hertwich (2009). The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(7): 791–798
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.07.010
48 JLatham (2002). Amelioration of global warming by controlled enhancement of the albedo and longevity of low-level maritime clouds. Atmospheric Science Letters, 3(2–4): 52–58
https://doi.org/10.1006/asle.2002.0048
49 V LLemieux (2016). Trusting records: Is Blockchain technology the answer? Records Management Journal, 26(2): 110–139
https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-12-2015-0042
50 J ILevy (2006). Contemplating delivery: futures trading and the problem of commodity exchange in the United States, 1875–1905. American Historical Review, 111(2): 307–335
https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.111.2.307
51 SLewis (2016). The Dirty Secret of The Paris Climate Deal. Foreign Policy. , 2015–12–17
52 LLiebenberg (2002). The Electronic Financial Markets of the Future and Survival Strategies of the Broker-Dealers. London: Palgrave Macmillan
53 BLocatelli, L Pedroni (2004). Accounting methods for carbon credits: Impacts on the minimum area of forestry projects under the clean development mechanism. Climate Policy, 4(2): 193–204
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2004.9685520
54 ALockley (2016). Licence to chill: Building a legitimate authorisation process for commercial SRM operations. Environmental Law Review, 18(1): 25–40
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452916630082
55 ALockley, D Coffman (2018). Carbon dioxide removal and tradeable put options at scale. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5): 054034
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabe96
56 GLomax, M Workman, TLenton, NShah (2015). Reframing the policy approach to greenhouse gas removal technologies. Energy Policy, 78: 125–136
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.002
57 J C SLong, J GShepherd (2014). The strategic value of geoengineering research. In: Freedman B, eds. Global Environmental Change. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1: 757–770
58 DMacMartin, K Caldeira, DKeith (2014). Solar geoengineering to limit the rate of temperature change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2031): 20140134
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0134
59 AMarshall (1919). Industry and Trade. London: Palgrave Macmillan
60 PMartin, M R Loeff, N Cassar, PVandromme, Fd’Ovidio, LStemmann, RRengarajan, MSoares, H EGonzález, FEbersbach, R SLampitt (2013). Iron fertilization enhanced net community production but not downward particle flux during the Southern Ocean iron fertilization experiment LOHAFEX. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 27(3): 871–881
https://doi.org/10.1002/gbc.20077
61 JMcClellan, D W Keith, J Apt (2012). Cost analysis of stratospheric albedo modification delivery systems. Environmental Research Letters, 7(3): 034019
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034019
62 K EMcCusker, K C Armour, C M Bitz, D S Battisti (2014). Rapid and extensive warming following cessation of solar radiation management. Environmental Research Letters, 9(2): 024005
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024005
63 G EMetcalf, D Weisbach (2009). The design of a carbon tax. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 33: 499–556
64 TMing, W Liu, SCaillol (2014). Fighting global warming by climate engineering: Is the earth radiation management and the solar radiation management any option for fighting climate change? Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31: 792–834
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.032
65 D LMitchell, W Finnegan (2009). Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 4(4): 045102
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045102
66 RMoriyama, M Sugiyama, AKurosawa, KMasuda, KTsuzuki, YIshimoto (2017). The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 22(8): 1207–1228
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y
67 ANalam, G Bala, AModak (2018). Effects of Arctic geoengineering on precipitation in the tropical monsoon regions. Climate Dynamics, 50(9–10): 3375–3395
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3810-y
68 ANoroozi, N Akbari, MMohammadi, KYousefiyan, M HAhmadzadegan (2018). A review of blockchain. International Journal of Information, Security and Systems Management, 7(1): 745–750
69 APapageorgiou, M Skordoulis, CTrichias, DGeorgakellos, MKoniordos (2015). Emissions trading scheme: Evidence from the European Union countries. In: Kravets A, Shcherbakov M, Kultsova M, Shabalina O, eds. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Proceedings of Creativity in Intelligent Technologies & Data Science Conference. Berlin: Springer, 222–233
70 G WPeters, G R Vishnia (2017). Blockchain architectures for electronic exchange reporting requirements: EMIR, Dodd Frank, MiFID I/II, MiFIR, REMIT, Reg NMS and T2S. In: Chuen D L K, Deng R, eds. Handbook of Blockchain, Digital Finance, and Inclusion, 2: 271–329
71 CPirrong (2001). Manipulation of cash‐settled futures contracts. Journal of Business, 74(2): 221–244
https://doi.org/10.1086/209671
72 FPloeg, C Withagen (2014). Growth, renewables, and the optimal carbon tax. International Economic Review, 55(1): 283–311
https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12049
73 GPoitras (2009). The early history of option contracts. In: Bronzin V, eds. Option Pricing Models. Berlin: Springer, 487–518
74 B RRoutledge, D JSeppi, C SSpatt (2000). Equilibrium forward curves for commodities. Journal of Finance, 55(3): 1297–1338
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00248
75 ARutkin (2016). Blockchain-Based Microgrid Gives Power to Consumers in New York. London: New Scientist
76 RSaleuddin (2018). The Government of Markets: How Interwar Collaborations between the CBOT and the State Created Modern Futures Trading. London: Palgrave Macmillan
77 RSaleuddin, D Coffman (2018). Can inflation expectations be measured using commodity futures prices? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 45: 37–48
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.01.002
78 JSargoni, A Lockley (2015). Solar radiation management and the voluntary carbon market. Environmental Law Review, 17(4): 266–269
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461452915611277
79 NStern, S Peters, VBakhshi, ABowen, CCameron, SCatovsky, DCrane, SCruickshank, SDietz, NEdmonson (2006). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. London: HM Treasury
80 HSubramanian (2017). Decentralized blockchain-based electronic marketplaces. Communications of the ACM, 61(1): 78–84
https://doi.org/10.1145/3158333
81 NTakezawa (1995). Currency swaps and long-term covered interest parity. Economics Letters, 49(2): 181–185
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00664-2
82 STilmes, J Fasullo, J FLamarque, D RMarsh, MMills, KAlterskjær, HMuri, J E Kristjánsson, O Boucher, MSchulz, J NCole, C LCurry, AJones, JHaywood, P JIrvine, DJi, J C Moore, D B Karam, B Kravitz, P JRasch, BSingh, J HYoon, UNiemeier, HSchmidt, ARobock, SYang, S Watanabe (2013). The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Journal of Geophysical Research, D, Atmospheres, 118(19): 11–36
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50868
83 JTruby (2018). Decarbonizing Bitcoin: Law and policy choices for reducing the energy consumption of Blockchain technologies and digital currencies. Energy Research & Social Science, 44: 399–410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.009
84 AWalch (2015). The bitcoin blockchain as financial market infrastructure: A consideration of operational risk. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 18: 837–892
85 XZhang, M Aranguiz, DXu, XZhang, XXu (2018). Utilizing blockchain for better enforcement of green finance law and regulations. In: Marke A, eds. Transforming Climate Finance and Green Investment with Blockchains. Cambridge: Academic Press, 289–301
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 高等教育出版社.
电话: 010-58556848 (技术); 010-58556485 (订阅) E-mail: subscribe@hep.com.cn